Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Quick search
Home
News
About the VSC
Aims & Objectives
Join the VSC!
Rules of the VSC (1.15mb Word Doc)
Commercial Partners
Shop
League Table
Fixtures
Viking Chat Forum
Search
Contact Us
Viking Supporters Co-operative
»
Forum
»
Viking Chat
»
Viking Chat
»
"RUMBLED" The reason why Lincoln Don't have a goalkeeper as a substitute
User
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
March 29, 2024, 02:02:27 am
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Links
Shortcuts
Forum Rules
Forum Ban Policy
Forum Layout options
Buddies/Ignored Users List
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: "RUMBLED" The reason why Lincoln Don't have a goalkeeper as a substitute (Read 2111 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Colemans Left Hook
Forum Member
Posts: 6164
"RUMBLED" The reason why Lincoln Don't have a goalkeeper as a substitute
«
on
March 26, 2017, 02:02:16 am
by
Colemans Left Hook
»
We all saw the Arsenal Lincoln Facup match and how the Lincoln Goalkeeper "appeared" to be injured HE LAID DOWN ON THE PITCH - AS IF HE DAD TO COME OFF - "PUT THE LIMP ON ETC "and we all thought Etherington Rovers on loan goalkeeper would be coming on as a substitute goalkeeper
Due to this "alleged" injury to the goalkeeper the LIncoln players all did their customary run to the Manager - for a drink of water get instructions etc (in Colemans world this is an AMERICAN Football time out)
The commentator in the Arsenal Lincoln match kept on saying about Lincoln breaking the match down into 10 minute segments (again as per American football)
ANYHOW Farman recovered and did not need to come off
-----------------------
Today we had Lincoln v Forest green on the TV
I only saw the second half of the Lincoln Forest Green match today (yes I wanted FG to win)
In the second half The TV woman did a quick 10 second interview with the Lincoln manager when they were 1-0 down and he mentioned that Lincoln had 17 turnovers in the first half ( is this AMERICAN football terminology or wot)
I didn't know until today that Lincoln NEVER have a substitute goalkeeper on the bench in League Matches -- which is going to PI$$ Etherington off because his chance of getting a game on loan is virtually NIL.
It is pure stupidity not to have a goalkeeper on the bench UNLESS YOU HAVE A "CUNNING PLAN"
We all know Lincoln play a high pressing game and to keep it up for 90 minutes --- breaking the match into sections and having "alleged" "well constructed" time-outs" ( players running to the manager etc ) helps break up the match SO DO "alleged" "FICTICIOUS" INJURIES
So wot happened today when Lincoln were winning their goalkeeper suddenly "lies down in his penalty area -- as if he might have to come off
surprise surprise Lincoln don't have a substitute goalkeeper on the bench IN SUCH A VITAL MATCH -- Lincoln take a long time out drinks huddle with the manager etc -- the goalkeeper and his "alleged" LIMP recover -- he even takes the goal kick himself (not the smartest move for an injured goalkeeper) and "totally" by chance this takes the momentum out f the game
As I have said that is now two matches it has looked as if their goalkeeper might have to come off injured
Logically because Farman seems to be "iinjury prone" (judging by wot we have seen on TV) obviously you would expect Etherington to be on the bench as an insurance policy afraid not so !!
but not so think someone's been "rumbled" food for thought ??
Talking of substitute goalkeepers The sacked Sutton goalkeeper's stomach never ever "rumbled "
AND their goalkeeper had a "GENUINE" injury and they had no substitute goalkeeper
never mind "wot comes around goes around "
«
Last Edit: March 26, 2017, 02:11:10 am by Colemans Left Hook
»
Logged
"RUMBLED" The reason why Lincoln Don't have a goalkeeper as a substitute
«
on:
March 26, 2017, 02:02:16 am »
(want to hide these ads?
Join the VSC today
!)
RedJ
Forum Member
Posts: 18491
Re: "RUMBLED" The reason why Lincoln Don't have a goalkeeper as a substitute
«
Reply #1 on
March 26, 2017, 10:07:49 am
by
RedJ
»
Not everything is a conspiracy, you know.
Logged
Colemans Left Hook
Forum Member
Posts: 6164
Re: "RUMBLED" The reason why Lincoln Don't have a goalkeeper as a substitute
«
Reply #2 on
March 26, 2017, 12:00:38 pm
by
Colemans Left Hook
»
Quote from: RedJ on March 26, 2017, 10:07:49 am
Not everything is a conspiracy, you know.
so are you saying there is no mileage in it ??
let's see wot BOBG thinks
funny how Ferguson realised the importance of having a 2nd goalkeeper on the bench for the TV game against Portsmouth and recalled no other than Mr Etherington on the bench
Logged
bobbymax
VSC Member
Posts: 1954
Re: "RUMBLED" The reason why Lincoln Don't have a goalkeeper as a substitute
«
Reply #3 on
March 26, 2017, 12:18:05 pm
by
bobbymax
»
FFS! IT'S ETHERIDGE!
Logged
RoversAlias
Forum Member
Posts: 11889
Re: "RUMBLED" The reason why Lincoln Don't have a goalkeeper as a substitute
«
Reply #4 on
March 26, 2017, 05:19:39 pm
by
RoversAlias
»
Can I have some of what you're on Coleman? Seems to be great stuff.
Logged
dickos1
VSC Member
Posts: 16795
Re: "RUMBLED" The reason why Lincoln Don't have a goalkeeper as a substitute
«
Reply #5 on
March 26, 2017, 05:27:52 pm
by
dickos1
»
Still don't know what the reason is that you're trying to explain.
They don't have a sub goalie because they can pretend to be injured??
Can't they do that if they have a substitute keeper like?
Logged
DaveDRFC
VSC Member
Posts: 2002
Re: "RUMBLED" The reason why Lincoln Don't have a goalkeeper as a substitute
«
Reply #6 on
March 26, 2017, 05:37:08 pm
by
DaveDRFC
»
I would wager loads of teams in the conference and below where they only get 5 named subs don't bother with a sub keeper.
Logged
Drover
Forum Member
Posts: 3955
Re: "RUMBLED" The reason why Lincoln Don't have a goalkeeper as a substitute
«
Reply #7 on
March 26, 2017, 06:36:10 pm
by
Drover
»
Neil Warnock did'nt have a keeper on his subs bench.I think its one of those options where it might cost you a point or two once in a blue moon,but it gives you an extra outfield option for all season.Swings and roundabouts.
Logged
BobG
VSC Member
Posts: 9715
Re: "RUMBLED" The reason why Lincoln Don't have a goalkeeper as a substitute
«
Reply #8 on
March 26, 2017, 09:52:12 pm
by
BobG
»
I think lots of things Coleman. Not all pretty, or intelligent or even interesting. But I enjoy them, mostly, and I do try, quite hard, to make them both coherent and lucid.
Cheers
BobG
Logged
TheFunk
Forum Member
Posts: 1437
Re: "RUMBLED" The reason why Lincoln Don't have a goalkeeper as a substitute
«
Reply #9 on
March 29, 2017, 09:40:41 am
by
TheFunk
»
I'm sure under SOD we didn't have a sub keeper many times.
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Viking Supporters Co-operative
»
Forum
»
Viking Chat
»
Viking Chat
»
"RUMBLED" The reason why Lincoln Don't have a goalkeeper as a substitute
TinyPortal
© 2005-2012