0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: SydneyRover on May 25, 2022, 02:25:17 pmquick look over thereNot pretty is it!/quote]your own debating style?
quick look over there
Quote from: Bristol Red Rover on May 25, 2022, 02:42:49 pmQuote from: SydneyRover on May 25, 2022, 02:25:17 pmquick look over thereNot pretty is it!your own debating style?
Quote from: SydneyRover on May 25, 2022, 02:25:17 pmquick look over thereNot pretty is it!
It's beginning to look like the new Russian tactic of throwing immense numbers at a focussed target is starting to pay off. Slowly but surely, sheer weight of numbers are starting to gain ground.Which makes me wonder, is now a good time to give way at the negotiating table? This war is costing Russia so much but Putin needs a way out. We could let them have some territory and it might bring this terrible war to an end.Personally I don't think the Russian army is a threat now to Eastern Europe. They exhausted it trying to take Ukraine. Economically things must be hurting in Russia. And how long has Putin got, if he's as sick as reports suggest?This war is likely to have a profound effect in Russia, as Afghanistan did. Perhaps now is the time to deescalate the situation?
A report out of Russia today:Sooner or later, Europe will tire of helping. This is both money and arms production that they need for themselves. Closer to the fall, they’ll have to negotiate [with Russia] on gas and oil, before the cold season arrives.
I think it's just symbolic now NR.Putin needs to show he's won something. That the whole adventure was worthwhile. That all the lives lost are worth it
BST, is that a point of some kind that you're making? That doesn't back up what your saying. There are consistent Russian advances across the whole East. Signs are this is accelerating. We know a dug in, entrenched defending force is tough to move. The Ukraines have been there for many years. It's going to be interesting to see how they cope when falling back. They could be well prepared, maybe in some ways not. I doubt there'll be a collapse, at least not yet. There is a danger that moral, losses, collapse could bring the Russians a lot of territory fairly quickly. Would they take it, go for destroying Ukraine further, or consolidate?On that destruction score, it has to be asked why Ukraine is destroying so much of its own towns and cities? I guess that's war.
BST At least you recognise they are doing. Some fools see it as one sided, same with civilian deaths. And the use of human shields appears to be more Ukraine - most notably in Mariupol.DD, they have guns and are shelling enemy positions and civilians. Lots of videos showing this. Guessing you haven't looked?
I recognise they are fighting like f**k to kick a fascist imperialist aggressor out of their country. What do YOU think they should do?
This is your regular reminder that people who come to a discussion with the preformed conclusion that NATO must be blamed will perform extraordinary mental gymnastics to reach the conclusion that NATO is to blame.