0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I'd have JOC for me too, Mr. Reliable, always talks, shows passion and is a pure pro. But I would also have Copps in mind for it.
SOD usually picks M Woods or Locky for captain when Stocky is out. Anyone know if Woods will be back for start of next season?
I know Stock is our captain but with the amount of time he spends out injured in a season and with him due to be out till atleast Christmas this coming season, why don't we have a new club captain? It can't be any good having the captain position getting passed around match after match, so why don't we give it to someone less injury prone, such as JOC or Hayter?
Quote from: \"DonnyOsmond\" post=156613I know Stock is our captain but with the amount of time he spends out injured in a season and with him due to be out till atleast Christmas this coming season, why don't we have a new club captain? It can't be any good having the captain position getting passed around match after match, so why don't we give it to someone less injury prone, such as JOC or Hayter?Good call re the Captain issue and worthy of being looked at. It's the last bit I'm not sure about.I've read numerous things on here in the last few days about these 'mystery players who are under-performing and been here too long', and who are they.It's purely opinion here, I may be way off the mark also and I may be a lone rider in this one. IMO I feel JOC and Hayter could well be those said players. Wilson is an obvious target, having also played the Boro game. However I don't feel Sean is the type of guy to make a decision on 1 game. I think he's based it over the last few months. In that time, JOC has greatly under-performed IMO. Hayts is a tireless runner, but his runs were done to effect play and maybe lead to goals. I think this had dropped in the last few months and had no effect on the game. Just tireless running with little outcome.I know this is unthinkable to some, but I'll stand by these thoughts. I will also suggest Muzzy is more than capable of being our first choice RB now, and gives us so much more. You then read Sean's comments about Mason and building a team around him. I don't think he's a replacement for Copps' role, but more for what Hayts can do and give the team. I also feel Sean is looking at changing Rovers and the way we play (again there are little hints in there from his comments). Hayts has always been Sean boy and central to what he has wanted over the years. I feel this may be coming to an end.Agreed there are sound cases for others, but something is telling me it may be these 2. Now for 1 minute I'm not saying they should go or that I don't rate them. However, there may be better that we have already got, or getting......we have to improve and keep moving forward.
Quote from: \"CusworthRovers\" post=156706Quote from: \"DonnyOsmond\" post=156613I know Stock is our captain but with the amount of time he spends out injured in a season and with him due to be out till atleast Christmas this coming season, why don't we have a new club captain? It can't be any good having the captain position getting passed around match after match, so why don't we give it to someone less injury prone, such as JOC or Hayter?Good call re the Captain issue and worthy of being looked at. It's the last bit I'm not sure about.I've read numerous things on here in the last few days about these 'mystery players who are under-performing and been here too long', and who are they.It's purely opinion here, I may be way off the mark also and I may be a lone rider in this one. IMO I feel JOC and Hayter could well be those said players. Wilson is an obvious target, having also played the Boro game. However I don't feel Sean is the type of guy to make a decision on 1 game. I think he's based it over the last few months. In that time, JOC has greatly under-performed IMO. Hayts is a tireless runner, but his runs were done to effect play and maybe lead to goals. I think this had dropped in the last few months and had no effect on the game. Just tireless running with little outcome.I know this is unthinkable to some, but I'll stand by these thoughts. I will also suggest Muzzy is more than capable of being our first choice RB now, and gives us so much more. You then read Sean's comments about Mason and building a team around him. I don't think he's a replacement for Copps' role, but more for what Hayts can do and give the team. I also feel Sean is looking at changing Rovers and the way we play (again there are little hints in there from his comments). Hayts has always been Sean boy and central to what he has wanted over the years. I feel this may be coming to an end.Agreed there are sound cases for others, but something is telling me it may be these 2. Now for 1 minute I'm not saying they should go or that I don't rate them. However, there may be better that we have already got, or getting......we have to improve and keep moving forward.In his interview after the Middlesborough match, O'Driscoll didn't say anything about ability or form. He specifically questioned the attitutude of player(s) who thought that we could go out and take the game to opponents, rather than knuckle down to a game plan. He said that the said player(s) might still have the ability, but didn't have the attitude.I might be totally wrong but to me, it stands out a mile who he was most likely to be talking about.
Cmon BST you've said this several times, it's time you named names on this one.
Quote from: \"ravenrover\" post=156767Cmon BST you've said this several times, it's time you named names on this one.'kin 'ell, could I BE more specific?Let's look at the clues. Going on O'Driscoll's outburst, the player(s):1)Played against Middlesborough2)Presumably is an outfield player.3)Has been with us for more than a few weeks.4)Is clearly very able.5)Perhaps is somewhat maverick in style, apparently believing that (to quote O'Driscoll) we/he are/is good enough to roll into places like Hull or Middlesborough and take the game to them.Surely you don't need Hercule Poirot...
Quote from: \"BillyStubbsTears\" post=156799Quote from: \"ravenrover\" post=156767Cmon BST you've said this several times, it's time you named names on this one.'kin 'ell, could I BE more specific?Let's look at the clues. Going on O'Driscoll's outburst, the player(s):1)Played against Middlesborough2)Presumably is an outfield player.3)Has been with us for more than a few weeks.4)Is clearly very able.5)Perhaps is somewhat maverick in style, apparently believing that (to quote O'Driscoll) we/he are/is good enough to roll into places like Hull or Middlesborough and take the game to them.Surely you don't need Hercule Poirot...Looks like I for one do. In previous posts you've dismissed the most obvious suspects ie Oster.Most other players have been mentioned but the only one who hasn't might be Killgallon???My brain hurts :side:
Quote from: \"ravenrover\" post=156824Quote from: \"BillyStubbsTears\" post=156799Quote from: \"ravenrover\" post=156767Cmon BST you've said this several times, it's time you named names on this one.'kin 'ell, could I BE more specific?Let's look at the clues. Going on O'Driscoll's outburst, the player(s):1)Played against Middlesborough2)Presumably is an outfield player.3)Has been with us for more than a few weeks.4)Is clearly very able.5)Perhaps is somewhat maverick in style, apparently believing that (to quote O'Driscoll) we/he are/is good enough to roll into places like Hull or Middlesborough and take the game to them.Surely you don't need Hercule Poirot...Looks like I for one do. In previous posts you've dismissed the most obvious suspects ie Oster.Most other players have been mentioned but the only one who hasn't might be Killgallon???My brain hurts :side: I didn't dismiss anyone as far as I remember. I think what I said previously was that I hadn't mentioned any names and that what I thought about players was irrelevant anyway. I'm simply reporting O'Driscoll's comments and drawing my own conclusions.