Theresa Villiers

[drfchound]

Oh is it who decides that you?

No, the electorate decided who is in power now.

thank you for your reply red wine

Red wine?

Satire.

In that case I make it he's a glass of water.

Have you bottled it?

I thought you didn't like people who joined in something that's nothing to do with them just to 'stir the pot'. Et tu, brute.

You obviously missed the humour there GW.
I’m not surprised though.
By the way, where did I say I didn’t like people joining in with something that is nothing to do with them.
I did say you like to stir the pot though.....because, well, you do.

[Glyn_Wigley]

And that's exactly what you're doing now.

[drfchound]

And that's exactly what you're doing now.

But you said that I said I don’t like people that joined in with something that was nothing to do with them.
Show me where I said that.

[Glyn_Wigley]

And that's exactly what you're doing now.

I've just looked back and you didn't say that. I was wrong.

Now, back to you stirring the pot. How else would you describe the needless answering a question asked of someone else?






But you said that I said I don’t like people that joined in with something that was nothing to do with them.
Show me where I said that.

[drfchound]

I see you are doing Sydney’s trick of posting your stuff out of sequence.

Isn’t this a forum where people respond to other people’s posts.....and make a comment if they see fit to.

Actually, I didn’t answer a question asked by someone else.
You are wrong on that too.
I just made a comment.

[Glyn_Wigley]

I see you are doing Sydney’s trick of posting your stuff out of sequence.

Isn’t this a forum where people respond to other people’s posts.....and make a comment if they see fit to.

(a) That's because you always leave these ridiculously big gaps when you quote when posting. Why do you do it? It makes you look like a desperate attention-seeker.

(b) Yes people can respond to other people posts, but why respond to a question that was directed to a specific other forum user and not yourself unless it's to stir the pot.

[drfchound]

I see you are doing Sydney’s trick of posting your stuff out of sequence.

Isn’t this a forum where people respond to other people’s posts.....and make a comment if they see fit to.

(a) That's because you always leave these ridiculously big gaps when you quote when posting. Why do you do it? It makes you look like a desperate attention-seeker.

(b) Yes people can respond to other people posts, but why respond to a question that was directed to a specific other forum user and not yourself unless it's to stir the pot.

But you should know better,  if you know I leave ridiculously big gaps between posts then you should have allowed for it.
You have done before.
Sydney does it on purpose for some strange reason.

Anyway, you must have missed my edit which I made before you wrote your post.
You said that I answered a question asked by someone else.
I didn’t, I just made a comment.
Anyone can make a comment or even respond to a question asked of another poster if they want to.
Have you changed the rules?

[Glyn_Wigley]

I see you are doing Sydney’s trick of posting your stuff out of sequence.

Isn’t this a forum where people respond to other people’s posts.....and make a comment if they see fit to.

(a) That's because you always leave these ridiculously big gaps when you quote when posting. Why do you do it? It makes you look like a desperate attention-seeker.

(b) Yes people can respond to other people posts, but why respond to a question that was directed to a specific other forum user and not yourself unless it's to stir the pot.

But you should know better,  if you know I leave ridiculously big gaps between posts then you should have allowed for it.
You have done before.
Sydney does it on purpose for some strange reason.

Anyway, you must have missed my edit which I made before you wrote your post.
You said that I answered a question asked by someone else.
I didn’t, I just made a comment.
Anyone can make a comment or even respond to a question asked of another poster if they want to.
Have you changed the rules?

No, I said you answered a question asked of someone else. If you want me to read your posts carefully, you'll do me the same courtesy. Unless this is you being the same WUM you owned up to being the other day.

You replied to something with a question mark at the end of it. That makes even a comment your answer to it.

[drfchound]

I see you are doing Sydney’s trick of posting your stuff out of sequence.

Isn’t this a forum where people respond to other people’s posts.....and make a comment if they see fit to.

(a) That's because you always leave these ridiculously big gaps when you quote when posting. Why do you do it? It makes you look like a desperate attention-seeker.

(b) Yes people can respond to other people posts, but why respond to a question that was directed to a specific other forum user and not yourself unless it's to stir the pot.

But you should know better,  if you know I leave ridiculously big gaps between posts then you should have allowed for it.
You have done before.
Sydney does it on purpose for some strange reason.

Anyway, you must have missed my edit which I made before you wrote your post.
You said that I answered a question asked by someone else.
I didn’t, I just made a comment.
Anyone can make a comment or even respond to a question asked of another poster if they want to.
Have you changed the rules?

No, I said you answered a question asked of someone else. If you want me to read your posts carefully, you'll do me the same courtesy. Unless this is you being the same WUM you owned up to being the other day.

You replied to something with a question mark at the end of it. That makes even a comment your answer to it.

I’m not sure which part you mean in which I put a question mark at the end.
If you mean where I asked if you bottled it (with a question mark) then that question was aimed at you following your description of red wine as being a glass of water.
I didn’t respond to a question by another poster when I said “Satire”, that was a comment not an answer to a question.
It didn’t have a question mark either.
If you look at the above post you will see that I did actually say ‘ a question asked OF another poster” in response to you.
Furthermore, I haven’t owned up to being a WUM.
I did said that I was having fun the other day, just as I am now having this repartee with you

Having fun isn’t the same as being a WUM.

[Glyn_Wigley]

Thanks for confirming you're stirring the pot!

[drfchound]

But I haven’t, that is just you saying it.
Maybe it is you who is the WUM.

Anyway, by your avoidance of answering the questions I asked in that last post of mine I thank you for acknowledging that you were wrong with your suggestions.

[drfchound]

Oh is it who decides that you?

No, the electorate decided who is in power now.

thank you for your reply red wine

Red wine?

Satire.

In that case I make it he's a glass of water.

Have you bottled it?

I thought you didn't like people who joined in something that's nothing to do with them just to 'stir the pot'. Et tu, brute.

Just a point of order GW.
The phrase “et tu brute” is commonly acknowledged to be a phrase used to express an ultimate betrayal by ones closest friend.
I don’t think that applies in our case.

[SydneyRover]

Satyre