0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I suspect they're more stable too Pinto. With greater crowds (in any division) than us and not needing to rely on the pocket of one man as much as us, they have an innate stability that we have always lacked. It'd be interesting to know just how much time JR has put in, over the years, to seeking more investment. With a better balance to the Board, that effort could have been put to much better use looking after the club in a different way. The other thought about stability is an obvious one: any organisation run by three is inherently unstable. It's the single most unstable form of government the world has ever seen. I wonder just how much time and effort has to go into maintaining that too...?CheersBobG
One man? Kind of. I'm sure you worked out what I meant! Everything stems from JR. According to this site the other two only put in when JR does by matching his investment. That may or may not be true, but if it is, it kind of indicates that JR is still the one man who can influence the shape and direction of the Rovers. It's a complex situation. And we don't have access to the deals and agreements that underpin it. What we do know is that the three of them own most of the shares between them - and that most definitely is the most unstable form of government known to man. So both my points have credibility Ha ha ha!Bob