Will give us the extra goal threat we need from midfield. He will force his way into the side.

Anyone who, like Feinstein, doesn't seem that the biggest issue in world politics is the fascist dictators in Russia and China doesn't really deserve to be taken seriously.

He's yet another of the Left's stooges for Putin.

Count the seconds down until this t**t has nothing to do but talk b*llocks on GB News for £400k a year.

https://x.com/Jacob_Rees_Mogg/status/1792868628607402059

Quote from: danumdon on May 21, 2024, 02:50:26 pm

Quote from: Not Now Kato on May 21, 2024, 12:41:26 pm

Quote from: danumdon on May 20, 2024, 08:15:17 pm

Quote from: SydneyRover on May 20, 2024, 06:34:18 pm

Quote from: tyke1962 on May 20, 2024, 06:30:37 pm

Quote from: SydneyRover on May 19, 2024, 09:42:21 pm

Quote from: selby on May 19, 2024, 04:00:33 pm

  When Labour get in the big money will be on a plane to avoid the non dom  labour stance.
  If Doncaster airport is open you might get the chance to wave off millions of pounds as it won't be around long in this country.

The tories have nicked that idea from labour selby, you need to keep up.

Tories nicking Labour ideas , sounds like an admittance that they are all the same to me .

I wonder if the Tories would nick any loosening of the anti trade union laws ?

Only you (maybe other othe moaners too) would find a problem with labour's policy of putting an end to non-dom largesse that's been around for 200 years plus tyke.

I'll ask again, seen as no one has answered.

Can you tell me why Labour in power between 1990 and 2010 did not feel the need to change the non-dom regulations?

Quite simple - media exposure/coverage.
 
The simple minded are easily led by the media and politically driven people, (especially politicians), are more than happy to exploit this - irrespective of party DD.

Good answer, now why couldn't your pal have said the same.

So in effect Starmer is hoping to catch a few floaters by announcing a policy that promises the public coffers some extra cash but in all reality is more likely to be dropped along with a multitude of other "focus group" nonsense.

For what he would stand to gain after the expense of administering the scheme it would be worth peanuts.

But at lease it would send out the right message to the target group eh.

Lets hope for all out sakes Starmer and the delightful Reeves can conjure up some enterprising schemes that empower wealth creators to want to create the wealth that this country desperately needs rather than socialist stodge that will kill it stone dead.

We've just had the "party of business" waste years going down the same road, lets hope Starmer has learnt from their lesson.

Let's hope Starmer blah blah blah, where have you been for the previous 14+ years? waiting for Starmer to pop up and blame.

It wouldn't be because he has an opportunity to to win would it?

You sound more desperate every day. Are you ill?

The trouble with Starmer is that he's letting the tail wag the dog. He's already demonstrated a willingness to cut and chase what his focus groups bring to him and will continue to do so, he's demonstrated zero conviction in anything and is ready and willing to take on failed policy from the present gov, how many times has he already back tracked and u-turned on his "favoured policies"

So yes, Starmer will cop for the blame, as the current favourite to become the next PM this bloke needs to convince many more people that he has the minerals to take us all the way. All we hear is that policy will be disclosed closer to an election, is this because the policy will be very much more of the same? so more failure to look forward to.

Whatever happened to politicians who had the stature to become proper statesmen? i can't see any wherever you look.

Wycombe in for him apparently.

Why to them ?

Money.  Haven't they been bought by a billionaire.