0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Sad-Rovers on May 30, 2014, 12:43:15 amQuote from: Glyn_Wigley on May 30, 2014, 12:38:51 amQuote from: Sad-Rovers on May 29, 2014, 11:39:37 pmQuote from: BigColSutherland on May 29, 2014, 11:36:34 pmI'm hearing there's more than just Tomlinson. SC are in the mix again.If our revenue is now down several million, and our asset base remains the same, a renewed takeover bid would make sense. And an acceptance of a bid more likely.SC plus others, a done deal according to my sources.Good. Your track record means that your 'confirmation' of the story gives it the kiss of death.Track record? I think you may be confusing me with someone else.Nope. You're the one I look to as a weather-vane for being wrong.
Quote from: Glyn_Wigley on May 30, 2014, 12:38:51 amQuote from: Sad-Rovers on May 29, 2014, 11:39:37 pmQuote from: BigColSutherland on May 29, 2014, 11:36:34 pmI'm hearing there's more than just Tomlinson. SC are in the mix again.If our revenue is now down several million, and our asset base remains the same, a renewed takeover bid would make sense. And an acceptance of a bid more likely.SC plus others, a done deal according to my sources.Good. Your track record means that your 'confirmation' of the story gives it the kiss of death.Track record? I think you may be confusing me with someone else.
Quote from: Sad-Rovers on May 29, 2014, 11:39:37 pmQuote from: BigColSutherland on May 29, 2014, 11:36:34 pmI'm hearing there's more than just Tomlinson. SC are in the mix again.If our revenue is now down several million, and our asset base remains the same, a renewed takeover bid would make sense. And an acceptance of a bid more likely.SC plus others, a done deal according to my sources.Good. Your track record means that your 'confirmation' of the story gives it the kiss of death.
Quote from: BigColSutherland on May 29, 2014, 11:36:34 pmI'm hearing there's more than just Tomlinson. SC are in the mix again.If our revenue is now down several million, and our asset base remains the same, a renewed takeover bid would make sense. And an acceptance of a bid more likely.SC plus others, a done deal according to my sources.
I'm hearing there's more than just Tomlinson. SC are in the mix again.If our revenue is now down several million, and our asset base remains the same, a renewed takeover bid would make sense. And an acceptance of a bid more likely.
TB and DW have more money than JR and LT times 10.
He won't be worth that. I'd have thought £20m tops.
Each member of 1D amassed 70 million last year ( so I read somewhere ).
Quote from: Wild Rover on May 30, 2014, 08:00:05 amEach member of 1D amassed 70 million last year ( so I read somewhere ).Worth £14million each apparentlyhttp://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/under-30s-music-rich-list-quelle-surprise-adele-tops-the-chart-again-while-one-direction-makes-boyband-history-9374651.html
And there goes the nice, calm summer then - just what we need. What a farce! Nice to see things staying behind closed doors again then...
No Filo, don't read it as that. Read it as what it is. Anything that is done like this should be kept quiet. I've said it for a long time that the poisonous leaking of takeover, transfer moves etc is poor from a professional organisation and I won't change my mind on that. It's what made last summer so awkward, things should not be done in public and Rovers never have got a grip on that at all.
Quote from: big fat yorkshire pudding on May 30, 2014, 08:17:03 amNo Filo, don't read it as that. Read it as what it is. Anything that is done like this should be kept quiet. I've said it for a long time that the poisonous leaking of takeover, transfer moves etc is poor from a professional organisation and I won't change my mind on that. It's what made last summer so awkward, things should not be done in public and Rovers never have got a grip on that at all.Are you saying this has been leaked from within the club, or are you just speculating?
Another summer of uncertainty looms as a result of jr. He built the club and it would appear he is intent on knocking it back down. I would which Los mouthed sod let this one out of the bag. I'm guessing it's the usual suspect.
Quote from: Filo on May 30, 2014, 08:24:58 amQuote from: big fat yorkshire pudding on May 30, 2014, 08:17:03 amNo Filo, don't read it as that. Read it as what it is. Anything that is done like this should be kept quiet. I've said it for a long time that the poisonous leaking of takeover, transfer moves etc is poor from a professional organisation and I won't change my mind on that. It's what made last summer so awkward, things should not be done in public and Rovers never have got a grip on that at all.Are you saying this has been leaked from within the club, or are you just speculating?Comments such as those on Facebook like "Steve Uttley has told me xxxxxxx" - I don't see how these are helpful.Equally, people have said that people in the club have told them things etc - it's poor and unprofessional in my view. If I did that in my company I'd be sacked no questions asked.
We know the leaks come from within the club I think I alluded to that in my previous posts. These people don't help anyone by making things public though do they?
Well part of the article is inaccurate as JR didn't sell his shares oh and another point the initial proposal from last year on the take over runs out at the end of May.
Quote from: DearneValleyRover on May 30, 2014, 08:36:07 amWell part of the article is inaccurate as JR didn't sell his shares oh and another point the initial proposal from last year on the take over runs out at the end of May.That seling of shares refers to Ryan selling 2/3 of his shares to TB and DW.