0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I'd be more than happy to play him for as long as he is a contracted DRFC player. He is still paid to do a job, and it's not like he's going to under-perform given that he'll be trying to secure something elsewhere.The idea of not playing people who don't commit their future just doesn't hold any water for me...otherwise how do you justify loan players?Also: "Let's see if anyone wants him when he's not played for 4 or 5 months"....surely that approach helps absolutely nobody. If nobody wanted him and he was forced to sign a new contract with us, he's hardly going to be motivated to perform well afterwards. If anything it's just a spiteful attitude to take without foundation. We should be getting the most out of our assets, whilst they are our assets.
MFD, if somebody wants him they will have already made contact with the player and his agent, I would not bet against Hull City myself.
Quote from: Superspy on February 24, 2020, 12:38:53 pmI'd be more than happy to play him for as long as he is a contracted DRFC player. He is still paid to do a job, and it's not like he's going to under-perform given that he'll be trying to secure something elsewhere.The idea of not playing people who don't commit their future just doesn't hold any water for me...otherwise how do you justify loan players?Also: "Let's see if anyone wants him when he's not played for 4 or 5 months"....surely that approach helps absolutely nobody. If nobody wanted him and he was forced to sign a new contract with us, he's hardly going to be motivated to perform well afterwards. If anything it's just a spiteful attitude to take without foundation. We should be getting the most out of our assets, whilst they are our assets.Quote from: selby on February 24, 2020, 12:40:39 pm MFD, if somebody wants him they will have already made contact with the player and his agent, I would not bet against Hull City myself.I would bet Hull as well if the snake hasn't been sacked before then.Superspy, maybe there's just a chance he's not bothered about playing/won't give it 100% so he doesn't get injured and miss out on a big fat pay rise
Let’s not get carried away he’s scored 2 goals against Southend in January. But as leading goal scorer he needs to play as others have not stepped up.
If Sadlier is our star player It says more about the quality of the team than the level of his quality, I'm afraid. We've lost better players in the past that were never considered as our star player.
Well, he wasn't 'left out' of the last game as such, he was brought on as a sub for 20 minutes. To be honest, I thought we were worse after both him and Taylor came on.In my opinion, Sadlier, like Copps, has a tendency to be lightweight in certain games that are dictated by pitch/weather conditions.
Quote from: Bentley Bullet on February 24, 2020, 04:21:26 pmWell, he wasn't 'left out' of the last game as such, he was brought on as a sub for 20 minutes. To be honest, I thought we were worse after both him and Taylor came on.In my opinion, Sadlier, like Copps, has a tendency to be lightweight in certain games that are dictated by pitch/weather conditions.He didn't start in either of our last 2 games so he was "left out" of the starting line up which is exactly the same thing but you know that anyway. As for being worse when he and Taylor came on, I didn't make the game but am led to believe from the feedback I have had from a good few others that did attend the game, that that's the complete opposite to what everyone else thought!As for not performing on poor pitches or in bad weather, all I can say is he was by far our best player up at Tranmere on the night on the worst pitch we have played on this season and ran his body into the ground, often seen deep in our own half defending and recovering the ball and starting attacks - I can only assume you didn't go to that game then BB?
Quote from: NewDonny on February 24, 2020, 04:44:52 pmQuote from: Bentley Bullet on February 24, 2020, 04:21:26 pmWell, he wasn't 'left out' of the last game as such, he was brought on as a sub for 20 minutes. To be honest, I thought we were worse after both him and Taylor came on.In my opinion, Sadlier, like Copps, has a tendency to be lightweight in certain games that are dictated by pitch/weather conditions.He didn't start in either of our last 2 games so he was "left out" of the starting line up which is exactly the same thing but you know that anyway. As for being worse when he and Taylor came on, I didn't make the game but am led to believe from the feedback I have had from a good few others that did attend the game, that that's the complete opposite to what everyone else thought!As for not performing on poor pitches or in bad weather, all I can say is he was by far our best player up at Tranmere on the night on the worst pitch we have played on this season and ran his body into the ground, often seen deep in our own half defending and recovering the ball and starting attacks - I can only assume you didn't go to that game then BB?He wasn't 'left out' of either of the games, he featured in both! I did see the Tranmere game and Sadlier played well considering the conditions. He wasn't the best player though, Ramsey clearly was. I did say Sadlier has a tendency to be lightweight in certain conditions, that doesn't mean there is no exception to the rule. He wasn't bad at Tranmere, but the hosts were pretty garbage.
All I have to say is the Bolton left back is in therapy after the 1st half against Sadlierk
Probably as much as your argument about one of our better regular starting player being on the subs bench but not "left out"of the starting XII think the term for a player being left out completely is droppedHave you an empty room you could go to and start an argument in there?