0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
A quick look at how we've lined up over recent years in this division really highlights how much character the side has lost, but surely not as bad as the one relegated in 2016?2012-13 / 2015-16 / 2017-18Woods / Stuckmann / LawlorQuinn / Lund / BlairMcCombe / McCullough / WrightJones / Butler / ButlerSpurr / T-Sinclair / MasonCotterill / Coppinger / CoppingerKeegan / Middleton / HoughtonSyers / Chaplow / WhitemanBennett / Evina / RowePaynter / Tyson / MayBrown / Williams / Marquis
Quote from: DMnumber4 on February 14, 2018, 02:04:29 pmA quick look at how we've lined up over recent years in this division really highlights how much character the side has lost, but surely not as bad as the one relegated in 2016?2012-13 / 2015-16 / 2017-18Woods / Stuckmann / LawlorQuinn / Lund / BlairMcCombe / McCullough / WrightJones / Butler / ButlerSpurr / T-Sinclair / MasonCotterill / Coppinger / CoppingerKeegan / Middleton / HoughtonSyers / Chaplow / WhitemanBennett / Evina / RowePaynter / Tyson / MayBrown / Williams / Marquis2012/13 team should have Lundstrum not Syers.
Quote from: Campsall rover on February 14, 2018, 02:11:51 pmQuote from: DMnumber4 on February 14, 2018, 02:04:29 pmA quick look at how we've lined up over recent years in this division really highlights how much character the side has lost, but surely not as bad as the one relegated in 2016?2012-13 / 2015-16 / 2017-18Woods / Stuckmann / LawlorQuinn / Lund / BlairMcCombe / McCullough / WrightJones / Butler / ButlerSpurr / T-Sinclair / MasonCotterill / Coppinger / CoppingerKeegan / Middleton / HoughtonSyers / Chaplow / WhitemanBennett / Evina / RowePaynter / Tyson / MayBrown / Williams / Marquis2012/13 team should have Lundstrum not Syers.Why? Syers played a more important role (and by that I mean he was our jack of all trades) for much of the season then I think he got injured with a couple of months to go. Lundstram played his part but not more so than Syers.
Was based on most appearances; Syers 32 v 14 LundstramBennett 35 v 25 Coppinger
Quote from: DMnumber4 on February 14, 2018, 02:15:38 pmWas based on most appearances; Syers 32 v 14 LundstramBennett 35 v 25 CoppingerJust seen this post. Are you sure? Is that starts and not subs. I am astounded in those figures as Lundstrum was a key player from my memory.
Quote from: Campsall rover on February 14, 2018, 03:47:48 pmQuote from: DMnumber4 on February 14, 2018, 02:15:38 pmWas based on most appearances; Syers 32 v 14 LundstramBennett 35 v 25 CoppingerJust seen this post. Are you sure? Is that starts and not subs. I am astounded in those figures as Lundstrum was a key player from my memory.Syers - 20 starts + 12 sub - 3 goalsLundstram - 14 starts + 0 sub - 0 goals