Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2024, 05:50:59 am

Login with username, password and session length

Links


FSA logo

Author Topic: 5 mins not 7!  (Read 4837 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Filo

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 30077
5 mins not 7!
« on November 11, 2017, 02:43:43 pm by Filo »
Ref will be kissing the Rotherham badge on is shirt tonight the tosser!



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

mushRTID

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 7567
Re: 5 mins not 7!
« Reply #1 on November 11, 2017, 02:46:56 pm by mushRTID »
Where did 5 come from anyway?

Filo

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 30077
Re: 5 mins not 7!
« Reply #2 on November 11, 2017, 02:56:34 pm by Filo »
Where did 5 come from anyway?

Dunno, bet the tef gave them everything

DonnyOsmond

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 11246
Re: 5 mins not 7!
« Reply #3 on November 11, 2017, 03:04:57 pm by DonnyOsmond »
Minimum of 5 mins. We did time waste, which is why he probably added more on.

1879Rovers

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1940
Re: 5 mins not 7!
« Reply #4 on November 11, 2017, 03:08:55 pm by 1879Rovers »
Rowe was down in injury time so you can see where the extra time came from.

i_ateallthepies

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 5064
Re: 5 mins not 7!
« Reply #5 on November 11, 2017, 03:09:21 pm by i_ateallthepies »
Shouldn't have been even 5 😡 Bent bas**rd ref!

WheatleyRover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 888
Re: 5 mins not 7!
« Reply #6 on November 11, 2017, 03:14:49 pm by WheatleyRover »
Sickening that was

Dutch Uncle

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 6766
Re: 5 mins not 7!
« Reply #7 on November 11, 2017, 03:16:15 pm by Dutch Uncle »
Shades of Arsenal game at OBV......

big fat yorkshire pudding

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 13552
Re: 5 mins not 7!
« Reply #8 on November 11, 2017, 03:18:16 pm by big fat yorkshire pudding »
Shades of Arsenal game at OBV......

Reminded me more of Sheffield united away.

RoversAlias

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 11889
Re: 5 mins not 7!
« Reply #9 on November 11, 2017, 03:43:17 pm by RoversAlias »
Referee was giving them everything until we scored, then it evened out. 5 added on, Rowe was receiving treatment when the board went up and they inform the 4th official of how much to add on a couple of minutes prior so it doesn't surprise me really.

RedJ

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 18491
Re: 5 mins not 7!
« Reply #10 on November 11, 2017, 03:44:34 pm by RedJ »
It's a minimum of, remember. But he had absolutely no interest in blowing, he wasn't even looking at his watch.

bobjimwilly

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 12206
Re: 5 mins not 7!
« Reply #11 on November 11, 2017, 05:20:55 pm by bobjimwilly »
can't remember what the exact stat was that sky put up during the second half, but Rovers conceding in the last 15 mins this season is A LOT

mushRTID

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 7567
Re: 5 mins not 7!
« Reply #12 on November 11, 2017, 05:44:06 pm by mushRTID »
can't remember what the exact stat was that sky put up during the second half, but Rovers conceding in the last 15 mins this season is A LOT

It’s obviously a problem but can’t see it changing under Fergie.

idler

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 10784
Re: 5 mins not 7!
« Reply #13 on November 11, 2017, 05:45:04 pm by idler »
Upto today's game we conced the most goals between 76-90.
6 before today now 7.
Then games run over so obviously the Rochdale goals will be in that total.
Surely with stats like that the opposition will try to pressure us knowing that our nerves will be jangling and we might concede.

roversdude

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 12845
Re: 5 mins not 7!
« Reply #14 on November 11, 2017, 06:05:39 pm by roversdude »
It wasn’t even latest goal in a game today
Cheltenham 90+7

pib

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3367
Re: 5 mins not 7!
« Reply #15 on November 11, 2017, 09:05:36 pm by pib »
What don't people understand about a MINIMUM of 5 mins.

Defend the box like that in the last minute and you get what you deserve.

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29677
Re: 5 mins not 7!
« Reply #16 on November 11, 2017, 09:08:19 pm by drfchound »
We did defend the box well in the last minute, two great blocks before the ball luckily fell to Moore.

pib

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3367
Re: 5 mins not 7!
« Reply #17 on November 11, 2017, 09:12:11 pm by pib »
We did defend the box well in the last minute, two great blocks before the ball luckily fell to Moore.

Wouldn't say that.  See how much space David Ball had when Lawlor made the save?  If we'd defended that situation properly Lawlor wouldn't have needed to be so far out of his goal to make the block.

since-1969

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 5220
Re: 5 mins not 7!
« Reply #18 on November 11, 2017, 09:17:50 pm by since-1969 »
If Marquis had did what he’s paid for the only thing this post  would be talking about would be another bad goal late in a game . We were toothless again today , ifs buts and maybes are what makes it worthwhile. 7 mins when 90 didn’t sort it is neither here nor  there . We need to be more ruthless in front of goal.

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29677
Re: 5 mins not 7!
« Reply #19 on November 11, 2017, 09:20:08 pm by drfchound »
We barely created a chance to score today.

RedJ

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 18491
Re: 5 mins not 7!
« Reply #20 on November 11, 2017, 09:42:02 pm by RedJ »
Think some people expect Marquis to carve out millions of chances all by himself even when he's getting absolutely no (decent) service.

mushRTID

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 7567
Re: 5 mins not 7!
« Reply #21 on November 11, 2017, 09:44:56 pm by mushRTID »
Iv been very critical of Marquis this season but today he had long ball after long ball banged up to him against what must be the tallest defence in the league.

It’s really poor tactics. He did alright given the service.

Filo

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 30077
Re: 5 mins not 7!
« Reply #22 on November 11, 2017, 09:58:49 pm by Filo »
Iv been very critical of Marquis this season but today he had long ball after long ball banged up to him against what must be the tallest defence in the league.

It’s really poor tactics. He did alright given the service.

Should have put his foot through the ball in the 96th minute instead of giving them possesion back in our half, if he had done that we'd have got 3 points in the bag instead of 1

mushRTID

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 7567
Re: 5 mins not 7!
« Reply #23 on November 11, 2017, 09:59:45 pm by mushRTID »
Iv been very critical of Marquis this season but today he had long ball after long ball banged up to him against what must be the tallest defence in the league.

It’s really poor tactics. He did alright given the service.

Should have put his foot through the ball in the 96th minute instead of giving them possesion back in our half, if he had done that we'd have got 3 points in the bag instead of 1

I agree.


since-1969

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 5220
Re: 5 mins not 7!
« Reply #24 on November 11, 2017, 11:00:45 pm by since-1969 »
Think some people expect Marquis to carve out millions of chances all by himself even when he's getting absolutely no (decent) service.
Rowe handed it on a plate and f*** up again . He is nothing like a striker who was given an extended deal for his efforts , he looks like another waister who just taking wage and keeping better players from coming to the Keepmoat because he’s got all the available budget .

GazLaz

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 12843
Re: 5 mins not 7!
« Reply #25 on November 12, 2017, 12:06:28 am by GazLaz »
Think some people expect Marquis to carve out millions of chances all by himself even when he's getting absolutely no (decent) service.
Rowe handed it on a plate and f*** up again . He is nothing like a striker who was given an extended deal for his efforts , he looks like another waister who just taking wage and keeping better players from coming to the Keepmoat because he’s got all the available budget .

He’s playing at a higher standard, that’s why he doesn’t look as good, not lack of effort.

1879Rovers

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1940
Re: 5 mins not 7!
« Reply #26 on November 12, 2017, 07:37:55 am by 1879Rovers »
Think some people expect Marquis to carve out millions of chances all by himself even when he's getting absolutely no (decent) service.
Rowe handed it on a plate and f*** up again . He is nothing like a striker who was given an extended deal for his efforts , he looks like another waister who just taking wage and keeping better players from coming to the Keepmoat because he’s got all the available budget .

The lads worked his knackers off today with little support and poor delivery into the middle. He needs someone along side him.

Donnywolf

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 20432
Re: 5 mins not 7!
« Reply #27 on November 12, 2017, 08:13:42 am by Donnywolf »
... and what do people think of the tactic of trying to keep the ball by the Corner Flag even when we had 2 if not 3 free kicks there right at the death

Yes I can see it offers a chance to run down the clock but surely the defending Team are themselves desperate NOT to go 2 goals down - and would be (or at least should be) nervous as hell. Why not stick the ball in the danger area - and hope for a goal / a rash challenge / a miskick back to us / or a clearance which we should be able to pick up and start another attack

True I concede its a difficult one to judge but (with hindsight) but the corner flag routine did not work this time round but may on other occasions. The cliche says the best from of defence is attack so what to others think given the choice of the 2 "tactics"

since-1969

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 5220
Re: 5 mins not 7!
« Reply #28 on November 12, 2017, 08:40:15 am by since-1969 »
Think some people expect Marquis to carve out millions of chances all by himself even when he's getting absolutely no (decent) service.
Rowe handed it on a plate and f*** up again . He is nothing like a striker who was given an extended deal for his efforts , he looks like another waister who just taking wage and keeping better players from coming to the Keepmoat because he’s got all the available budget .

The lads worked his knackers off today with little support and poor delivery into the middle. He needs someone along side him.
Wrong all accounts he was ineffective and failed to over come his markers throughout the game and when given a good opportunity he bottled it ....again.
« Last Edit: November 12, 2017, 10:34:27 am by since-1969 »

ravenrover

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 9764
Re: 5 mins not 7!
« Reply #29 on November 12, 2017, 03:52:20 pm by ravenrover »
just out of interest when I got home I timed how long Rowe was treated on the pitch, it was nearly 1.1/2 mins till him coming off change his shirt you could clearly hear the added time announcement after the ref had gone over to him so we can't blame the ref for adding that on to his added time. But for me the biggest question is why didn't JM put it in row z?

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012