Viking Supporters Co-operative

Viking Chat => Lucky Pint => Topic started by: FuzzyDuck on October 19, 2012, 08:52:41 pm

Title: Rovers v Bees
Post by: FuzzyDuck on October 19, 2012, 08:52:41 pm: http://fuzzyrovers.blogspot.ch/2012/10/rovers-v-bees.html

There you go guys!

:rtid: :scarf: :rtid: :scarf: :rtid: :scarf: :rtid: :scarf: :rtid: :scarf: :rtid: :scarf:
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: idler on October 20, 2012, 08:48:11 am: Thanks Fuzzy, I enjoyed reading that and hope that your predictions are right. :scarf:
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: DearneValleyRover on October 20, 2012, 01:20:46 pm: Thanks once again Mister Duck, great read
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: Dutch Uncle on October 20, 2012, 02:50:03 pm: Team:
33 Woods
02 Quinn
04 Martis
05 Jones
14 Spurr
07 Woods
11 Cotterill
20 Harper
09 Brown
17 Hume
23 Bennett

Substitutes

01 Sullivan
06 Syers
12 Woods
30 Keegan
08 Paynter
10 Blake
25 Ball

Presumably Husband unfit. Strange no defender of the bench, unless you count Syers as RB. Has Wakefield been sent back to Bradford?
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: FuzzyDuck on October 20, 2012, 03:03:34 pm: Glad you liked it guys - Now C'MON DONNY!

:scarf: :rtid: :scarf: :rtid: :scarf: :rtid: :scarf: :rtid: :scarf: :rtid:
:clapping: :clapping: :clapping: :clapping: :clapping: :clapping:
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: Dutch Uncle on October 20, 2012, 03:04:34 pm: Sorry Fuzzy - forgot to mention I liked your blogspot as well :rtid:
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: CottyRover on October 20, 2012, 03:05:28 pm: To reply to Dutch Uncle's observation about the non defensive bench, I suppose Keegan could take up a defensive role. We must be going for a win, but I hope this isn't over optimistic!
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: FuzzyDuck on October 20, 2012, 03:09:35 pm: A German barking orders - that's happened before, I'm sure it has
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: CottyRover on October 20, 2012, 03:13:53 pm: I'm sure I don't know what you mean, Herr Duck! ;)
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: Bristol Red Rover on October 20, 2012, 03:17:31 pm: Better to bark them than miaow them Fuzzy :clapping:

Whats the chances of Ball being super sub again?
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: CottyRover on October 20, 2012, 03:18:26 pm: Have the Bees picked Forrester to counteract all the Woods in the Rovers team? :coat:
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: Bristol Red Rover on October 20, 2012, 03:22:10 pm: Bennett will come good... :whistle:
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: CottyRover on October 20, 2012, 03:22:32 pm: Bennett miss - the start of things to come? (I mean goal chances, not misses!)
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: Chris on October 20, 2012, 03:23:29 pm: Is anyone getting the '405 Not Allowed' page when trying to log into player?
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: Bristol Red Rover on October 20, 2012, 03:24:01 pm: Quote from: CottyRover on October 20, 2012, 03:18:26 pm
Have the Bees picked Forrester to counteract all the Woods in the Rovers team? :coat:

Nah, he's in there to take care of Logan and Douglas :huh:
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: Bristol Red Rover on October 20, 2012, 03:26:01 pm: Player fine for me, maybe you've been banned for running on the screen?
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: FuzzyDuck on October 20, 2012, 03:27:46 pm: There's a few getting that Chris
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: rover-n-out on October 20, 2012, 03:34:17 pm: Anybody got an ideea how the game is going? Cheers.
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: CottyRover on October 20, 2012, 03:40:00 pm: Brentford really pushing Rovers, but we've had a couple of chances.
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: FuzzyDuck on October 20, 2012, 03:40:37 pm: All Brentford at the moment. Rovers 1 really good chance which Bennett skied
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: ScillyRover on October 20, 2012, 03:41:26 pm: Quote from: Chris on October 20, 2012, 03:23:29 pm
Is anyone getting the '405 Not Allowed' page when trying to log into player?
I'm getting that too Chris as are a few others
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: Dutch Uncle on October 20, 2012, 03:42:14 pm: BBC has ~~Brentford with 81% possession,~~ and a foul count of 11-0 to us.

Whoops sorry not supposed to mention that word :chair:
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: MrFrost on October 20, 2012, 03:42:21 pm: This is truly shocking. Martis looks like he hasn't played the game before
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: Dutch Uncle on October 20, 2012, 03:44:43 pm: I see Byron Webster has scored for Yeovil. How did that happen? I seem to remember it being very comical when he went up front for us.
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: ScillyRover on October 20, 2012, 03:45:15 pm: Quote from: ScillyRover on October 20, 2012, 03:41:26 pm
Quote from: Chris on October 20, 2012, 03:23:29 pm
Is anyone getting the '405 Not Allowed' page when trying to log into player?
I'm getting that too Chris as are a few others
I've got into Player via another club's website (Leicester) site then chosen 'another match' if that helps
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: ScillyRover on October 20, 2012, 03:48:11 pm: 0-1 :unsure:
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: CottyRover on October 20, 2012, 03:48:51 pm: 0 - 1. It was coming, sad to say :thumbdown:
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: ScillyRover on October 20, 2012, 03:50:53 pm: Sounds like there's a few boos echoing around the ground :facepalm:
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: Bristol Red Rover on October 20, 2012, 03:51:03 pm: Oh, dear.... :facepalm:

Syers on for Woods, Ball for Bennett - come on Deano :boxing:
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: godlike1 on October 20, 2012, 03:51:24 pm: I will take a scrappy 1-0 win at this stage. it seems like Brentford should be home and dry by now :-(
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: FuzzyDuck on October 20, 2012, 03:51:37 pm: Yep was coming.

We need to get at them. They are good at running with the ball and like to attack. But the defence isn't that good.
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: MrFrost on October 20, 2012, 03:57:34 pm: They've had 86 % possession in the first half. Disgusting.
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: Standanista on October 20, 2012, 04:04:49 pm: Is that a MickStat(c)?
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: Chris on October 20, 2012, 04:05:31 pm: Mick will be creaming his pants.
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: BillyStubbsTears on October 20, 2012, 04:10:35 pm: Same old PA bullshit. The possession stats were 50:50 after 20 mins, and 19:81 after 40 mins.

So, we had 10 mins possession of the first 20 mins, but only 7:36 mins in the first 40.

Ignore the possession stats. They are pointless.
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: lewis9111 on October 20, 2012, 04:11:52 pm: Now I know BBC stats are questionable but is it really as bad as Donny - 14% Brentford - 86%
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: MrFrost on October 20, 2012, 04:15:08 pm: Looks like Martis has pulled something again
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: ScillyRover on October 20, 2012, 04:36:16 pm: YYYEEEESSSS!!!!!!
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: Bristol Red Rover on October 20, 2012, 04:37:47 pm: Thats the difference this season, we always threaten near the end - excellent! :scarf:

Now lets have another - Jordan!!! :boxing:
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: FuzzyDuck on October 20, 2012, 04:39:13 pm: Yeeeeessssssss :scarf:
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: ScillyRover on October 20, 2012, 04:46:15 pm: WWWWoooooooooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
:scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo:
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: Bristol Red Rover on October 20, 2012, 04:46:49 pm: Fooooookin YESSSSSSSS!!!! :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf: :scarf:
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: CottyRover on October 20, 2012, 04:47:11 pm: :scarf: :scarf: Really pleased for Paynter! :scarf: :scarf:
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: ScillyRover on October 20, 2012, 04:48:08 pm: Decorator, decorator, yeah, yeah yeah !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Can we have a smiley with a paintbrush in his hand ;)
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: FuzzyDuck on October 20, 2012, 04:51:13 pm: :rtid: :scarf: :rtid: :scarf: :rtid: :scarf: :rtid: :scarf: :rtid: :scarf: :rtid: :scarf: :rtid: :scarf: :rtid: :scarf:

:clapping: :clapping: :clapping: :clapping: :clapping: :clapping: :clapping: :clapping: :clapping: :clapping:

:woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo:

Knew we'd win this!!!!
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: ScillyRover on October 20, 2012, 04:52:24 pm: 4 mins added
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: MrFrost on October 20, 2012, 04:52:42 pm: Payntet has made a big difference since coming on
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: Dutch Uncle on October 20, 2012, 04:56:08 pm: He's certainly brightened things up....... :chair:

:rtid: :rtid: :rtid:
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: Bristol Red Rover on October 20, 2012, 04:57:13 pm: I like the way he brushed Brentford aside :huh:
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: ScillyRover on October 20, 2012, 04:57:32 pm: YYYEEESSSS!!!!! 3 points in the bag
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: CottyRover on October 20, 2012, 04:57:56 pm: I thought he'd never blow! Great win! :woohoo:
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: ScillyRover on October 20, 2012, 04:58:29 pm: Paynter papers over the cracks !!
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: Dutch Uncle on October 20, 2012, 04:58:35 pm: Quote from: Bristol Red Rover on October 20, 2012, 04:57:13 pm
I like the way he brushed Brentford aside :huh:

And such a lovely finish........
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: Bristol Red Rover on October 20, 2012, 04:58:54 pm: 7th - 6th if we win the game in hand. Who'd have thunked it? :woohoo:
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: rover-n-out on October 20, 2012, 05:00:12 pm: Well done Paynter. Could do with getting him a couple of strike partners.
How about Matt Black, and Red Oxide. :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo:
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: Dutch Uncle on October 20, 2012, 05:04:20 pm: Quote from: rover-n-out on October 20, 2012, 05:00:12 pm
Well done Paynter. Could do with getting him a couple of strike partners.
How about Matt Black, and Red Oxide. :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo:

We could start with Chris Brown.............
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: wilts rover on October 20, 2012, 05:08:19 pm: Nah it's a better mixture with Hume, they do the lines better
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: Standanista on October 21, 2012, 03:21:09 am: No need to get all emulsional.
Title: Re: Rovers v Bees
Post by: MachoMadness on October 21, 2012, 03:31:17 pm: All these puns are really taking the gloss off the victory for me. It's a load of Pollocks.