0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
He did throughout most of 2007
utterly agree with that. 2nd half they looked disinterested, even copps. Worse performance i have seen for sometimeQuote from: BillyStubbsTears on September 27, 2014, 09:16:17 pmHe did throughout most of 2007Were you there today, BST? Because that was worse than anything served up in 2007, poor as it was. First half I just thought it was a case of two poor sides. We conceded a goal from a free kick in the depths of stoppage time because we failed to anticipate that Walsall might not just lump the ball into the box. I still thought we could come back into it, but the second half was one of the most gutless displays I've ever seen from a Rovers team.In one respect I have some sympathy for Dickov. He was let down badly by his players and I'd struggle to single out anyone who had a performance that was even "average." However, he made two massive mistakes. Selecting the Furman/ Keegan duo as holding midfielders meant we had no-one who could pass the ball from deep. Secondly, giving the players two days off after the Fulham game (which we lost, FFS!) meant that we didn't prepare properly for this game. Also, God knows what he said to them at half-time, but they managed to be worse than they were in the first half and they looked totally uninterested. Yes, we had some difficult times under O'Driscoll, but I always had a sense that he knew what he was trying to do with the team. I just don't have that with Dickov. However, lest we forget, Dickov was JR's appointment. I wonder if he's having second thoughts about that now?
Quote from: BillyStubbsTears on September 27, 2014, 09:16:17 pmHe did throughout most of 2007Were you there today, BST? Because that was worse than anything served up in 2007, poor as it was. First half I just thought it was a case of two poor sides. We conceded a goal from a free kick in the depths of stoppage time because we failed to anticipate that Walsall might not just lump the ball into the box. I still thought we could come back into it, but the second half was one of the most gutless displays I've ever seen from a Rovers team.In one respect I have some sympathy for Dickov. He was let down badly by his players and I'd struggle to single out anyone who had a performance that was even "average." However, he made two massive mistakes. Selecting the Furman/ Keegan duo as holding midfielders meant we had no-one who could pass the ball from deep. Secondly, giving the players two days off after the Fulham game (which we lost, FFS!) meant that we didn't prepare properly for this game. Also, God knows what he said to them at half-time, but they managed to be worse than they were in the first half and they looked totally uninterested. Yes, we had some difficult times under O'Driscoll, but I always had a sense that he knew what he was trying to do with the team. I just don't have that with Dickov. However, lest we forget, Dickov was JR's appointment. I wonder if he's having second thoughts about that now?
They did all agree to it so I would blame them all. Equally as Jr didn't get his way and took his ball home it is the other owners who will decide. That decision should be goodbye Dickov and I hope they make it soon.