0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
We aren't going to get loan players in to take up positions we have players for.
instead of replacing those players with better quality we cannot afford
you have to think what the long standing players are thinking ie : stock ,copps oconnor !!!
I believe Blackpool's wage bill at least doubled in the first year they brought in a host of loans and short term signings. The fact they secured promotion meant they'd gambled and won. If it hadn't come off they'd have been in financial trouble. McKay's strategy is very different to what Blackpool did.I'm interested in how a player like Chimbonda fits into this arrangement as well? He's a free agent on a short term deal, seemingly destined for Montreal in January. Where's our \"cut\" here?
Quote from: \"DearneValleyRover\" post=193056We aren't going to get loan players in to take up positions we have players for.I suppose we'll only know whether this is true in due course.Quote from: \"DearneValleyRover\" post=193056instead of replacing those players with better quality we cannot affordThis is assuming that better players are always unaffordable.
completley agree with donnynoel we went backwards after losing wellens green mills you can always replace these without doing something diffrent
I don't like this one bit. I've felt uneasy since the first rumblings of this McKay character came about and I now feel downright sick. They may have said that the big concern is the fans relation to the club and the squad if it's a team of mercenaries but it comes across to me like they don't really care. They acknowledge that that is a potential pitfall, but will push on and do this anyway.Our great reputation as a nice club is going down the toilet, and I think some people may lose (or already have lost) sight of what going to football is all about. It isn't all about money, a soulless team and faceless success. I'd gladly take the next 20 years being a small club punching above our weight in this division or League One, going along as we were then get to the Premier League off the back of a selfish agent and a bunch of players who've come here for 3 months at a time to try and secure moves elsewhere.
Quote from: \"RoversAlias\" post=193067I don't like this one bit. I've felt uneasy since the first rumblings of this McKay character came about and I now feel downright sick. They may have said that the big concern is the fans relation to the club and the squad if it's a team of mercenaries but it comes across to me like they don't really care. They acknowledge that that is a potential pitfall, but will push on and do this anyway.Our great reputation as a nice club is going down the toilet, and I think some people may lose (or already have lost) sight of what going to football is all about. It isn't all about money, a soulless team and faceless success. I'd gladly take the next 20 years being a small club punching above our weight in this division or League One, going along as we were then get to the Premier League off the back of a selfish agent and a bunch of players who've come here for 3 months at a time to try and secure moves elsewhere.Hang on a minute. These players that are coming in for 3 months are being paid a quarter of what some of our existing players are being paid.How is the agent selfish?Who are the mercenaries?I think you are living in a dream world. Our great reputation as a nice club is going down the toilet, and I think some people may lose (or already have lost) sight of what going to football is all about.I think those days are long gone sadly!
Would clubs \"show-case\" their players if we dropped into League One? I'm not sure they would, so I'd be interested to see how this idea worked if we were to go down this year.But, going back to my original query - let's use Tommy Spurr as an example. Assuming when he's fit again he'd like to play, Illunga would be keeping him out of the team. So he'd eventually want to leave. Then assume Illunga gets his big move at some point. Who's left? Another McKay fella to come straight in? Does he have a constant stream of decent left-backs? Apply the same logic to every position taken by a McKay player and I begin to question the sustainability of the club.With regards to the Sharp point, no we cannot afford another. But neither could Scunny when they sold him. So they bought Martin Paterson. And then they bought Gary Hooper. And they kept turning a profit on these players. For a club with 5k crowds to have had two stints in the Championship and now comfortably sustain a League One club shows to me that the model works.rtid88 - this is in no way, shape or form a Sean related argument. I'm not sure why you would seek to make it one.
Well, even if I have some slight concerns about long term sustainability, what I will say is it's nice to get some clarity on the whole affair and a bit of transparency from the club. Well done JR and co from me with this one.
Quote from: \"The L J Monk\" post=193045Would clubs \"show-case\" their players if we dropped into League One? I'm not sure they would, so I'd be interested to see how this idea worked if we were to go down this year.But, going back to my original query - let's use Tommy Spurr as an example. Assuming when he's fit again he'd like to play, Illunga would be keeping him out of the team. So he'd eventually want to leave. Then assume Illunga gets his big move at some point. Who's left? Another McKay fella to come straight in? Does he have a constant stream of decent left-backs? Apply the same logic to every position taken by a McKay player and I begin to question the sustainability of the club.With regards to the Sharp point, no we cannot afford another. But neither could Scunny when they sold him. So they bought Martin Paterson. And then they bought Gary Hooper. And they kept turning a profit on these players. For a club with 5k crowds to have had two stints in the Championship and now comfortably sustain a League One club shows to me that the model works.rtid88 - this is in no way, shape or form a Sean related argument. I'm not sure why you would seek to make it one.Totally and utterly agree with that, that's how I thought we were being run. The fear of being relegated back to our more natural level seems to have taken hold of the board, first resulting in big money signings like Sharp and now this \"strategy\".Am I really the only one who'd prefer us to return to the model we had in the first (couple of) Championship seasons where the defecit was smaller (and covered by the benevolance of the board) and we sold players like Wellens and Mills in order to fund the gap? Am I really the only one who doesn't see relegation and a clearing of the financial decks as the end of the world? Am I really the only one, who having seen so called stars of other teams in our time in the championship, isn't wetting my pants at a couple of foreigners who are coming in for three or four games and pissing off again? Am I the only one who thinks that Doncaster Rovers is better than being a shop window? Am I the only one who doesn't believe that Saunders will have a free hand in team selection (ie picking a loan player over an established first teamer...how are they going to earn moves elsewhere if the established player is better than them and they can't get in the team)?I know JR has done this with the best of intentions but I have to say I'm really disappointed. This is my 20th season and it's a world away since that first game v Halifax. There are people on this thread who are obviously geniunely excited about Chimbonda, Diarra and the numerous other show ponies who are about to trot around for a month to earn a move somewhere \"better\". Me? I've seen a lot of friends and people I knew in the first ten years melting away (after the Conf years, not before!) after becoming disillusioned with various aspects (ticket prices, the Keepmoat, etc). I'm going to have to have a long hard think about how I spend my money and time and as I finally understand why. If you find yourself questioning your love for your spouse then you really shouldn't be there at all.
We've got better over the last ten years, but the crowds haven't. It's simple maths. I'd draw graphs over crowd V attendance but I'll leave that to someone else...hehe They know who they are!
A third of not very much amounts to ... not very much. We were and still are a small club. Fractions don't impress, whole numbers do.EDIT Really you have to compare attendances with other clubs in this league, and ours are very poor