0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: albie on May 15, 2022, 09:49:36 pmQuote from: glosterred on May 15, 2022, 03:09:07 pmLots on here don’t like the idea of voter ID, the Labour Party don’t like it. But in Wakefield you need it to vote for the Labour candidate https://twitter.com/RobParsonsNorth/status/1525812793143971842Unfortunately, this is correct.Labour members in Wakefield were required to show photo ID before voting in the rigged choice of candidate.The shortlist of two outsiders was imposed by Labour HQ against the wishes of Wakefield Labour.Ironically, the Labour Party OPPOSES voter ID requirements because many do not have up to date photo ID, and it reduces democratic integrity by preventing legitimate votes being cast.Utterly shameful from Starmer and Co.So are the Labour Party being two faced about this?
Quote from: glosterred on May 15, 2022, 03:09:07 pmLots on here don’t like the idea of voter ID, the Labour Party don’t like it. But in Wakefield you need it to vote for the Labour candidate https://twitter.com/RobParsonsNorth/status/1525812793143971842Unfortunately, this is correct.Labour members in Wakefield were required to show photo ID before voting in the rigged choice of candidate.The shortlist of two outsiders was imposed by Labour HQ against the wishes of Wakefield Labour.Ironically, the Labour Party OPPOSES voter ID requirements because many do not have up to date photo ID, and it reduces democratic integrity by preventing legitimate votes being cast.Utterly shameful from Starmer and Co.
Lots on here don’t like the idea of voter ID, the Labour Party don’t like it. But in Wakefield you need it to vote for the Labour candidate https://twitter.com/RobParsonsNorth/status/1525812793143971842
Kier Starmer pledged to end NEC placed candidates aswell. He's not good at sticking by his promises is he?
Syd you’re diverting attention from the thread with your last two posts. Voters required to produce photo ID to vote for Labour candidate, something that you and the Labour Party are against. Why’s that then?
Quote from: glosterred on May 16, 2022, 06:59:22 amSyd you’re diverting attention from the thread with your last two posts. Voters required to produce photo ID to vote for Labour candidate, something that you and the Labour Party are against. Why’s that then?Exactly this, Sydney are you for voter ID or not? Are you for centrally placed candidates or not?
Never in a GE nope (note I haven't voted in many given my age).
4 I think it is. I'm not sure on the relevance of this to my questions though?
I'm surprised that in this day and age they could not have the electorate voting by using their mobile phones.Surely its not beyond the wit of man to develop an app that has enough encryption and protections to enable everyone to use it the one time, without it being vulnerable to easily attacked code.There seems quite a few social and business app's that have a similar function. I'm sure someone will be along shortly and say that its discriminating to some?
So Syd from this, to quote youSo to answer your questions, ID in general elections NO, there has been no evidence that the minute amount of fraud to date would change an election or justify it, what individual parties do on internal matters is up to them.I take it that you are happy for fraud to take place because it’s only “minute”. When do you draw a line on size of fraud to introduce voter ID?