0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: tommy toes on May 23, 2020, 06:03:54 pmHoundSo you're asserting that a high ranking advisor with he ear of the PM and living in a city with 8 million people had to travel 269 miles to find help with a virus that he and his wife did or did not have (and which has little or no effect on young children)Don't make me laugh. They're using the childcare/safeguarding issue as a smokescreen.I’m not asserting anything TT because I don’t know the full circumstances.........and neither do you.
HoundSo you're asserting that a high ranking advisor with he ear of the PM and living in a city with 8 million people had to travel 269 miles to find help with a virus that he and his wife did or did not have (and which has little or no effect on young children)Don't make me laugh. They're using the childcare/safeguarding issue as a smokescreen.
IMHO I do not beleive 90+% of the population would have done what DC did. We would have complied with the governments guidlines. I know very little about DC, although BST & others have fed us various information. I for one said my final good byes to my late mother some 3 weeks before she passed, as I thought it was responsible of me not to enter the care home she was a resident in, for both the care homes benefit & of course mine. Where was DC's responsibilty, with this action. Have they no friends in London? His action makes me very angry. Having watched the BBC news earlier & seeing him slouch at the door of number 10, to me, shows a totall disrespect.
Appreciate that TT, I did not mention it for sympathy, but to highlight what I believe was a responsible action under the circumstances.
At least he stayed put in Durham when he was there.https://twitter.com/guardian/status/1264264397972811776?s=19Oh.
Quote from: drfchound on May 23, 2020, 06:19:46 pmQuote from: tommy toes on May 23, 2020, 06:03:54 pmHoundSo you're asserting that a high ranking advisor with he ear of the PM and living in a city with 8 million people had to travel 269 miles to find help with a virus that he and his wife did or did not have (and which has little or no effect on young children)Don't make me laugh. They're using the childcare/safeguarding issue as a smokescreen.I’m not asserting anything TT because I don’t know the full circumstances.........and neither do you.So. That report about Cummings' son? Any ideas?
Shouldn’t need to be hacked, the police should be able to do that anyway.
They don’t have to.. if he had made repeated journeys between Durham and London, before the rules changed to allow unlimited travel for exercise, would be be liable to be fined for making an unnecessary journey.?
I dunno.. but the more evidence that comes out which goes against his story, the less tenable his position becomes.
HoundIf Cummings's kid had breathing difficulties, there is no way that wouldn't have been front and centre of the defence. And if it had been in the media once, it would have been picked up and repeated widely.Now, there have been LOTS of reports of Cummings himself having had breathing difficulties while suffering with CV-19.May I suggest you misheard? But it suited the narrative you want to be correct?
Quote from: IDM on May 23, 2020, 08:38:37 pmI dunno.. but the more evidence that comes out which goes against his story, the less tenable his position becomes.I've heard he's terrible at tenable.