0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
For sure spot kicks would have Been more fair?I Cant for life Of me workout why the away goal ruleCarrys This.How does it come about that Spurs v inter is the firstGame,Hence addvantage to Spurs as it was to how things panned out tonite?
Quote from: oslorovers link=topic=238129.msg318497#msg318497 date=1363294793So it must be based on final group standings Then.As first in group A Will play 2nd in group B???But if Thats the case When Spurs beat Lyon in previous round,iam certian they allready knew that they would be playing inter or whoever they was up against in previous round.Fcuk it This is doing me head in For sure spot kicks would have Been more fair?I Cant for life Of me workout why the away goal ruleCarrys This.How does it come about that Spurs v inter is the firstGame,Hence addvantage to Spurs as it was to how things panned out tonite?I think being at home first is decided on where you finish in the group stages
So it must be based on final group standings Then.As first in group A Will play 2nd in group B???But if Thats the case When Spurs beat Lyon in previous round,iam certian they allready knew that they would be playing inter or whoever they was up against in previous round.Fcuk it This is doing me head in For sure spot kicks would have Been more fair?I Cant for life Of me workout why the away goal ruleCarrys This.How does it come about that Spurs v inter is the firstGame,Hence addvantage to Spurs as it was to how things panned out tonite?
I agree with you , everyone considers the game to be a 90 min. affair so counting the 30 mins. of extra time in favour of Spurs is illogical to me too.They had a leg each, resulting in the same amount of away goals in normal time.........it's ridiculous and yes either a penalty shoot out or a next goal wins system would have been fairer.
Quote from: hoolahoop on March 14, 2013, 09:15:12 pmI agree with you , everyone considers the game to be a 90 min. affair so counting the 30 mins. of extra time in favour of Spurs is illogical to me too.They had a leg each, resulting in the same amount of away goals in normal time.........it's ridiculous and yes either a penalty shoot out or a next goal wins system would have been fairer. agree but on the other foot how about inter millan having extra 30 mins playing at home to score more
the thing is, lots of people think the penalty shoot out way of deciding the fixture is unfair. So the question is, IS there a fair way of deciding a tied fixture at the end of 90 minutes?I always thought the golden goal rule was the fairer way of settling it myself!!
Quote from: jonnydog on March 15, 2013, 01:11:06 pmthe thing is, lots of people think the penalty shoot out way of deciding the fixture is unfair. So the question is, IS there a fair way of deciding a tied fixture at the end of 90 minutes?I always thought the golden goal rule was the fairer way of settling it myself!!Highest number of corners gives the team attacking most the advantage ?
And you would end up with professional corner stealing too... Now that WOULD be boring!Still, something has to be done. I know. How about having a replay at a neutral ground?!BobG
It was RedRover. And I was there! About 3,500 in the crowd. Our lot were behind the goal the pennos were taken. Mental. It was the first ever penalty shoot out anywhere in this country actually - not just one that involved the Rovers. I wish it had never been invented now though - although despite winning, Liverpool fans night prefer it to tossing a coin!CheersBobG