Viking Supporters Co-operative

Viking Chat => Viking Chat => Topic started by: lee.j09 on November 28, 2013, 07:43:56 pm

Title: terry bramall
Post by: lee.j09 on November 28, 2013, 07:43:56 pm
will the vsc now ask questions of terry?

what does he want with drfc?

why does he want the club?

what his proposed investment will be?

all questions you asked about sequentia capital.

after all don't forget about this not so long ago;
http://www.southyorkshiretimes.co.uk/sport/local-sport/four-resign-from-board-1-4179951 (http://www.southyorkshiretimes.co.uk/sport/local-sport/four-resign-from-board-1-4179951)
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Alickismyhero on November 28, 2013, 07:50:21 pm
There will be a statement by the board and if TB does answer these questions what will your position be then?

a sniper?

a supporter of the board?

I wander?
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Sprotyrover on November 28, 2013, 08:12:23 pm
Why do they need to do that? I don't see how Bramhall has damaged his credibility in any way!
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Sprotyrover on November 28, 2013, 08:19:54 pm
They appeared from no where (a bit like your name sake,Casper Hauser) bits of paper were being waved around by JR purportedly showing bank accounts containing vast amounts of money, and the VSC quite rightly asked questions. TB has been around for years his money isn't an enigma ,it's real.and intentions towards the club are benign,something which was never established about SC
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: PDX_Rover on November 28, 2013, 10:33:49 pm
"I have in my hand a piece of paper" said a certain Prime Minister. And we all know how that ended.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: BobG on November 28, 2013, 10:37:31 pm
Oh don't forget Mark, it "signed by Mr Hitler" too. Makes all the difference!

Casper: haven't you been reading? Watching? You've had roughly 5 months now to bone up on what's been happening. Looks like you've left it a bit late sparrow.

Cheers

BobG
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Alickismyhero on November 28, 2013, 10:40:06 pm
I don't think OP is far out, and not necessarily sniping.

VSC grilled and doubted sequentia over several months. I suppose it will now be interesting to see how the non-football man who made his fortune in the construction industry deals with the football club with construction prospects.

In the interest of fairness and to discourage bias on here, shouldn't the VSC now consistently moan about not having questions answered by TB and question his credibility?

I think you lost all cred when you said the VSC grilled SC!!! I thought that SC refused to answer questions put to them and in addition didn't they threaten legal action if we said anything they never liked ?

No street cred my friend.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: silent majority on November 28, 2013, 10:40:25 pm
Can I just say, and this isn't an official statement on all things VSC, that we have done exactly what you're asking.

We asked questions of SC/JR and didn't get any answers, in fact we got solicitors threatening legal,action for having the temerity to question their intentions. You'll see more of this in days to come.

However, when we asked questions of TB we got an audience. Not only that he answered all of our questions and went further in expressing how he would like to see the club progress. It's not for me, or us, to expand on that, TB will do so shortly I would guess. But you have to accept that this guy is a force to be reckoned with, and in a nice way. I'm sure his tenure ship,of DRFC will be a good one.

You can make your own minds up on what that means.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: dknward2 on November 28, 2013, 10:54:09 pm
good little info there SM i do feel that TB will be good for this club maybe we do now need a board that stays in the boardroom, we have plenty of other members of staff at the club that can make statements etc

hope TB comes out on either Fri or Sat and runs though even just some quick bullet point bits of his plans even if he doesn't want to expand just a quick list i'm sure would help most fans

Then the few negative fans who think that we may as well get up now then may change there tune
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: bedale rover on November 28, 2013, 10:57:54 pm
Can I just say, and this isn't an official statement on all things VSC, that we have done exactly what you're asking.

We asked questions of SC/JR and didn't get any answers, in fact we got solicitors threatening legal,action for having the temerity to question their intentions. You'll see more of this in days to come.

However, when we asked questions of TB we got an audience. Not only that he answered all of our questions and went further in expressing how he would like to see the club progress. It's not for me, or us, to expand on that, TB will do so shortly I would guess. But you have to accept that this guy is a force to be reckoned with, and in a nice way. I'm sure his tenure ship,of DRFC will be a good one.

You can make your own minds up on what that means.

This deserves to be a sticky
The most positive post in the last 3 months
At last the merest hint of daylight
Thanks martin
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: BobG on November 28, 2013, 10:59:19 pm
I am mightily impressed with TB DKN. A quiet yet powerful figure. He clearly knows all the moves and he clearly knows how to win. Politically he's run rings around the competition - despite their control of the local press. That takes some doing that does. Despite all the noise and bluster, it's the other side that's come out on top. TB is a man to respect.

BobG
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: River Don on November 28, 2013, 11:02:02 pm
SM

Just to be clear, are the solicitors threats you are speaking of regarding the letter we are aware of about the thread subsequently removed from the forum? Or are these different threats aimed squarely at the VSC?
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: dknward2 on November 28, 2013, 11:10:32 pm
Really cant wait to hear the plans I personally wonder if all this time TB has been trying to find out what SC want with the club and what they wanted to do with it i.e. building and the ground/youth funding/expand the stadium, whatever there plans were. Now TB has them and thinks yes this will help make DRFC a better club that can pay for its self.

More money coming in means more can be spent on the team which fingers crossed and whole chunk of luck maybe the dream can be real?
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: silent majority on November 28, 2013, 11:12:18 pm
RD,

These are different threats.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: River Don on November 28, 2013, 11:14:20 pm
Blimey, they're a litigious lot aren't they?
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: BobG on November 28, 2013, 11:15:52 pm
Tells you an awful lot about them doesn't it?

BobG
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: River Don on November 29, 2013, 08:48:17 am
Threatening legals towards supporters and the supporters trust was a bit odd considering they told everyone it was supposed to be a friendly takeover, wasn't it Casper?
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: River Don on November 29, 2013, 09:08:37 am
Well I doubt the VSC in it's official capacity would have asked anything of them that would merit a response like that. Perhaps we'll find out in due course.

Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: bobjimwilly on November 29, 2013, 09:55:51 am
Not really. I doubt they would have threatened action if there was no reason to.

Why should SC be interested on staying on the right side of a small fan base (or even smaller number of internet forum users)?

It's not as if VSC accounts for 40k season ticket holders is it?

VSC were just a 'thorn in SC's side' whilst the grown ups were negotiating deals.


If they weren't bothered about threatening a supporters trust, or any sort of fans organisation, do you think they would be bothered about individual fans feelings once they took over?
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Colin C No.3 on November 29, 2013, 10:16:46 am
Not really. I doubt they would have threatened action if there was no reason to.

Why should SC be interested on staying on the right side of a small fan base (or even smaller number of internet forum users)?

It's not as if VSC accounts for 40k season ticket holders is it?

VSC were just a 'thorn in SC's side' whilst the grown ups were negotiating deals.


I'll try & keep it simple....just for you.

"Look before you leap".

Do you know what you/we're looking at?

If so, please enlighten.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: River Don on November 29, 2013, 10:43:07 am
Not really. I doubt they would have threatened action if there was no reason to.

Why should SC be interested on staying on the right side of a small fan base (or even smaller number of internet forum users)?

It's not as if VSC accounts for 40k season ticket holders is it?

VSC were just a 'thorn in SC's side' whilst the grown ups were negotiating deals.


If they weren't bothered about threatening a supporters trust, or any sort of fans organisation, do you think they would be bothered about individual fans feelings once they took over?

No I don't. the fans are insignificant in the case of DRFC. We are a small proportion of the income and the size of the fanbase is smaller than that of clubs of the same playing standard. It may have entered their thoughts if they were attempting to take over Man U or someone similar.

You're entering into the sphere of wilful blindness with this Casper.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: silent majority on November 29, 2013, 10:46:54 am
Not really. I doubt they would have threatened action if there was no reason to.

Why should SC be interested on staying on the right side of a small fan base (or even smaller number of internet forum users)?

It's not as if VSC accounts for 40k season ticket holders is it?

VSC were just a 'thorn in SC's side' whilst the grown ups were negotiating deals.


If they weren't bothered about threatening a supporters trust, or any sort of fans organisation, do you think they would be bothered about individual fans feelings once they took over?

No I don't. the fans are insignificant in the case of DRFC. We are a small proportion of the income and the size of the fanbase is smaller than that of clubs of the same playing standard. It may have entered their thoughts if they were attempting to take over Man U or someone similar.

That I'm afraid is absolute rubbish. Your argument is the other way around. Gate money for DRFC is much more vital than it is for Man Utd. Clubs in the PL receive disproportionately more TV money than gate money. The supporters at Man Utd were so upset with the Glazers takeover they set up their own football club.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: wesisback on November 29, 2013, 10:56:15 am
He only has within the bubble of the VSC though Bob. Being an exile you miss the core bulk of our supporters talking, the guys in the staffroom discussing the club. In no way, shape or form has he won any kind of battle in that respect. The fans at Barnsley weren't shouting 'One TB' were they?
It's within the confines of this forum and this forum alone where there seems to be support for TB and even here it's divided.

I am mightily impressed with TB DKN. A quiet yet powerful figure. He clearly knows all the moves and he clearly knows how to win. Politically he's run rings around the competition - despite their control of the local press. That takes some doing that does. Despite all the noise and bluster, it's the other side that's come out on top. TB is a man to respect.

BobG
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: silent majority on November 29, 2013, 10:57:16 am
Just fans? Wow, no wonder football clubs treat their supporters poorly when you adopt that stance.

Look, the government were so concerned about football club owners treating football clubs and their supporters in such abysmal fashion (i.e. Ken Richardson!) that they did something about it. They provided significant funds to set up an organisation known as Supporters Direct which is the organisation that helped breath life into the VSC. That's why we are here. So we do have rights and we do have influence. That's why they tried to shut us up.

 
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: silent majority on November 29, 2013, 11:01:32 am
He only has within the bubble of the VSC though Bob. Being an exile you miss the core bulk of our supporters talking, the guys in the staffroom discussing the club. In no way, shape or form has he won any kind of battle in that respect. The fans at Barnsley weren't shouting 'One TB' were they?
It's within the confines of this forum and this forum alone where there seems to be support for TB and even here it's divided.

I am mightily impressed with TB DKN. A quiet yet powerful figure. He clearly knows all the moves and he clearly knows how to win. Politically he's run rings around the competition - despite their control of the local press. That takes some doing that does. Despite all the noise and bluster, it's the other side that's come out on top. TB is a man to respect.

BobG

I'm quite intrigued to know how you know what the 'core bulk' of our supporters are talking about. Where's the evidence for this?
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: wesisback on November 29, 2013, 11:09:22 am
Was the man in the stands shouting their support of TB? Do you think they will be this weekend? You may wish to cast a blind eye but do the social media sites (twitter and facebook) indicate that the support lies behind TB. Even the site, maintained by the VSC seems pretty divided by the whole scenario.
I cannot understand how politically he can run rings round his opposition when he has mostly only the VSC's backing and the miniscule % of backing that comes with that.

Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: River Don on November 29, 2013, 11:16:38 am
These days no football fan can ignore what's going off the field because football is a business and the successs of the team is dependant on the success of the business.

So what if we had ignored Richardson? We probably wouldn't have a club now.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: River Don on November 29, 2013, 11:46:30 am
Maybe we wouldn't have DRFC no, but there would be a Doncaster football club and we would all be supporting them.

Maybe because actually football is a bit more than a business its a part of the community too. Would we all be supporting them? If they were kicking about in the lower reaches of the pyramid, only the hardcore support would remain.

Personally, I think the answer is the opposite to your suggestion of limited fan engagement, leave it to be an entertainment business. We should be more like the Germans and have the supporters trusts own a fraction more than 50% of  clubs. Then it might return to being more of a sport.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Muttley on November 29, 2013, 12:36:40 pm
Was the man in the stands shouting their support of TB? Do you think they will be this weekend?

That's because anyone with an ounce of intelligence could see JR's stunt for exactly what it was and didn't need to feel the need to go shouting the odds when there was an important football match to watch and a team to support.

The only ones that were singing for JR were the blinkered sheep who would let him lead them over the edge of a cliff.

This club is more than one man. It's DRFC not JRFC!
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Alickismyhero on November 29, 2013, 12:58:23 pm
Casp & Wesco I see you are relatively new to the forum with very similar views, strange!

When it comes to the Ryan fiasco at Barnsley he shot himself in the foot. Our supports were shocked and yes there were supporters chanting for Bramall out. It was understandable with all the leaked information to the media from Ryan intended to turn supporters against Bramall. Did it work? at Barnsley a little but by the Charlton game no chants at all. An embarrassing end to the Ryan period in Donny's history.

I take it you were not at Charlton. I made the effort to discuss the situation with as many of our supporters I could. Nobody, nobody supported Ryans action at Barnsley. Yes all were very sad to lose Ryan. Did you hear any calls of Bramall out? No, none.

I tried to advise Ryan when I was tipped off what he intended to do at Barnsley "Don't leave this way" I know he reads this forum but no he went ahead with his selfish action. If we also put the lies Ryan came out with to one side in recent times I am still very sad that this period has tarnished his reputation.

                                  "The King is dead long live the king"

Its time to move on and forget our differences over the TO.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: mrfrostsdad on November 29, 2013, 01:12:33 pm
Come on then Alick, tell us all about John Ryan's lies
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: steve@dcfd on November 29, 2013, 01:32:37 pm
What does TB mean by “Results on the pitch have not been great, but developments at the club have been going well. The mood is upbeat and the staff are pleased it’s staying with us.

Does he mean the developments for club Doncaster.

Surely us fans are bothered about results on the pitch than acquiring two Rugby clubs.

JR had his faults but he put all his efforts in to getting the best possible team he could for the Fans.

Club Doncaster means nothing to me has a fan, performance and results on the pitch are the main thing. I believe the 6400 home fans that on average turn up to support the team want that also.

We keep getting told about IRWT and the input from Fans, but really how many fans have an input. On all the votes carried out on here we normally get 200 forum users voting. So when VSC go and put their views to the club it comes from a minority who are supporters but a lot of exiles. When talking to Gavin are they giving their points of view which is the views on here and may be not the views of supporters at games.

I want TB to ensure we do not get relegated this season, it's not all down to the manager.

After all the club have said, “They are excited about the future of Doncaster Rovers and helping the club to realise some of its unfulfilled aims. The current owners have a clear and exciting vision for the club which they are keen to deliver". This should mean for the team not Club Doncaster, my season ticket is for the football team not for two rugby clubs in which I have no interest.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Alickismyhero on November 29, 2013, 01:37:15 pm
What about.......

                          DOB, and "I was tricked in to giving his name"? Who tricked him?

                                   
                           Oh .....Its not DOB at all.......I made a mistake, really
 
                         I have sold my shares to SC and when asked about his sale refused to answer the question. According to CH he still owns the shares as of today.

I think it is very sad that his credibility went down the pan when he should have been given a knighthood.


Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: River Don on November 29, 2013, 01:40:26 pm
The supporters at the game are always welcome and encouraged to join the VSC because the VSC are here to represent them.

The supporters at the game are not prevented from airing their views on this forum. The supporters at the game can also participate in IRWT questionnaires and such.

AND the people who use this forum and members of the VSC are actually supporters at the game too.

Why is it always supposed that the wider majority of supporters at the game have views radically different to the views of the minority of supporters at the game who are keen enough to join the VSC or post on the forum?
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Alickismyhero on November 29, 2013, 03:56:04 pm
OldFrosty,

Are they lies, terminological inexactitudes, or have I just misunderstood him?

Whatever they are we should all move on. The future is secure.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: lee.j09 on November 29, 2013, 05:59:19 pm
The supporters at the game are always welcome and encouraged to join the VSC because the VSC are here to represent them.

The supporters at the game are not prevented from airing their views on this forum. The supporters at the game can also participate in IRWT questionnaires and such.

AND the people who use this forum and members of the VSC are actually supporters at the game too.

Why is it always supposed that the wider majority of supporters at the game have views radically different to the views of the minority of supporters at the game who are keen enough to join the VSC or post on the forum?

that's where your wrong the vsc represents its self and itself only. the majority of the fans backed JR FACT! the vsc didn't.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: IDM on November 29, 2013, 06:07:51 pm
Hang on, didn't the VSC question the proposed takeover, then hold off from supporting it because their questions went unanswered?

That's a lot different to not backing JR.!  I am also fairly sure the VSC represents its members, and anyone is free to join...
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: silent majority on November 29, 2013, 06:16:02 pm
Lee.j09

So whereabouts are these facts you speak of? I haven't seen anything that represents what the majority of DRFC fans wanted, not on here or any other social media outlet.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: mrfrostsdad on November 29, 2013, 07:07:56 pm
I think it reasonable to assume his credibility didn't go down the pan with the majority of the fans.
I read Facebook as well as this forum (not Twitter I admit) and I think JR has a lot of support. He has support on here too, as does TB. Having said that, most of his support comes from the VSC directors.

If JR does read this forum and I don't know if he does or not, I'm sure he would love to read exactly where and when he lied.

I wouldn't follow him over a cliff, but I know who I would sooner have at the helm of my football club
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: River Don on November 29, 2013, 07:17:50 pm
The supporters at the game are always welcome and encouraged to join the VSC because the VSC are here to represent them.

The supporters at the game are not prevented from airing their views on this forum. The supporters at the game can also participate in IRWT questionnaires and such.

AND the people who use this forum and members of the VSC are actually supporters at the game too.

Why is it always supposed that the wider majority of supporters at the game have views radically different to the views of the minority of supporters at the game who are keen enough to join the VSC or post on the forum?

that's where your wrong the vsc represents its self and itself only. the majority of the fans backed JR FACT! the vsc didn't.

Well that's a bit strange then Lee, because I was at the game and you didn't ask me what I thought. I was with half a dozen friends, I don't remember you or anyone else canvassing our opinion about the takeover.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Alickismyhero on November 29, 2013, 08:30:02 pm


I wouldn't follow him over a cliff, but I know who I would sooner have at the helm of my football club
[/quote]
I think it reasonable to assume his credibility didn't go down the pan with the majority of the fans.
I read Facebook as well as this forum (not Twitter I admit) and I think JR has a lot of support. He has support on here too, as does TB. Having said that, most of his support comes from the VSC directors.

If JR does read this forum and I don't know if he does or not, I'm sure he would love to read exactly where and when he lied.



And I thought you were going to answer my questions I did pose the questions to you and not Ryan.

Right now Bramall is the man for me but when things settle down I would like to see a strong football director to put that side of things over. Bramall doesn't like yes men, he is a force to deal with in the boardroom and he is not easy to beat, Ryan is an example of that. So I would like to see a balance to create the synergy going forward.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: wesisback on November 29, 2013, 11:04:20 pm
Casp & Wesco I see you are relatively new to the forum with very similar views, strange!

I dont quite get what your issue is. I have fully submitted all my details to the forum that can be put against most social network sites to confirm my identity.
It must be hard to see more than one person challenge the bubbled world a lot of you live in on here where every decision made is a good one and deserves a good pat on the back all round but unfortunately, while my opinion is similar to mentioned poster, it's also representative of a hell of lot more fans!
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: BobG on December 01, 2013, 12:54:34 am
Hmm Wesco. Anyone who believes pretty well anything that's written on twitter, facebook and all the other organs  for those unable to think simply prove the point. To then quote that as 'evidence for Gods sake simply damns you out of your own mouth. Well, keyboard actually.

Sorry Wexco. Your points have less credibility than even my claim to be an England opening batsman.

BobG

PS. I see the insufferable Lee hasn't come back with any evidence either. Poor lad.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: lee.j09 on December 01, 2013, 09:27:23 am
It was plain to see at barnsley and every other internet platform but this one simples!
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Rovers Return on December 01, 2013, 09:41:07 am
It was plain to see at barnsley and every other internet platform but this one simples!

I was at Barnsley and there were certainly far more not joining in than were. Also the demographic group that were actually chanting looked like they had school on Monday. Just saying......
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: IDM on December 01, 2013, 09:46:24 am
Maybe that same demographic is the one that has the most usage of FB and t**tter?  Whilst they are both very popular with millions of users, I would still say they are not representative of DRFC fans as a whole.  I am in my 40's and I don't use FB for example, but I will post on here (and used to use BBC 606).  My dad in his 60's has been following DRFC since his childhood and wouldn't even look at the forums, never mind FB etc.  I would guess (but not claim as fact) that this is representative of similar generations?
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Wellred on December 01, 2013, 09:54:20 am
Hmm Wesco. Anyone who believes pretty well anything that's written on twitter, facebook and all the other organs  for those unable to think simply prove the point. To then quote that as 'evidence for Gods sake simply damns you out of your own mouth. Well, keyboard actually.

Sorry Wexco. Your points have less credibility than even my claim to be an England opening batsman.

BobG

PS. I see the insufferable Lee hasn't come back with any evidence either. Poor lad.

You seem to be getting confused in your old age.

Are you an England opening batsman or are you England's future opening bowler.

How can we take anybody seriously who doesn't know whether they are batting or bowling ;-)
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Rovers Return on December 01, 2013, 09:57:03 am
Maybe that same demographic is the one that has the most usage of FB and t**tter?  Whilst they are both very popular with millions of users, I would still say they are not representative of DRFC fans as a whole.  I am in my 40's and I don't use FB for example, but I will post on here (and used to use BBC 606).  My dad in his 60's has been following DRFC since his childhood and wouldn't even look at the forums, never mind FB etc.  I would guess (but not claim as fact) that this is representative of similar generations?

I'd go along with that. The more seasoned you are the less you feel the need to publicly announce your feelings. Most of us have seen pantomime tricks like that many times before and are less impressed. If I remember correctly at a pantomime it's the kids who are encouraged to shout out 'He's behind you' because they are the ones easily influenced. Sadly as we grow some adults never learn that Jack didn't really have any magic beans at all and it was a fairy story all along.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: BobG on December 01, 2013, 11:58:19 pm
I'm neither Red. although i loved playing, I was, basically, not very good at it.

BobG
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: roversdude on December 02, 2013, 04:26:40 am
It's quite easy to get caught up in things in the heat of the moment
I dare bet a lot of those "showing their support" for JR at Barnsley fell into this category
Personally speaking JR WAS brilliant for the club and I doubt no one would hesitate in offering thanks for what he has done, however it seemed to me he had been looking for a way out for a while
The comments regarding FB etc are valid in my opinion, I'm 40+ and have never felt the need to tell the world that I'm having a shite/going to Sainsburys/etc
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: PDX_Rover on December 02, 2013, 04:30:57 am
Maybe that same demographic is the one that has the most usage of FB and t**tter?  Whilst they are both very popular with millions of users, I would still say they are not representative of DRFC fans as a whole.  I am in my 40's and I don't use FB for example, but I will post on here (and used to use BBC 606).  My dad in his 60's has been following DRFC since his childhood and wouldn't even look at the forums, never mind FB etc.  I would guess (but not claim as fact) that this is representative of similar generations?

I'd go along with that. The more seasoned you are the less you feel the need to publicly announce your feelings. Most of us have seen pantomime tricks like that many times before and are less impressed. If I remember correctly at a pantomime it's the kids who are encouraged to shout out 'He's behind you' because they are the ones easily influenced. Sadly as we grow some adults never learn that Jack didn't really have any magic beans at all and it was a fairy story all along.

The Jack I knew had some magic beans. You could get some every Saturday night at the George IV in Brixton. In the beginning there was Jack... And Jack had a groove...
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Glyn_Wigley on December 02, 2013, 07:04:06 am
It was plain to see at barnsley and every other internet platform but this one simples!

Really? And how many of those people you say were showing him support were actually aware that he'd just resigned five minutes earlier? Why do you think he's timed theannouncementfor then?
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Wellred on December 02, 2013, 07:07:19 am
Do you not think it's time to give the whole JR v TB thing a rest now?
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: The Red Baron on December 02, 2013, 08:36:13 am
Do you not think it's time to give the whole JR v TB thing a rest now?

I agree- but let's not forget who made the whole thing personal in the first place.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Wellred on December 02, 2013, 02:32:32 pm
Ok so let it rest after you have had one last little dig  :facepalm:
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: hoolahoop on December 02, 2013, 02:38:21 pm
Ok so let it rest after you have had one last little dig  :facepalm:

AMEN TO THAT   :rtid: :rtid: :rtid:
AMEN TO THAT  :rtid: :rtid: :rtid:
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Alickismyhero on December 02, 2013, 03:13:57 pm
Wellred,

and you thought I would never agree with you? Its a dead DUCK AND SO SAY ALL OF US
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: hoolahoop on December 02, 2013, 04:12:38 pm
Right we can all be mates again and discuss footy rather than argue for the sake of it ?
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Filo on December 02, 2013, 05:33:55 pm
As fans we never had a say on how the club should run but we seemed to have voice and and ear in JR and that has been silenced with his resignation . I doubt we can expect to
Have much of an input apart from how we want to pay for our season ticket . Those who in the past gave credit to JR for all the clubs success may find the new management a little deaf from now  on. IMO of course . Just incase there listening.


My understanding is you are well wide of the mark, you need to accept, JR is not around any more and stop hankering for the past, look to the future and support whoever is in charge instead of trying to keep the recent political unrest festering
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: hoolahoop on December 02, 2013, 05:53:37 pm
As fans we never had a say on how the club should run but we seemed to have voice and and ear in JR and that has been silenced with his resignation . I doubt we can expect to
Have much of an input apart from how we want to pay for our season ticket . Those who in the past gave credit to JR for all the clubs success may find the new management a little deaf from now  on. IMO of course . Just incase there listening.

I have supported this club for many years and save the odd trip into the Polypipe Stand that's all you got from JR. Please name me one just one instance where JR actually listened and took action from a single or group of fans.
You don't have to think too long as there aren't many instances over many yearswhere that has actually happened.
Where has this myth come from ? Look I don't  and never have had any problems with him as a person over the years but the Barnsley ''stunt''really pissed me off ..........it was the day that John Ryan FORGOT that DRFC belongs to the folk of Doncaster as it has for over a century and didn't belong to HIM.
Why oh why  people fall for such stunts is beyond me ? They have for years and the gullibility goes on and on and on...................................RANT OVER

Remember that this club belongs to this town and not any individual. I thank JR for what all that he has done but am disappointed in his recent actions
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: silent majority on December 02, 2013, 06:02:21 pm
As fans we never had a say on how the club should run but we seemed to have voice and and ear in JR and that has been silenced with his resignation . I doubt we can expect to
Have much of an input apart from how we want to pay for our season ticket . Those who in the past gave credit to JR for all the clubs success may find the new management a little deaf from now  on. IMO of course . Just incase there listening.

 I find your comments very wide of the mark. The best that we've had, in terms of a voice, has come through the IRWT project, and this has received nationwide acclaim for its wide ranging and, in some cases, groundbreaking ideas. It's Fan Engagement at its best.

But the people responsible for driving this and delivering this across all areas has been Gavin Baldwin and Shaun Lockwood, with great support from all Heads Of Departments.

I don't think John even knew we had this programme running.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Savvy on December 02, 2013, 06:11:57 pm
As fans we never had a say on how the club should run but we seemed to have voice and and ear in JR and that has been silenced with his resignation . I doubt we can expect to
Have much of an input apart from how we want to pay for our season ticket . Those who in the past gave credit to JR for all the clubs success may find the new management a little deaf from now  on. IMO of course . Just incase there listening.

I have supported this club for many years and save the odd trip into the Polypipe Stand that's all you got from JR. Please name me one just one instance where JR actually listened and took action from a single or group of fans.
You don't have to think too long as there aren't many instances over many yearswhere that has actually happened.
Where has this myth come from ? Look I don't  and never have had any problems with him as a person over the years but the Barnsley ''stunt''really pissed me off ..........it was the day that John Ryan FORGOT that DRFC belongs to the folk of Doncaster as it has for over a century and didn't belong to HIM.
Why oh why  people fall for such stunts is beyond me ? They have for years and the gullibility goes on and on and on...................................RANT OVER

Remember that this club belongs to this town and not any individual. I thank JR for what all that he has done but am disappointed in his recent actions

My understanding is that during the early days of his time as chairman, he used to meet on a regular basis with Andy Liney and co to discuss supporters concerns.

As for his actions at Barnsley, what was he meant to do? He'd just resigned his position and therefore had no authority to sit in the Directors box. He wants to watch the team HE resued along with the rest of the away support, whats the big deal, it wasn't an audience with...if people wanted to show their appreciation that's up to them...after all they had plenty to thank him for!!!!!!!
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: pib on December 02, 2013, 06:12:31 pm
As fans we never had a say on how the club should run but we seemed to have voice and and ear in JR and that has been silenced with his resignation . I doubt we can expect to
Have much of an input apart from how we want to pay for our season ticket . Those who in the past gave credit to JR for all the clubs success may find the new management a little deaf from now  on. IMO of course . Just incase there listening.

 I find your comments very wide of the mark. The best that we've had, in terms of a voice, has come through the IRWT project, and this has received nationwide acclaim for its wide ranging and, in some cases, groundbreaking ideas. It's Fan Engagement at its best.

But the people responsible for driving this and delivering this across all areas has been Gavin Baldwin and Shaun Lockwood, with great support from all Heads Of Departments.

I don't think John even knew we had this programme running.

How can JR not have known about it when he was present at several of the forums at the Keepmoat?
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: RedJ on December 02, 2013, 06:13:51 pm
As fans we never had a say on how the club should run but we seemed to have voice and and ear in JR and that has been silenced with his resignation . I doubt we can expect to
Have much of an input apart from how we want to pay for our season ticket . Those who in the past gave credit to JR for all the clubs success may find the new management a little deaf from now  on. IMO of course . Just incase there listening.

I have supported this club for many years and save the odd trip into the Polypipe Stand that's all you got from JR. Please name me one just one instance where JR actually listened and took action from a single or group of fans.
You don't have to think too long as there aren't many instances over many yearswhere that has actually happened.
Where has this myth come from ? Look I don't  and never have had any problems with him as a person over the years but the Barnsley ''stunt''really pissed me off ..........it was the day that John Ryan FORGOT that DRFC belongs to the folk of Doncaster as it has for over a century and didn't belong to HIM.
Why oh why  people fall for such stunts is beyond me ? They have for years and the gullibility goes on and on and on...................................RANT OVER

Remember that this club belongs to this town and not any individual. I thank JR for what all that he has done but am disappointed in his recent actions

My understanding is that during the early days of his time as chairman, he used to meet on a regular basis with Andy Liney and co to discuss supporters concerns.

As for his actions at Barnsley, what was he meant to do? He'd just resigned his position and therefore had no authority to sit in the Directors box. He wants to watch the team HE resued along with the rest of the away support, whats the big deal, it wasn't an audience with...if people wanted to show their appreciation that's up to them...after all they had plenty to thank him for!!!!!!!

Well nobody forced him to resign at that specific moment...
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Savvy on December 02, 2013, 06:16:22 pm
As fans we never had a say on how the club should run but we seemed to have voice and and ear in JR and that has been silenced with his resignation . I doubt we can expect to
Have much of an input apart from how we want to pay for our season ticket . Those who in the past gave credit to JR for all the clubs success may find the new management a little deaf from now  on. IMO of course . Just incase there listening.

I have supported this club for many years and save the odd trip into the Polypipe Stand that's all you got from JR. Please name me one just one instance where JR actually listened and took action from a single or group of fans.
You don't have to think too long as there aren't many instances over many yearswhere that has actually happened.
Where has this myth come from ? Look I don't  and never have had any problems with him as a person over the years but the Barnsley ''stunt''really pissed me off ..........it was the day that John Ryan FORGOT that DRFC belongs to the folk of Doncaster as it has for over a century and didn't belong to HIM.
Why oh why  people fall for such stunts is beyond me ? They have for years and the gullibility goes on and on and on...................................RANT OVER

Remember that this club belongs to this town and not any individual. I thank JR for what all that he has done but am disappointed in his recent actions

My understanding is that during the early days of his time as chairman, he used to meet on a regular basis with Andy Liney and co to discuss supporters concerns.

As for his actions at Barnsley, what was he meant to do? He'd just resigned his position and therefore had no authority to sit in the Directors box. He wants to watch the team HE resued along with the rest of the away support, whats the big deal, it wasn't an audience with...if people wanted to show their appreciation that's up to them...after all they had plenty to thank him for!!!!!!!

Well nobody forced him to resign at that specific moment...

And conversely, nobody told him he couldn't resign at that specific moment either!!!
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: selby on December 02, 2013, 06:19:59 pm
JR leaving was going to happen one day and he was always going to be missed by the club and the supporters when it happened.
 Myself I am sad it couldnot have been in happier circumstances and still hope that JR is still interested enough to come to the matches and support the team like the rest of us a big ask I know but I think he would be thought of in the highest esteem by the supporters if he did and prove what a big man he is.
  And thats the differance with the Rovers we are a club we have our faults but we pull together when things get tough and show our true metal.
   Thanks JR its been a great ride for those of us who have come all the way with you and all the best for your future whatever that may be but my heart is with the club for better or worse.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Filo on December 02, 2013, 06:25:48 pm
As fans we never had a say on how the club should run but we seemed to have voice and and ear in JR and that has been silenced with his resignation . I doubt we can expect to
Have much of an input apart from how we want to pay for our season ticket . Those who in the past gave credit to JR for all the clubs success may find the new management a little deaf from now  on. IMO of course . Just incase there listening.

I have supported this club for many years and save the odd trip into the Polypipe Stand that's all you got from JR. Please name me one just one instance where JR actually listened and took action from a single or group of fans.
You don't have to think too long as there aren't many instances over many yearswhere that has actually happened.
Where has this myth come from ? Look I don't  and never have had any problems with him as a person over the years but the Barnsley ''stunt''really pissed me off ..........it was the day that John Ryan FORGOT that DRFC belongs to the folk of Doncaster as it has for over a century and didn't belong to HIM.
Why oh why  people fall for such stunts is beyond me ? They have for years and the gullibility goes on and on and on...................................RANT OVER

Remember that this club belongs to this town and not any individual. I thank JR for what all that he has done but am disappointed in his recent actions

My understanding is that during the early days of his time as chairman, he used to meet on a regular basis with Andy Liney and co to discuss supporters concerns.

As for his actions at Barnsley, what was he meant to do? He'd just resigned his position and therefore had no authority to sit in the Directors box. He wants to watch the team HE resued along with the rest of the away support, whats the big deal, it wasn't an audience with...if people wanted to show their appreciation that's up to them...after all they had plenty to thank him for!!!!!!!


Where did he watch the game from during the first half?

Did he get ejected from the Directors box at HT?
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: albie on December 02, 2013, 06:28:59 pm
Please....can we all move on now?
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Savvy on December 02, 2013, 06:30:39 pm
Filo, I wasn't there so perhaps you could tell me?
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: silent majority on December 02, 2013, 06:53:43 pm
As fans we never had a say on how the club should run but we seemed to have voice and and ear in JR and that has been silenced with his resignation . I doubt we can expect to
Have much of an input apart from how we want to pay for our season ticket . Those who in the past gave credit to JR for all the clubs success may find the new management a little deaf from now  on. IMO of course . Just incase there listening.

 I find your comments very wide of the mark. The best that we've had, in terms of a voice, has come through the IRWT project, and this has received nationwide acclaim for its wide ranging and, in some cases, groundbreaking ideas. It's Fan Engagement at its best.

But the people responsible for driving this and delivering this across all areas has been Gavin Baldwin and Shaun Lockwood, with great support from all Heads Of Departments.

I don't think John even knew we had this programme running.

How can JR not have known about it when he was present at several of the forums at the Keepmoat?

John turned up for the 'meet the owners' events but I was talking about IRWT, and he never turned up for any of those meetings.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: pib on December 02, 2013, 07:31:21 pm
As fans we never had a say on how the club should run but we seemed to have voice and and ear in JR and that has been silenced with his resignation . I doubt we can expect to
Have much of an input apart from how we want to pay for our season ticket . Those who in the past gave credit to JR for all the clubs success may find the new management a little deaf from now  on. IMO of course . Just incase there listening.

 I find your comments very wide of the mark. The best that we've had, in terms of a voice, has come through the IRWT project, and this has received nationwide acclaim for its wide ranging and, in some cases, groundbreaking ideas. It's Fan Engagement at its best.

But the people responsible for driving this and delivering this across all areas has been Gavin Baldwin and Shaun Lockwood, with great support from all Heads Of Departments.

I don't think John even knew we had this programme running.

How can JR not have known about it when he was present at several of the forums at the Keepmoat?

John turned up for the 'meet the owners' events but I was talking about IRWT, and he never turned up for any of those meetings.

Yes, but from my memory, IRWT was discussed at the 'meet the owners' events. I was at one where Mark Bradley was talking about it, and JR was in attendance at that event. So JR must have been aware of it.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Rovers Return on December 02, 2013, 07:35:54 pm
As fans we never had a say on how the club should run but we seemed to have voice and and ear in JR and that has been silenced with his resignation . I doubt we can expect to
Have much of an input apart from how we want to pay for our season ticket . Those who in the past gave credit to JR for all the clubs success may find the new management a little deaf from now  on. IMO of course . Just incase there listening.

 I find your comments very wide of the mark. The best that we've had, in terms of a voice, has come through the IRWT project, and this has received nationwide acclaim for its wide ranging and, in some cases, groundbreaking ideas. It's Fan Engagement at its best.

But the people responsible for driving this and delivering this across all areas has been Gavin Baldwin and Shaun Lockwood, with great support from all Heads Of Departments.

I don't think John even knew we had this programme running.

How can JR not have known about it when he was present at several of the forums at the Keepmoat?

John turned up for the 'meet the owners' events but I was talking about IRWT, and he never turned up for any of those meetings.

Yes, but from my memory, IRWT was discussed at the 'meet the owners' events. I was at one where Mark Bradley was talking about it, and JR was in attendance at that event. So JR must have been aware of it.

aaaaahhh But was he paying attention? Or did he have a glazed look in his eyes?
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Wellred on December 02, 2013, 08:41:10 pm
So according to SM JR didn't know about IRWT?
But JR was at the meet the owners meeting where IRWT discussed?

Something isn't quite right there.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: silent majority on December 02, 2013, 09:00:59 pm
I said he wasn't at any of the IRWT meetings, being difficult again by any chance?
Title: Re: (No subject)
Post by: DonnyBazR0ver on December 02, 2013, 09:20:25 pm
Let's get some balance here. JR was aware of IRWT however he may not have been a driver of it, leaving it to GB and SL. He attended a small fan panel with Gavin before start of season. In the past I heard of John's stubborness on certain fan issues but by enlarge the IRWT appears to progressed well. Let's not nitpick about things like this chaps.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: hoolahoop on December 02, 2013, 09:23:03 pm
So according to SM JR didn't know about IRWT?
But JR was at the meet the owners meeting where IRWT discussed?

Something isn't quite right there.

Wellred JR wasn't at any of the meetings according to SM so unless you know for a fact he was then why can't you just accept that statement ?
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: GazLaz on December 02, 2013, 10:34:18 pm
SM said he thinks JR doesn't even know we have the scheme. Others are entitled to disagree.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: PDX_Rover on December 03, 2013, 01:46:07 am
JR watched the first half of the Barnsley game from the Directors' Box, before joining the unwashed masses for the second half to attempt his Beer Hall Putsch, which is what it was.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: hoolahoop on December 03, 2013, 05:11:01 am
Before we go any further , I want to make it quite clear that I have never been an anti-JR person . In fact I along with most Rovers supporters admired  the way he fought to drag this club from 3rd/4th level non_achievers over the last 50/60 years to a club that could compete at 2nd/3rd tier regularly. No-one can take that away from him and DW/TB in latter years. This could never have been achieved without the financing of the 'KM2' and I don't think that they were ever given or sought any credit from our supporters......it was all achieved by JR as many thought and still think.
There had to be a day when they would eventually seek to become more involved in the direction that the club moved in and that's what caused the rift. First there was    their obvious objection to the 'experiment' and latterly to the terms and conditions of the SC bid for ownership.
For the first time , JR sought to use the press and the fans to balance up his loss of control in the Boardroom to get his way. That could only lead to one eventual conclusion I.e his ultimate defeat. Rather than go down as the retiring magnificent Chairman he or rather his advisors elected to have him 'showboat' at Barnsley and that will unfortunately tarnish his image to many.

However overall he was a magnificent Chairman and supporter of his 'hometown' club who masterminded and cemented hopefully forever his club from being a 5th tier /nigh non-existent club to a 2nd/3rd tier club.
In terms of the way the money is distributed in modern football in this country that is a magnificent achievement for both him and DW/TB without whom it would never have been financially possible.

They will of course leave their own legacies in good time but never forget that it was JR who invited them ( and their money) to share his vision.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Savvy on December 03, 2013, 07:30:02 am
Before we go any further , I want to make it quite clear that I have never been an anti-JR person . In fact I along with most Rovers supporters admired  the way he fought to drag this club from 3rd/4th level non_achievers over the last 50/60 years to a club that could compete at 2nd/3rd tier regularly. No-one can take that away from him and DW/TB in latter years. This could never have been achieved without the financing of the 'KM2' and I don't think that they were ever given or sought any credit from our supporters......it was all achieved by JR as many thought and still think.
There had to be a day when they would eventually seek to become more involved in the direction that the club moved in and that's what caused the rift. First there was    their obvious objection to the 'experiment' and latterly to the terms and conditions of the SC bid for ownership.
For the first time , JR sought to use the press and the fans to balance up his loss of control in the Boardroom to get his way. That could only lead to one eventual conclusion I.e his ultimate defeat. Rather than go down as the retiring magnificent Chairman he or rather his advisors elected to have him 'showboat' at Barnsley and that will unfortunately tarnish his image to many.

However overall he was a magnificent Chairman and supporter of his 'hometown' club who masterminded and cemented hopefully forever his club from being a 5th tier /nigh non-existent club to a 2nd/3rd tier club.
In terms of the way the money is distributed in modern football in this country that is a magnificent achievement for both him and DW/TB without whom it would never have been financially possible.

They will of course leave their own legacies in good time but never forget that it was JR who invited them ( and their money) to share his vision.


Were they actually on the board when we played our first championship game at Derby?
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: RobTheRover on December 03, 2013, 07:44:10 am
SM said he thinks JR doesn't even know we have the scheme. Others are entitled to disagree.

Why is everything anyone says taken so literally?  Have we all lost the inability to process the difference between opinion,  humour, tongue in cheek comments and facts?
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: hoolahoop on December 03, 2013, 07:55:24 am
Before we go any further , I want to make it quite clear that I have never been an anti-JR person . In fact I along with most Rovers supporters admired  the way he fought to drag this club from 3rd/4th level non_achievers over the last 50/60 years to a club that could compete at 2nd/3rd tier regularly. No-one can take that away from him and DW/TB in latter years. This could never have been achieved without the financing of the 'KM2' and I don't think that they were ever given or sought any credit from our supporters......it was all achieved by JR as many thought and still think.
There had to be a day when they would eventually seek to become more involved in the direction that the club moved in and that's what caused the rift. First there was    their obvious objection to the 'experiment' and latterly to the terms and conditions of the SC bid for ownership.
For the first time , JR sought to use the press and the fans to balance up his loss of control in the Boardroom to get his way. That could only lead to one eventual conclusion I.e his ultimate defeat. Rather than go down as the retiring magnificent Chairman he or rather his advisors elected to have him 'showboat' at Barnsley and that will unfortunately tarnish his image to many.

However overall he was a magnificent Chairman and supporter of his 'hometown' club who masterminded and cemented hopefully forever his club from being a 5th tier /nigh non-existent club to a 2nd/3rd tier club.
In terms of the way the money is distributed in modern football in this country that is a magnificent achievement for both him and DW/TB without whom it would never have been financially possible.

They will of course leave their own legacies in good time but never forget that it was JR who invited them ( and their money) to share his vision.


Were they actually on the board when we played our first championship game at Derby?

I would need to check that savvy but we could all go on forever 'picking pieces ' out of each other' s posts. The point is I too admired the man for his early achievements particularly.
The point of my post is the 'sustainability' we have now achieved and for that we must all thank the 3 of them and all the other shareholders who chipped in to make it all possible.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Rovers Return on December 03, 2013, 08:15:18 am
As fans we never had a say on how the club should run but we seemed to have voice and and ear in JR and that has been silenced with his resignation . I doubt we can expect to
Have much of an input apart from how we want to pay for our season ticket . Those who in the past gave credit to JR for all the clubs success may find the new management a little deaf from now  on. IMO of course . Just incase there listening.

 I find your comments very wide of the mark. The best that we've had, in terms of a voice, has come through the IRWT project, and this has received nationwide acclaim for its wide ranging and, in some cases, groundbreaking ideas. It's Fan Engagement at its best.

But the people responsible for driving this and delivering this across all areas has been Gavin Baldwin and Shaun Lockwood, with great support from all Heads Of Departments.

I don't think John even knew we had this programme running.

How can JR not have known about it when he was present at several of the forums at the Keepmoat?

Jeez.....talk about taking things literally. My wife would often say I didn't even know where the kitchen was. She didn't mean it literally, she meant I conveniently side stepped it when it suited me.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: silent majority on December 03, 2013, 08:26:02 am


[/quote]

Were they actually on the board when we played our first championship game at Derby?
[/quote]

Of course they were. They invested in DRFC and elected to the board shortly after, in October 2006. Our play off year was 2007-2008.

Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: BillyStubbsTears on December 03, 2013, 08:38:09 am
Before we go any further , I want to make it quite clear that I have never been an anti-JR person . In fact I along with most Rovers supporters admired  the way he fought to drag this club from 3rd/4th level non_achievers over the last 50/60 years to a club that could compete at 2nd/3rd tier regularly. No-one can take that away from him and DW/TB in latter years. This could never have been achieved without the financing of the 'KM2' and I don't think that they were ever given or sought any credit from our supporters......it was all achieved by JR as many thought and still think.
There had to be a day when they would eventually seek to become more involved in the direction that the club moved in and that's what caused the rift. First there was    their obvious objection to the 'experiment' and latterly to the terms and conditions of the SC bid for ownership.
For the first time , JR sought to use the press and the fans to balance up his loss of control in the Boardroom to get his way. That could only lead to one eventual conclusion I.e his ultimate defeat. Rather than go down as the retiring magnificent Chairman he or rather his advisors elected to have him 'showboat' at Barnsley and that will unfortunately tarnish his image to many.

However overall he was a magnificent Chairman and supporter of his 'hometown' club who masterminded and cemented hopefully forever his club from being a 5th tier /nigh non-existent club to a 2nd/3rd tier club.
In terms of the way the money is distributed in modern football in this country that is a magnificent achievement for both him and DW/TB without whom it would never have been financially possible.

They will of course leave their own legacies in good time but never forget that it was JR who invited them ( and their money) to share his vision.


Were they actually on the board when we played our first championship game at Derby?
http://companycheck.co.uk/director/902174228

http://companycheck.co.uk/director/900564488

Yes they were. They joined the Board in Nov 2006. Just as we started pouring money into building O'Driscoll's side.

Draw your own conclusions.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Yargo on December 03, 2013, 09:39:37 am
Andy Liney pointed out on the old forum that JR couldnt attempt a challenge at getting to the Championship or staying there out of his own pocket.this fact has been forgotten by many
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: hoolahoop on December 03, 2013, 09:48:29 am
Thank God for that lads , I damn well thought they were but you have to check everything in your posts these days or face a firing squad ;)
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: hoolahoop on December 03, 2013, 09:52:44 am
Andy Liney pointed out on the old forum that JR couldnt attempt a challenge at getting to the Championship or staying there out of his own pocket.this fact has been forgotten by many

That's why the credit for our achievements needs to be spread through all the Shareholders/Owners and not just John Ryan.
Just because none of them wanted to be in the limelight .........does not imply that they weren't due any accolades too. That's my point.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Sprotyrover on December 03, 2013, 10:03:38 am
John Ryan biggest self publicist since Benito Mussolini!
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Wellred on December 03, 2013, 01:14:08 pm
I said he wasn't at any of the IRWT meetings, being difficult again by any chance?

I think that is very different from saying: "I don't think John even knew we had this programme running."

If that is being difficult then yes I am.

It probably explains a lot about your anti JR stance.

Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: wing commander on December 03, 2013, 01:38:14 pm
I think what they are trying to say is that although JR new about IRWT he didn't want to get actively involved in it personally and left it to others to implement

Everybody happy??
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: silent majority on December 03, 2013, 01:44:26 pm
Wellygogs,

I'm not ant-JR, that's just your opinion.


My first comment was an opinion, of which I'm entitled to, my second comment was a fact. My opinion was based on the facts as I know them, therefore it's not very different, as you claim.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Savvy on December 03, 2013, 06:11:28 pm
Before we go any further , I want to make it quite clear that I have never been an anti-JR person . In fact I along with most Rovers supporters admired  the way he fought to drag this club from 3rd/4th level non_achievers over the last 50/60 years to a club that could compete at 2nd/3rd tier regularly. No-one can take that away from him and DW/TB in latter years. This could never have been achieved without the financing of the 'KM2' and I don't think that they were ever given or sought any credit from our supporters......it was all achieved by JR as many thought and still think.
There had to be a day when they would eventually seek to become more involved in the direction that the club moved in and that's what caused the rift. First there was    their obvious objection to the 'experiment' and latterly to the terms and conditions of the SC bid for ownership.
For the first time , JR sought to use the press and the fans to balance up his loss of control in the Boardroom to get his way. That could only lead to one eventual conclusion I.e his ultimate defeat. Rather than go down as the retiring magnificent Chairman he or rather his advisors elected to have him 'showboat' at Barnsley and that will unfortunately tarnish his image to many.

However overall he was a magnificent Chairman and supporter of his 'hometown' club who masterminded and cemented hopefully forever his club from being a 5th tier /nigh non-existent club to a 2nd/3rd tier club.
In terms of the way the money is distributed in modern football in this country that is a magnificent achievement for both him and DW/TB without whom it would never have been financially possible.

They will of course leave their own legacies in good time but never forget that it was JR who invited them ( and their money) to share his vision.


Were they actually on the board when we played our first championship game at Derby?
http://companycheck.co.uk/director/902174228

http://companycheck.co.uk/director/900564488

Yes they were. They joined the Board in Nov 2006. Just as we started pouring money into building O'Driscoll's side.

Draw your own conclusions.


If they were, they weren't interested in providing O'Driscoll with any charitable donations were they? Anyway why are you picking holes in my post, have you lost the ability to differentiate between humour, fact and irony?
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: RedJ on December 03, 2013, 06:32:37 pm
There's no irony in your post...
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: PDX_Rover on December 03, 2013, 06:47:47 pm
There's a photo used widely recently of the three amigos on the pitch at OBV so yeah, they were on board before the move to the Moat and promotion.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Savvy on December 03, 2013, 07:01:54 pm
Before we go any further , I want to make it quite clear that I have never been an anti-JR person . In fact I along with most Rovers supporters admired  the way he fought to drag this club from 3rd/4th level non_achievers over the last 50/60 years to a club that could compete at 2nd/3rd tier regularly. No-one can take that away from him and DW/TB in latter years. This could never have been achieved without the financing of the 'KM2' and I don't think that they were ever given or sought any credit from our supporters......it was all achieved by JR as many thought and still think.
There had to be a day when they would eventually seek to become more involved in the direction that the club moved in and that's what caused the rift. First there was    their obvious objection to the 'experiment' and latterly to the terms and conditions of the SC bid for ownership.
For the first time , JR sought to use the press and the fans to balance up his loss of control in the Boardroom to get his way. That could only lead to one eventual conclusion I.e his ultimate defeat. Rather than go down as the retiring magnificent Chairman he or rather his advisors elected to have him 'showboat' at Barnsley and that will unfortunately tarnish his image to many.

However overall he was a magnificent Chairman and supporter of his 'hometown' club who masterminded and cemented hopefully forever his club from being a 5th tier /nigh non-existent club to a 2nd/3rd tier club.
In terms of the way the money is distributed in modern football in this country that is a magnificent achievement for both him and DW/TB without whom it would never have been financially possible.

They will of course leave their own legacies in good time but never forget that it was JR who invited them ( and their money) to share his vision.


Were they actually on the board when we played our first championship game at Derby?

I would need to check that savvy but we could all go on forever 'picking pieces ' out of each other' s posts. The point is I too admired the man for his early achievements particularly.
The point of my post is the 'sustainability' we have now achieved and for that we must all thank the 3 of them and all the other shareholders who chipped in to make it all possible.

Hoola, What do you mean "sustainability" and I'll thank all 3 when I think they have done something to thank them for! Keeping us in this division would be a great start!!!
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: hoolahoop on December 03, 2013, 07:33:25 pm
Before we go any further , I want to make it quite clear that I have never been an anti-JR person . In fact I along with most Rovers supporters admired  the way he fought to drag this club from 3rd/4th level non_achievers over the last 50/60 years to a club that could compete at 2nd/3rd tier regularly. No-one can take that away from him and DW/TB in latter years. This could never have been achieved without the financing of the 'KM2' and I don't think that they were ever given or sought any credit from our supporters......it was all achieved by JR as many thought and still think.
There had to be a day when they would eventually seek to become more involved in the direction that the club moved in and that's what caused the rift. First there was    their obvious objection to the 'experiment' and latterly to the terms and conditions of the SC bid for ownership.
For the first time , JR sought to use the press and the fans to balance up his loss of control in the Boardroom to get his way. That could only lead to one eventual conclusion I.e his ultimate defeat. Rather than go down as the retiring magnificent Chairman he or rather his advisors elected to have him 'showboat' at Barnsley and that will unfortunately tarnish his image to many.

However overall he was a magnificent Chairman and supporter of his 'hometown' club who masterminded and cemented hopefully forever his club from being a 5th tier /nigh non-existent club to a 2nd/3rd tier club.
In terms of the way the money is distributed in modern football in this country that is a magnificent achievement for both him and DW/TB without whom it would never have been financially possible.

They will of course leave their own legacies in good time but never forget that it was JR who invited them ( and their money) to share his vision.


Were they actually on the board when we played our first championship game at Derby?

I would need to check that savvy but we could all go on forever 'picking pieces ' out of each other' s posts. The point is I too admired the man for his early achievements particularly.
The point of my post is the 'sustainability' we have now achieved and for that we must all thank the 3 of them and all the other shareholders who chipped in to make it all possible.

Hoola, What do you mean "sustainability" and I'll thank all 3 when I think they have done something to thank them for! Keeping us in this division would be a great start!!!

Jeez you don't want much out of me do you savvy. I haven't got the full Profit & Loss Accounts for Patienceform and really we both know that ''sustainability'' should be the aim of any club. We are nowhere near it yet but are trying. Btw where have you been all this time just struck me that you haven't posted for ages ! Have you been away/ill ?
All three and other Directors need thanking for what they've achieved so far. Their achievements have been immense and I'm surprised that you can't thank all 3 of them and presumably that statement means that you have chosen to thank just one of them.
That being the case I see little reason to debate further their contributions with you !
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Savvy on December 03, 2013, 08:53:30 pm
Hoola, in your previous post, you refer to "the sustainability we have achieved" and now you say sustainability should be an aim and that we are nowhere near achieving it, so I feel sure you can understand my point?

Your right, I haven't posted for sometime, but I'm sure you'll remember sometime ago when I was questioning why they had joined the board and their motives in the first place. I have witnessed nothing to change my mind thus far from Terry Tactile and the Dinosaur, but as John Ryan stated in his interview its over to them now to run the ship and certainly up to January they have a window of opportunity to dis-credit him. Having alluded to the fact that they see our future in the lower reaches, they could make some funds available that would indicate their willingness to keep the club in this division! So I'm sure you can see why in my opinion the jury is still out? I'll be the first to congratulate them if they manage to keep us in the division and eat a large slice of humble pie, but let's just see how this pans out eh?
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: BillyStubbsTears on December 03, 2013, 09:01:09 pm
Savvy.

You are convinced that Bramall joined the Board because he saw a fantastic chance to line his own pockets. It's clear that nothing will change your opinion. Your choice.

Me, I see a phenomenally successful late 60s bloke who already HAS lined his own pockets and who is on record as saying that he wants to give something back to the town. I see him pouring money into the club for 6 years with no obvious mechanism for ever getting that back. I see him being hugely out of pocket on that until the present day, when he is into his 70s. I see him turning down a chance (according to Ryan) to get his money back and walk away. I see no obvious strategy from him to make a killing on the money that he has put in.

If you know what that strategy is, you could save us a lot of circular arguments by telling us.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: hoolahoop on December 03, 2013, 09:11:36 pm
Hoola, in your previous post, you refer to "the sustainability we have achieved" and now you say sustainability should be an aim and that we are nowhere near achieving it, so I feel sure you can understand my point?

Your right, I haven't posted for sometime, but I'm sure you'll remember sometime ago when I was questioning why they had joined the board and their motives in the first place. I have witnessed nothing to change my mind thus far from Terry Tactile and the Dinosaur, but as John Ryan stated in his interview its over to them now to run the ship and certainly up to January they have a window of opportunity to dis-credit him. Having alluded to the fact that they see our future in the lower reaches, they could make some funds available that would indicate their willingness to keep the club in this division! So I'm sure you can see why in my opinion the jury is still out? I'll be the first to congratulate them if they manage to keep us in the division and eat a large slice of humble pie, but let's just see how this pans out eh?


You lost any further chance of a sensible adult debate with your childish ''Terry Tactile and the Dinosaur'' comment.  :blink:
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Savvy on December 03, 2013, 09:13:37 pm
Billy, don't be daft man, he'll get his money back because what he's put in will be in the form of loans, some with interest, and probably some without!!!! Not a particularly difficult mechanism to work out eh?
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Savvy on December 03, 2013, 09:15:18 pm
Hoola, in your previous post, you refer to "the sustainability we have achieved" and now you say sustainability should be an aim and that we are nowhere near achieving it, so I feel sure you can understand my point?

Your right, I haven't posted for sometime, but I'm sure you'll remember sometime ago when I was questioning why they had joined the board and their motives in the first place. I have witnessed nothing to change my mind thus far from Terry Tactile and the Dinosaur, but as John Ryan stated in his interview its over to them now to run the ship and certainly up to January they have a window of opportunity to dis-credit him. Having alluded to the fact that they see our future in the lower reaches, they could make some funds available that would indicate their willingness to keep the club in this division! So I'm sure you can see why in my opinion the jury is still out? I'll be the first to congratulate them if they manage to keep us in the division and eat a large slice of humble pie, but let's just see how this pans out eh?


You lost any further chance of a sensible adult debate with your childish ''Terry Tactile and the Dinosaur'' comment.  :blink:

Thanks for those few kind words!!
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: River Don on December 03, 2013, 09:21:06 pm
Savvy

There are many less risky ways he could put his money to work than investing it in a football club. He has demonstrated that earning more money isn't his prime concern since he's been giving it away lately.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: DearneValleyRover on December 03, 2013, 10:00:55 pm
Hoola, in your previous post, you refer to "the sustainability we have achieved" and now you say sustainability should be an aim and that we are nowhere near achieving it, so I feel sure you can understand my point?

Your right, I haven't posted for sometime, but I'm sure you'll remember sometime ago when I was questioning why they had joined the board and their motives in the first place. I have witnessed nothing to change my mind thus far from Terry Tactile and the Dinosaur, but as John Ryan stated in his interview its over to them now to run the ship and certainly up to January they have a window of opportunity to dis-credit him. Having alluded to the fact that they see our future in the lower reaches, they could make some funds available that would indicate their willingness to keep the club in this division! So I'm sure you can see why in my opinion the jury is still out? I'll be the first to congratulate them if they manage to keep us in the division and eat a large slice of humble pie, but let's just see how this pans out eh?


You lost any further chance of a sensible adult debate with your childish ''Terry Tactile and the Dinosaur'' comment.  :blink:

Thanks for those few kind words!!
Billy, don't be daft man, he'll get his money back because what he's put in will be in the form of loans, some with interest, and probably some without!!!! Not a particularly difficult mechanism to work out eh?


No different to John Ryan and not all are loans as demonstrated by the accounts, I really don't see how this back and forth bitching is helping the Club, Support, sanity and morale of those who post on here (not directed at you savvy) lets see how we progress before making assumptions as to where we go next shall we.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: BillyStubbsTears on December 03, 2013, 10:02:42 pm
Savvy

You've lost me spadge. Was that another humorous comment?
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: PDX_Rover on December 03, 2013, 10:06:16 pm
8 points from 15 since the three became two. Not bad going.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: DonnyBazR0ver on December 03, 2013, 10:16:45 pm
Quote
Having alluded to the fact that they see our future in the lower reaches

Got to pick you up on that one. It was JR who made the insinuation. Now why would he do that?

Anyway. Pigged off that this thread it's well passed its sell by date.

As JR said "Let someone else have a go".
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Savvy on December 03, 2013, 10:32:01 pm
Hoola, in your previous post, you refer to "the sustainability we have achieved" and now you say sustainability should be an aim and that we are nowhere near achieving it, so I feel sure you can understand my point?

Your right, I haven't posted for sometime, but I'm sure you'll remember sometime ago when I was questioning why they had joined the board and their motives in the first place. I have witnessed nothing to change my mind thus far from Terry Tactile and the Dinosaur, but as John Ryan stated in his interview its over to them now to run the ship and certainly up to January they have a window of opportunity to dis-credit him. Having alluded to the fact that they see our future in the lower reaches, they could make some funds available that would indicate their willingness to keep the club in this division! So I'm sure you can see why in my opinion the jury is still out? I'll be the first to congratulate them if they manage to keep us in the division and eat a large slice of humble pie, but let's just see how this pans out eh?


You lost any further chance of a sensible adult debate with your childish ''Terry Tactile and the Dinosaur'' comment.  :blink:

Thanks for those few kind words!!
Billy, don't be daft man, he'll get his money back because what he's put in will be in the form of loans, some with interest, and probably some without!!!! Not a particularly difficult mechanism to work out eh?


No different to John Ryan and not all are loans as demonstrated by the accounts, I really don't see how this back and forth bitching is helping the Club, Support, sanity and morale of those who post on here (not directed at you savvy) lets see how we progress before making assumptions as to where we go next shall we.

I totally agree with the first part of that! I feel sure that John Ryan will have got back a return on the money that he put into the club for sure.  And nobody's suggesting that he shouldn't do either. Nor am I suggesting that the current two shouldn't get all that they put into the club either.  But lets not forget that 15 or so years ago, John Ryan took a punt, a risk, with no guarantees, he managed to turn the club around put it back on its feet and supported the club with funds at a time when no fecker else was interested in doing so.  Over the 15 years in charge, he did everything that he said he would do at those rallies both at the Earl and the Dome which kinda helps a little on the credibility front wouldn't you agree?  Unless I've missed a trick, all we have heard from the current two is talk of a bright and prosperous future. Someone recently spoke on here of people who would quite happily follow John Ryan over the cliff to oblivion, I would counter that by saying that there are also some people on here who are prepared to believe that businessmen give money away, I'm don't subscribe to this point of view and to me, talk is cheap, and empty rhetoric remains just that until its backed up by tangible actions!!! Like I've said a couple of times now, for me the jury is out, and come the end of the January transfer window, I think I'll have a decent view of the current management's intentions!!
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Savvy on December 03, 2013, 10:34:55 pm
Quote
Having alluded to the fact that they see our future in the lower reaches

Got to pick you up on that one. It was JR who made the insinuation. Now why would he do that?

Anyway. Pigged off that this thread it's well passed its sell by date.

As JR said "Let someone else have a go".

Why would you be pigged off? Just don't read/reply if it upsets you? I thought it was a decent debate but hey ho!!!
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: DonnyBazR0ver on December 03, 2013, 10:38:39 pm
Quote
But lets not forget that 15 or so years ago, John Ryan took a punt, a risk, with no guarantees, he managed to turn the club around put it back on its feet and supported the club with funds at a time when no fecker else was interested in doing so.  Over the 15 years in charge, he did everything that he said he would

We all agree with that. Yes, actions will be needed to give the club every chance of staying up. So let's give 'em that chance. 
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Sprotyrover on December 03, 2013, 10:44:54 pm
But lets not forget that 15 or so years ago, John Ryan took a punt, a risk, with no guarantees, he managed to turn the club around put it back on its feet and supported the club with funds at a time when no fecker else was interested in doing so.  Over the 15 years in charge, he did everything that he said he would


Yes Savvy he did and he was willing to jump into the void blindly yet again!
Would you advocate we accepted his actions blindly or maybe ask a few pertinent questions first,questions his would be backers won't answer.!
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: BillyStubbsTears on December 03, 2013, 10:47:20 pm
Savvy

You remember all this Tier 2 football we've seen over the past 6 years? When you say that all we've heard from TB is platitudes about plans, you DO realise that it was his and DW's money that made it possible don't you?

And you STILL haven't explained the me hanism by which he gets his "investment" back. It's easy to say that he has given interest bearing loans. I could stick a £20 pound note in an envelope with a note saying "I expect 10% interest on this" then chuck it on the fire. I would get neither my capital nor any interest back.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Savvy on December 03, 2013, 10:57:49 pm
Billy are you saying that without their money we wouldn't have got into the championship in the first place because I don't believe that for a second.

I haven't responded to the second part of your post because to me it makes no sense.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: BobG on December 03, 2013, 11:01:30 pm
I believe it Savvy. They were on the Board at the time. They matched JR's contributions and JR himself had said that he couldn't do it on his own. The conclusion is inescapable.

BobG
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: River Don on December 03, 2013, 11:03:09 pm
Without their money promotion would have been a lot more difficult and it would have been a lot more difficult to stay up too.

JR knew it, that's why he brought them in and was prepared to lose overall control of the club to do it.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: BillyStubbsTears on December 03, 2013, 11:05:17 pm
Savvy

You can believe what you want. The fact is that the arrival of TB and DW coincided exactly with the step change of investment into the squad that laid the foundations for our promotion.

Now, we MAY have got promoted without them. But given the fact that we couldn't manage a top 2 position even WITH the biggest transfer and wage bill in the club's history, that's a triumph of hope over experience.

The second part of my post was simple enough, I thought. You say that TB will get his money back plus interest. I've been asking you for weeks now to explain what the source of the funds that will pay him this money is likely to be. And I've still heard nowt by way of a reply.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Savvy on December 04, 2013, 12:00:14 am
Bill, I think we'll have to agree to disagree on your first point but John Ryan's stated aim before they came onto the board was Championship football, so I've no doubt in my mind that we would have made it there without these two in any event! If we are talking time lines, interesting to see how their interest soon waned after the Mayor announced that the stadium was to be leased to the club rather than sold as he had previously intimated.

As far as the budget was concerned at the time, your attempt at manipulating statistics doesn't cut it!!! The biggest transfer and wage bill in the clubs history, well considering it was the first time we'd been in the second tier of English football for 50 years... not really unexpected was it? Probably a better statistic would have been how it compared with other teams in the same league, but that wouldn't support your arguement would it?

Insofar as your second point goes, to me its simple, if he has loaned the club money, the club then becomes indebted to him and I would have thought that unless the club went bankrupt, he would have arranged a "mechanism" by which the club would repay the money! or is that too simplistic an answer, is there something I'm missing here?
 
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: BillyStubbsTears on December 04, 2013, 12:22:58 am
Savvy

I wasn't talking about the wage bill in the Championship. I was talking about the one we had in 07/08.

As far as Bramall getting his money back, there are only three mechanisms. One is a sell out. He's just turned that down. One is for the club to make a profit and for him to skim that off. Well, if that's his plan, he's playing a long game for a 70 year old. The third is to make money from ancillary infrastructure developments. Maybe he is intending to do that, but again it's a long term game for an old man. An old man who had a very successful and profitable company of his own to play with if his aim in life was to continue making lots of money.

As you say, we'll have to agree to differ.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: River Don on December 04, 2013, 08:03:33 am
John Ryan's stated aim before they came onto the board was Championship football, so I've no doubt in my mind that we would have made it there without these two in any event!
 

What makes you so sure of that Savvy? JR wanted Championship football but he was struggling to finance it. Would he have just decided to dig a lot deeper to make it happen?
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Wild Rover on December 04, 2013, 08:10:55 am
Savvy

One is a sell out. He's just turned that down.


I understand it was a close call.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Rovers Return on December 04, 2013, 09:19:27 am
Savvy

One is a sell out. He's just turned that down.


I understand it was a close call.


Not even in the same galaxy.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Wild Rover on December 04, 2013, 09:34:35 am
Lets wait and see shall we.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Rovers Return on December 04, 2013, 11:25:38 am
Lets wait and see shall we.

Long wait......and I don't have forever
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: bedale rover on December 04, 2013, 11:40:43 am
John Ryan's stated aim before they came onto the board was Championship football, so I've no doubt in my mind that we would have made it there without these two in any event!
 

What makes you so sure of that Savvy? JR wanted Championship football but he was struggling to finance it. Would he have just decided to dig a lot deeper to make it happen?


So if he was sure that we would have been promoted why did he seek out DW&TB?
Answer because he knew he didn't have deep enough pockets to do it

Logically therefore it ONLY happened because of the collective efforts of the KM3
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Wellred on December 04, 2013, 12:09:26 pm
Lets wait and see shall we.

Long wait......and I don't have forever

You really are very sure of yourself aren't you?

Why not just sit back enjoy what is happening on the field and let the financial side of things take care of themselves.
If something happens so be it.
If not then you will be happy but do you/we really need to keep going round and round in circles about something NONE of us know for certain.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Rovers Return on December 04, 2013, 03:43:47 pm
Lets wait and see shall we.

Long wait......and I don't have forever

You really are very sure of yourself aren't you?

Why not just sit back enjoy what is happening on the field and let the financial side of things take care of themselves.
If something happens so be it.
If not then you will be happy but do you/we really need to keep going round and round in circles about something NONE of us know for certain.

No just running out of time.
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: Wellred on December 04, 2013, 03:53:31 pm
 
Lets wait and see shall we.

Long wait......and I don't have forever

You really are very sure of yourself aren't you?

Why not just sit back enjoy what is happening on the field and let the financial side of things take care of themselves.
If something happens so be it.
If not then you will be happy but do you/we really need to keep going round and round in circles about something NONE of us know for certain.

No just running out of time.

 :headbang: :headbang:
Title: Re: terry bramall
Post by: wing commander on December 04, 2013, 04:20:40 pm
 :that: