0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Why should they hang their heads in shame? What a daft thing to say
It's very easy to spend someone else's money isn't it?
Quote from: big fat yorkshire pudding on August 22, 2013, 02:54:57 pmIt's very easy to spend someone else's money isn't it?Get off your high horse.That is what football supporters of EVERY club expect isn't it?
Quote from: Wellred on August 22, 2013, 03:02:29 pmQuote from: big fat yorkshire pudding on August 22, 2013, 02:54:57 pmIt's very easy to spend someone else's money isn't it?Get off your high horse.That is what football supporters of EVERY club expect isn't it?No
It's been mooted more than once that any extra investment has to be given 3 ways, what if a portion of that is financially unable to commit more funds.
Quote from: dickos1 on August 22, 2013, 02:39:50 pmWhy should they hang their heads in shame? What a daft thing to say BEcause they seem to be dragging Their feet from what we all can workout via ths scraps Of info floating about.an idiot can see that staying in This division is vital for DRFC ,and to turn a blind eye to what rovers need to Help do that is silly.i Get the impression that powers that be cant or wont see Throu the woods for the trees
Quote from: DearneValleyRover on August 22, 2013, 03:02:59 pmQuote from: Wellred on August 22, 2013, 03:02:29 pmQuote from: big fat yorkshire pudding on August 22, 2013, 02:54:57 pmIt's very easy to spend someone else's money isn't it?Get off your high horse.That is what football supporters of EVERY club expect isn't it?NoQuote from: DearneValleyRover on August 22, 2013, 03:01:43 pmIt's been mooted more than once that any extra investment has to be given 3 ways, what if a portion of that is financially unable to commit more funds.ok with the exception of the members of the status quo club at Doncaster Rovers vsc
Quote from: DearneValleyRover on August 22, 2013, 03:01:43 pmIt's been mooted more than once that any extra investment has to be given 3 ways, what if a portion of that is financially unable to commit more funds.So if that is the case, like the other things the VSC forum posters/ fans want is reassurances that the owners can maintain the squad we have at least. It's not a "little bit of Bully" here's what you "did" have.
Quote from: dickos1 on August 22, 2013, 02:39:50 pmWhy should they hang their heads in shame? What a daft thing to say an idiot can see that staying in This division is vital for DRFC ,and to turn a blind eye to what rovers need to Help do that is silly.
Ok, lets not spend anyones money and watch us throw away what we are building.If we end up losing players as a result of this takeover/investment farce then people have a right to moan.
Quote from: oslorovers on August 22, 2013, 02:47:52 pmQuote from: dickos1 on August 22, 2013, 02:39:50 pmWhy should they hang their heads in shame? What a daft thing to say an idiot can see that staying in This division is vital for DRFC ,and to turn a blind eye to what rovers need to Help do that is silly. It's just a pity the general population of Donny can't see it because the support the club receives is pitiful when measured against what the club has achieved over the last 10 years and ultimately it's why we are where we are. Not once have we ever sold out at the Keepmoat... It's the towns folk that should hang their heads in shame.
Quote from: MrFrost on August 22, 2013, 03:19:32 pmOk, lets not spend anyones money and watch us throw away what we are building.If we end up losing players as a result of this takeover/investment farce then people have a right to moan.I agree if it is as a result of the above, If the investment had not reared it's head though we would have the budget that PD is now working with so the question really is can our shareholders afford to up the budget but has it not been stated how unfair it is to expect them to keep dipping into their pockets to fund the deficit? All these contradictions.
Quote from: DearneValleyRover on August 22, 2013, 03:23:38 pmQuote from: MrFrost on August 22, 2013, 03:19:32 pmOk, lets not spend anyones money and watch us throw away what we are building.If we end up losing players as a result of this takeover/investment farce then people have a right to moan.I agree if it is as a result of the above, If the investment had not reared it's head though we would have the budget that PD is now working with so the question really is can our shareholders afford to up the budget but has it not been stated how unfair it is to expect them to keep dipping into their pockets to fund the deficit? All these contradictions.OK so let us say that no talks of any takeover/investment ever took place.Would the shareholders put money up to sign Reece Wabara or would we be saying NO to him signing for us as we cannot afford him?Because it seems as though that is the situation.
OK so let us say that no talks of any takeover/investment ever took place.Would the shareholders put money up to sign Reece Wabara or would we be saying NO to him signing for us as we cannot afford him?Because it seems as though that is the situation.
Quote from: Wellred on August 22, 2013, 03:34:43 pmOK so let us say that no talks of any takeover/investment ever took place.Would the shareholders put money up to sign Reece Wabara or would we be saying NO to him signing for us as we cannot afford him?Because it seems as though that is the situation.Call me old fashioned, but not signing a player because we can't afford to sign him seems like a wholly sensible approach.
He's working within the budget that was set in the summer before this investment. Now people have heard of this takeover they're saying we should be spending more.Dickov was happy with the budget set, so let him get on with it.Ridiculous to suggest that just because a takeover was on the cards that now the directors should spend more of their own money.They spend a damn site more of their own money than most owners do as it is