Charlie Seaman recalled?

[Warwickshire Red]

Looks like Charlie may have been recalled

https://twitter.com/charlieseaman99/status/1362721373441961990?s=21

[donnievic]

Their season has been null and voided

[Metalmicky]

Hopefully get some work into the lad and he'll be ready for take-off at the start of next season.  Only down side is that he is back on our payroll..

[Warwickshire Red]

Their season has been null and voided

I didn’t realise that.  That explains it then lol

[scawsby steve]

Hopefully get some work into the lad and he'll be ready for take-off at the start of next season.  Only down side is that he is back on our payroll..

I doubt he's ever been off it, MM. I don't think Maidstone will have contributed much towards his wages, if any at all.

The move was to get him game time.

[Metalmicky]

Hopefully get some work into the lad and he'll be ready for take-off at the start of next season.  Only down side is that he is back on our payroll..

I doubt he's ever been off it, MM. I don't think Maidstone will have contributed much towards his wages, if any at all.

The move was to get him game time.

Based on....?

[scawsby steve]

Hopefully get some work into the lad and he'll be ready for take-off at the start of next season.  Only down side is that he is back on our payroll..

I doubt he's ever been off it, MM. I don't think Maidstone will have contributed much towards his wages, if any at all.

The move was to get him game time.

Based on....?

Based on simple maths. How much do you think that Maidstone, a 6th tier club, probably part-time, can afford to pay their players?

Or to take it further, how much do you think the Rovers are contributing towards the massive wages of Sims, Smith, Richards, Balcombe, and even Simoes?

If clubs could afford to pay the wages of quality players, they wouldn't have them on loan, they'd sign them permanently. This is why loans are a lifeline to clubs like us, and to non-league clubs.

[Draytonian III]

There’s not set % of loan wages paid by clubs either way, they are sorted out player by player

[welloffside]

It can appear rather strange, but a lower tier club on ocasions, will not pay any contribuitions to the wages.

Let us imagine DRFC borrow a reserve player from say Man U.  Manchester want him to have first team game time, and will continue to pay his wages. The deal is, that DRFC will be required to pay a slice if they don't play him. Therefore preventing lower tier clubs from signing a player 'just in case'.  In effect you've signed him, play him.

[Metalmicky]

Hopefully get some work into the lad and he'll be ready for take-off at the start of next season.  Only down side is that he is back on our payroll..

I doubt he's ever been off it, MM. I don't think Maidstone will have contributed much towards his wages, if any at all.

The move was to get him game time.

Based on....?

Based on simple maths. How much do you think that Maidstone, a 6th tier club, probably part-time, can afford to pay their players?

Or to take it further, how much do you think the Rovers are contributing towards the massive wages of Sims, Smith, Richards, Balcombe, and even Simoes?

If clubs could afford to pay the wages of quality players, they wouldn't have them on loan, they'd sign them permanently. This is why loans are a lifeline to clubs like us, and to non-league clubs.

If it's 'simple maths' as you say, why sign a player, on a one year deal in October, pay him a wage to play for another team all season... without having an option for further year/s.  I know we have a recall option, but surely we aren't going to pay his full wages for a year, without any prospect of him appearing in the hoops...

[Draytonian III]

Each loan is worked out individually there is no sliding scale, Man Utd > Rovers . Rovers > Maidstone, it doesn’t matter

[Metalmicky]

Each loan is worked out individually there is no sliding scale, Man Utd > Rovers . Rovers > Maidstone, it doesn’t matter

I get that - just waiting on the 'simple maths' reasoning that we sign a player on a one year contract and then let him pay for another club whilst paying his wages.....

[scawsby steve]

Each loan is worked out individually there is no sliding scale, Man Utd > Rovers . Rovers > Maidstone, it doesn’t matter

I get that - just waiting on the 'simple maths' reasoning that we sign a player on a one year contract and then let him pay for another club whilst paying his wages.....

Can't help you with that mate, because I didn't make the decision. You'll have to ask Martin.

[Metalmicky]

Each loan is worked out individually there is no sliding scale, Man Utd > Rovers . Rovers > Maidstone, it doesn’t matter

I get that - just waiting on the 'simple maths' reasoning that we sign a player on a one year contract and then let him pay for another club whilst paying his wages.....

Can't help you with that mate, because I didn't make the decision. You'll have to ask Martin.

It was your declaration of 'simple maths' chap......expand away..

[albie]

I thought Rovers did have an option on a further year.
From memory, that was the situation when he signed in October.

[RugbyRover]

I was never convinced there was such a thing as simple maths, as I scraped a very poor o -level all those years ago.

[Dagenham Rover]

Free Press says they are both back training Monday at Cantley Park depending on negative covid tests

[scawsby steve]

Each loan is worked out individually there is no sliding scale, Man Utd > Rovers . Rovers > Maidstone, it doesn’t matter

I get that - just waiting on the 'simple maths' reasoning that we sign a player on a one year contract and then let him pay for another club whilst paying his wages.....

Can't help you with that mate, because I didn't make the decision. You'll have to ask Martin.

It was your declaration of 'simple maths' chap......expand away..

F*cking hell, you're making this hard work. OK, I'll make it as easy as I can. Maidstone, 6th tier, part-time club, limited resources; Donny Rovers, 3rd tier promotion chasing club, heavily backed by rich owner. Who's the most likely to be paying the bulk of Seaman's wages, or even the whole lot?

[Metalmicky]

Each loan is worked out individually there is no sliding scale, Man Utd > Rovers . Rovers > Maidstone, it doesn’t matter

I get that - just waiting on the 'simple maths' reasoning that we sign a player on a one year contract and then let him pay for another club whilst paying his wages.....

Can't help you with that mate, because I didn't make the decision. You'll have to ask Martin.

It was your declaration of 'simple maths' chap......expand away..

F*cking hell, you're making this hard work. OK, I'll make it as easy as I can. Maidstone, 6th tier, part-time club, limited resources; Donny Rovers, 3rd tier promotion chasing club, heavily backed by rich owner. Who's the most likely to be paying the bulk of Seaman's wages, or even the whole lot?

OK.......... so you don't actually know - that's fine, but not so 'simple' eh