0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
And as I said before I saw the same thing with you and Glyn. When it come to who would tell the truth between you and Glyn I think you lose.I just thought I would prove my theory correct is all, busted.
The link to where it is on the forum hound
Syd’s out stood on a rock swinging a stick tied to a length of string. He’s phoning a friend.
Has Tory Chief Whip also been reported to the same committee as Starmer for the same reason?
Not wishing to fan the flames, and in all probability I got it wrong somewhere, but your photo of your post Hound says it reply 98 on the thread. I've just.looked back to see why Syd can't see it and this is post 98 on the same thread but 2 months earlier?
Quote from: ravenrover on February 25, 2024, 01:07:55 pmNot wishing to fan the flames, and in all probability I got it wrong somewhere, but your photo of your post Hound says it reply 98 on the thread. I've just.looked back to see why Syd can't see it and this is post 98 on the same thread but 2 months earlier?Raven, mate, the one with post 98 was because the chat with Syd morphed into two threads this morning.I did a screen shot of the post I had made on December 5th and tried to copy it onto the Labour U Turn thread but for some reason it ended up on the Electric Cars and Environment thread. If you look at the picture the next post says it is the Electric cars thread.I did put all the info on the Labour U Turns thread which was the main thread on which this all started.He has accused me several times of deleting that post and I just wanted to make sure he understood that I hadn’t done.Replies 474,479, 482 and 487 gave him all the information he had asked for but he couldn’t grasp what he was being told.
Raven,Well, if Labour felt that the Tories had threatened the Speaker they could refer them to the Standards Committee, but as far as I know they have not.That does suggest they do not agree with your comparison.The "threat" under consideration is the allegation that Starmer (or the Labour Chief Whip) suggested to Hoyle that he would lose his job if he did not disregard protocol and call the Labour amendment before the main SNP motion.There is an additional allegation that Starmer consulted with Israeli President Herzog, before approaching Hoyle to set aside the agreed procedure in favour of Labour.As the SNP have now said that they will re-introduce their motion to the HoC, as the vote was not taken on the original ceasefire proposal, Keith is no further forward from his skullduggery...except that an irrelevant culture war battle on Islamic influence is now in full swing!
Quote from: drfchound on February 25, 2024, 01:43:35 pm Quote from: ravenrover on February 25, 2024, 01:07:55 pmNot wishing to fan the flames, and in all probability I got it wrong somewhere, but your photo of your post Hound says it reply 98 on the thread. I've just.looked back to see why Syd can't see it and this is post 98 on the same thread but 2 months earlier?Raven, mate, the one with post 98 was because the chat with Syd morphed into two threads this morning.I did a screen shot of the post I had made on December 5th and tried to copy it onto the Labour U Turn thread but for some reason it ended up on the Electric Cars and Environment thread. If you look at the picture the next post says it is the Electric cars thread.I did put all the info on the Labour U Turns thread which was the main thread on which this all started.He has accused me several times of deleting that post and I just wanted to make sure he understood that I hadn’t done.Replies 474,479, 482 and 487 gave him all the information he had asked for but he couldn’t grasp what he was being told.I did say I might have it wrong :-]]
Looks like Keith has pulled the proposed New Deal on Workers Rights.Here is the FT summary:https://www.ft.com/content/fe1608d1-3a61-43a0-9c17-2868c40821c2Sharon Graham from Unite reckons it is a goner!https://nitter.poast.org/UniteSharon/status/1788231614427799593#m