Viking Supporters Co-operative
Viking Chat => Off Topic => Topic started by: Filo on March 29, 2024, 10:09:56 am
-
Why can’t I view any update on that thread, I can’t even see my latest post on there
-
Me neither.
-
I thought it was just me and reported it in the forum issues, where I see filo's post.
-
And me
If you click on a post to quote it as if in a message you can dee the latest posts
-
I can see the posts if not logged in, they disappear when I login
-
It's probably a sign that Angela Is Innocent
-
It’s the deep state, the very deep state
-
The last one I can see on there is by sproty on 28th March.
-
I know…Nothing!!! It wasn’t me!
-
It's them old lucky legs
-
It's them old lucky legs
You old misogynistic t**t.
-
Hey Steve I can see you posted on the AR thread there's a few of us that can't
-
I reckon the mods have derailed the thread because we're all drooling over Angela's legs, which is detracting from the political substance of the subject.
I still reckon she flashed Boris though.
-
Hey Steve I can see you posted on the AR thread there's a few of us that can't
Yes, I posted it, Syd, but nothing happened. Is this the start of Putin's cyber attacks?
-
I'll just point out that most of those getting stuck into AR are the ones that pronounced Starmer guilty of beergate before the fact and and that johson was innocent of partygate, just saying like.
-
Hey Steve I can see you posted on the AR thread there's a few of us that can't
Yes, I posted it, Syd, but nothing happened. Is this the start of Putin's cyber attacks?
Logged out I can read the 'missing' posts
-
I'll just point out that most of those getting stuck into AR are the ones that pronounced Starmer guilty of beergate before the fact and and that johson was innocent of partygate, just saying like.
I can't recall one person on here saying that Johnson was innocent of Partygate.
-
I'll just point out that most of those getting stuck into AR are the ones that pronounced Starmer guilty of beergate before the fact and and that johson was innocent of partygate, just saying like.
I can't recall one person on here saying that Johnson was innocent of Partygate.
Ha,ha,ha,ha
I can't express enough ha,ha without filling up all the pages on the off topic on that one.
Must be an age thing SS,like your band of friends keep hilariously joking about.
-
I'll just point out that most of those getting stuck into AR are the ones that pronounced Starmer guilty of beergate before the fact and and that johson was innocent of partygate, just saying like.
I can't recall one person on here saying that Johnson was innocent of Partygate.
Ha,ha,ha,ha
I can't express enough ha,ha without filling up all the pages on the off topic on that one.
Must be an age thing SS,like your band of friends keep hilariously joking about.
Show me the evidence, and I'll hold my hand up, as I always do.
As regards having lots of friends, especially in the South Stand, that's what happens when you're a good guy.
-
You're maybe right Steve, on the 'Talk your way out of this one johnson' thread around 250 pages about partygate I cannot see you saying johnson is innocent, but I cannot see any criticism of him from you either.
There is the usual flannelling of course ............
''Thing is, everyone in their right mind knows that this partying inquest has blown over any form of reasonable proportion simply for political reasons, and it has been amplified for the simple reason that the opposition has absolutely nothing going for it and can only raise its own popularity by lowering the oppositions.
Put it this way, how many of you Labour lot would have condemned a Labour government so vehemently for doing the same thing?''
-
You're maybe right Steve, on the 'Talk your way out of this one johnson' thread around 250 pages about partygate I cannot see you saying johnson is innocent, but I cannot see any criticism of him from you either.
There is the usual flannelling of course ............
''Thing is, everyone in their right mind knows that this partying inquest has blown over any form of reasonable proportion simply for political reasons, and it has been amplified for the simple reason that the opposition has absolutely nothing going for it and can only raise its own popularity by lowering the oppositions.
Put it this way, how many of you Labour lot would have condemned a Labour government so vehemently for doing the same thing?''
You've not quoted a name. You could have made that up yourself.
-
Just accept that it is genuine, I don't deliberately mislead Steve unless it is just a bit of banter then of course I may give someone a poke
-
You're maybe right Steve, on the 'Talk your way out of this one johnson' thread around 250 pages about partygate I cannot see you saying johnson is innocent, but I cannot see any criticism of him from you either.
There is the usual flannelling of course ............
''Thing is, everyone in their right mind knows that this partying inquest has blown over any form of reasonable proportion simply for political reasons, and it has been amplified for the simple reason that the opposition has absolutely nothing going for it and can only raise its own popularity by lowering the oppositions.
Put it this way, how many of you Labour lot would have condemned a Labour government so vehemently for doing the same thing?''
You've not quoted a name. You could have made that up yourself.
SS, it says much about Syd that he spent around two hours scanning 250 pages of a thread looking for something to prove your statement wrong.
If he has found something he should do what he asked me to do when accusing me of deleting a post, SHOW THE POST AS IT APPEARED ON THIS FORUM.
Just show it as a quote.
If he can do that we can see that it isn’t something else that he has made up.
-
You're maybe right Steve, on the 'Talk your way out of this one johnson' thread around 250 pages about partygate I cannot see you saying johnson is innocent, but I cannot see any criticism of him from you either.
There is the usual flannelling of course ............
''Thing is, everyone in their right mind knows that this partying inquest has blown over any form of reasonable proportion simply for political reasons, and it has been amplified for the simple reason that the opposition has absolutely nothing going for it and can only raise its own popularity by lowering the oppositions.
Put it this way, how many of you Labour lot would have condemned a Labour government so vehemently for doing the same thing?''
You've not quoted a name. You could have made that up yourself.
With word search it takes a couple of minutes or less Steve, it's not difficult.
-
Just show the post Syd, as it appears on the forum.
If it’s easy why don’t you do it?
-
You're maybe right Steve, on the 'Talk your way out of this one johnson' thread around 250 pages about partygate I cannot see you saying johnson is innocent, but I cannot see any criticism of him from you either.
There is the usual flannelling of course ............
''Thing is, everyone in their right mind knows that this partying inquest has blown over any form of reasonable proportion simply for political reasons, and it has been amplified for the simple reason that the opposition has absolutely nothing going for it and can only raise its own popularity by lowering the oppositions.
Put it this way, how many of you Labour lot would have condemned a Labour government so vehemently for doing the same thing?''
You've not quoted a name. You could have made that up yourself.
And ...... if you ever want to find who posted anything just copy and paste it into the word search box and voila there it is.
-
You're maybe right Steve, on the 'Talk your way out of this one johnson' thread around 250 pages about partygate I cannot see you saying johnson is innocent, but I cannot see any criticism of him from you either.
There is the usual flannelling of course ............
''Thing is, everyone in their right mind knows that this partying inquest has blown over any form of reasonable proportion simply for political reasons, and it has been amplified for the simple reason that the opposition has absolutely nothing going for it and can only raise its own popularity by lowering the oppositions.
Put it this way, how many of you Labour lot would have condemned a Labour government so vehemently for doing the same thing?''
You've not quoted a name. You could have made that up yourself.
And ...... if you ever want to find who posted anything just copy and paste it into the word search box and voila there it is.
Slandersome Syd strikes again!
-
sue me spotty?
-
Did someone mention sue?
-
Did someone mention sue?
As I've said before, mate; Rita, Sue, and Sydney too.
-
How is Adelaide anyway.
-
Did someone mention sue?
I regret every time I read one of your comments hound, you're a full time troll
-
Did someone mention sue?
I regret every time I read one of your comments hound, you're a full time troll
Foll de roll, and I'll eat you for supper.
-
Did someone mention sue?
I regret every time I read one of your comments hound, you're a full time troll
Aawww, poor thing.
Don’t worry cobber, the feeling is mutual.
As you said to me, if you can’t take it then don’t dish it out.
-
Happy to see it struck a nerve aye?
-
Happy to see it struck a nerve aye?
Ha, no chance.
-
Happy easter little fella
-
Old lucky legs with a thread of her own and then Syd comes along.
-
Ole Papa won’t be happy, Syd being his naughty spiteful sinner self on Easter Day!
Say 10 hail Mary’s Syd and give yerself a good slap!
-
Ole Papa won’t be happy, Syd being his naughty spiteful sinner self on Easter Day!
Say 10 hail Mary’s Syd and give yerself a good slap!
Yes; a good flagellate would do him good.
-
There's some rather embarrassing,misogynistic posting going on here
-
Selby makes a disparaging (at best) post #37 above. It gets 3 likes. I guess who the 3 are, so I look. Yep spot on.
-
Selby makes a disparaging (at best) post #37 above. It gets 3 likes. I guess who the 3 are, so I look. Yep spot on.
It's like the Garrick Club on here at times,old boys old mentality! :(
-
Selby makes a disparaging (at best) post #37 above. It gets 3 likes. I guess who the 3 are, so I look. Yep spot on.
The likes were because of Syd derailing yet another thread, Tommy.
As regards Angela's legs, she's admitted herself that it used to put Boris off. It's all just light-hearted banter.
-
Selby makes a disparaging (at best) post #37 above. It gets 3 likes. I guess who the 3 are, so I look. Yep spot on.
It's like the Garrick Club on here at times,old boys old mentality! :(
What was it that made you so ageist? Has some big old guy given you a slapping?
-
Selby makes a disparaging (at best) post #37 above. It gets 3 likes. I guess who the 3 are, so I look. Yep spot on.
It's like the Garrick Club on here at times,old boys old mentality! :(
What was it that made you so ageist? Has some big old guy given you a slapping?
Maybe pearly offered a necklace to the wrong fella?
-
Selby makes a disparaging (at best) post #37 above. It gets 3 likes. I guess who the 3 are, so I look. Yep spot on.
The likes were because of Syd derailing yet another thread, Tommy.
Mine was specifically because of that.
-
Selby makes a disparaging (at best) post #37 above. It gets 3 likes. I guess who the 3 are, so I look. Yep spot on.
The likes were because of Syd derailing yet another thread, Tommy.
As regards Angela's legs, she's admitted herself that it used to put Boris off. It's all just light-hearted banter.
Thames Water are looking for someone with your skills to handle the media if you're interested Steve
-
Selby makes a disparaging (at best) post #37 above. It gets 3 likes. I guess who the 3 are, so I look. Yep spot on.
The likes were because of Syd derailing yet another thread, Tommy.
As regards Angela's legs, she's admitted herself that it used to put Boris off. It's all just light-hearted banter.
You will of course be supporting this with a citation from the MP herself Steve, otherwise it is just part and parcel of putting women down, misogyny if you like, no?
-
Selby makes a disparaging (at best) post #37 above. It gets 3 likes. I guess who the 3 are, so I look. Yep spot on.
The likes were because of Syd derailing yet another thread, Tommy.
As regards Angela's legs, she's admitted herself that it used to put Boris off. It's all just light-hearted banter.
You will of course be supporting this with a citation from the MP herself Steve, otherwise it is just part and parcel of putting women down, misogyny if you like, no?
If you want to see real misogyny, Syd, go on the football forum and see some of the comments against women's football, and how I always defend the women's game vehemently.
-
I don't actually Steve but nice deflection, are you going to post proof?
Also if you are volunteering to be a shadow mod you're going to be a lot busier that you usually are as it means you'll have to 'see' all the posts you appear to conveniently miss.
-
Hey up Syd you been sorting the Riots in ‘Alice’ on behalf of Albinese last week?
-
Glad you've bought a telly spraty it will help keep you off the streets yourself
-
Why would I be on the Streets?
-
I don't actually Steve but nice deflection, are you going to post proof?
Also if you are volunteering to be a shadow mod you're going to be a lot busier that you usually are as it means you'll have to 'see' all the posts you appear to conveniently miss.
Oh I forgot, Syd, you don't go on the football forum, as you're obviously not very interested in football.
Well, it takes all kinds.
-
I don't actually Steve but nice deflection, are you going to post proof?
Also if you are volunteering to be a shadow mod you're going to be a lot busier that you usually are as it means you'll have to 'see' all the posts you appear to conveniently miss.
Oh I forgot, Syd, you don't go on the football forum, as you're obviously not very interested in football.
Well, it takes all kinds.
[/quote
So you are a champion of women on one thread but post rubbish about them on another and it's my fault, great work Steve.
-
Syd, you need to put your post outside the blue box. You really do get worse.
By the way, we beat Wrexham tonight; not that you're interested.
-
Steve maybe you should take responsibility for your own posts and check what you write the next morning too.
-
Syd, you need to put your post outside the blue box. You really do get worse.
By the way, we beat Wrexham tonight; not that you're interested.
He won’t have a clue about the game SS.
-
I always thought when I was a kid Australia must be a long way away, the test team taking days to sail there.
Now I question if it's too near, and should I be sending comfort parcels to his neighbours.
-
Comfort Parcels? They need Ear Plugs!
-
Comfort Parcels? They need Ear Plugs!
Or a big stick.
-
Comfort Parcels? They need Ear Plugs!
Or a big stick.
To hit yourself with Pearly?
-
Police investigate Labour deputy leader Angela Rayner in council house row https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68797258
Hmm Police are investigating Angela Rayners Tax affairs!
-
Wonder if she will stick to her standards (Boris obvs didn’t)
https://x.com/angelarayner/status/1485986345067634699?s=46&t=ineOQWVeqaGIc2ZoyBwTGA
-
Wonder if she will stick to her standards (Boris obvs didn’t)
https://x.com/angelarayner/status/1485986345067634699?s=46&t=ineOQWVeqaGIc2ZoyBwTGA
Boris had standards?
-
Bog standard
-
Police investigate Labour deputy leader Angela Rayner in council house row https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68797258
Hmm Police are investigating Angela Rayners Tax affairs!
Also, her breaking of electoral law.
The bloke who lived next door to the council house she sold says that her never saw he there at all in the four years he had been resident there.
-
Police investigate Labour deputy leader Angela Rayner in council house row https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68797258
Hmm Police are investigating Angela Rayners Tax affairs!
Also, her breaking of electoral law.
The bloke who lived next door to the council house she sold says that her never saw he there at all in the four years he had been resident there.
A friend of a friend said..
Now it's gospel
-
Police investigate Labour deputy leader Angela Rayner in council house row https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68797258
Hmm Police are investigating Angela Rayners Tax affairs!
Also, her breaking of electoral law.
The bloke who lived next door to the council house she sold says that her never saw he there at all in the four years he had been resident there.
A friend of a friend said..
Now it's gospel
We will see.
-
Well the Police have enough evidence to interview Rayner if they didn’t they would have told the Tory’s where to get off, clearly Andy Burnham and his Labour Bros had been putting pressure on the GMP not to get involved but when N0 10 rings You Jump to it!
-
Well the Police have enough evidence to interview Rayner if they didn’t they would have told the Tory’s where to get off, clearly Andy Burnham and his Labour Bros had been putting pressure on the GMP not to get involved but when N0 10 rings You Jump to it!
You don't need to have evidence before you interview someone, you interview someone to get evidence!
-
Well the Police have enough evidence to interview Rayner if they didn’t they would have told the Tory’s where to get off, clearly Andy Burnham and his Labour Bros had been putting pressure on the GMP not to get involved but when N0 10 rings You Jump to it!
Really? Both things the Tories/Guido Fawkes are alledging Rayner committed are time limited. Even if she did do whatever it is she is alledged she can't be prosecuted for them.
You reckon that's a good use of police time and money? If only the Daily Mail whould put every crime committed in the UK every day then they might get investigated.
-
And on the subject of 'evidence' - (ie something you have seen in the papers) here's the Daily Mail apology that it was 'mistaken' in claiming & printing something about the Clapham chemical attacker that was not true.
https://twitter.com/MailOnline/status/1778479442634920029
-
Well the Police have enough evidence to interview Rayner if they didn’t they would have told the Tory’s where to get off, clearly Andy Burnham and his Labour Bros had been putting pressure on the GMP not to get involved but when N0 10 rings You Jump to it!
Really? Both things the Tories/Guido Fawkes are alledging Rayner committed are time limited. Even if she did do whatever it is she is alledged she can't be prosecuted for them.
You reckon that's a good use of police time and money? If only the Daily Mail whould put every crime committed in the UK every day then they might get investigated.
They don't care if it's time limited it's that it happened. Given the comments she made about Boris eating sandwiches at the wrong time with wrong people she really has to be squeaky clean.
-
Didn't you call for Starmer to be investigated because he had a beer, pud?
-
Didn't you call for Starmer to be investigated because he had a beer, pud?
Didn’t you call for Boris to be sacked because he did the same though Syd.
-
Here's all those that lost their money trying to smeer Starmer, double or quits?
https://www.drfc-vsc.co.uk/index.php?topic=283693.0
-
Well the Police have enough evidence to interview Rayner if they didn’t they would have told the Tory’s where to get off, clearly Andy Burnham and his Labour Bros had been putting pressure on the GMP not to get involved but when N0 10 rings You Jump to it!
Really? Both things the Tories/Guido Fawkes are alledging Rayner committed are time limited. Even if she did do whatever it is she is alledged she can't be prosecuted for them.
You reckon that's a good use of police time and money? If only the Daily Mail whould put every crime committed in the UK every day then they might get investigated.
They don't care if it's time limited it's that it happened. Given the comments she made about Boris eating sandwiches at the wrong time with wrong people she really has to be squeaky clean.
The defence of Johnson and Co for having parties? All praise to our masters.
-
Well the Police have enough evidence to interview Rayner if they didn’t they would have told the Tory’s where to get off, clearly Andy Burnham and his Labour Bros had been putting pressure on the GMP not to get involved but when N0 10 rings You Jump to it!
You don't need to have evidence before you interview someone, you interview someone to get evidence!
Hey up Glynn, I doubt very much that GMP had any interest in looking into the affairs of an opposition MP ,regarding to such trivial matters as Dodging Capital gains Tax. Clearly some one at Downing Street has been doing some Sleuthing and GMP will have been presented with a dossier of evidence which has caused them to get involved, Rayner should have kept her ‘Estate Girl’ gob shut instead of calling names, believe me there will be enough evidence to charge an interview will merely be a formality!
-
And on the subject of 'evidence' - (ie something you have seen in the papers) here's the Daily Mail apology that it was 'mistaken' in claiming & printing something about the Clapham chemical attacker that was not true.
https://twitter.com/MailOnline/status/1778479442634920029
Good grief Wilts what has that got to do with Raynergate?
-
This is the sort of decent Tory MP that the party used to be full of.
https://x.com/richardhorton1/status/1780130294927970414
Yes, of course Rayner will have to resign if she's found to have broken the law. But the thought of her being hounded by a billionaire Tory who is a resident of Belize so he pays f**k all tax, and who has a history of chumming up to Russian kleptocrats is, frankly, disgusting.
-
It isn’t pretty, I agree bst.
However I don’t think it is out of the realms of reality for any politician to do similar if it makes life difficult for a member of another Party
-
It isn’t pretty, I agree bst.
However I don’t think it is out of the realms of reality for any politician to do similar if it makes life difficult for a member of another Party
Playground Politics, ignoring the real issues, what they were elected to do, instead trying to discredit an opponent, as Rayner has said if she is found guilty of a criminal offence she will resign
-
It isn’t pretty, I agree bst.
However I don’t think it is out of the realms of reality for any politician to do similar if it makes life difficult for a member of another Party
Playground Politics, ignoring the real issues, what they were elected to do, instead trying to discredit an opponent, as Rayner has said if she is found guilty of a criminal offence she will resign
Fuuuuuuccccckkkkkkiiiiiinnnnngggggg hell!
https://youtu.be/nKUGSlv0Bo8
-
Gobshite, subjected to the same package of slime and innuendo that she was perfectly happy to subject others to in the past decides she doesn't like it!
Nobody cares about the money!
"Playground Politics, ignoring the real issues, what they were elected to do, instead trying to discredit an opponent, as Rayner has said if she is found guilty of a criminal offence she will resign"
Pitiful.
-
Gobshite,
Pitiful
For one moment the I thought you were going to do a self portrait,you know,one of your usual random rants.
Ah you did.
-
Nick Boles, former Tory MP, in today's Times:
-
danum: ''Gobshite, subjected to the same package of slime and innuendo that she was perfectly happy to subject others to in the past decides she doesn't like it!''
tory MP struggling with the calendar ..........
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/angela-rayner-council-house-james-daly-b2528997.html
The past decade ............ hmmm
The scum comment was in 2021 what did she say that got under your skin in the seven years previous to that dd?
-
GMP investigating multiple offences say CC Watson
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/angela-rayner-manchester-police-investigation-b2529840.html
Typical Council Estate Slapper fiddling, and some of you want the likes of her running the country?
-
Is there anyone you could ask what the difference is between an allegation and an offence?
-
GMP investigating multiple offences say CC Watson
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/angela-rayner-manchester-police-investigation-b2529840.html
Typical Council Estate Slapper fiddling, and some of you want the likes of her running the country?
Yeah, but, but, but, but, but, but, but, but, but, but, but, but, but, but..........
......She's Labour.
-
Yes, bb that appears to be the offence/allegation
-
How about (this is a repost) calling for Boris to go when he was under police investigation (note not convicted or changed at the time just under investigation) but now not falling on her sword when she is??? Hypocritical doesn’t cover it.
https://x.com/angelarayner/status/1485986345067634699?s=46&t=ineOQWVeqaGIc2ZoyBwTGA
-
This is the problem Raynor is being compared to Johnson a professional liar whom only fools would trust.
-
No, the problem is she’s set a moral bar by calling for someone only under investigation to go. Who it is doesn’t matter, the principle has been set by her. Not going when she is in the same position shows her true character
-
She's a self-righteous phoney who only appeals to other self-righteous phonies.
-
How about (this is a repost) calling for Boris to go when he was under police investigation (note not convicted or changed at the time just under investigation) but now not falling on her sword when she is??? Hypocritical doesn’t cover it.
https://x.com/angelarayner/status/1485986345067634699?s=46&t=ineOQWVeqaGIc2ZoyBwTGA
-
raynor apologised, tell me when johnson ever issued a full and proper apology?
-
When did she apologise for being a hypocrite?
-
And she said she will resign if found guilty.
I hope the public purse will be offered for a defence if charges are laid
-
When did she apologise for being a hypocrite?
Is that a chargeable offence in your world?
-
And she said she will resign if found guilty.
I hope the public purse will be offered for a defence if charges are laid
But called for someone else to go just because they were under investigation? And you don’t see the hypocrisy??
-
Maybe you should put up the reasons and it can be trawled through again, the two people cannot be compared the circumstances the dates not their positions at the time.
-
When did she apologise for being a hypocrite?
Is that a chargeable offence in your world?
It's not a characteristic that would get my vote.
-
When did she apologise for being a hypocrite?
Is that a chargeable offence in your world?
It's not a characteristic that would get my vote.
Tell me when you have previously voted labour?
-
She's a self-righteous phoney who only appeals to other self-righteous phonies.
Boris is a w@nker who only appealed to other w@nkers.
-
So it seems to be accepted by some people, to lie when you are not a politician but still ok to continue the lie when you are a politician.
If it turns out that she registered her kids at the wrong address by accident then I would think that is a bit strange too.
-
So it seems to be accepted by some people, to lie when you are not a politician but still ok to continue the lie when you are a politician.
If it turns out that she registered her kids at the wrong address by accident then I would think that is a bit strange too.
I remind you of BST rule number 1
Labour = honest mistake made in good faith
Tory = string them up now!
-
She's a self-righteous phoney who only appeals to other self-righteous phonies.
Boris is a w@nker who only appealed to other w@nkers.
One simply has to admire your denial.
-
So it seems to be accepted by some people, to lie when you are not a politician but still ok to continue the lie when you are a politician.
If it turns out that she registered her kids at the wrong address by accident then I would think that is a bit strange too.
I remind you of BST rule number 1
Labour = honest mistake made in good faith
Tory = string them up now!
Goodness. Is it THAT time again?
-
So it seems to be accepted by some people, to lie when you are not a politician but still ok to continue the lie when you are a politician.
If it turns out that she registered her kids at the wrong address by accident then I would think that is a bit strange too.
I remind you of BST rule number 1
Labour = honest mistake made in good faith
Tory = string them up now!
Goodness. Is it THAT time again?
I knew you’d appreciate that
-
And she said she will resign if found guilty.
I hope the public purse will be offered for a defence if charges are laid
Of what though Syd?
-
It's fair to be critical of her given she can't practice what she preaches. It opens up questions about how you can trust what she says. When you've set yourself out as something you have to be that person and I'd question whether she is!
-
So it seems to be accepted by some people, to lie when you are not a politician but still ok to continue the lie when you are a politician.
If it turns out that she registered her kids at the wrong address by accident then I would think that is a bit strange too.
I remind you of BST rule number 1
Labour = honest mistake made in good faith
Tory = string them up now!
Goodness. Is it THAT time again?
I knew you’d appreciate that
I'd appreciate it a lot more if you knew any examples where I've said that and it's not actually been the case.
-
And she said she will resign if found guilty.
I hope the public purse will be offered for a defence if charges are laid
Of what though Syd?
Very good point, I'm sure someone will think of something, breaking ulez rules?
-
It's fair to be critical of her given she can't practice what she preaches. It opens up questions about how you can trust what she says. When you've set yourself out as something you have to be that person and I'd question whether she is!
True to a point pud, the misogyny by some is not required. Many of whom wouldn't know an apology or retraction from a bar of soap.
-
https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1888789/labour-angela-rayner-house-row
I wander how long Back Stabber will hold out before he throws Rayner under a Boris bus?
-
Raynors former chief aide now claims she was not living at the house she sold.
He has allegedly given a statement to GMP which contradicts what she has said.
-
https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1888789/labour-angela-rayner-house-row
I wander how long Back Stabber will hold out before he throws Rayner under a Boris bus?
''Starmer dismisses Tory attack on Rayner as 'billionaire PM smearing working-class woman'
Starmer says the Tories have been smearing a working-class woman''
And
''James Daly, the deputy chair of the Conservative party, wrote to Greater Manchester police asking them to investigate Angela Rayner and, when the force initially declined to look into it, he successfully persuaded them to think again.
But in interviews Daly has refused to say what he thinks Rayner did wrong. He did this yesterday on Politics Live, and again today on Sky News''
-
https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1888789/labour-angela-rayner-house-row
I wander how long Back Stabber will hold out before he throws Rayner under a Boris bus?
''Starmer dismisses Tory attack on Rayner as 'billionaire PM smearing working-class woman'
Starmer says the Tories have been smearing a working-class woman''
And
''James Daly, the deputy chair of the Conservative party, wrote to Greater Manchester police asking them to investigate Angela Rayner and, when the force initially declined to look into it, he successfully persuaded them to think again.
But in interviews Daly has refused to say what he thinks Rayner did wrong. He did this yesterday on Politics Live, and again today on Sky News''
Why should he?
-
''A supposedly grassroots ‘tax protest’ against Labour party Deputy Leader Angela Rayner, which hit the headlines on Wednesday, was organised and conducted by Conservative party politicians, one of the organisers has admitted to Byline Times''
https://bylinetimes.com/2024/04/10/angela-rayner-tax-protest-was-staged-by-conservative-politicians-posing-as-tax-activists/
look at the photo in the link
-
One side of political divide tries to discredit the other side shock.
Come on Syd, don’t pretend to be surprised that things like this happen.
-
Or surprised that things like this happen....
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68841840
Wonder how you end up being kidnapped/blackmailed /extorted and you don't tell police.....
-
Or surprised that things like this happen....
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68841840
Wonder how you end up being kidnapped/blackmailed /extorted and you don't tell police.....
Maybe Boy George has been busy again!
-
Or surprised that things like this happen....
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68841840
Wonder how you end up being kidnapped/blackmailed /extorted and you don't tell police.....
Depressingly familiar reporting by the BBC.
That info about the MP calling a retired fund manager a 3:15 to demand £5k to pay off "bad people" was all over the media yesterday.
Until they changed the content this morning, that BBC page was just saying the MP was accused of misusing party funds.
That's what happens when you stuff senior BBC management full of ex Tory party officials and donors. They bend over backwards to give the Tories the least damaging coverage possible.
-
Or surprised that things like this happen....
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68841840
Wonder how you end up being kidnapped/blackmailed /extorted and you don't tell police.....
Depressingly familiar reporting by the BBC.
That info about the MP calling a retired fund manager a 3:15 to demand £5k to pay off "bad people" was all over the media yesterday.
Until they changed the content this morning, that BBC page was just saying the MP was accused of misusing party funds.
That's what happens when you stuff senior BBC management full of ex Tory party officials and donors. They bend over backwards to give the Tories the least damaging coverage possible.
He has been suspended by the Tories, and what are Labour doing!
-
Starmer is a lawyer, he’ll have cross examined Raynor and come to the conclusion that there is no case to answer, I think Labour ate enjoying this when for when it eventually comes out that the Tory MP has been wasting Police time
-
Starmer is a lawyer, he’ll have cross examined Raynor and come to the conclusion that there is no case to answer,
Starmer is a very poor ‘Woke’ finger wagging Nanny state Buffoon, Rayner will have denied every thing and told him he was bullying her!
He will have kacked his pants and done nothing!
The CCof GMP is a very firm but fair man if there is no case to answer that will be that, no chance of another wasted investigation into ‘Wasting PoliceTime” if there is some evidence to support a conviction there will be a conviction.
-
Starmer is a lawyer, he’ll have cross examined Raynor and come to the conclusion that there is no case to answer,
Starmer is a very poor ‘Woke’ finger wagging Nanny state Buffoon, Rayner will have denied every thing and told him he was bullying her!
He will have kacked his pants and done nothing!
The CCof GMP is a very firm but fair man if there is no case to answer that will be that, no chance of another wasted investigation into ‘Wasting PoliceTime” if there is some evidence to support a conviction there will be a conviction.
Hi Gammon AI. Could you write me a really bad Daily Heil comment piece please and don't forget to put Woke in quotation marks.
-
Or surprised that things like this happen....
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68841840
Wonder how you end up being kidnapped/blackmailed /extorted and you don't tell police.....
Depressingly familiar reporting by the BBC.
That info about the MP calling a retired fund manager a 3:15 to demand £5k to pay off "bad people" was all over the media yesterday.
Until they changed the content this morning, that BBC page was just saying the MP was accused of misusing party funds.
That's what happens when you stuff senior BBC management full of ex Tory party officials and donors. They bend over backwards to give the Tories the least damaging coverage possible.
He has been suspended by the Tories, and what are Labour doing!
waiting to see if there's any case to actually answer as I understand, following the first time where it was said there wasn't. Slightly different to a bloke with previous for male prostitutes and drug involvement having action taken after 3month after party office informed.
-
Funniest comment on Bad People Gate is Dominic Cummings saying how Westminster is full of incompetent sociopaths.
That's of course the sociopathically incompetent Dominic Cummings who used to run Westminster.
-
Starmer is a lawyer, he’ll have cross examined Raynor and come to the conclusion that there is no case to answer,
Starmer is a very poor ‘Woke’ finger wagging Nanny state Buffoon, Rayner will have denied every thing and told him he was bullying her!
He will have kacked his pants and done nothing!
The CCof GMP is a very firm but fair man if there is no case to answer that will be that, no chance of another wasted investigation into ‘Wasting PoliceTime” if there is some evidence to support a conviction there will be a conviction.
Hi Gammon AI. Could you write me a really bad Daily Heil comment piece please and don't forget to put Woke in quotation marks.
Are you really a middle school teacher ?
-
Just dawned on me, d'oh.
The reason the Tory party deputy chair has been pushing the police now of all times to open the investigation into Rayner.
They must have known that they couldn't keep a lid on Bad People Gate for much longer.
And in other news, the husband of Nicola Sturgeon has been charged with embezzlement of SNP funds.
-
If after GMP have concluded their investigation and the ginger one has nothing to answer for then all well and good.
I'm just trying to visualise the meltdown on here from certain sources if the investigation coughed up anything positive, the backtracking would be illuminating!
-
If after GMP have concluded their investigation and the ginger one has nothing to answer for then all well and good.
You obviously have a very neutral stance on this with the 'ginger one'.
That's pleasing to see.
-
If after GMP have concluded their investigation and the ginger one has nothing to answer for then all well and good.
You obviously have a very neutral stance on this with the 'ginger one'.
That's pleasing to see.
Not sure why i'm wasting my time with you.
Do you have a point? or is it just your usual post a load of guff, i don't think i've ever seen a post of any sort of relevance from you.
Are you a bit special?
-
.... https://youtu.be/ZUlZpEPuhD8
-
Oh dear!
No fewer than four Conservative MPs have declined to disclose whether they paid capital gains tax on profits made from the sale of their own taxpayer-funded second homes.
A Mirror investigation has revealed that David Tredinnick, Eleanor Laing, Shailesh Vara and Maria Miller raked in a combined £5.4 million between them from flogging houses funded by the public.
They have all declined to comment on whether they paid any tax on the profits they made
-
Oh dear!
No fewer than four Conservative MPs have declined to disclose whether they paid capital gains tax on profits made from the sale of their own taxpayer-funded second homes.
A Mirror investigation has revealed that David Tredinnick, Eleanor Laing, Shailesh Vara and Maria Miller raked in a combined £5.4 million between them from flogging houses funded by the public.
They have all declined to comment on whether they paid any tax on the profits they made
Get em investigated what’s sauce for the goose!
-
Oh dear!
No fewer than four Conservative MPs have declined to disclose whether they paid capital gains tax on profits made from the sale of their own taxpayer-funded second homes.
A Mirror investigation has revealed that David Tredinnick, Eleanor Laing, Shailesh Vara and Maria Miller raked in a combined £5.4 million between them from flogging houses funded by the public.
They have all declined to comment on whether they paid any tax on the profits they made
All 5 of them should regardless of party. They must follow the law. Also if they've followed the law and found loopholes let the public know so they can judge the morality of it.
-
Mindst you, you have to ask how big and where were these house to rake in £5.4m obviously not some Council estate in Manchester
-
Raven have decided to comment or not to!
-
Two up two down cottages in Pudsey with outside toilet at the bottom of the yard.
-
Raven have decided to comment or not to!
Please translate Sproty
If people of any party break the rules they should all be investigated..... once they have been found out
Remind me though Sproty Rayner is being nvestigated over how much?
-
It's a shame to have to keep saying it but everyone's aware of the consistent undercurrent of sleaze and corruption in our elected membership, across all political parties.
If these people spent as much time trying to produce legislation to help and support the betterment of society that they do in fiddling the system and feathering their nests for the present and when they are eventually kicked out, we may just succeed as a nation.
If any politicians have questions to answer in their financial arrangements they should be taken to task with the toughest possible censures delivered to them.
Its been going on far too long and needs eradicating, these people are given far to much capability to defraud the system and require much stronger regulation, if they don't agree with this then they should be forced out and replaced by a generation of people who have professional and technical competencies to take us forward.
We don't want or need people who's first thought is always how they can advance themselves on the public purse before even thinking about the electorate.
#allthebloodysame
-
I'll repeat. The irony of the Rayner case is that it has come back into the limelight because of a book written by a Tory billionaire whose companies are registered in Belize so that he doesn't pay UK tax.
-
Ironic or not, it still doesn't absolve any MP in the pay of the public purse from being investigated if they have questions that need clarifying.
Does anyone know why Labour when in power from 1997 to 2010 did not legislate to change the non-dom status?
-
Only those without sin should cast the first stone.