0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
It might depend on the wages the player is on. If it means he can bring a couple of players in then RW might take the decision. I would be really worried if it is Anderson though.
I really can’t see Williams going freeing up much wage. When we signed him he’d never played in the football league so he surely won’t be on much.
Hope you're all right about Omar. I'd be delighted if it was him. Why all the cloak and dagger stuff from RW? He's happy to name Williams, why not just come out and say the 2nd one is Omar?
Quote from: RugbyRover on August 20, 2021, 01:21:05 pmHope you're all right about Omar. I'd be delighted if it was him. Why all the cloak and dagger stuff from RW? He's happy to name Williams, why not just come out and say the 2nd one is Omar? Because Wlliams is surplus to requirements anyway.Whereas, like it or not, if this all falls through, Bogle is the best forward player we have at the club this side of the clocks gong back and Wellens will need to get the very best out of him that he can. So you don't go round openly saying we want rid of him.
Quote from: NickDRFC on August 20, 2021, 12:38:27 pmI really can’t see Williams going freeing up much wage. When we signed him he’d never played in the football league so he surely won’t be on much.You might think that, but Wellens has said Williams is on a decent League One wage. Wellens reckoned that freeing that up would allow potentially two players to be brought in.
Would you sell big tom if it ment getting 3/4 players in?
Quote from: keith79 on August 20, 2021, 01:41:03 pmWould you sell big tom if it ment getting 3/4 players in?100% yes, looked a shadow of his former self since Balcombe wiped him out
Quote from: BillyStubbsTears on August 20, 2021, 01:30:02 pmQuote from: RugbyRover on August 20, 2021, 01:21:05 pmHope you're all right about Omar. I'd be delighted if it was him. Why all the cloak and dagger stuff from RW? He's happy to name Williams, why not just come out and say the 2nd one is Omar? Because Wlliams is surplus to requirements anyway.Whereas, like it or not, if this all falls through, Bogle is the best forward player we have at the club this side of the clocks gong back and Wellens will need to get the very best out of him that he can. So you don't go round openly saying we want rid of him.The thing is though BST the other player(more than likely Bogle) probably already knows its him so the club get a disgruntled player who they need to rely on but can't and don't. Surely a case of moving on for everyone's benefit