0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Syderney, I'm also talking about predictability and RD's use of his biased political agenda to judge one's ability in it. My last post was suggesting to him that the party in which his biased agenda supports has given no indication that it would have been any more effective if given the responsibility.
It's easy to be an expert without responsibility. If you think Starmer would have been any more effective in handling the responsibility than he's shown in his piss poor performances in criticising those with it, you really need to give your head a wobble.
Dominic Cummings was among those calling for caution, sharing a post on social media which said 'the cost of another big wave is much higher than the cost of delaying the next stage of the roadmap'.
Hound.You don't seem to be able to draw the distinction between Cummings as someone who might have factual evidence on what happened in Government and Cummings as the dangerous, egotistical maniac when it comes to the "vision thing".It's perfectly possible for him to be both or neither.
I fail to see how it's hindsight when the results of his actions are predicted. I've lost count of how many times he's not acted quickly enough. At least 6 times probably more.He got lucky with the decision to send kids back to school when he did. I admit I would have held off for a couple of weeks. What would have been lost? A couple of weeks lost education amongst the weeks and weeks of lost education. Many of the lost weeks due to Boris Johnson inaction that forced longer, more damaging lock downs than might otherwise have been. His strike rate of getting it right is hopeless. He's a rubbish gambler.
It's really simple Hound.1) Do I believe he is a borderline insane megalomaniac with a sketchy handle on real science? Yes I do because I've read his witterings for years.2) Do I believe he said that COVID policy in Feb 2020 was "save the economy and if a few old folk die, too bad"? Yes I do because he has never denied it, whereas he goes off like the Tasmanian Devil when he thinks he's been unfairly maligned.3) Do I think he lied about his Barnard Castle trip to check his eyesight? Yes because I have self respect...4) Do I believe he is telling the truth that Johnson said that line about bodies piling high? Probably, because it's been independently backed up and I don't see what he has to gain by lying on that point. But I'd reserve judgement until I saw him provide evidence or repeat it under oath at the inquiry.I really don't get which part of this you think is inconsistent.
It's really simple Hound.1) Do I believe he is a borderline insane megalomaniac with a sketchy handle on real science? Yes I do because I've read his witterings for years.2) Do I believe he said that COVID policy in Feb 2020 was ""? Yes I do because he has never denied it, whereas he goes off like the Tasmanian Devil when he thinks he's been unfairly maligned.3) Do I think he lied about his Barnard Castle trip to check his eyesight? Yes because I have self respect...4) Do I believe he is telling the truth that Johnson said that line about bodies piling high? Probably, because it's been independently backed up and I don't see what he has to gain by lying on that point. But I'd reserve judgement until I saw him provide evidence or repeat it under oath at the inquiry.I really don't get which part of this you think is inconsistent.
Quote from: BillyStubbsTears on May 15, 2021, 03:49:41 pmIt's really simple Hound.1) Do I believe he is a borderline insane megalomaniac with a sketchy handle on real science? Yes I do because I've read his witterings for years.2) Do I believe he said that COVID policy in Feb 2020 was ""? Yes I do because he has never denied it, whereas he goes off like the Tasmanian Devil when he thinks he's been unfairly maligned.3) Do I think he lied about his Barnard Castle trip to check his eyesight? Yes because I have self respect...4) Do I believe he is telling the truth that Johnson said that line about bodies piling high? Probably, because it's been independently backed up and I don't see what he has to gain by lying on that point. But I'd reserve judgement until I saw him provide evidence or repeat it under oath at the inquiry.I really don't get which part of this you think is inconsistent. Johnson HAS denied he said, "save the economy and if a few old folk die, too bad."
Quote from: BillyStubbsTears on May 15, 2021, 03:49:41 pmIt's really simple Hound.1) Do I believe he is a borderline insane megalomaniac with a sketchy handle on real science? Yes I do because I've read his witterings for years.2) Do I believe he said that COVID policy in Feb 2020 was ""? Yes I do because he has never denied it, whereas he goes off like the Tasmanian Devil when he thinks he's been unfairly maligned.3) Do I think he lied about his Barnard Castle trip to check his eyesight? Yes because I have self respect...4) Do I believe he is telling the truth that Johnson said that line about bodies piling high? Probably, because it's been independently backed up and I don't see what he has to gain by lying on that point. But I'd reserve judgement until I saw him provide evidence or repeat it under oath at the inquiry.I really don't get which part of this you think is inconsistent. Johnson HAS denied he said, "save the economy and if a few old folk die, too bad."
It's really simple Hound.1) Do I believe he is a borderline insane megalomaniac with a sketchy handle on real science? Yes I do because I've read his witterings for years.2) Do I believe he said that COVID policy in Feb 2020 was ""? Yes I do because he has never denied it, whereas he goes off like the Tasmanian Devil when he thinks he's been unfairly maligned.3) Do I think he lied about his Barnard Castle trip to check his eyesight? Yes because I have self respect...4) Do I believe he is telling the truth that Johnson said that line about bodies piling high? Probably, because it's been independently backed up and I don't see what he has to gain by lying on that point. But I'd reserve judgement until I saw him provide evidence or repeat it under oath at the inquiry.I really don't get which part of this you think is inconsistent.
Yes of course it is. I assume you read my original post before wading in?It's an opinion informed by years of watching Cummings. We'll eventually find out the truth when he and others have to give testimony under oath. Although Johnson's made sure that can is kicked well down the road.
Had it changed thou albie is there any proof that it will not work with vaccines?