0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.
Regarding the Panorama investigation, I take it that some of you on here will be dropping your agenda against Laura Kuenssberg, now that she's obviously not pandering to the Tory Party, which you've accused her of in the past.
Over 300 photos submitted to the Met Police with regards to partying in No.10. (Three Hundred!!!).1 photo of Starmer drinking a beer after a day when we know he had been working.Do you think the guy who took the Starmer photo took just one pic and did a runner?Or do you think he sat there all night and that was the best ‘evidence’ of law breaking he could come up with?(Maybe he’s keeping back the pic of Starmer doing the Okey Cokey with Rayner, till the price is right)?
So if it was a video perhaps the claim that whoever made it was there for forty odd minutes is true.
Quote from: drfchound on May 24, 2022, 09:55:17 pmSo if it was a video perhaps the claim that whoever made it was there for forty odd minutes is true.I know its a video because I have seen some short clips. How long the whole thing is, sorry dont know.On that agenda that came out a couple of weeks ago they were due to be in the hall for an hour and half - working with their meal maybe?
Quote from: wilts rover on May 24, 2022, 10:03:57 pmQuote from: drfchound on May 24, 2022, 09:55:17 pmSo if it was a video perhaps the claim that whoever made it was there for forty odd minutes is true.I know its a video because I have seen some short clips. How long the whole thing is, sorry dont know.On that agenda that came out a couple of weeks ago they were due to be in the hall for an hour and half - working with their meal maybe?Yeah, quite possible.It’s just that someone said that the student who took the picture(video) CLAIMED to have been there for 45 minutes.
Quote from: drfchound on May 24, 2022, 10:19:29 pmQuote from: wilts rover on May 24, 2022, 10:03:57 pmQuote from: drfchound on May 24, 2022, 09:55:17 pmSo if it was a video perhaps the claim that whoever made it was there for forty odd minutes is true.I know its a video because I have seen some short clips. How long the whole thing is, sorry dont know.On that agenda that came out a couple of weeks ago they were due to be in the hall for an hour and half - working with their meal maybe?Yeah, quite possible.It’s just that someone said that the student who took the picture(video) CLAIMED to have been there for 45 minutes.I dunno, maybe, it wasn't me. All I know it is a video and was taken by a student at an illegal party in the halls across the way.I would guess that if there was really damning evidence of Starmer doing something illegal, the Daily Heil/S*n would pay anything for it and have it up on their website in a shot.
Quote from: SydneyRover on May 24, 2022, 12:56:35 pmAnd why would johnson lie about it if he had nothing to worry about? it wasn't a party apparentlyYou and your mates, sorry, Labour supporting co posters, had demanded the PM resign as soon as the news broke. Before an investigation began. Before the police got involved.But, but but, that was ok wasn’t it.
And why would johnson lie about it if he had nothing to worry about? it wasn't a party apparently
Boris Johnson is going to apologise. Again. In a 'day of contrition'.How many official apologies is this now?It's just words, sorry iis the easiest.
Quote from: River Don on May 25, 2022, 07:32:59 amBoris Johnson is going to apologise. Again. In a 'day of contrition'.How many official apologies is this now?It's just words, sorry iis the easiest.I fail to see how1. He hasn't yet resigned.2. His fellow conservatives haven't ditched him yet.He should have been gone months ago today should just confirm it.
He'll be fine today. The line will be:He really didn't think he was at any parties.He's appalled at what happened.He takes fully responsibility.Now let's move on.And about 30% of the electorate will be perfectly happy with that and accept that we have, for the first time in history, a PM that has broken the law and lied to Parliament. And that's how these things just get normalised and the foundations of democracy get undermined.
Quote from: drfchound on May 24, 2022, 01:50:53 pmQuote from: SydneyRover on May 24, 2022, 12:56:35 pmAnd why would johnson lie about it if he had nothing to worry about? it wasn't a party apparentlyYou and your mates, sorry, Labour supporting co posters, had demanded the PM resign as soon as the news broke. Before an investigation began. Before the police got involved.But, but but, that was ok wasn’t it.post #6 this thread bp''Has to resign simple as that''post #7 this thread houndHas to resign simple as that you're welcome
Quote from: Not Now Kato on January 25, 2022, 10:53:54 amQuote from: rich1471 on January 25, 2022, 10:48:11 amThe met police are going to investigate the parties held at number 10 over the last 2 years this has to be the final nail in his coffin Not too sure about that. Watch out for PMQ's tomorrow - 'Sue Grays report publication will have to wait until the result of the police enquiry'! IMO 'Dame Dick' knows exactly what she's doing - protect Big Dog!This is corruption beyond belief.The Met have categorically said all the way through this that their policy is not to investigate retrospective COVID breaches.The Gray Report is just about to be released, and would almost certainly mean the end of Johnson's career.Suddenly the Met are investigating and as a result, the Gray Report has been shelved.Which means Johnson's safe for the meantime. He's kicked the can down the road and will hope that something else comes up to save him.At what point do we wake up and realise what this Kitson and his entourage are doing to our democracy?
Quote from: rich1471 on January 25, 2022, 10:48:11 amThe met police are going to investigate the parties held at number 10 over the last 2 years this has to be the final nail in his coffin Not too sure about that. Watch out for PMQ's tomorrow - 'Sue Grays report publication will have to wait until the result of the police enquiry'! IMO 'Dame Dick' knows exactly what she's doing - protect Big Dog!
The met police are going to investigate the parties held at number 10 over the last 2 years this has to be the final nail in his coffin
Sue Gray stopped investigating to let the police investigate which meant that neither of them investigated the party in the flat. What sort of logic is this? It smells of collusion.