Total Members Voted: 171
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: wilts rover on November 27, 2022, 11:06:37 pmQuote from: Avsuptem on November 27, 2022, 04:08:31 pmQuote from: BillyStubbsTears on November 27, 2022, 01:32:11 pmPete Davies in his seminal book about Italia 90 made a superb observation.From that tournament on, the World Cup wasn't held in a country. A country played host to Planet Football. Yes the final was in Rome that year, but that was nigh on irrelevant. The World Cup Finals became from then on a global celebration that happened to be physically based in a particular geographical location. It transcended the local culture.Even Russia, even Putin understood this. He had the police stop arresting and assaulting gay people for the duration. Russia strove to show itself as part of the global family.Qatar have not played that game. They've insisted that they will impose their own specific culture on the tournament, not have the world bring its culture to them. They've bought FIFA off, then shoved their noses in the issue of who had the power, by, at the last minute, banning alcohol and shows of tolerance and support to gay people. The left it to the very last minute to do this, to give a fait accompli to countries at the finals. That's their prerogative, but it must never, ever happen again. Host countries don't own a WC. They host it, and the world takes them over for a brief period. We now know countries like Qatar don't want those rules. So they can f**k right off in future.There's a difference BST. Russia is not a Muslim country.Under your logic FIFA should be allowed to impose Christian / Western values upon the host nation, either that or no muslim country should ever be allowed to host again.No country that exploits people (workers rights) or discriminates against them in defiance of UN Human Rights Law (gay/women's rights) should ever stage a major international sporting event.Fifa had better take the world cup away from USA then before it's too late.BST I was just wandering if there was anything else on your list that you think should preclude a country ? I would start with lack of fish and chip shops.
Quote from: Avsuptem on November 27, 2022, 04:08:31 pmQuote from: BillyStubbsTears on November 27, 2022, 01:32:11 pmPete Davies in his seminal book about Italia 90 made a superb observation.From that tournament on, the World Cup wasn't held in a country. A country played host to Planet Football. Yes the final was in Rome that year, but that was nigh on irrelevant. The World Cup Finals became from then on a global celebration that happened to be physically based in a particular geographical location. It transcended the local culture.Even Russia, even Putin understood this. He had the police stop arresting and assaulting gay people for the duration. Russia strove to show itself as part of the global family.Qatar have not played that game. They've insisted that they will impose their own specific culture on the tournament, not have the world bring its culture to them. They've bought FIFA off, then shoved their noses in the issue of who had the power, by, at the last minute, banning alcohol and shows of tolerance and support to gay people. The left it to the very last minute to do this, to give a fait accompli to countries at the finals. That's their prerogative, but it must never, ever happen again. Host countries don't own a WC. They host it, and the world takes them over for a brief period. We now know countries like Qatar don't want those rules. So they can f**k right off in future.There's a difference BST. Russia is not a Muslim country.Under your logic FIFA should be allowed to impose Christian / Western values upon the host nation, either that or no muslim country should ever be allowed to host again.No country that exploits people (workers rights) or discriminates against them in defiance of UN Human Rights Law (gay/women's rights) should ever stage a major international sporting event.
Quote from: BillyStubbsTears on November 27, 2022, 01:32:11 pmPete Davies in his seminal book about Italia 90 made a superb observation.From that tournament on, the World Cup wasn't held in a country. A country played host to Planet Football. Yes the final was in Rome that year, but that was nigh on irrelevant. The World Cup Finals became from then on a global celebration that happened to be physically based in a particular geographical location. It transcended the local culture.Even Russia, even Putin understood this. He had the police stop arresting and assaulting gay people for the duration. Russia strove to show itself as part of the global family.Qatar have not played that game. They've insisted that they will impose their own specific culture on the tournament, not have the world bring its culture to them. They've bought FIFA off, then shoved their noses in the issue of who had the power, by, at the last minute, banning alcohol and shows of tolerance and support to gay people. The left it to the very last minute to do this, to give a fait accompli to countries at the finals. That's their prerogative, but it must never, ever happen again. Host countries don't own a WC. They host it, and the world takes them over for a brief period. We now know countries like Qatar don't want those rules. So they can f**k right off in future.There's a difference BST. Russia is not a Muslim country.Under your logic FIFA should be allowed to impose Christian / Western values upon the host nation, either that or no muslim country should ever be allowed to host again.
Pete Davies in his seminal book about Italia 90 made a superb observation.From that tournament on, the World Cup wasn't held in a country. A country played host to Planet Football. Yes the final was in Rome that year, but that was nigh on irrelevant. The World Cup Finals became from then on a global celebration that happened to be physically based in a particular geographical location. It transcended the local culture.Even Russia, even Putin understood this. He had the police stop arresting and assaulting gay people for the duration. Russia strove to show itself as part of the global family.Qatar have not played that game. They've insisted that they will impose their own specific culture on the tournament, not have the world bring its culture to them. They've bought FIFA off, then shoved their noses in the issue of who had the power, by, at the last minute, banning alcohol and shows of tolerance and support to gay people. The left it to the very last minute to do this, to give a fait accompli to countries at the finals. That's their prerogative, but it must never, ever happen again. Host countries don't own a WC. They host it, and the world takes them over for a brief period. We now know countries like Qatar don't want those rules. So they can f**k right off in future.
Normal if you read everything about all the reasons a country shouldn’t hold a World Cup you are looking a a very small a limited amount. List the reasons why people are complaining about this location and put those reasons against other countries that are soon to hold the competition or are hoping to Not many would get it probably including the UK Definitely not USA Canada and Mexico
India hosted the 2010 Commonwealth Games, a modest sized international event, and this was by fairly universal acceptance the worst organised multinational sporting event in living memory. While 12 years might have passed, the complexities and scale of a tournament like the World Cup means even the fabulously corrupt FIFA selection committee would think twice about handing them the tournament.
I can remember in "fish in our pond" on this forum about looking for good young players who played against us for clubs in our range putting forward Harry Souttar then of Fleetwood, now of Stoke and quarter finalists Australia as one we should be looking at. Who would have thought it? nobody at the Rovers at the time obviously.
Quote from: selby on December 01, 2022, 11:37:37 am I can remember in "fish in our pond" on this forum about looking for good young players who played against us for clubs in our range putting forward Harry Souttar then of Fleetwood, now of Stoke and quarter finalists Australia as one we should be looking at. Who would have thought it? nobody at the Rovers at the time obviously.He was only on loan as a young lad at Fleetwood and has been a regular first team player for Stoke for 3 seasons now. He would never have been a realistic target for us.
Probably. But these ain't and you know it.It's hardly been a well kept secret.....BobG