0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.
I’ve just watched the pm address the house followed by the leader of the opposition.Say what you like about left right politics, but I’ve just witnessed two very moving speeches from Two people who are usually at each other’s throats.
Billy, I was commenting on the football posters wanting to use the World cup as a stick to beat Russia with, and pointing out that the Asia, Concaf, South American,and African football federations already think that too many European countries qualify for the finals at the expense of countries in their federations. And that any organised lack of attendance could cost the European countries places in subsequent World Cups as those federations would take advantage of the situation in my opinion. They are already organised enough to make sure England , and the UK have little chance of hosting the competition again, and would like nothing more to make it more difficult for European and England especially to qualify' Choose how you dress yourself up your British and they dislike you, just as much as they do me buddy, and if they got to know how boring and condescending you can be, they would probably dislike you even more.
Quote from: big fat yorkshire pudding on February 24, 2022, 03:56:26 pmQuote from: SydneyRover on February 24, 2022, 01:58:06 pmQuote from: big fat yorkshire pudding on February 24, 2022, 01:27:04 pmQuote from: BillyStubbsTears on February 24, 2022, 12:33:33 pmQuote from: Ldr on February 24, 2022, 10:07:26 amThe irony BST that you campaigned door to door to have the worlds biggest Russian apologist elected PMI did. And I said at the time that t was the worst choice of PM there had ever been in an election. But on balance, I preferred the one who had a schoolboy outlook on Russia, but who was surrounded by MPs who were much more hard-headed and would control him, rather than one who had deliberately sat on a report into how Russia was attacking or democracy, who had given a peerage to the son of an FSB colonel, and whose party was up to its neck in Putin kleptocrat finance.Politics is about getting a least worst outcome. One of those two was going to be in No10 after that election. Which one would you have preferred?And which of the two alternatives would you prefer now?Still Boris.... As much as I dislike Boris he is still a better choice than Corbyn ever would be. Just look at Corbyn and Abbott's comments last week to see how he'd have been a disaster.I'll accept I may be wrong but have you ever voted labour pud?Yes, my local labour councillors largely do a good job.So you would not have supported the Brown government that went on to save the UK economy and knowing that presumably voted them out for a couple of wide boys that went on to do their best to trash the economy and then deliver brexit and jellyback johnson that has been protecting putiin's thugs in London. In a nutshell.
Quote from: SydneyRover on February 24, 2022, 01:58:06 pmQuote from: big fat yorkshire pudding on February 24, 2022, 01:27:04 pmQuote from: BillyStubbsTears on February 24, 2022, 12:33:33 pmQuote from: Ldr on February 24, 2022, 10:07:26 amThe irony BST that you campaigned door to door to have the worlds biggest Russian apologist elected PMI did. And I said at the time that t was the worst choice of PM there had ever been in an election. But on balance, I preferred the one who had a schoolboy outlook on Russia, but who was surrounded by MPs who were much more hard-headed and would control him, rather than one who had deliberately sat on a report into how Russia was attacking or democracy, who had given a peerage to the son of an FSB colonel, and whose party was up to its neck in Putin kleptocrat finance.Politics is about getting a least worst outcome. One of those two was going to be in No10 after that election. Which one would you have preferred?And which of the two alternatives would you prefer now?Still Boris.... As much as I dislike Boris he is still a better choice than Corbyn ever would be. Just look at Corbyn and Abbott's comments last week to see how he'd have been a disaster.I'll accept I may be wrong but have you ever voted labour pud?Yes, my local labour councillors largely do a good job.
Quote from: big fat yorkshire pudding on February 24, 2022, 01:27:04 pmQuote from: BillyStubbsTears on February 24, 2022, 12:33:33 pmQuote from: Ldr on February 24, 2022, 10:07:26 amThe irony BST that you campaigned door to door to have the worlds biggest Russian apologist elected PMI did. And I said at the time that t was the worst choice of PM there had ever been in an election. But on balance, I preferred the one who had a schoolboy outlook on Russia, but who was surrounded by MPs who were much more hard-headed and would control him, rather than one who had deliberately sat on a report into how Russia was attacking or democracy, who had given a peerage to the son of an FSB colonel, and whose party was up to its neck in Putin kleptocrat finance.Politics is about getting a least worst outcome. One of those two was going to be in No10 after that election. Which one would you have preferred?And which of the two alternatives would you prefer now?Still Boris.... As much as I dislike Boris he is still a better choice than Corbyn ever would be. Just look at Corbyn and Abbott's comments last week to see how he'd have been a disaster.I'll accept I may be wrong but have you ever voted labour pud?
Quote from: BillyStubbsTears on February 24, 2022, 12:33:33 pmQuote from: Ldr on February 24, 2022, 10:07:26 amThe irony BST that you campaigned door to door to have the worlds biggest Russian apologist elected PMI did. And I said at the time that t was the worst choice of PM there had ever been in an election. But on balance, I preferred the one who had a schoolboy outlook on Russia, but who was surrounded by MPs who were much more hard-headed and would control him, rather than one who had deliberately sat on a report into how Russia was attacking or democracy, who had given a peerage to the son of an FSB colonel, and whose party was up to its neck in Putin kleptocrat finance.Politics is about getting a least worst outcome. One of those two was going to be in No10 after that election. Which one would you have preferred?And which of the two alternatives would you prefer now?Still Boris.... As much as I dislike Boris he is still a better choice than Corbyn ever would be. Just look at Corbyn and Abbott's comments last week to see how he'd have been a disaster.
Quote from: Ldr on February 24, 2022, 10:07:26 amThe irony BST that you campaigned door to door to have the worlds biggest Russian apologist elected PMI did. And I said at the time that t was the worst choice of PM there had ever been in an election. But on balance, I preferred the one who had a schoolboy outlook on Russia, but who was surrounded by MPs who were much more hard-headed and would control him, rather than one who had deliberately sat on a report into how Russia was attacking or democracy, who had given a peerage to the son of an FSB colonel, and whose party was up to its neck in Putin kleptocrat finance.Politics is about getting a least worst outcome. One of those two was going to be in No10 after that election. Which one would you have preferred?And which of the two alternatives would you prefer now?
The irony BST that you campaigned door to door to have the worlds biggest Russian apologist elected PM
Quote from: SydneyRover on February 24, 2022, 04:39:19 pmQuote from: big fat yorkshire pudding on February 24, 2022, 03:56:26 pmQuote from: SydneyRover on February 24, 2022, 01:58:06 pmQuote from: big fat yorkshire pudding on February 24, 2022, 01:27:04 pmQuote from: BillyStubbsTears on February 24, 2022, 12:33:33 pmQuote from: Ldr on February 24, 2022, 10:07:26 amThe irony BST that you campaigned door to door to have the worlds biggest Russian apologist elected PMI did. And I said at the time that t was the worst choice of PM there had ever been in an election. But on balance, I preferred the one who had a schoolboy outlook on Russia, but who was surrounded by MPs who were much more hard-headed and would control him, rather than one who had deliberately sat on a report into how Russia was attacking or democracy, who had given a peerage to the son of an FSB colonel, and whose party was up to its neck in Putin kleptocrat finance.Politics is about getting a least worst outcome. One of those two was going to be in No10 after that election. Which one would you have preferred?And which of the two alternatives would you prefer now?Still Boris.... As much as I dislike Boris he is still a better choice than Corbyn ever would be. Just look at Corbyn and Abbott's comments last week to see how he'd have been a disaster.I'll accept I may be wrong but have you ever voted labour pud?Yes, my local labour councillors largely do a good job.So you would not have supported the Brown government that went on to save the UK economy and knowing that presumably voted them out for a couple of wide boys that went on to do their best to trash the economy and then deliver brexit and jellyback johnson that has been protecting putiin's thugs in London. In a nutshell.As a student at that time who'd just been saddled with 30k+ of student debt due to the policies brought in by said labour government, this after my labour mp said it was tough luck that I lost out on place at the local school because those from outside the area had more right to it than me. Nope I wasn't much of a fan of the labour party at that point.As to my point on Corbyn and McDonnell. It appears Starmer agrees as he has asked mcdonnell to withdraw his criticism of nato tonight..... That would have been government policy under Corbyn, just think about that.
At the moment, all that coded talk by the West about SWIFT sanctions is sounding like piss and wind. Locking Russia out of Swift would be a real smash in the face, but the west has so far backed down from doing it. If a full scale tank invasion isn't enough to trigger that, it makes you wonder what is.
Quote from: DRFCSouth on February 23, 2022, 08:10:34 pmQuote from: normal rules on February 23, 2022, 07:59:36 pmQuote from: aidanstu on February 23, 2022, 07:49:21 pmQuote from: normal rules on February 23, 2022, 07:46:43 pmBack on topic I can see that BA are still operating flights to Moscow. Tomorrow for instance from Heathrow. Surely airlines around the world should look to sanction Russia by limiting the ability of its people to get around. Why target just the wealthy? Whilst they hold a lot of power and influence, there would be no better way to alienate his own people from him by banning international travel in and out of Russia.Why should airlines have to take the lead when the government could quite easily do it for them but don’t.Airlines are already taking steps by cancelling flights to Ukraine, but that’s to protect planes and people. But they are still happy to fly to the aggressor nation. It just seems a bit daft. The Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 was shot down over Ukraine. Perhaps that's a good enough reason.The airlines will wait for direction as ultimately people need ferrying around.And their freedom to overfly countries is protected.Are you suggesting that Ukraine shot down the plane?
Quote from: normal rules on February 23, 2022, 07:59:36 pmQuote from: aidanstu on February 23, 2022, 07:49:21 pmQuote from: normal rules on February 23, 2022, 07:46:43 pmBack on topic I can see that BA are still operating flights to Moscow. Tomorrow for instance from Heathrow. Surely airlines around the world should look to sanction Russia by limiting the ability of its people to get around. Why target just the wealthy? Whilst they hold a lot of power and influence, there would be no better way to alienate his own people from him by banning international travel in and out of Russia.Why should airlines have to take the lead when the government could quite easily do it for them but don’t.Airlines are already taking steps by cancelling flights to Ukraine, but that’s to protect planes and people. But they are still happy to fly to the aggressor nation. It just seems a bit daft. The Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 was shot down over Ukraine. Perhaps that's a good enough reason.The airlines will wait for direction as ultimately people need ferrying around.And their freedom to overfly countries is protected.
Quote from: aidanstu on February 23, 2022, 07:49:21 pmQuote from: normal rules on February 23, 2022, 07:46:43 pmBack on topic I can see that BA are still operating flights to Moscow. Tomorrow for instance from Heathrow. Surely airlines around the world should look to sanction Russia by limiting the ability of its people to get around. Why target just the wealthy? Whilst they hold a lot of power and influence, there would be no better way to alienate his own people from him by banning international travel in and out of Russia.Why should airlines have to take the lead when the government could quite easily do it for them but don’t.Airlines are already taking steps by cancelling flights to Ukraine, but that’s to protect planes and people. But they are still happy to fly to the aggressor nation. It just seems a bit daft.
Quote from: normal rules on February 23, 2022, 07:46:43 pmBack on topic I can see that BA are still operating flights to Moscow. Tomorrow for instance from Heathrow. Surely airlines around the world should look to sanction Russia by limiting the ability of its people to get around. Why target just the wealthy? Whilst they hold a lot of power and influence, there would be no better way to alienate his own people from him by banning international travel in and out of Russia.Why should airlines have to take the lead when the government could quite easily do it for them but don’t.
Back on topic I can see that BA are still operating flights to Moscow. Tomorrow for instance from Heathrow. Surely airlines around the world should look to sanction Russia by limiting the ability of its people to get around. Why target just the wealthy? Whilst they hold a lot of power and influence, there would be no better way to alienate his own people from him by banning international travel in and out of Russia.
Quote from: BillyStubbsTears on February 24, 2022, 05:57:11 pmAt the moment, all that coded talk by the West about SWIFT sanctions is sounding like piss and wind. Locking Russia out of Swift would be a real smash in the face, but the west has so far backed down from doing it. If a full scale tank invasion isn't enough to trigger that, it makes you wonder what is.The EU looking likely to vote against removing SWIFT .Make of that what you will Billy .
Quote from: tyke1962 on February 24, 2022, 07:08:52 pmQuote from: BillyStubbsTears on February 24, 2022, 05:57:11 pmAt the moment, all that coded talk by the West about SWIFT sanctions is sounding like piss and wind. Locking Russia out of Swift would be a real smash in the face, but the west has so far backed down from doing it. If a full scale tank invasion isn't enough to trigger that, it makes you wonder what is.The EU looking likely to vote against removing SWIFT .Make of that what you will Billy .Swift works both ways, it stops Russia gathering payments. But it also stops creditors outside Russia getting paid. It would be a very big double edged sword.
Quote from: normal rules on February 24, 2022, 07:56:32 pmQuote from: tyke1962 on February 24, 2022, 07:08:52 pmQuote from: BillyStubbsTears on February 24, 2022, 05:57:11 pmAt the moment, all that coded talk by the West about SWIFT sanctions is sounding like piss and wind. Locking Russia out of Swift would be a real smash in the face, but the west has so far backed down from doing it. If a full scale tank invasion isn't enough to trigger that, it makes you wonder what is.The EU looking likely to vote against removing SWIFT .Make of that what you will Billy .Swift works both ways, it stops Russia gathering payments. But it also stops creditors outside Russia getting paid. It would be a very big double edged sword.Well that's fair enough but warfare tends to do that and it's a question of what you are prepared to suffer yourself in order to strike a blow on the aggressor .Looks like we are only prepared to suffer minimally whilst a democratic country is invaded right in front of our noses . Chamberlain would be proud .
Quote from: tyke1962 on February 24, 2022, 08:09:24 pmQuote from: normal rules on February 24, 2022, 07:56:32 pmQuote from: tyke1962 on February 24, 2022, 07:08:52 pmQuote from: BillyStubbsTears on February 24, 2022, 05:57:11 pmAt the moment, all that coded talk by the West about SWIFT sanctions is sounding like piss and wind. Locking Russia out of Swift would be a real smash in the face, but the west has so far backed down from doing it. If a full scale tank invasion isn't enough to trigger that, it makes you wonder what is.The EU looking likely to vote against removing SWIFT .Make of that what you will Billy .Swift works both ways, it stops Russia gathering payments. But it also stops creditors outside Russia getting paid. It would be a very big double edged sword.Well that's fair enough but warfare tends to do that and it's a question of what you are prepared to suffer yourself in order to strike a blow on the aggressor .Looks like we are only prepared to suffer minimally whilst a democratic country is invaded right in front of our noses . Chamberlain would be proud .Id beat Russia with every stick I could lay my hands on, metaphorically speaking. But there is a reason the leaders of the modern world are holding back on the SWIFT payments system,