Rwanda policy

[danumdon]

My comment was only in response to you reckoning not to understand Iberian Red's post which was about your lazy insistence in writing 'of' in place of 'have'.  My remark about respect was that to make your contributions on here more difficult to read just for the sake of using the correct word is disrespectful to anyone reading what you write.

As above your going to have to point out these grammatic errors because i'm not seeing them.

Your talking as if i'm doing this on a regular basis, care to show me?

[ravenrover]

Grammatical - just saying :-)

[danumdon]

Grammatical - just saying :-)

Did it on purpose to see who would correct me this time!!

[Sprotyrover]

Oh no !!! it’s ‘The Grammar Police’ !a Tardy bunch of Rascals who get sexual gratification out of ‘Dotting the I’s and crossing the ‘T’s on other Peoples post’s nearly as disreputable as Viz Comic’s ‘Bottom Inspectors’
But not quite!

[BillyStubbsTears]

Remember how the UK Supreme Court ruled that Rwanda wasn't a safe place for refugees?

Remember how this shit show of a ruling party responded by simply passing a law to make it illegal to claim that Rwanda wasn't safe for refugees?

https://x.com/sundersays/status/1786669612269990390

[Ldr]

Remember how the UK Supreme Court ruled that Rwanda wasn't a safe place for refugees?

Remember how this shit show of a ruling party responded by simply passing a law to make it illegal to claim that Rwanda wasn't safe for refugees?

https://x.com/sundersays/status/1786669612269990390

All that says is Congo isn’t a safe country

[BillyStubbsTears]

1) Goma is literally right on the Rwanda border. The boundary fence of Goma airport is the border with Rwanda.

2) There is continuous fighting going on in Goma, part sponsored by Rwanda which occasionally spills into Rwandan territory.

3) Even if none of that mattered, the fact that the Rwandan government is sponsoring fatal attacks on refugee camps speaks volumes of their attitude towards the rights of refugees, and shines a light on the law that our Govt passed making it illegal for any Govt employee or body to question the edict that Rwanda is "safe".

[Ldr]

So point 3, given we supply funding and aid for various wars around the world. You would agree that we should not be a safe country for refugees then?

[BillyStubbsTears]

So point 3, given we supply funding and aid for various wars around the world. You would agree that we should not be a safe country for refugees then?

What funding do we supply for armed groups that kill refugees?

[bpoolrover]

Its easy to say dont send them to rwanda.but what options are there? Labour say will stop the criminal gangs and speed the process up, unless you imprison them they will just vanish never to be seen again so that wont work

[BillyStubbsTears]

Bpool.

Take a moment and explain to me how spending the thick end of a billion quid on a crackpot scheme that MIGHT at a push remove one arrival in fifty is going to work.

The whole f**king plan is for it NOT to work and to blame Woke for it not working.

[Ldr]

So point 3, given we supply funding and aid for various wars around the world. You would agree that we should not be a safe country for refugees then?

What funding do we supply for armed groups that kill refugees?

Depends, sure there’s ppl on here that would happily point out instances of say the IDF or Ukrainian forces killing refuges

[ravenrover]

Even Cruella is now saying the current Rwanda scheme wont work........... now that is saying something!

[Ldr]

Even Cruella is now saying the current Rwanda scheme wont work........... now that is saying something!

Course it won’t work, it’s a reactionary policy like most of them from this risible government

[bpoolrover]

Bpool.

Take a moment and explain to me how spending the thick end of a billion quid on a crackpot scheme that MIGHT at a push remove one arrival in fifty is going to work.

The whole f**king plan is for it NOT to work and to blame Woke for it not working.

im not saying it will work im saying there is no one else coming up with any other credible option

[drfchound]

 .

Bpool.

Take a moment and explain to me how spending the thick end of a billion quid on a crackpot scheme that MIGHT at a push remove one arrival in fifty is going to work.

The whole f**king plan is for it NOT to work and to blame Woke for it not working.

im not saying it will work im saying there is no one else coming up with any other credible option

Easy to criticise when in opposition but what are they going to do when in power in a few months.

[danumdon]

Does anyone know what the Labour party policy is on illegal immigration?

Would love to know, just in case it changes for something else after the election!

[Iberian Red]

Does anyone know what the Labour party policy is on illegal immigration?

Would love to know, just in case it changes for something else after the election!

Could you please enlighten me on what the current government have as a policy?

Whatever it is it's working perfectly.

[Pancho Regan]

Congo is a different country to Rwanda, right?

[danumdon]

Does anyone know what the Labour party policy is on illegal immigration?

Would love to know, just in case it changes for something else after the election!

Could you please enlighten me on what the current government have as a policy?

Whatever it is it's working perfectly.

No one particularly cares about the current government policy as they will very soon be toast.

What we all want to know is what the incoming government will have as a policy, and if its any good, people may just want to vote for it.

Who knows? they may just expand on what this government is attempting to do.

[BillyStubbsTears]

Does anyone know what the Labour party policy is on illegal immigration?

Would love to know, just in case it changes for something else after the election!

Could you please enlighten me on what the current government have as a policy?

Whatever it is it's working perfectly.

No one particularly cares about the current government policy as they will very soon be toast.

What we all want to know is what the incoming government will have as a policy, and if its any good, people may just want to vote for it.

Who knows? they may just expand on what this government is attempting to do.

If you really were interested in this, you could read up on what Labour's policy is.

Why don't you? Instead of spouting your tired shite in here?

[drfchound]

Which version should he read though because it changes fairly often.

[Bentley Bullet]

It doesn't matter what policy the Labour government deploys, even if they continue with the Tory strategy it'll suddenly become the right approach by the "As Long As It's Labour" brigade.