0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Am I missing something? Why are we so "chuffed" about being sponsored by a company that seems to be "on the right tracks"
Quote from: not on facebook on February 06, 2017, 10:16:25 pmQuote from: RedJ on February 06, 2017, 10:02:53 pmSounds like the five year plan will be full steam ahead if true.Is that a hidden clue as to who the supposed next big sponsor will be ?if so would I be in the loop if I was to add some branston pickle to my cheese doorstep sarnieThat company have also sponsored Darlington's kit - must be a rail issue and offered discount fares too. 4 adult and 1 child ticket to Kings X in August they want £371. (Return I may add)
Quote from: RedJ on February 06, 2017, 10:02:53 pmSounds like the five year plan will be full steam ahead if true.Is that a hidden clue as to who the supposed next big sponsor will be ?if so would I be in the loop if I was to add some branston pickle to my cheese doorstep sarnie
Sounds like the five year plan will be full steam ahead if true.
Someone actually asked why we pass backwards and sideways? Wtf is our support?
The Virgin east coast logos were already on Gavin Strachan's training gear and on hoardings inside the stadium on saturday.
This idea might be in the deal for all I know, but there is chance to try something that might encourage Season ticket sales as well as increase away support. If every season ticket holder was offered free rail travel for away games it might encourage the away game only fan to buy a season ticket, and the flip side is the long term season ticket holder that only attends home games might be tempted to travel away
First one I've missed in a while sadly! I hope they explained some of their exciting longer term strategy plans in as much detail as they could?
To be pedantic - terry and dick weren't keen to offload yonks ago - they were prepared to listen to the workability of possible takeovers that would be in the best interests of the club - the couple of bids we know about plus a mooted 'possibles' other option weren't deemed viable hence they fell through/were rejected! They always said they were happy to look after the club until a sensible and sound option was offered. The whole crowdfunder thing was imo never an option that would never come to fruition but they listened and let the architects of that fall on their own swords! Ditto the Sequentia thing! At least that was my take on things!
The Sequentia thing was a risk which may or may not have pulled off in the end but with the debt we'd take on were better off being sustainable. The crowd funder was a joke, we would have gone bust if that had worked.