0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
QuoteI feel that some of the comments on this thread are truly refreshing by you menfolk!But according to some, you're as dull as dishwater unless you're misogynistic.However, I'd rather be dull than an arsehole.
I feel that some of the comments on this thread are truly refreshing by you menfolk!
?[/quoteTotally over the top, two blokes having a bit of banter between themselves, having a bit of a laugh and they sack him, the pc brigade has gone mad, they would have to sack half of the workforce in the country if they heard what stuff was said in snap cabins up and down the country, the worlds going fcuking mad, how about ITV sacking the presenters on Loose Women for thier sexist remarks about men!
like i said 'in my book' coventryrover i took the tone as banter.but now you bring 'mocking' to the table iam all ears fella.
oslorovers wrote:Quotelike i said 'in my book' coventryrover i took the tone as banter.but now you bring 'mocking' to the table iam all ears fella.Thats not relevant though. It's up to the person on the receiving end to decide that. I can give and take banter all day with a couple of blokes at work and also know there's a couple of blokes with whom I wouldn't engage in banter/micket taking if they walked into the office wearing their mams knickers. Know your audience. The lass from Sky certainly didn't look impressed.
Yes Savvy. The taste of post event hysteria, whipped up by a press with an agenda, is simply too strong to take all this at face value. They were idiots. Of course they were. They should have been punished. Of course they should. But at the time! Not days later after the shit stirrers have got everyone all lathered up. I never did like Murdoch. Now I like him and his minions even less. Not that I ever liked Andy gray either tbh. A great big dimwitted thug on a football field and a great big dimwitted thug off it too. As for Keys, I've never even seen the bloke.BobG
glyn wigley....offensive comments in my book can be judge by thetone in the voice alone,at the sametime as banter can be judge in the toneof the voice.
Don't think Keys is out of the water yet looking at this!!! http://www.whoateallthepies.tv/videos/62797/richard-keys-would-you-smash-it.html
Not sure this is all over yet. Jamie Redknapp may have some baggage yet.
You know, I have been thinking about this alot today, and in no way am I going to excuse the comments made, the men are silly old fools, yet I do as I have already said feel a smattering of sympathy for them.However thinking about the way women are viewed by some sections of the football world seems to tie in with the obnoxious comments. Lets face it, for decades now it is a certain type of girl that naturally gravitates towards the players, girls who see these men as an easy meal ticket.. Whose ideas of a sunday roast doesn't come with yorkshire puds and gravy included. Women who debase themselves, act like the trollops from the planet slut and generally give the less than highly intelligent amongst the football fraternity the idea that women are only good for one thing, well two if you just want to watch.... This isn't a world normal men inhabit, rockstar/sportstar you get groupies... flesh on a stick ..walking talking pleasure dolls... Does this go some way to explain their thinking? Remember these two deal predominately with the seedy over sexed over cashed world of the premiership after all.
if a mate or a person i knew called us a fcukingc*nt in a correct style of tone i could take it as banter.its as i said with me i go on the tone.now if a stranger was to call me a fcuking c*ntin the exact same tone as above i would have problems i guess for obvious reasons.