Viking Supporters Co-operative

Viking Chat => Viking Chat => Topic started by: BobG on April 24, 2024, 07:49:40 pm

Title: A question
Post by: BobG on April 24, 2024, 07:49:40 pm
If Rovers lost 1-0 this Saturday and Crawley won 1-0,  just how would the placings in the league of both be decided?

Note! It couldn't be by points, goal difference, goals scored or victories. Results across their 2 games??

BobG

Later: damn!! Goal difference and goals scored would do it after all. Crawley would have 1 more. But assuming that would have been identical, it's still an interesting question
Title: Re: A question
Post by: Nudga on April 24, 2024, 07:52:32 pm
Rock, paper, scissors, obviously!
Title: Re: A question
Post by: IDM on April 24, 2024, 08:01:57 pm
Goal difference wouldn’t be the same..
Title: Re: A question
Post by: Dutch Uncle on April 24, 2024, 08:09:40 pm
Could happen with us and Crewe

e.g. we lose 0-2, Goals F/A, currently 71-66 become 71-68
Crewe lose 3-4. their goals, currently 68-64 also becomes 71-68
If Barrow and Crawley win then Crewe and us are vying for the last playoff place.

Don't know the answer, but we would have both more wins and a better head-to-head vs Crewe

Edit: I remember in the mid 1960s, probably 1964-65, I was staying with my relatives in Swansea, and the local papers were full of the situation regarding relegation because on the last day a not unrealistic combination of results would put Swansea and someone else (Swindon maybe) on identical points, goals scored and conceded. I think they were thinking it would be a one off playoff. The situation didn't arise, Swansea lost badly, were relegated fair and square, and anyway the rules will certainly have changed since then.   

 
Title: Re: A question
Post by: Monkcaster_Rover on April 24, 2024, 08:23:57 pm
Meet in Coventry or somewhere in the middle and have a big dust up.
Title: Re: A question
Post by: wilts rover on April 24, 2024, 08:38:40 pm
It's quite convoluted but essentially after a number of criteria have been exhausted - a play-off.

https://www.gazettelive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/how-promotion-would-decided-clubs-11238267
Title: Re: A question
Post by: Herman Hessian on April 24, 2024, 08:40:06 pm
league position is determined, in order, by points obtained, goal difference, goals scored, a mini-league of the results between two or more teams ranked using the previous three criteria, and finally a series of one or more play-off matches
Title: Re: A question
Post by: BobG on April 24, 2024, 09:10:29 pm
Thank you Wilts. Thank you Herman.

Hope you're both well? It's been a while....

BobG
Title: Re: A question
Post by: Iberian Red on April 24, 2024, 09:43:10 pm
If Rovers lost 1-0 this Saturday and Crawley won 1-0,  just how would the placings in the league of both be decided?

Note! It couldn't be by points, goal difference, goals scored or victories. Results across their 2 games??

BobG

Later: damn!! Goal difference and goals scored would do it after all. Crawley would have 1 more. But assuming that would have been identical, it's still an interesting question

Maybe take a leaf out of some of our Etonian,Bullingdon Club PMs.



Soggy biscuit.
Title: Re: A question
Post by: Herman Hessian on April 24, 2024, 10:23:33 pm
Thank you Wilts. Thank you Herman.

Hope you're both well? It's been a while....

BobG

all good thanks, Bob - you know me - out the woodwork at the sniff of some reflected glory, never been one for the hard yards...  ;)
Title: Re: A question
Post by: adamtherover on April 24, 2024, 10:28:44 pm
Can we just get woody and big tom in the ring, Crewe can bring as many as they want, winner goes through !!!
Title: Re: A question
Post by: Wokingviking on April 24, 2024, 10:33:48 pm
Remember the days of “Goal Average” in the days when it was also just 2 points for a win and so there were often more teams tied on points than nowadays? (Or I may be imagining that, I have no statistics to back it up)

I think Goal Average was calculated as the ratio of goals scored to goals conceded.  Which meant you could have exactly the same goal difference as another team, but if you scored more (and correspondingly conceded more of course) then bizarrely you were worse off.  The system favoured defensive play.
Title: Re: A question
Post by: Dutch Uncle on April 24, 2024, 10:43:00 pm
Remember the days of “Goal Average” in the days when it was also just 2 points for a win and so there were often more teams tied on points than nowadays? (Or I may be imagining that, I have no statistics to back it up)

I think Goal Average was calculated as the ratio of goals scored to goals conceded.  Which meant you could have exactly the same goal difference as another team, but if you scored more (and correspondingly conceded more of course) then bizarrely you were worse off.  The system favoured defensive play.

I reckon young people's mental arithmetic is worse today than in the 1960's for 3 reasons:

- Calculators instead of log tables (remember them?)
- Going metric
- Goal Difference replacing Goal Average

29 of us huddled together in t' Cowshed with a log tables book recalculating Goal Average with every goal going in against Aldershot, with the 7-0 taking us from 5th to top. The youth of today..................... :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: A question
Post by: dickos1 on April 24, 2024, 11:07:38 pm
If we lost 1-0 and Crawley won 1-0 they would go above us on goal difference
Title: Re: A question
Post by: BobG on April 25, 2024, 12:28:34 pm
Yes.  We all know that Dickos. See the postscript to the original post. I added it  within 3 minutes of the original post.
Title: Re: A question
Post by: wilts rover on April 25, 2024, 05:49:21 pm
Thank you Wilts. Thank you Herman.

Hope you're both well? It's been a while....

BobG

No problem Bob. See you at Wembley although we will both have to make our own way there this time.
Title: Re: A question
Post by: graingrover on April 25, 2024, 06:01:33 pm
In the olden days either Barrow or  Workington would be bottom of League 4 every season .There was no way Non League clubs would be admitted but Workington had to apply for re election. The decision was a majority vote by all other fourth division clubs . Can you imagine the number of rounds  the Workington Chairman must have paid in opponents Board rooms after games ever increasing as end of season approached .Dutch may have the detail in his super data base ?
Title: Re: A question
Post by: Draytonian III on April 25, 2024, 06:19:55 pm
Hartlepool 11
Crewe 7
Barrow 6
Workington 5
Rovers 3
Are amongst the teams who had to apply for re-election, the number is the times they had to
Title: Re: A question
Post by: Herman Hessian on April 25, 2024, 06:25:08 pm
In the olden days either Barrow or  Workington would be bottom of League 4 every season .There was no way Non League clubs would be admitted but Workington had to apply for re election. The decision was a majority vote by all other fourth division clubs . Can you imagine the number of rounds  the Workington Chairman must have paid in opponents Board rooms after games ever increasing as end of season approached .Dutch may have the detail in his super data base ?

all the information is on wikipedia, here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Re-election_(Football_League)) - i never knew that Saturday's opponents had been slung out the league and then voted back in again...
Title: Re: A question
Post by: graingrover on April 25, 2024, 06:27:34 pm
Hartlepool 11
Crewe 7
Barrow 6
Workington 5

Spoilt my story a bit but I did not realise WE had had to apply three times !
Title: Re: A question
Post by: Herman Hessian on April 25, 2024, 06:29:52 pm
looks like the footballing authorities have really got it in for Gateshead - this season's ejection from the national league play-offs, and being thrown out of the league on the one and only time they had to apply for re-election - seems a trifle harsh given the multiple times that Hartlepool, Halifax, Southport and the like went cap in hand to the league !
Title: Re: A question
Post by: graingrover on April 25, 2024, 06:35:31 pm
Sentimentally speaking the only club which I was sorry to see lose league status is Bradford Park Avenue ( Kevin Hector was a classy player )
Title: Re: A question
Post by: Donnywolf on April 25, 2024, 06:44:07 pm
I remember Wigan ( then Borough ) trying to nick a place every year but it was seeming like a closed shop

Then one year it seemed like they could be "in" finally.

However they handed out Pens inscribed "Into the League with Wigan Borough" at the Meeting and they failed to get in

We can't be bought said the voting Clubs lol so they blew them out again
Title: Re: A question
Post by: Wokingviking on April 25, 2024, 07:53:02 pm
It was called “The Old Pals Act” and the only reason Barrow and Workington lost the vote was because the rest of the fourth division didn’t like the long away trips.
Title: Re: A question
Post by: scawsby steve on April 25, 2024, 09:33:48 pm
I remember Wigan ( then Borough ) trying to nick a place every year but it was seeming like a closed shop

Then one year it seemed like they could be "in" finally.

However they handed out Pens inscribed "Into the League with Wigan Borough" at the Meeting and they failed to get in

We can't be bought said the voting Clubs lol so they blew them out again

That's it, Wolfie, you've just confirmed your Methuselah status in remembering Wigan Borough.

They folded in 1932 and were replaced by Wigan Athletic.
Title: Re: A question
Post by: Surrey Rover on April 25, 2024, 09:56:47 pm
Up until season 1975/76 there was no limit on the number of non league clubs who could apply to join the Football League. From season 1976/77 only two were permitted.

In that last season of unlimited applications Gainsborough Trinity were amongst nine non league sides who applied but fell well short with just one vote.
http://www.englishfootballstats.co.uk/Level%204%20Tables/1975-76.htm
Title: Re: A question
Post by: Donnywolf on April 26, 2024, 06:30:07 am
I remember Wigan ( then Borough ) trying to nick a place every year but it was seeming like a closed shop

Then one year it seemed like they could be "in" finally.

However they handed out Pens inscribed "Into the League with Wigan Borough" at the Meeting and they failed to get in

We can't be bought said the voting Clubs lol so they blew them out again

That's it, Wolfie, you've just confirmed your Methuselah status in remembering Wigan Borough.

They folded in 1932 and were replaced by Wigan Athletic.

Yes , thanks SS.

I remember the bribery cost them a place in FL but had it seared in my head that it was Wigan Borough and I hold my hands up .

I also remember Springfield Park ( Wigan's home Ground ) as having the thinnest goal posts I've ever seen

Hope someone at least confirms that one as I've mentioned it on here a few times and nobody has commented lol

Cheers again Wolfie
Title: Re: A question
Post by: BobG on April 26, 2024, 01:26:29 pm
I remember watching none league Wigan Athletic winning, I think 2-0, at Belle Vue in an FA Cup tie. That was so, so, bad.....

BobG
Title: Re: A question
Post by: Campsall rover on April 26, 2024, 01:41:55 pm
Man Utd won the 1st Div on goal average from Leeds Utd in 1964/65 season

Leeds drew their last match 3-3 at Birmingham
If it had been 2-2 Leeds would have been Champions
Yes it was that close
Unbelievable Jeff

But yes it favoured conceding less goals not scoring more.



Title: Re: A question
Post by: Dutch Uncle on April 26, 2024, 03:00:32 pm
The thing that bugged me about Goal Average was people saying 'we lost out by 0.36 of a goal' or something similar.

First, importantly, Goal Average was a unitless quantity, just a number. It is just like for example gradient. A gradient of 1 in 10, or 10% is unitless (1 foot height gained for every 10 feet travelled horizontally or feet divided by feet). No-one would say that is a gradient of 0.10 feet.     

Secondly annoyingly, it made it sound close when it often isn't.

For example 80/50 is a goal average of 1.6; 60/50 is a goal average of 1.2

So the first is better by 0.4 which sounds close, but the second team would have needed 21 goals without reply to beat the first. 

Here ends the mathematics lesson :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: A question
Post by: Silkscarf on April 26, 2024, 03:09:16 pm
QPR were close to winning the league in about 1975. I remember the discussions on Radio 2 commentary about their goal average versus Liverpool’s. I’d probably only just learnt about averages at school.
Title: Re: A question
Post by: Guernsey Exile on April 26, 2024, 03:14:46 pm
Colchester and Sutton could be interesting tomorrow - this scenario could play out....taken from SSN -

 There is a scenario that both sides could finish level on points, goal difference and goals scored: Sutton win by three clear goals 3-0 and Colchester lose by one. In that case, the head-to-head between the sides comes into play but as both games finished 1-1, then most wins in the division would secure a higher finish, and that would be Colchester, who have 11 to Sutton's nine.
Title: Re: A question
Post by: Campsall rover on April 26, 2024, 07:26:15 pm
Colchester and Sutton could be interesting tomorrow - this scenario could play out....taken from SSN -

 There is a scenario that both sides could finish level on points, goal difference and goals scored: Sutton win by three clear goals 3-0 and Colchester lose by one. In that case, the head-to-head between the sides comes into play but as both games finished 1-1, then most wins in the division would secure a higher finish, and that would be Colchester, who have 11 to Sutton's nine.
If Sutton win 3-0 away at Mk Dons then MK are on the beach. They are very strong at home.
Colchester will be asking questions I should think.
Having said that I can see Colchester beating Crewe tomorrow as they are in awful form.
The U’s need to sort out their finishing. They have some considerable ability in their team but need to be much more clinical.
Let’s hope the U’s win and comfortably. It will make tomorrow much less stressful.
I can’t see Crawley not beating Grimsby so that one worries me.
Barrow Mansfield I  just can’t call. Will Mansfield be going 100% for the win or will they take it a bit easy?

Title: Re: A question
Post by: RobTheRover on April 26, 2024, 07:49:49 pm
I thought we were going to get the age old dilemma....

A1 or M1. ?
Title: Re: A question
Post by: Campsall rover on April 26, 2024, 08:05:18 pm
I thought we were going to get the age old dilemma....

A1 or M1. ?
If only.  :facepalm:

If we are ever going to finally get the Gillingham away hoodoo off our back, tomorrow is the day.

If we are really at it and just continue what we have been doing for the last 10 games then we will win this match.
It’s so easy sat on here typing that but just a tad more difficult for the players with what’s at stake.

Am I nervous? You bet. At least I had 5 hours to switch off today at Headingley. Very therapeutic that was I must say.
Title: Re: A question
Post by: scawsby steve on April 26, 2024, 10:05:53 pm
I remember watching none league Wigan Athletic winning, I think 2-0, at Belle Vue in an FA Cup tie. That was so, so, bad.....

BobG

I think you're wrong there, Bob. It was in the early 1960s, and we drew 2-2 at Belle Vue and lost the replay at Springfield Park 1-3.

I can't remember us playing them again in the FA Cup while they were still non-league, but I'll hold my hands up if I'm wrong.
Title: Re: A question
Post by: BobG on April 26, 2024, 10:12:38 pm
Possibly Steve. Memory ain't what it once was. I was bloody convinced though! My only hope is another Cup match. At a guess it'd have to be somewhere between 1966 and 1974. Probably the earlier end of that. Now I shall have to go googling. Lol!

Bob

Later: nope. You are spot on Steve. That memory from 1965 is 59 years old then!