0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Marquis inability to do what required in defence did not cost us the game as drew , but his inability to take a shot when presented may have cost us a win .
TRB. He couldn't lash the ball down the park. That was physically impossible, given his body position and the position of the ball. Have a look at the video. Regarding hammering the ball out of play, no player is ever going to do that in those circumstances. You don't know how long is left of the clock. So you're not going to wilfully give a throw-in to the opposition 30 yards out from goal and give them the initiative. That could equally well have led to a goal. Especially since they had someone who could throw the ball 40 yards, and a centre forward who had 4 inches on any of our defenders. Marquis would have been castigated for that. His only really safe outlet would have been to turn round 180 degrees and lay the ball back to Toffolo. But that would have required him to have eyes in the back of his head. And not to slip up, withfour Rotherham players around him. What he did do clearly didn't work, but there are lots of Monday Morning Quarterbacks on here saying it's obvious he should have done something else. And it wasn't obvious. Neither at the time, nor now.
If you cannot see that Marquis is the best leader of the line we have had since Brown at his best,dont put in for the job as a Sky pundit. You have to Know something about football to do that job. And by the way he has scored goals at a decent average per game with us as well.
MFD. You keep going on about Marquis not shooting. So does 1969. I really don't know what instances you are in about, but I do recall Marquis having a powerful shot in target that hit an arm and should have led to a penalty, and another excellent shot on the turn that skimmed over the bar. That doesn't sound to me like a player who chooses not to shoot. Whatever the occurrence is that you keep hammering on about, do you think there may have been something about it that you didn't see? Maybe a player blocking the route to goal? To be honest, if you really think that ANY player would have booted the ball into touch in that incident that led to the goal, it doesn't give me much confidence that you understand how footballers make their split-second decisions.
MFD,just pointing out your job prospects mate (joke),you are more than entitled to your opinion, we all see different things in players,thats football and this is a discussion forum,I want to read other peoples opinions,it is the only way I can learn about the game. Nobody sees everything that goes on on the field of play,we are making mistakes in games as a team that are frustrating to the fans and the management,again that is part of the beauty of the game. What I will say is that if I was a defender playing against us,the strikers I would not like to mark would be Marquis and Mandeville.The reasons being Marquis can play with his back to goal and bring other players into the game while drawing defenders around him,Mandeville can collect the ball and turn you and then carry the ball at speed and is capable of playing the through ball.Alfie and Williams run the channels and need an extra touch to control the ball (in my opinion you may disagree) in the box and miss more chances because of the way defenders block the shot nowadays. It is only a personal choice,we have the best all round strikers we have had for years with hopefully another good one getting nearer to fitness.