Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 02, 2024, 05:16:50 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Links


FSA logo

Poll

Who was your MOM vs Watford?

Turnbull
20 (47.6%)
Husband
2 (4.8%)
Jones
0 (0%)
Wabara
0 (0%)
Khumalo
6 (14.3%)
Coppinger
1 (2.4%)
Wellens
3 (7.1%)
Keegan
2 (4.8%)
Cotterill
0 (0%)
Brown
8 (19%)
Robinson
0 (0%)
Macheda
0 (0%)
Furman
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 41

Voting closed: September 20, 2013, 09:44:56 pm

Author Topic: Watford MOM  (Read 2596 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

bobjimwilly

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 12206
Watford MOM
« on September 17, 2013, 09:44:56 pm by bobjimwilly »
Voting closes on Friday  :scarf:



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

Mr1Croft

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5298
Re: Watford MOM
« Reply #1 on September 18, 2013, 02:17:30 am by Mr1Croft »
Thought Brown played well until the introduction of Macheda and we began to sit back limiting his service.

Turnbull very close second!

GazLaz

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 12706
Re: Watford MOM
« Reply #2 on September 18, 2013, 10:28:33 am by GazLaz »
Brown was awesome. How he's only got 3 votes is bewildering.

SoundbiteBarmyArmy

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1217
Re: Watford MOM
« Reply #3 on September 19, 2013, 12:49:52 pm by SoundbiteBarmyArmy »
Brown was awesome. How he's only got 3 votes is bewildering.

It should of course be 5 and counting.

Browny, again, MOTM for me! Outstanding.  :clapping:

SoundbiteBarmyArmy

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1217
Re: Watford MOM
« Reply #4 on September 20, 2013, 08:26:34 am by SoundbiteBarmyArmy »
Not so sure why/how Turnbull is winning this vote btw, as well as a defensive lapse for their first goal, Turnbull could've done a whole lot better!

RedJ

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 18491
Re: Watford MOM
« Reply #5 on September 20, 2013, 12:03:39 pm by RedJ »
On the other hand, had it not been for Turnbull Watford could have been out of sight by the time the penalty was given.

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012