0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: silent majority on April 12, 2019, 09:16:36 amIt seems the rape charge wasn't dropped in Sweden, it was 'set aside' because of his unavailability. I'd expect that to have priority over other charges.A bit of info on the 'rape' charges here SM''On 20 August 2010, two women, a 26-year-old living in Enköping and a 31-year-old living in Stockholm,[4][5] jointly went to the Swedish police not seeking to bring charges against Assange but in order to track him down and persuade him to be tested for sexually transmitted diseases after their separate sexual encounters with him.[6] The police told them that they could not simply tell Assange to take a test, but that their statements would be passed to the prosecutor.[7] Later that day, the duty prosecutor ordered the arrest of Julian Assange on the suspicion of rape and molestation.[8]''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assange_v_Swedish_Prosecution_Authority
It seems the rape charge wasn't dropped in Sweden, it was 'set aside' because of his unavailability. I'd expect that to have priority over other charges.
You can't make an omelette without breaking eggs. Islamic terrorism MUST be destroyed at all costs.