0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: scawsby steve on April 05, 2024, 05:43:18 pmSyd, how many female leaders have the Labour Party had?In your own time.You don't have to be scared of women just because they're smarter than you Steve
Syd, how many female leaders have the Labour Party had?In your own time.
I support meritocracy but at present the house is stacked against women. I'm trying to show that it is important that if several people apply for a position and are equally qualified it shouldn't matter whether you are female, male or which school you went to for that matter, all should have equal opportunity.
Quote from: SydneyRover on April 05, 2024, 11:19:42 pmQuote from: scawsby steve on April 05, 2024, 05:43:18 pmSyd, how many female leaders have the Labour Party had?In your own time.You don't have to be scared of women just because they're smarter than you SteveYou really are the most stupid person I've come across.Stop acting daft, and just answer the f*cking question I asked.
Quote from: scawsby steve on April 06, 2024, 04:38:39 pmQuote from: SydneyRover on April 05, 2024, 11:19:42 pmQuote from: scawsby steve on April 05, 2024, 05:43:18 pmSyd, how many female leaders have the Labour Party had?In your own time.You don't have to be scared of women just because they're smarter than you SteveYou really are the most stupid person I've come across.Stop acting daft, and just answer the f*cking question I asked.Isn't it just banter Steve, you did tell me that again the other day, oh that's right it's just you and the peanut gallery that make the rules right?
Quote from: SydneyRover on April 06, 2024, 12:24:51 pmI support meritocracy but at present the house is stacked against women. I'm trying to show that it is important that if several people apply for a position and are equally qualified it shouldn't matter whether you are female, male or which school you went to for that matter, all should have equal opportunity.The mistake you liberals make with your identity politics is to assume that gender , sexuality and skin colour are the only reason why people don't always make it to the top .
How did a thread about equality get hijacked and descend into insults?Rhetorical.
Quote from: Iberian Red on April 06, 2024, 05:54:44 pmHow did a thread about equality get hijacked and descend into insults?Rhetorical.Because a certain poster was asked why the Labour Party, who are supposed to be the champions of equality, have never elected a female leader.As usual, he refused to answer.
Quote from: scawsby steve on April 06, 2024, 09:07:43 pmQuote from: Iberian Red on April 06, 2024, 05:54:44 pmHow did a thread about equality get hijacked and descend into insults?Rhetorical.Because a certain poster was asked why the Labour Party, who are supposed to be the champions of equality, have never elected a female leader.As usual, he refused to answer.was it the same when you voted labour Steve?
Quote from: tyke1962 on April 06, 2024, 05:48:54 pmQuote from: SydneyRover on April 06, 2024, 12:24:51 pmI support meritocracy but at present the house is stacked against women. I'm trying to show that it is important that if several people apply for a position and are equally qualified it shouldn't matter whether you are female, male or which school you went to for that matter, all should have equal opportunity.The mistake you liberals make with your identity politics is to assume that gender , sexuality and skin colour are the only reason why people don't always make it to the top .I see you don't have an answer so you try to divert and start an argument, it's your modus operandi tyke.I guess you can take heart from all the others around doing exactly the same
Quote from: SydneyRover on April 06, 2024, 08:20:13 pmQuote from: tyke1962 on April 06, 2024, 05:48:54 pmQuote from: SydneyRover on April 06, 2024, 12:24:51 pmI support meritocracy but at present the house is stacked against women. I'm trying to show that it is important that if several people apply for a position and are equally qualified it shouldn't matter whether you are female, male or which school you went to for that matter, all should have equal opportunity.The mistake you liberals make with your identity politics is to assume that gender , sexuality and skin colour are the only reason why people don't always make it to the top .I see you don't have an answer so you try to divert and start an argument, it's your modus operandi tyke.I guess you can take heart from all the others around doing exactly the samePoor old Syd , you don't even know what it is you claim to stand up for .You claim to stand up for equal opportunities for individuals irrespective of gender , race , sexuality or religious beliefs which is fine .Except that's not what progressives are actually doing today but you support this as well .Today progressives campaign for equal outcomes for groups , Black Lives Matter is the standout example .They are conflicting ideologies .
Quote from: tyke1962 on April 06, 2024, 10:36:52 pmQuote from: SydneyRover on April 06, 2024, 08:20:13 pmQuote from: tyke1962 on April 06, 2024, 05:48:54 pmQuote from: SydneyRover on April 06, 2024, 12:24:51 pmI support meritocracy but at present the house is stacked against women. I'm trying to show that it is important that if several people apply for a position and are equally qualified it shouldn't matter whether you are female, male or which school you went to for that matter, all should have equal opportunity.The mistake you liberals make with your identity politics is to assume that gender , sexuality and skin colour are the only reason why people don't always make it to the top .I see you don't have an answer so you try to divert and start an argument, it's your modus operandi tyke.I guess you can take heart from all the others around doing exactly the samePoor old Syd , you don't even know what it is you claim to stand up for .You claim to stand up for equal opportunities for individuals irrespective of gender , race , sexuality or religious beliefs which is fine .Except that's not what progressives are actually doing today but you support this as well .Today progressives campaign for equal outcomes for groups , Black Lives Matter is the standout example .They are conflicting ideologies .hope not hate tyke
Quote from: SydneyRover on April 06, 2024, 11:00:48 pmQuote from: tyke1962 on April 06, 2024, 10:36:52 pmQuote from: SydneyRover on April 06, 2024, 08:20:13 pmQuote from: tyke1962 on April 06, 2024, 05:48:54 pmQuote from: SydneyRover on April 06, 2024, 12:24:51 pmI support meritocracy but at present the house is stacked against women. I'm trying to show that it is important that if several people apply for a position and are equally qualified it shouldn't matter whether you are female, male or which school you went to for that matter, all should have equal opportunity.The mistake you liberals make with your identity politics is to assume that gender , sexuality and skin colour are the only reason why people don't always make it to the top .I see you don't have an answer so you try to divert and start an argument, it's your modus operandi tyke.I guess you can take heart from all the others around doing exactly the samePoor old Syd , you don't even know what it is you claim to stand up for .You claim to stand up for equal opportunities for individuals irrespective of gender , race , sexuality or religious beliefs which is fine .Except that's not what progressives are actually doing today but you support this as well .Today progressives campaign for equal outcomes for groups , Black Lives Matter is the standout example .They are conflicting ideologies .hope not hate tykeThat's another campaign for equal outcomes for groups Syd .
Quote from: tyke1962 on April 07, 2024, 08:36:44 amQuote from: SydneyRover on April 06, 2024, 11:00:48 pmQuote from: tyke1962 on April 06, 2024, 10:36:52 pmQuote from: SydneyRover on April 06, 2024, 08:20:13 pmQuote from: tyke1962 on April 06, 2024, 05:48:54 pmQuote from: SydneyRover on April 06, 2024, 12:24:51 pmI support meritocracy but at present the house is stacked against women. I'm trying to show that it is important that if several people apply for a position and are equally qualified it shouldn't matter whether you are female, male or which school you went to for that matter, all should have equal opportunity.The mistake you liberals make with your identity politics is to assume that gender , sexuality and skin colour are the only reason why people don't always make it to the top .I see you don't have an answer so you try to divert and start an argument, it's your modus operandi tyke.I guess you can take heart from all the others around doing exactly the samePoor old Syd , you don't even know what it is you claim to stand up for .You claim to stand up for equal opportunities for individuals irrespective of gender , race , sexuality or religious beliefs which is fine .Except that's not what progressives are actually doing today but you support this as well .Today progressives campaign for equal outcomes for groups , Black Lives Matter is the standout example .They are conflicting ideologies .hope not hate tykeThat's another campaign for equal outcomes for groups Syd .May 2 and General Election a little later and Alfie May is rumoured to be a Starmer admirer.
Quote from: ncRover on April 05, 2024, 07:26:14 amQuote from: SydneyRover on March 26, 2024, 09:09:58 pmI think what a lot of men are missing is that if we get the smartest of women in the top positions the country will benefit as a whole. Having exclusive blokey clubs ends up with mates looking after mates.What barriers exist at present for smart women getting in to top roles in this country?(I’m not necessarily saying there isn’t I’m just picking your brains and we’ll go from there)I'm really surprised I have to educate you on this nc''Women hold 42% of board seats at big UK firms, but just 10 are FTSE 100 bosses. Women occupy more than two in five seats on the boards of the UK's biggest listed companies but there are still “too few” in top positions with just 10 female FTSE 100 chief executives, according to a report.27 Feb 2024''https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/feb/27/women-board-seats-uk-firms-ftse-100-bosses#:~:text=1%20month%20old-,Women%20hold%2042%25%20of%20board%20seats%20at%20big%20UK%20firms,10%20are%20FTSE%20100%20bosses&text=Women%20occupy%20more%20than%20two,executives%2C%20according%20to%20a%20report.
Quote from: SydneyRover on March 26, 2024, 09:09:58 pmI think what a lot of men are missing is that if we get the smartest of women in the top positions the country will benefit as a whole. Having exclusive blokey clubs ends up with mates looking after mates.What barriers exist at present for smart women getting in to top roles in this country?(I’m not necessarily saying there isn’t I’m just picking your brains and we’ll go from there)
I think what a lot of men are missing is that if we get the smartest of women in the top positions the country will benefit as a whole. Having exclusive blokey clubs ends up with mates looking after mates.
Yes but this isn't new it's been like this forever, no?
the 'although bit is general and it means that men still want to rule by bullying and it shows on both boards quite often, although there is an 'although' for women in this case as it does occurs with them also.
On cue we have the apoplectic murdoch media (advisedly) and the 'right' finding offence with the appointment of a female governor-general, in the past this position has gone to someone living on welfare at buck house or ex-military etc .......(correction friends of buck house)''Viceregal controversies aren't new but Sam Mostyn's appointment took the outrage to new levels''.......... ''There have to date been 27 governors-general of this federation. One of them, Dame Quentin Bryce, has been female. The addition of another does not, to a rational eye, even faintly confirm an emerging new underclass of judicial and military gentlemen crushed under the merciless Jimmy Choos of a new skirtocracy''https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-04-10/sam-mostyn-governor-general-viceregal-drama/103686858