0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: idler on November 23, 2021, 07:12:12 pmBB has anybody supporting Boris apologised for supporting a serial liar?While his supporters are laughing at Boris the buffoon and scoring points the country is rapidly going down the pan.What do you want people to do, Idler? The next GE probably won't be fought until 2024, and it will most likely be between Sunak and AN Other.
BB has anybody supporting Boris apologised for supporting a serial liar?While his supporters are laughing at Boris the buffoon and scoring points the country is rapidly going down the pan.
I don't know which would be more embarrassing here BB. The idea that you might actually think there's a real equivalence here.Or the idea that you don't. Straight question. Do you truly and honestly think Johnson and Starmer are as bad as each other when it comes to their relationship with the truth.Simple yes or no. No need for your usual blather.My answer. No.
What about Johnson's lifetime of lying before he was PM?Do you think Starmer lies as much? Has Starmer been sacked...twice...for lying?Was Starmer's first major job writing lies about the EU on a weekly basis for a major paper? You know? Like the bent bananas and the eurocondom?
You are more of an idiot than you even realise. Go and read up about the supposed "lie" that you're blathering on about. And then have a think where your self respect has gone.
You're a bit of a pillock, basically, aren't you BST? I suppose I should be thankful for being capable of seeing through your bullshit. I just pity those who aren't.
The issue is BB, you never, ever bring anything to a discussion. You just dribble out any argument you can think of to keep the argument going. You decide you are not going to accept you are wrong and you act like a ten year old as a result .Look at this case.1) Firstly you claim that Starmer is a liar for an issue where by any rational assessment, he wasn't deliberately trying to deceive and he set the record straight within hours.2) In that issue, you constantly refer to the wrong issue. Ironically, the thing you accuse Starmer of lying about is an issue that the Tories themselves lied about as a deliberate policy - as you could easily have found out for yourself. https://www.channel4.com/news/factcheck/factcheck-keir-starmer-did-want-to-stay-in-the-european-medicines-agency-but-it-wouldnt-have-affected-the-vaccine-rollout3) Then you accept that Johnson has lied repeatedly as PM but say that's because he's PM and Starmer would be as bad.4) Then you say Johnson's lifelong habit of lying doesn't matter because it was too long ago.5) Then for some bizarre reason, vou raise the fact that Starmer's stance on Brexit changed after Brexit had happened as evidence of him being as bad as Johnson.Do you get why it is so difficult to respect your approach?
That's precisely the issue Wilts.If you don't call this out, if you excuse it, you normalise it.Even lifelong Tories like Ken Clarke are pointing out this is how democracy slips away. Have you EVER heard a politician say that about their own Govt before?A shame some folk in here prefer to have a tired fight rather than wake up to what is going on.
ravenrover, we are all guilty of errors and inaccuracies in things we say, so I suppose we all qualify as liars, in your book....Unless you believe in the theory that only Tories can be liars?