Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 17, 2024, 01:32:52 am

Login with username, password and session length

Links


FSA logo

Author Topic: 6-1!!! to city  (Read 6992 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ruby12345

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 66
Re: 6-1!!! to city
« Reply #60 on October 23, 2011, 10:52:14 pm by ruby12345 »
hoolahoop you have previous form of defending utd i seem to remember.apologies if im wrong.



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

ruby12345

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 66
Re: 6-1!!! to city
« Reply #61 on October 23, 2011, 10:55:31 pm by ruby12345 »
and after all liverpools spending has been recouped also with the sales of owen alonso mascherano torres benayoun meireles rieira. not to sure with chelsea to be honest

hoolahoop

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 10269
Re: 6-1!!! to city
« Reply #62 on October 23, 2011, 10:56:42 pm by hoolahoop »
Btw here's where the money came from.........

 Rnd Attn Rnd Attn Cup Rnd Attn Attn
2011 Champion 1 1 75.109 SF 169.770 QF 44.356 CL Final 488.704 2.129.907
2010 2 1 2 74.864 3 37.263 Winners 183.070 CL QF 371.074 2.013.831
2009 Champion 1 1 75.304 SF 125.911 Winners 202.615 CL Final 484.350 2.243.652
2008 Champion 1 1 75.691 QF 130.231 3 37.028 CL Champion 484.189 2.089.584
2007 Champion 1 1 75.826 Final 236.187 4 10.789 CL SF 444.484 2.132.154
2006 2 1 2 68.765 4 66.064 Winners 151.596 CL R1 245.910 1.770.098
2005 3 1 3 67.748 Final 177.313 SF 130.049 CL R2 328.435 1.923.016
2004 3 1 3 67.641 Winners 146.929 4 31.414 CL R2 267.397 1.730.915
2003 Champion 1 1 67.602 5 100.806 Final 163.924 CL QF 463.821 2.012.985
2002 3 1 3 67.558 4 28.034 3 15.347 CL QF 531.009 1.857.992
2001 Champion 1 1 67.490 4 43.104 4 33.207 CL QF 460.565 1.819.184
2000 Champion 1 1 58.014     3 16.908 CL QF 394.484 1.513.655
1999 Champion 1 1 55.188 Winners 198.912 QF 62.717 CL Champion 366.108 1.676.317
1998 2 1 2 55.164 5 81.408 3 11.087 CL QF 213.834 1.354.454
1997 Champion 1 1 55.081 4 65.719 4 34.867 CL QF 265.678 1.412.811
1996 Champion 1 1 41.683 Winners 141.644 2 29.049 EC3 R1 29.274 991.937
1995 2 1 2 43.683 Final 143.477 3 48.704 CL R1 112.909 1.222.438
1994 Champion 1 1 44.244 Winners 141.560 Final 195.366 CL R2 75.177 1.341.236
1993 Champion 1 1 35.132 5 45.714 3 43.387 EC3 R1 19.998 846.876
1992 2 1 2 45.389 4 42.369 Winners 163.704 EC2 R2 74.677 1.233.929
1991 6 1 6 43.242 5 50.709 Final 167.661 EC2 Winners 165.027 1.204.986
1990 13 1 13 39.331 Winners 171.064 3 49.578       967.937
1989 11 1 11 36.474 QF 136.221 3 26.029       855.265
1988 2 1 2 39.152 5   QF          
1987 11 1 11 40.594 4   3          
1986 4 1 4 46.321 5   4          
1985 4 1 4 42.881 Winners   3   EC3 QF    
1984 4 1 4 42.534 3   4   EC2 SF    
1983 3 1 3 41.695 Winners   Final   EC3 R1    
1982 3 1 3 44.571 3   2          
1981 8 1 8 45.071 4   2   EC3 R1    
1980 2 1 2 51.608 3   3          
1979 9 1 9 46.430 Final   3          
1978 10 1 10 51.860 4   2   EC2 R2    
1977 6 1 6 53.710 Winners   QF   EC3 R2    
1976 3 1 3 54.750 Final   4          
1975 1 2 23 48.389 3   SF          
1974 21 1 21 42.712 4   2          
1973 18 1 18 48.623 3   3          
1972 8 1 8 45.999 4   4          
1971 8 1 8 43.945 3   SF          
1970 8 1 8 49.862 SF   SF          
1969 11 1 11 51.169 QF       EC1 SF    
1968 2 1 2 57.552 3       EC1 Champion    
1967 Champion 1 1 53.854 4   2          
1966 4 1 4 38.769 SF       EC1 SF    
1965 Champion 1 1 46.521 SF       EC3 SF    
1964 2 1 2 44.125 SF       EC2 QF    
1963 19 1 19 40.329 Winners              
1962 15 1 15 33.491 SF              
1961 7 1 7 38.888 4   2          
1960 7 1 7 47.288 5              
1959 2 1 2 53.258 3              
1958 9 1 9 46.073 Final       EC1 SF    
1957 Champion 1 1 45.481 Final       EC1 SF    
1956 Champion 1 1 39.254 3              
1955 5 1 5 36.911 4              
1954 4 1 4 36.887 3              
1953 8 1 8 37.571 5              
1952 Champion 1 1 42.916 3              
1951 2 1 2 39.008 QF              
1950 4 1 4 43.282 QF              
1949 2 1 2 48.808 SF              
1948 2 1 2 54.890 Winners              
1947 2 1 2 43.945 4  

Check out the attendances ....long before Munich and the Sky monies

hoolahoop

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 10269
Re: 6-1!!! to city
« Reply #63 on October 23, 2011, 10:58:06 pm by hoolahoop »
Quote from: \"ruby12345\" post=193790
and after all liverpools spending has been recouped also with the sales of owen alonso mascherano torres benayoun meireles rieira. not to sure with chelsea to be honest


Believe me Liverpool have spent more......

ruby12345

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 66
Re: 6-1!!! to city
« Reply #64 on October 23, 2011, 11:00:15 pm by ruby12345 »
you just revealed your true colours. i suspected before but couldnt remember 100 percent that it was you. everytime anyone on this forum has a bad word for manchester utd you arrive on your white horse to fight thier corner. why is that?

ruby12345

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 66
Re: 6-1!!! to city
« Reply #65 on October 23, 2011, 11:02:01 pm by ruby12345 »
yes people are imagining the 100m spent on ferdinand rooney berbatov and countless others. all the big clubs spend similar amounts of money apart from arsenal.

hoolahoop

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 10269
Re: 6-1!!! to city
« Reply #66 on October 23, 2011, 11:03:54 pm by hoolahoop »
Quote from: \"ruby12345\" post=193787
hoolahoop you have previous form of defending utd i seem to remember.apologies if im wrong.


I do when the arguments are weak , I also have form defending City on certain issues. I won't pretend for one minute that they haven't been a joy to watch over the years but then again 2 of my favourite players were/are Bell and Lee.
Sorry if I don't conform to the 'we must all hate Man U' club.

Who I enjoy watching is obviously my business as for Fergie he's an arse but a very clever one

ruby12345

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 66
Re: 6-1!!! to city
« Reply #67 on October 23, 2011, 11:05:51 pm by ruby12345 »
if this weekend city or chelsea or lpool or arsenal had lost 6-1 i think people on this forum would have a chuckle at thier exspense(its what football fans do) i know i did when united beat arsenal 8-2

ruby12345

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 66
Re: 6-1!!! to city
« Reply #68 on October 23, 2011, 11:09:06 pm by ruby12345 »
utd got spanked people found it amusing. next week it will be liverpool or chelsea its nothing to do with hating utd. i cant see any reason why rovers fans should hate manchester united. after all the success they have had down the years is mind blowing for a simple fan of a pub team like me. dont take utd jokes personal it makes you appear to be a closet utd fan.

ruby12345

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 66
Re: 6-1!!! to city
« Reply #69 on October 23, 2011, 11:11:59 pm by ruby12345 »
roy hodgson would beg to differ about liverpools spending power. those 2 yanks nearly run them into the ground

inSODwetrust

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 857
Re: 6-1!!! to city
« Reply #70 on October 24, 2011, 08:59:01 am by inSODwetrust »
Who cares about Man U Man City? Please can this be moved to the 'Off Topic' section of the board!

ruby12345

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 66
Re: 6-1!!! to city
« Reply #71 on October 24, 2011, 10:34:13 am by ruby12345 »
judging by the amount of posts people have made on the subject its obvious people do care and have an intrest in other football other than drfc. football fans should have a vague intrest in all leagues including non league.

Mark Mccammon

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 47
Re: 6-1!!! to city
« Reply #72 on October 24, 2011, 10:44:36 am by Mark Mccammon »
Mark Mccammon played in and FA Cup final against Man Utd. Personally shocked this was not another big money buy from them.

hoolahoop

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 10269
Re: 6-1!!! to city
« Reply #73 on October 24, 2011, 11:24:58 pm by hoolahoop »
Quote from: \"ruby12345\" post=193794
you just revealed your true colours. i suspected before but couldnt remember 100 percent that it was you. everytime anyone on this forum has a bad word for manchester utd you arrive on your white horse to fight thier corner. why is that?


I'll tell you what it is shall I ruby12345, the fact that not one person on 5 pages of posts have talked about the game, the fantastic performance by City.........it's fookin irrational to gather incorrect facts together to slag off Man U. Not one person, don't you find that strange on a football forum.
I told you I have Mancunian roots on one side of my family .........yes they wear 'BLUE' the whole fookin lot of them and they used to come up with the same sort of irrational crap that you do. Times have changed and they are growing up unlike you sadly, all they wanted to do was talk about the silky skills of Mancini's men , they were there , 3 of them in the AWAY ent at OT. Brother-in-law and both my nephews.

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012