0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Wilts, is that your response to the point that there is an epidemic of blatant one-sided bias on this forum?
No BST, YOU just argue with anybody who believes one-sided, biased opinions are ....... well, one-sided and biased.
Quote from: Bentley Bullet on April 30, 2020, 01:44:58 pmNo BST, YOU just argue with anybody who believes one-sided, biased opinions are ....... well, one-sided and biased.Aren’t all opinions biased, to some degree.?Judgement should be unbiased..
Quote from: IDM on April 30, 2020, 01:51:31 pmQuote from: Bentley Bullet on April 30, 2020, 01:44:58 pmNo BST, YOU just argue with anybody who believes one-sided, biased opinions are ....... well, one-sided and biased.Aren’t all opinions biased, to some degree.?Judgement should be unbiased..To some degree, I suppose they are. But, when that degree of bias reaches a point of it becoming an obsession the result is a totally unbalanced view. A sign of that point being reached is when, in desperation, the guilty party start resorting to silly, cartoon pictures. I think they call it 'grown-up politics'.
Filo, your judgement amazes me! Have a look at the stats and see how many times BST responds negatively to my posts, compared to my responses to his. This last spat, for instance. Who responded first? Now, If you want to count only my responses to BST, and miss out BST's responses to me, that would be a typical example of my entire point.
It's impossible and pointless Glyn.He's not interested in arguing about issues. He just argues about arguing.
Quote from: Bentley Bullet on April 30, 2020, 02:27:34 pmFilo, your judgement amazes me! Have a look at the stats and see how many times BST responds negatively to my posts, compared to my responses to his. This last spat, for instance. Who responded first? Now, If you want to count only my responses to BST, and miss out BST's responses to me, that would be a typical example of my entire point. I never mentioned the posters name, which really confirms my point, your obsession with a certain poster
Quote from: BillyStubbsTears on April 30, 2020, 01:19:43 pmIt's impossible and pointless Glyn.He's not interested in arguing about issues. He just argues about arguing. I know. All it takes is for BB to post in a thread and it suddenly takes on the nature of a kid going ner-ner-ner-ne-ner-ne through the bars of an infant school playground to the grown-ups outside.
Quote from: Filo on April 30, 2020, 02:40:05 pmQuote from: Bentley Bullet on April 30, 2020, 02:27:34 pmFilo, your judgement amazes me! Have a look at the stats and see how many times BST responds negatively to my posts, compared to my responses to his. This last spat, for instance. Who responded first? Now, If you want to count only my responses to BST, and miss out BST's responses to me, that would be a typical example of my entire point. I never mentioned the posters name, which really confirms my point, your obsession with a certain posterObviously you meant the poster who has an obsession with me, but not unexpectedly got it the wrong way round. I'm assuming you meant the one with the initials Biased Selective Tendentious, Didn't you?
It depends how you see bias, as I said on the other thread there is an abundance of science, 99% that says we need to do somethng about climate change and 1% of nutters that say otherwise do we have to have 50% of each according to you and hound?
Quote from: Bentley Bullet on April 30, 2020, 02:54:53 pmQuote from: Filo on April 30, 2020, 02:40:05 pmQuote from: Bentley Bullet on April 30, 2020, 02:27:34 pmFilo, your judgement amazes me! Have a look at the stats and see how many times BST responds negatively to my posts, compared to my responses to his. This last spat, for instance. Who responded first? Now, If you want to count only my responses to BST, and miss out BST's responses to me, that would be a typical example of my entire point. I never mentioned the posters name, which really confirms my point, your obsession with a certain posterObviously you meant the poster who has an obsession with me, but not unexpectedly got it the wrong way round. I'm assuming you meant the one with the initials Biased Selective Tendentious, Didn't you?I don’t play childish game, I meant you, and you know it
Quote from: SydneyRover on April 30, 2020, 11:38:55 amIt depends how you see bias, as I said on the other thread there is an abundance of science, 99% that says we need to do somethng about climate change and 1% of nutters that say otherwise do we have to have 50% of each according to you and hound?What are you on about Syderney.The last time I looked on the Coronavirus thread there was a reference to climate change BY YOU, then IDM commented on it.I never entered into discussion about it.You are lying to say that I have said anything about climate change.You complain about the government lying and yet you do it yourself.Hypocrite.
The same as the unbiased version of Corbyn's and Starmer's records.
To some degree, I suppose they are. But, when that degree of bias reaches a point of it becoming an obsession the result is a totally unbalanced view. A sign of that point being reached is when, in desperation, the guilty party start resorting to silly, cartoon pictures. BBs fingers make contact with the keyboard.I think they call it 'grown-up politics'.
Wilts, how many times have those stories been mentioned in the past? Is it a BBC style tactic where you have to show repeats because you haven't got enough new material?