0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: IDM on May 18, 2019, 09:49:00 amIf silence is the better argument maybe the OP should follow that advice.!One thing you will always get on a forum is a reaction to controversial posts.!Over a period of time, you get an impression of the amount of negativity certain posters show.. You spoilt it again by personalising ! Controversy to one man is food for thought to another.....every negative statement needs debating and rationalising.....otherwise the negative becomes a fact....Deep breath and answer this question;IDM, Do you think GM would have stuck with Marosi in goal for the final against Sunderland , or preferred a fully fit Lawlor ?
If silence is the better argument maybe the OP should follow that advice.!One thing you will always get on a forum is a reaction to controversial posts.!Over a period of time, you get an impression of the amount of negativity certain posters show..
Wouldn't have even made the playoffs if it wasn't for Marosis form at the beginning of the season
I think McCann would have started with Marosi at Wembley.Mainly for continuity and the fact that Lawlor isn’t match fit.I have no doubt that Lawlor will be our number one next season and if anything I think Marosi has shown the last couple of months he isn’t good enough overall and has too many mistakes in him.