0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: RedRover45 on September 30, 2018, 10:12:31 pmQuote from: RoversAlias on September 30, 2018, 10:11:39 pmQuote from: RedRover45 on September 30, 2018, 09:21:02 pmQuote from: since-1969 on September 30, 2018, 09:19:39 pmNo longer with us thank f***I wondered that but Blair is still here unless I've missed something Just a mistyped comma, that asterisk is meant for Mandeville.So why isn't there one next to Garrett?I thought that they were all representing Canals - well theres Blair and Calder but then I realised they were the Canal - and most of the others are either banal or Anal ?
Quote from: RoversAlias on September 30, 2018, 10:11:39 pmQuote from: RedRover45 on September 30, 2018, 09:21:02 pmQuote from: since-1969 on September 30, 2018, 09:19:39 pmNo longer with us thank f***I wondered that but Blair is still here unless I've missed something Just a mistyped comma, that asterisk is meant for Mandeville.So why isn't there one next to Garrett?
Quote from: RedRover45 on September 30, 2018, 09:21:02 pmQuote from: since-1969 on September 30, 2018, 09:19:39 pmNo longer with us thank f***I wondered that but Blair is still here unless I've missed something Just a mistyped comma, that asterisk is meant for Mandeville.
Quote from: since-1969 on September 30, 2018, 09:19:39 pmNo longer with us thank f***I wondered that but Blair is still here unless I've missed something
No longer with us thank f***
Quote from: Donnywolf on October 01, 2018, 11:18:30 amQuote from: RedRover45 on September 30, 2018, 10:12:31 pmQuote from: RoversAlias on September 30, 2018, 10:11:39 pmQuote from: RedRover45 on September 30, 2018, 09:21:02 pmQuote from: since-1969 on September 30, 2018, 09:19:39 pmNo longer with us thank f***I wondered that but Blair is still here unless I've missed something Just a mistyped comma, that asterisk is meant for Mandeville.So why isn't there one next to Garrett?I thought that they were all representing Canals - well theres Blair and Calder but then I realised they were the Canal - and most of the others are either banal or Anal ?Wolfie, I am sure you would have seen it, but can you remember when the letter C fell off the Canal Tavern sign and was left that way for months on end.It always made me chuckle when I drove over the bridge.
Who is Johnson?
Open season League 2 Lost 3-2 I’m Surprised we lasted another season with this team Etheridge * Lund Wright Butler Coppinger Evina * Middleton * Houghton. * Rowe Williams * Marquis Subs Mandeville,*Blair, Calder*, Garrett, Beestin, Keegan*, Marosi
Quote from: since-1969 on September 30, 2018, 08:50:20 pm Open season League 2 Lost 3-2 I’m Surprised we lasted another season with this team Etheridge * Lund Wright Butler Coppinger Evina * Middleton * Houghton. * Rowe Williams * Marquis Subs Mandeville,*Blair, Calder*, Garrett, Beestin, Keegan*, Marosi that wasn’t the team. Mason started on the left of the back 3. Blair started as a right wing back. Calder started as left wing back.
Steve, I thought Mason played that day, and ended up playing in more than one position, left back and central defender? He was a secret signing with Houghton, and had trained with us all the week before without an announcement. It was said big things were expected of him. Etheridge let a long shot go in after Houghton failed to close down a player, Calder failed to track back for another of their goals after losing the ball out wide, just letting their player run away from him, and Williams missed a penalty I think.
1-0 a fair result as we were just not up to the task of playing against thugs and weak refereeing. Marosi did his usual man of match performance and Marquis had a quiet game . We tried and tried but just could not get up to speed. Start another winning run fromSaturday.
The referee put the whistle to his lips then seemed to totally change his mind. Baffling.
I agree with Gaz, they looked a good side, and the game was a decent game that they shaded. The penalty shout looked like some that are given, and I was told the ref looked long and hard at the lino, with his whistle at the ready. The substitutions seemed to upset our rhythm, and Coppinger going off was a bad move, "Tayles" contributing absolutely nothing, perhaps we should start with him, and hook him after 8 to ten minutes to get Coppinger on for when it matters, and before "Tayles" tires. We probably lost the game trying to win it, leaving one on one at that stage of the match, others would have taken what they had.
Quote from: selby on October 03, 2018, 04:13:25 pm I agree with Gaz, they looked a good side, and the game was a decent game that they shaded. The penalty shout looked like some that are given, and I was told the ref looked long and hard at the lino, with his whistle at the ready. The substitutions seemed to upset our rhythm, and Coppinger going off was a bad move, "Tayles" contributing absolutely nothing, perhaps we should start with him, and hook him after 8 to ten minutes to get Coppinger on for when it matters, and before "Tayles" tires. We probably lost the game trying to win it, leaving one on one at that stage of the match, others would have taken what they had. Coppinger was poor last night. Taylor didn’t do a lot but he did nothing wrong, and he made one very good run bursting out of the right back position. The whole team was disjointed yesterday, it’s pretty pathetic to call a sub who had limited time to make an impact out when there was much worse out there last night.
Just seen their goal and most un Butler like to let the player get through him. There would normally be only one winner.From the highlights and reports it seemed an even game which could have gone either way. Nothing to worry about.