Viking Supporters Co-operative

Viking Chat => Off Topic => Topic started by: Mr1Croft on May 14, 2011, 10:37:04 am

Title: Doncaster City
Post by: Mr1Croft on May 14, 2011, 10:37:04 am
What does everyone think of the idea in Free Press about winning City status next year.

I for one certainly back the bid
Title: Re: Doncaster City
Post by: Boomstick on May 14, 2011, 11:11:29 am
Same here, I don't think any sane Doncastrian wouldnt. I would make us the favs out of the candidates too.
Title: Re: Doncaster City
Post by: RedJ on May 14, 2011, 01:24:27 pm
Doncaster's fair city and all that ;-)

I back t'bid!
Title: Re: Doncaster City
Post by: Nudga on May 14, 2011, 07:15:17 pm
I can't wait to get out of the shit hole. Looks like NZ is a non starter so hopefully going back to my roots in Retford.
Title: Re: Doncaster City
Post by: Rios on May 14, 2011, 08:44:19 pm
Quote from: \"Nudga\" post=156656
I can't wait to get out of the shit hole. Looks like NZ is a non starter so hopefully going back to my roots in Retford.


Donny's ok as far as northern towns go.  It's got problems but I work in places like Hyde, Wigan, Oldham, Rochdale and Dewsbury and makes you realise there are far worse places.
Title: Re: Doncaster City
Post by: RedJ on May 14, 2011, 09:19:29 pm
In my opinion Stoke is the arsehole of the universe.
Title: Re: Doncaster City
Post by: Thinwhiteduke on May 14, 2011, 11:02:27 pm
Been to Nottingham today...and if Doncaster has thoughts of city status it has miles to go in comparison.

Public Transport, the Park and Ride / Tram system in Nottingham is absolutely superb, and cheap, puts the two bit cobbled together system in Doncaster to shame, and competitively priced too ..... http://www.thetram.net/times/index.php

Spotlessly clean city centre as well, with a distinct lack of chavvy teenagers slouched about on street corners embarrassing themselves.

Simply put, in comparison, its chalk and cheese, and if thats a benchmark for city status....sadly Doncaster are absolutely no where near.
Title: Re: Doncaster City
Post by: RedJ on May 14, 2011, 11:10:33 pm
I heard we only need to get a Cathedral - isn't that why they were working on one of the churches? - and a university, and I hear the Hub is trying to get that.

Correct me if I'm wrong about this, someone.
Title: Re: Doncaster City
Post by: Muttley on May 14, 2011, 11:39:02 pm
Quote from: \"RedJ\" post=156690
I heard we only need to get a Cathedral - isn't that why they were working on one of the churches? - and a university, and I hear the Hub is trying to get that.

Correct me if I'm wrong about this, someone.


Complete fallacy that you need a cathedral or a university or a cetain population...all you need is for the Queenie to grant the status of city.

re Nottingham - agreed Doncaster's a long way from that but Sundeland, Preston? Not much different in my eyes.

But I reckon Reading's nailed on for the 2012 award.
Title: Re: Doncaster City
Post by: RedJ on May 14, 2011, 11:52:13 pm
Quote from: \"Muttley\" post=156693
Quote from: \"RedJ\" post=156690
I heard we only need to get a Cathedral - isn't that why they were working on one of the churches? - and a university, and I hear the Hub is trying to get that.

Correct me if I'm wrong about this, someone.


Complete fallacy that you need a cathedral or a university or a cetain population...all you need is for the Queenie to grant the status of city.

re Nottingham - agreed Doncaster's a long way from that but Sundeland, Preston? Not much different in my eyes.

But I reckon Reading's nailed on for the 2012 award.


I know that, but don't you need to meet certain criteria for that to happen?
Title: Re: Doncaster City
Post by: Filo on May 15, 2011, 12:17:59 am
If Wakefield can be a City, then there`s hope for us!
Title: Re: Doncaster City
Post by: RedJ on May 15, 2011, 01:03:37 am
Never mind Wakefield - look at fcuking Stoke!
Title: Re: Doncaster City
Post by: Donnywolf on May 15, 2011, 05:53:22 am
... and Wolverhampton*** which won City status the time before last ... which is a similar type of place to Donny. It has a Premiership Team but that did not / does not count when Queenie decides

There is no population criteria - the smallest City in the UK is St Davids in Wales which is tiny (population 1800 ish) - and any City does not need to have a Cathedral to \"qualify\"

I agree that Reading looks stitched on this time



***They are staying up
   said
   They are staying up

Just trying to keep a link to Football !!!
Title: Re: Doncaster City
Post by: Kenny_Senior on May 15, 2011, 09:13:31 am
Reading will get 2012 for sure. The place is probably the largest settlement in England which isn't already a city, therefore it's almost a dead cert.
Title: Re: Doncaster City
Post by: RTID75 on May 15, 2011, 09:38:49 am
Quote from: \"DONNYWOLF\" post=156698
There is no population criteria - the smallest City in the UK is St Davids in Wales which is tiny (population 1800 ish) - and any City does not need to have a Cathedral to \"qualify\"


Christ! I used to live in a VILLAGE with 5 times that population!
Title: Re: Doncaster City
Post by: RedJ on May 15, 2011, 11:08:37 am
Don't Thorne and Moorends have more than 1800? :laugh:
Title: Re: Doncaster City
Post by: Pintolager on May 15, 2011, 01:29:20 pm
It's controversial, but I think our past with \"Donnygate\" scuppers our chances of getting city status.

Political decisions are not to be undermimed.