Viking Supporters Co-operative

Viking Chat => Viking Chat => Topic started by: Buzzberry on January 03, 2012, 11:42:16 am

Title: New Sharp bid rejected!
Post by: Buzzberry on January 03, 2012, 11:42:16 am
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/16392738.stm


Just been put on the BBC website!
Title: Re: New Sharp bid rejected!
Post by: dickos1 on January 03, 2012, 11:43:42 am
That was Saunders talking yesterday about the bid last week. Thought to be from Leicester.
Title: Re: New Sharp bid rejected!
Post by: ljm-drfc on January 03, 2012, 12:46:51 pm
We've rejected £2m from Leicester. http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/sport/football/barnsley/doncaster_rebuff_2m_bid_from_leicester_for_sharp_1_4108402
Title: Re: New Sharp bid rejected!
Post by: Filo on January 03, 2012, 01:00:10 pm
Quote from: \"ljm-drfc\" post=208165
We've rejected £2m from Leicester. http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/sport/football/barnsley/doncaster_rebuff_2m_bid_from_leicester_for_sharp_1_4108402



If that article is true it puts to bed the £1.85M clause that was banded about!
Title: Re: New Sharp bid rejected!
Post by: RobTheRover on January 03, 2012, 02:03:11 pm
The bottom line is this....

1) the club will listen to offers, but do not HAVE to sell.  Only a silly money bid will get to stage 2.

2) the final decision will be Billy's.  He is settled in the area, has had a personal tragedy and may not be interested in going too far (if at all).

Leicester is commutable, so I understand them taking a punt.  I doubt he will go anywhere much further than that though.
Title: Re: New Sharp bid rejected!
Post by: Tazemma on January 03, 2012, 04:14:04 pm
The club is in a catch 22 situation though. Billy will leave at some point and it will be sooner rather than later. The club cannot afford to keep him as:

1. We cannot afford to give him an improved contract
2. We cannot afford to let him leave for free when his contract expires

The best we can hope for is Billy stays till the summer and then we will be forced to sell. He will be offered far more money than he is on here and probably his shot at the premiership which he craves and deserves where ever that may be?
Title: Re: New Sharp bid rejected!
Post by: BessieBlue on January 03, 2012, 04:20:58 pm
With the Bramall Lane Mob pitching for a promotion push this year does anyone think he might wish to hang on until the end of the season when a return to his homeland might be feasible?
Title: Re: New Sharp bid rejected!
Post by: jonnydog on January 03, 2012, 04:29:01 pm
Quote from: \"BessieBlue\" post=208280
With the Bramall Lane Mob pitching for a promotion push this year does anyone think he might wish to hang on until the end of the season when a return to his homeland might be feasible?


Not when the possibility of the Premiership looms.
Title: Re: New Sharp bid rejected!
Post by: mushRTID on January 03, 2012, 04:42:03 pm
How about he stays the season to keep us up. In turn, we allow him to leave in the summer for the bargain of £2m meaning more premiership clubs may take the chance on him.

Deal Billy???
Title: Re: New Sharp bid rejected!
Post by: Standanista on January 03, 2012, 06:27:46 pm
Quote from: \"mushRTID\" post=208285
How about he stays the season to keep us up. In turn, we allow him to leave in the summer for the bargain of £2m meaning more premiership clubs may take the chance on him.

Deal Billy???

Not as daft as it sounds, given that there's already something of a precedent: that suggestion has strong parallels with the deal that took Ian Snodin to Leeds.

Bremner cut a deal which kept Snods Jr with us till the season end as at the time we had a decent shot at getting promoted to the (old) Second Division.  The sweetener for Leeds was that they then got to buy him for the previously agreed price of £200,000, far less than the resale price to Everton shortly afterwards of £930,000 (if my memory serves me correctly).
Title: Re: New Sharp bid rejected!
Post by: Superspy on January 03, 2012, 06:43:45 pm
If he scores enough goals between now and the end of the season to keep us up he'll be worth a damn sight more than 2 million...that's the sickening point.
Title: Re: New Sharp bid rejected!
Post by: mushRTID on January 03, 2012, 06:48:24 pm
Yes but we will have stayed up and saved ourselves a lot more money!!!

What would you rather? Sell now for 3m and go down or sell in the summer for £2m and stay up.

I know what I would prefer and I could guess what the board would prefer.

Obviously the risk comes if he stays and we still go down but I honestly think we will stay up with him.
Title: Re: New Sharp bid rejected!
Post by: cas rover on January 03, 2012, 07:19:10 pm
Daily express quotes a 3 mil clause today  linking west han southhampton
& others
stating saunders as saying billy wont be with us by the end of the week
:cry: :cry:
Title: Re: New Sharp bid rejected!
Post by: southwestexile on January 03, 2012, 07:32:32 pm
fulham is a strong bet