Viking Supporters Co-operative

Viking Chat => Viking Chat => Topic started by: tuffty on March 31, 2012, 12:24:34 am

Title: John Oster
Post by: tuffty on March 31, 2012, 12:24:34 am
This bloke is the biggest waste of time ever.

We might as well put a muppet in midfield who could give the ball away as much as him and then hold his arms out and point at everybody else that it was there fault!!!!

he does one good pass out of every ten, not bad for a midfielder.

Get rid and get somebody in who will actually fight for the ball rather than float about like a F**king fairy.

Rant over.

:rtid:
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: The Red Baron on March 31, 2012, 07:06:30 am
He had a shocking game. After Blackpool I'd have binned him had I been in Saunders' position, but realistically we are very short of midfielders so I can understand why he was kept.

George Friend was extremely poor too- he let King run off him all night.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: donnyvikings on March 31, 2012, 07:29:34 am
Oster's been appauling for months, but there's a few other players who need to take a good look at their own performances too! We need to face facts, irrespective of it being \"mathematically\" possible to stay up.....were not good enough. The players won't or don't seem to want to play for Saunders, and to quote from one of the loan players \"its a shambles\" . Time to go Mr Saunders.......before you destroy my beloved football team.:cry:
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: WBDRFC on March 31, 2012, 07:46:08 am
Quote from: \"donnyvikings\" post=230681
Oster's been appauling for months, but there's a few other players who need to take a good look at their own performances too! We need to face facts, irrespective of it being \"mathematically\" possible to stay up.....were not good enough. The players won't or don't seem to want to play for Saunders, and to quote from one of the loan players \"its a shambles\" . Time to go Mr Saunders.......before you destroy my beloved football team.:cry:


The players didn't want to play for O'Driscoll either. So let's sack every manager, because it's so obviously the manager's fault? Get real. We should replace the players if they don't want to pay for the manager. The club is paying their wages, so they should be putting 100% into every game.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: mutleyrover on March 31, 2012, 08:02:37 am
Who choses which players go out on the field and represent the club? If they dont want to play for the manager then who decides if they remain at the club?  Its his fault!!!! 9 times out of 10 that would be the manager.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: mutleyrover on March 31, 2012, 08:08:51 am
Who choses which players go out on the field and represent the club? If they dont want to play for the manager then who decides if they remain at the club?  Its his fault!!!! 9 times out of 10 that would be the manager.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: Wellred on March 31, 2012, 08:19:02 am
So why did we persevere so long with the previous one?
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: Colin C No.3 on March 31, 2012, 08:26:42 am
Quote from: \"Wellred\" post=230703
So why did we persevere so long with the previous one?


What, the one who took us to The Millenium Stadium, The New Wembley & The Championship?
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: mutleyrover on March 31, 2012, 08:33:42 am
Because he got us playing the best football I have seen Doncaster Rovers play in my lifetime. Took the side to a level I had not seen in my lifetime and won a decent trophy and as far as I'm aware made the decisions on which players were in the team and which players came and left the club. Has any Rovers manager been more sucessful? Not in my lifetime.  To clarify the above, my lifetime is since the 70s.

He then went on to keep us at that level of football for several years and although it wasnt pretty all the time, I enjoyed going to the games and was entertained by it.

Not sure during all this time, I can say that the players didnt want to play for him, in fact listen to comments from the players who left to better their careers and you will hear only good things said.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: WBDRFC on March 31, 2012, 08:34:34 am
Quote from: \"Colin C No.3\" post=230709
Quote from: \"Wellred\" post=230703
So why did we persevere so long with the previous one?


What, the one who took us to The Millenium Stadium, The New Wembley & The Championship?


So we live on past glories and ignore the last 9 months of his reign? Put up with inept performances, losing game after game, a squad who didn't want to play for him, all because of what he did 4 or 5 years before?
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: mutleyrover on March 31, 2012, 08:37:18 am
Those past glories earn the right to time when things aren't going well.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: WBDRFC on March 31, 2012, 08:38:25 am
Quote from: \"mutleyrover\" post=230691
Who choses which players go out on the field and represent the club? If they dont want to play for the manager then who decides if they remain at the club?  Its his fault!!!! 9 times out of 10 that would be the manager.


If they are under contract (as Oster is), you can't just sack them. We're not exactly flush with money, so cannot bring a replacement easily. That is not the manager's fault.

If a player is not performing on the pitch then it is clearly the player's fault. By all accounts he played well at Crystal Palace (apart from one mistake), so Saunders could have been justified in expecting Oster to perform again. The problem with our players is that the performances are so unpredictable - a problem that existed at the club well before Saunders arrived!
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: WBDRFC on March 31, 2012, 08:41:51 am
Quote from: \"mutleyrover\" post=230717
Those past glories earn the right to time when things aren't going well.


Totally disagree. In any business, employees are appraised and judged on current results and performance, and not something that happened 5 years before. O'Driscoll was given more time than probably any manager in history when things were not going well.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: Wellred on March 31, 2012, 08:47:18 am
Quote from: \"WBDRFC\" post=230716
Quote from: \"Colin C No.3\" post=230709
Quote from: \"Wellred\" post=230703
So why did we persevere so long with the previous one?


What, the one who took us to The Millenium Stadium, The New Wembley & The Championship?


So we live on past glories and ignore the last 9 months of his reign? Put up with inept performances, losing game after game, a squad who didn't want to play for him, all because of what he did 4 or 5 years before?


Exactly.
SOD's problems started when we got into the Championship.
I go to a football match to watch my team play exciting football score goals and win games.

For the last three years under O'Driscolls management we have been utterly boring.
To some people we played great football. To me passing a ball around 22 times to your own players is totally pointless unless there isn't an end product.
Other Managers quickly sussed our style of play and let us play that way. They knew we would never really hurt them.
OK we did get some results but overall we became sterile and boring.

If you want to come home from a game thinking wow what great football we played but never mind we lost again then fine and you can think the Manager is wonderful then good for you. I'm sorry but that's not what I want.

We have got players in this team who also think like that. Its time we got rid of them and get players who want to win no matter what. Not players who think its ok to lose as long as I play well.

As for slagging DS for his press conferences and what he says, you have pretty short memories. The previous Manager in his pre match conferences sent the players on to the pitch with an already beaten attitude after bigging up the opposition every game.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: Colin C No.3 on March 31, 2012, 08:47:29 am
Quote from: \"mutleyrover\" post=230715
Because he got us playing the best football I have seen Doncaster Rovers play in my lifetime. Took the side to a level I had not seen in my lifetime and won a decent trophy and as far as I'm aware made the decisions on which players were in the team and which players came and left the club. Has any Rovers manager been more sucessful? Not in my lifetime.  To clarify the above, my lifetime is since the 70s.

He then went on to keep us at that level of football for several years and although it wasnt pretty all the time, I enjoyed going to the games and was entertained by it.

Not sure during all this time, I can say that the players didnt want to play for him, in fact listen to comments from the players who left to better their careers and you will hear only good things said.


That's what I said, only shorthand!

Our kid reminded me last night of an interview given by Jason Price when he was playing for Morecombe & he said of SOD, \"My only regret is that I wasn't playing under him when I was younger. He would have made me a better player than the one I became\". Now that's a tribute.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: bobjimwilly on March 31, 2012, 09:04:01 am
If Oster played good in his previous game, then fine, he deserves to start. But he shouldn't have been allowed to play at all in the 2nd half, never mind 80 mins! Every pass he completed was dubious, and the ones he gave away were because they were awful passes. Every around me saw it, why didn't Dean? :blink:
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: WBDRFC on March 31, 2012, 09:11:25 am
Quote from: \"bobjimwilly\" post=230732
If Oster played good in his previous game, then fine, he deserves to start. But he shouldn't have been allowed to play at all in the 2nd half, never mind 80 mins! Every pass he completed was dubious, and the ones he gave away were because they were awful passes. Every around me saw it, why didn't Dean? :blink:


I can't disagree with that, but strange/lacking substitutions are hardly a new phenomenon at Rovers. We've been used to those for a number of years.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: jonnydog on March 31, 2012, 09:15:23 am
Not only that, but he rarely knew who was behind him, and instead of being aware and pass he tries some fancy b*llocks and then ends up losing the ball in risky/dangerous areas.

Fancy stuff is alreet when your winning, but not when your behind. When their players were coming in from behind him, everyone around me shouted 'Man On'... Reminiscent of Forest Gump when they have to tell him to stop. Thankfully Forest Gump wasn't as simple as Oster. :)
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: hoolahoop on March 31, 2012, 10:25:23 am
Quote from: \"WBDRFC\" post=230735
Quote from: \"bobjimwilly\" post=230732
If Oster played good in his previous game, then fine, he deserves to start. But he shouldn't have been allowed to play at all in the 2nd half, never mind 80 mins! Every pass he completed was dubious, and the ones he gave away were because they were awful passes. Every around me saw it, why didn't Dean? :blink:


I can't disagree with that, but strange/lacking substitutions are hardly a new phenomenon at Rovers. We've been used to those for a number of years.


Yes we have but you are never quick to defend it when somebody says it was because of SO'D in the past.
DS should have pulled him off at half time or better still not played him at all, btw where was Keegan ?
Both Oster and Saunders should be paid up and asked  to leave our premises immediately imo.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: WBDRFC on March 31, 2012, 10:43:43 am
Quote from: \"hoolahoop\" post=230753
Quote from: \"WBDRFC\" post=230735
Quote from: \"bobjimwilly\" post=230732
If Oster played good in his previous game, then fine, he deserves to start. But he shouldn't have been allowed to play at all in the 2nd half, never mind 80 mins! Every pass he completed was dubious, and the ones he gave away were because they were awful passes. Every around me saw it, why didn't Dean? :blink:


I can't disagree with that, but strange/lacking substitutions are hardly a new phenomenon at Rovers. We've been used to those for a number of years.


Yes we have but you are never quick to defend it when somebody says it was because of SO'D in the past.
DS should have pulled him off at half time or better still not played him at all, btw where was Keegan ?
Both Oster and Saunders should be paid up and asked  to leave our premises immediately imo.


I think you must have mistaken me for somebody else.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: hoolahoop on March 31, 2012, 10:47:23 am
Sorry fella I did , that's the trouble when your mind is racing through posts.........please take it as a general point. ;)
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: WBDRFC on March 31, 2012, 10:50:35 am
Quote from: \"hoolahoop\" post=230764
Sorry fella I did , that's the trouble when your mind is racing through posts.........please take it as a general point. ;)


No worries. I think we've seen from the last 15 months what the stress and pressure can do to everyone's minds!
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: hoolahoop on March 31, 2012, 10:57:57 am
Quote from: \"WBDRFC\" post=230765
Quote from: \"hoolahoop\" post=230764
Sorry fella I did , that's the trouble when your mind is racing through posts.........please take it as a general point. ;)


No worries. I think we've seen from the last 15 months what the stress and pressure can do to everyone's minds!


Yep who needs mind bending drugs when you have to sit and look at the twice weekly dross we've been putting out lately. :laugh:
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: Milepostuk on March 31, 2012, 11:07:10 am
I'd like to see Oster playing behind a front two with a solid midfield behind him. All this season (and last) he has had to come too deep to collect the ball and always seems too desperate to make something happen so, too many long attempted passes go astray. Also, we all know how weak he is defensively. He is still (apart from Diof) the player most likely to create something.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: roversdude on March 31, 2012, 11:14:40 am
Simply not good enough Oster, surely Saunders can see this !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: Colin C No.3 on March 31, 2012, 12:08:51 pm
Quote from: \"WBDRFC\" post=230716
Quote from: \"Colin C No.3\" post=230709
Quote from: \"Wellred\" post=230703
So why did we persevere so long with the previous one?


What, the one who took us to The Millenium Stadium, The New Wembley & The Championship?


So we live on past glories and ignore the last 9 months of his reign? Put up with inept performances, losing game after game, a squad who didn't want to play for him, all because of what he did 4 or 5 years before?


Who are you, Wellred's minder?
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: timdrfc on March 31, 2012, 12:20:01 pm
The players didn't want to play for O'Driscoll either. So let's sack every manager, because it's so obviously the manager's fault? Get real. We should replace the players if they don't want to pay for the manager. The club is paying their wages, so they should be putting 100% into every game.[/quote]

Well said , people have short selective memories & the players who appear mostly in the shite performance are the players who were at the club before Saunders!

Don't forget the sick bay is full of players picking up their wages week in week out who only came here because no one else would have them with their injury records , who signed all these NOT Saunders if you can't remember.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: WBDRFC on March 31, 2012, 12:54:44 pm
Quote from: \"Colin C No.3\" post=230788
Quote from: \"WBDRFC\" post=230716
Quote from: \"Colin C No.3\" post=230709
Quote from: \"Wellred\" post=230703
So why did we persevere so long with the previous one?


What, the one who took us to The Millenium Stadium, The New Wembley & The Championship?


So we live on past glories and ignore the last 9 months of his reign? Put up with inept performances, losing game after game, a squad who didn't want to play for him, all because of what he did 4 or 5 years before?


Who are you, Wellred's minder?


So everything was perfect before Saunders became manager? Did you choose to obliterate January to September 2011 from your memory?

I don't care if Alex Ferguson/Arsene Wenger/Harry Redknapp/(replace with any name you want) was manager. The club was not performing as it should be, and we can't forget that just because of something good that happened 4 or 5 years before. If we lived by that philosophy the club would become regressive and we'd soon find ourselves back in non-league football, and the last 10 years progress would be wasted.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: CusworthRovers on March 31, 2012, 01:03:37 pm
Is this a sweeping statement that none of the players wanted to play for SOD?

I never saw anybody come out and say that, or to be fair any rumours of that. Is this the same statement that Stock and Wellens were fighting every week.

Or is it simply guesswork to try and make an argument appear stronger.

When looking at facts, I only saw actual QUOTES from players current and past describing how good it was to play for him.

As for Oster he did some bad things agreed, but he also did many good things last night, which may some his time with us. Most of our play went through him and he saw a hell of a lot of the ball. I think Milepostuk post sums it nicely.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: WBDRFC on March 31, 2012, 01:04:56 pm
Quote from: \"CusworthRovers\" post=230811
Is this a sweeping statement that none of the players wanted to play for SOD?

I never saw anybody come out and say that, or to be fair any rumours of that. Is this the same statement that Stock and Wellens were fighting every week.

Or is it simply guesswork to try and make an argument appear stronger.

When looking at facts, I only saw actual QUOTES from players current and past describing how good it was to play for him.

As for Oster he did some bad things agreed, but he also did many good things last night, which may some his time with us. Most of our play went through him and he saw a hell of a lot of the ball. I think Milepostuk post sums it nicely.


SO'D publicly stated at the end of last season that some players clearly did not want to play for Doncaster Rovers, and they should move on.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: CusworthRovers on March 31, 2012, 01:17:42 pm
Did that not mean, they didn't want to play for DRFC because some needed to step up a little ie need to play harder and better to merit playing for us, rather than they actually never want to play for DRFC and would rather play for another club. Either way, you're making out the players were coming out and stating they never wanted to play for Sean. So it's not the players saying anything direct, and it's not Sean that they don't want to play for, direct.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: donnyvikings on March 31, 2012, 03:22:12 pm
O'Dismal had players respect but had strange formations and No plan B.
And sorry, but this is as 'real' as it gets! Don't remember any players under previous managers telling me that the place is a shambles.......players laughing in Saunders face in dressing room. You don't know the facts...so don't comment.
Do you want to keep Saunders and watch us plummet to the conference, or get rid of the manager? Oh you already answered that.......
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: wilts rover on March 31, 2012, 05:26:36 pm
Quote from: \"WBDRFC\" post=230812
SO'D publicly stated at the end of last season that [b
some[/b] players clearly did not want to play for Doncaster Rovers, and they should move on.


Wasn't the actual quote, 'some players may been at the club too long', obviously not referring to Oster. There was a lot of general spectulation at the time as to who he was referring too.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: mushRTID on March 31, 2012, 05:32:08 pm
Oster to me hasn't looked like he gives a toss since his best mate moved south.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: Thinwhiteduke on March 31, 2012, 05:35:54 pm
Quote from: \"Wellred\" post=230723

I go to a football match to watch my team play exciting football score goals and win games.



You must be piss bored for the last month or so then.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: Glyn_Wigley on March 31, 2012, 05:37:38 pm
Quote from: \"Milepostuk\" post=230774
I'd like to see Oster playing behind a front two with a solid midfield behind him. All this season (and last) he has had to come too deep to collect the ball and always seems too desperate to make something happen so, too many long attempted passes go astray. Also, we all know how weak he is defensively. He is still (apart from Diof) the player most likely to create something.


Oster might occasionally put a good ball through, but he's also given the ball away too easily too often without trying (or the having the ability, it's hard to tell) to get it back. For the last two seasons. In a team that's struggling to compete to start with, his occasional good balls are a luxury we can't afford.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: Wellred on March 31, 2012, 05:44:17 pm
Quote from: \"Thinwhiteduke\" post=230921
Quote from: \"Wellred\" post=230723

I go to a football match to watch my team play exciting football score goals and win games.



You must be piss bored for the last month or so then.


Correct I have been most of the time. I am prepared however to give the manager time to put HIS own team together whether that be in the championship or as seems more likely league 1. Unlike some.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: donnyroversfc on March 31, 2012, 05:55:53 pm
I'm a better footballer than John Oster... I'm a better human being than he is too.

If you're reading this John Oster (i doubt it, probably admiring yourself in the mirror or tanked up somewhere) then i HATE you! Hated you at Everton and i still HATE you at Rovers! Please retire and go live on some island in the middle of nowhere!

I pray you don't make it to 100 appearances for this club.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: ravenrover on March 31, 2012, 06:22:54 pm
Quote from: \"hoolahoop\" post=230753
Quote from: \"WBDRFC\" post=230735
Quote from: \"bobjimwilly\" post=230732
If Oster played good in his previous game, then fine, he deserves to start. But he shouldn't have been allowed to play at all in the 2nd half, never mind 80 mins! Every pass he completed was dubious, and the ones he gave away were because they were awful passes. Every around me saw it, why didn't Dean? :blink:


I can't disagree with that, but strange/lacking substitutions are hardly a new phenomenon at Rovers. We've been used to those for a number of years.


Yes we have but you are never quick to defend it when somebody says it was because of SO'D in the past.
DS should have pulled him off at half time or better still not played him at all, btw where was Keegan ?Both Oster and Saunders should be paid up and asked  to leave our premises immediately imo.


He hobbled around the pitch just after half time. Did you see Chimbonda swagger around with his entourage of 3 young ladies in tow?
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: DRFCTom on March 31, 2012, 07:52:55 pm
Quote from: \"donnyroversfc\" post=230935
I'm a better footballer than John Oster... I'm a better human being than he is too.

If you're reading this John Oster (i doubt it, probably admiring yourself in the mirror or tanked up somewhere) then i HATE you! Hated you at Everton and i still HATE you at Rovers! Please retire and go live on some island in the middle of nowhere!

I pray you don't make it to 100 appearances for this club.


Please please please just shut up. Your not a better footballer than John Oster, you never have been and never will.
Oster on his day is a class player, fair enough he's not been up to his best recently but have any of the other players???
Stop using him as a scapegoat to blame someone and give the guy a break. He's not even playing in his favoured position!
Copps has been poor for us among other players but I don't see you moaning about them.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: donnyroversfc on March 31, 2012, 07:58:39 pm
Quote from: \"DRFCTom\" post=230973
Quote from: \"donnyroversfc\" post=230935
I'm a better footballer than John Oster... I'm a better human being than he is too.

If you're reading this John Oster (i doubt it, probably admiring yourself in the mirror or tanked up somewhere) then i HATE you! Hated you at Everton and i still HATE you at Rovers! Please retire and go live on some island in the middle of nowhere!

I pray you don't make it to 100 appearances for this club.


Please please please just shut up. Your not a better footballer than John Oster, you never have been and never will.
Oster on his day is a class player, fair enough he's not been up to his best recently but have any of the other players???
Stop using him as a scapegoat to blame someone and give the guy a break. He's not even playing in his favoured position!
Copps has been poor for us among other players but I don't see you moaning about them.


I've NEVER liked Oster so i'm not using him as a scapegoat, i dont rate him (obvisouly an exxageration about me being better) he's always been overrtated and he's been terrible for us for ages! 2 goals in 98 appearances, so many times he loses the ball in a dangerous place, never goes in for a challenge but on a rare occasion he puts in a sublime pass.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: DRFCTom on March 31, 2012, 08:12:45 pm
Quote from: \"donnyroversfc\" post=230974
Quote from: \"DRFCTom\" post=230973
Quote from: \"donnyroversfc\" post=230935
I'm a better footballer than John Oster... I'm a better human being than he is too.

If you're reading this John Oster (i doubt it, probably admiring yourself in the mirror or tanked up somewhere) then i HATE you! Hated you at Everton and i still HATE you at Rovers! Please retire and go live on some island in the middle of nowhere!

I pray you don't make it to 100 appearances for this club.


Please please please just shut up. Your not a better footballer than John Oster, you never have been and never will.
Oster on his day is a class player, fair enough he's not been up to his best recently but have any of the other players???
Stop using him as a scapegoat to blame someone and give the guy a break. He's not even playing in his favoured position!
Copps has been poor for us among other players but I don't see you moaning about them.


I've NEVER liked Oster so i'm not using him as a scapegoat, i dont rate him (obvisouly an exxageration about me being better) he's always been overrtated and he's been terrible for us for ages! 2 goals in 98 appearances, so many times he loses the ball in a dangerous place, never goes in for a challenge but on a rare occasion he puts in a sublime pass.


Your moaning about his lack of goals? He's not a goal scorer, never has and never will. Throughout his career he's always been a play maker and a good one at that so please everyone get off the lads back and get behind him. The poor lad must have absolutely no confidence at all! He's even deleted twitter because everyone sent him abusive messages. Put yourself in his shoes and imagine how it'd make you feel?
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: donnyroversfc on March 31, 2012, 08:19:53 pm
He's rubbish and i'll never support or get behind him (actually i would get behind him, just to push him over).
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: DRFCTom on March 31, 2012, 08:21:31 pm
Quote from: \"donnyroversfc\" post=230978
He's rubbish and i'll never support or get behind him (actually i would get behind him, just to push him over).


What a nob you really are.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: donnyroversfc on March 31, 2012, 08:22:32 pm
Atleast me and Oster have 1 thing in common then.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: Spud on March 31, 2012, 09:03:38 pm
Quote from: \"Milepostuk\" post=230774
I'd like to see Oster playing behind a front two with a solid midfield behind him. All this season (and last) he has had to come too deep to collect the ball and always seems too desperate to make something happen so, too many long attempted passes go astray. Also, we all know how weak he is defensively. He is still (apart from Diof) the player most likely to create something.


Agreed. The witch hunt against John Oster is shameful. How anyone can say he doesn't give a toss is beyond me, he had more of the ball than anyone last night and at Palace because he dropped deep and wanted it, it's called taking responsibility and it's credit to him that he does given that he's not in the best form (who is? goes with the territory we're bottom of the league). You all moan that we could make numerous passes without getting anywhere under sod but when someone tries to make a spark we can't wait to moan at that too.
Personally i think he got worse after 70 mins and needed subbing then up to then he was playing well enough. I hope he stays on next season but wouldn't blame him if he never comes near the place ever again.

Donnyroversfc grow up ffs
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: donnyroversfc on March 31, 2012, 09:06:38 pm
John Oster needs to remember one thing... That a kid never forgets!
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: donnyproletarian on March 31, 2012, 09:39:08 pm
When John first came to us on loan he was ranked on here as the best midfielder in the championship .If a weeks a long time in politics its even less in football
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: Red wizard on March 31, 2012, 09:54:55 pm
I was slagging Oster the other week. However after the millwall game he was the only player who always wanted the ball. Add in we was 3-0down and the crowd going mad at every bad pass he could of hid away like most did. The fact is he never and he never does.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: tuffty on March 31, 2012, 10:30:58 pm
Quote from: \"DRFCTom\" post=230976
Quote from: \"donnyroversfc\" post=230974
Quote from: \"DRFCTom\" post=230973
Quote from: \"donnyroversfc\" post=230935
I'm a better footballer than John Oster... I'm a better human being than he is too.

If you're reading this John Oster (i doubt it, probably admiring yourself in the mirror or tanked up somewhere) then i HATE you! Hated you at Everton and i still HATE you at Rovers! Please retire and go live on some island in the middle of nowhere!

I pray you don't make it to 100 appearances for this club.


Please please please just shut up. Your not a better footballer than John Oster, you never have been and never will.
Oster on his day is a class player, fair enough he's not been up to his best recently but have any of the other players???
Stop using him as a scapegoat to blame someone and give the guy a break. He's not even playing in his favoured position!
Copps has been poor for us among other players but I don't see you moaning about them.


I've NEVER liked Oster so i'm not using him as a scapegoat, i dont rate him (obvisouly an exxageration about me being better) he's always been overrtated and he's been terrible for us for ages! 2 goals in 98 appearances, so many times he loses the ball in a dangerous place, never goes in for a challenge but on a rare occasion he puts in a sublime pass.


Your moaning about his lack of goals? He's not a goal scorer, never has and never will. Throughout his career he's always been a play maker and a good one at that so please everyone get off the lads back and get behind him. The poor lad must have absolutely no confidence at all! He's even deleted twitter because everyone sent him abusive messages. Put yourself in his shoes and imagine how it'd make you feel?


Were not just blaming it all on Oster, we are just simply saying he is SHIT!
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: The Red Baron on April 01, 2012, 09:19:52 am
He was good when he first came to the club but after that first season his performances have declined. And since he had that spell off with the neck injury he hasn't seemed interested at all.

I wonder if it is something to do with Billy's departure?
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: big fat yorkshire pudding on April 01, 2012, 07:56:11 pm
He's getting older it's no surprise he's not able to show the energy he did 3 years ago.  However I don't think he's performed that badly in the last few games.  He improeved us when coming on as sub and I thought the ironic cheers for him going off was ridiculous.  He passed the ball pretty well and always looked to get on the ball.  He does sometimes give it away daftly because he doesn't always try the simple thing, but I bet he completes more passes than anyone else in our team aswell.  He tended to set a lot of goals up for Sharp and he's missing a striker with his movement.

But to call him shit is pathetic as he isn't.  Granted he's not as good as he used to be but then he had players like Sharp, Woods, JET etc to play the ball to then, now he doesn't have those around him performing to the same ability.  It isn't his fault if he doesn't have a good option to pass to.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: DRFCSouth on April 01, 2012, 08:06:26 pm
Some of the drivel being written about Oster is shameful. He has been a quality player for Rovers. They have had few players with the vision he has given over the last few seasons. Amazing how many have jumped on his back as soon as performances decline a bit. Quality player, always has been and not appreciated enough by many on here.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: pubteam on April 01, 2012, 08:40:13 pm
Quote from: \"big fat yorkshire pudding\" post=231133
He's getting older it's no surprise he's not able to show the energy he did 3 years ago.  However I don't think he's performed that badly in the last few games.  He improeved us when coming on as sub and I thought the ironic cheers for him going off was ridiculous.  He passed the ball pretty well and always looked to get on the ball.  He does sometimes give it away daftly because he doesn't always try the simple thing, but I bet he completes more passes than anyone else in our team aswell.  He tended to set a lot of goals up for Sharp and he's missing a striker with his movement.

But to call him shit is pathetic as he isn't.  Granted he's not as good as he used to be but then he had players like Sharp, Woods, JET etc to play the ball to then, now he doesn't have those around him performing to the same ability.  It isn't his fault if he doesn't have a good option to pass to.


Surely that bit higlighted is a joke?

I don't think he completed a pass all night on Friday!
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: bobjimwilly on April 01, 2012, 11:07:27 pm
Quote from: \"pubteam\" post=231151
Quote from: \"big fat yorkshire pudding\" post=231133
He's getting older it's no surprise he's not able to show the energy he did 3 years ago.  However I don't think he's performed that badly in the last few games.  He improeved us when coming on as sub and I thought the ironic cheers for him going off was ridiculous.  He passed the ball pretty well and always looked to get on the ball.  He does sometimes give it away daftly because he doesn't always try the simple thing, but I bet he completes more passes than anyone else in our team aswell.  He tended to set a lot of goals up for Sharp and he's missing a striker with his movement.

But to call him shit is pathetic as he isn't.  Granted he's not as good as he used to be but then he had players like Sharp, Woods, JET etc to play the ball to then, now he doesn't have those around him performing to the same ability.  It isn't his fault if he doesn't have a good option to pass to.


Surely that bit higlighted is a joke?

I don't think he completed a pass all night on Friday!


I counted 2 :blush:
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: tuffty on April 02, 2012, 12:51:29 am
Quote from: \"big fat yorkshire pudding\" post=231133
He's getting older it's no surprise he's not able to show the energy he did 3 years ago.  However I don't think he's performed that badly in the last few games.  He improeved us when coming on as sub and I thought the ironic cheers for him going off was ridiculous.  He passed the ball pretty well and always looked to get on the ball.  He does sometimes give it away daftly because he doesn't always try the simple thing, but I bet he completes more passes than anyone else in our team aswell.  He tended to set a lot of goals up for Sharp and he's missing a striker with his movement.

But to call him shit is pathetic as he isn't.  Granted he's not as good as he used to be but then he had players like Sharp, Woods, JET etc to play the ball to then, now he doesn't have those around him performing to the same ability.  It isn't his fault if he doesn't have a good option to pass to.


I don't know what games you have been watching BFYP but it definatley hasn't been the ones we have been watching, to say he sometimes gives the ball away is total garbage IT'S EVERY GAME!

IT isn't just me with the opinion is it, if when being subbed he gets the \"ironic cheers\"

Come on mate think about what you have just written.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: Rios on April 02, 2012, 07:08:53 am
I'm definitely no fan of Oster, but singling him out as the scapegoat for our ills this seasons is quite pathetic.  I watched Newcastle v Liverpool yesterday and Steve \"England International, passing midfielder on £150k a week\" Gerrard gave the ball away more than Oster did on Friday night.  It happens and blaming Oster for trying to run the midfield when he's only getting help from Gillett whilst the likes of Diouf and Robert piss off up the pitch and don't track back because they still think they're forwards is beyond belief.

The FLP paper gave Oster a 7 for Friday's game which was higher than any of our other players.  Whilst I wouldn't have been that kind, if you think he had a worse game than Illunga, who has been stealing a living and was a total passenger all night, then you really need to get your eyes testing.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: Norfolk N Chance on April 02, 2012, 11:45:22 am
Quote from: \"donnyroversfc\" post=230978
He's rubbish and i'll never support or get behind him (actually i would get behind him, just to push him over).


100% **** you are !

Other than Robert I thought he was the best player inside!
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: AbsolutDRFC on April 02, 2012, 04:14:37 pm
Quote from: \"Rios\" post=231189
I'm definitely no fan of Oster, but singling him out as the scapegoat for our ills this seasons is quite pathetic.  I watched Newcastle v Liverpool yesterday and Steve \"England International, passing midfielder on £150k a week\" Gerrard gave the ball away more than Oster did on Friday night.  It happens and blaming Oster for trying to run the midfield when he's only getting help from Gillett whilst the likes of Diouf and Robert piss off up the pitch and don't track back because they still think they're forwards is beyond belief.

The FLP paper gave Oster a 7 for Friday's game which was higher than any of our other players.  Whilst I wouldn't have been that kind, if you think he had a worse game than Illunga, who has been stealing a living and was a total passenger all night, then you really need to get your eyes testing.


That's harsh on Illunga. ....
I thought he at least had a claim for an assist on the Birmingham equaliser by allowing that giant full-back Murphy a free header ;)

Maybe it is that pay-off from West Ham that's weighing him down.

Just to comment on something else you mentioned....
Steve Gerrard....
Only saw the 1st half of the game on Sunday and have to agree completely about his performance.
But how much was that because LFC went 4-3-3, which clearly didn't work at all and left Gerrard completely exposed. That kid alongside him was shocking as well.
Title: Re: John Oster
Post by: donnyroversfc on April 02, 2012, 04:19:27 pm
Quote from: \"Norfolk N Chance\" post=231224
Quote from: \"donnyroversfc\" post=230978
He's rubbish and i'll never support or get behind him (actually i would get behind him, just to push him over).


100% **** you are !

Other than Robert I thought he was the best player inside!


Ok, thanks for letting me know.