Viking Supporters Co-operative

Viking Chat => Viking Chat => Topic started by: PaulRover08 on May 02, 2013, 10:06:07 pm

Title: Neil Warnock
Post by: PaulRover08 on May 02, 2013, 10:06:07 pm
Was told he was with JR in Zinis 2 days ago. Didn't post till now as thought Flynn deserved to be exempt from this kind of speculation until the club announced it was looking for a manager officially, as seems to be the case now.
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: DonnyOsmond on May 02, 2013, 10:07:37 pm
Bawtry is full of football managers at the moment.
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: Rovers-on-Thames on May 02, 2013, 10:07:54 pm
Yep, heard from two different sources Warnock and Ryan were out jogging round Bawtry.
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: PaulRover08 on May 02, 2013, 10:10:01 pm
Mock all you want. Check my profile, I am not a rumour spreader. Just telling you what a friend told me. I personally would welcome Warnock in the short term. Certainly wouldn't go down.
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: mushRTID on May 02, 2013, 10:11:15 pm
Mock all you want. Check my profile, I am not a rumour spreader. Just telling you what a friend told me. I personally would welcome Warnock in the short term. Certainly wouldn't go down.

Thats the key, he would keep us up im sure and thats our aim.
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: drfcbenny625 on May 02, 2013, 10:13:02 pm
Thought he was retiring. he said on FLS that he was looking to go into a director of football type role
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: BK29 on May 02, 2013, 10:15:09 pm
He also treat Leeds top goalscorer like shite and practically firced him out and said he was useless and always persisted with Luke Varney ffs!

I don't agree that he'd keep us up... Uncommited, egotistical, Dinosaur who would have taken Leeds down if he'd have stayed.

I'D RATHER HAVE DICKOV!!!
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: PaulRover08 on May 02, 2013, 10:15:57 pm
That is what I said when I heard but he has always stated he has a soft spot for Donny and what better to have on his CV than to take a pub team to the Prem. (yeah, i've had a drink).
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: Rovers-on-Thames on May 02, 2013, 10:16:47 pm
Doncaster is closer to Cornwall than Leeds.
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: dickos1 on May 02, 2013, 10:17:24 pm
He also treat Leeds top goalscorer like shite and practically firced him out and said he was useless and always persisted with Luke Varney ffs!

I don't agree that he'd keep us up... Uncommited, egotistical, Dinosaur who would have taken Leeds down if he'd have stayed.

I'D RATHER HAVE DICKOV!!!

Heard all this nonsense before when Saunders and flynn were appointed,
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: PaulRover08 on May 02, 2013, 10:18:02 pm
He also treat Leeds top goalscorer like shite and practically firced him out and said he was useless and always persisted with Luke Varney ffs!

I don't agree that he'd keep us up... Uncommited, egotistical, Dinosaur who would have taken Leeds down if he'd have stayed.

I'D RATHER HAVE DICKOV!!!

He left because they didn't make the play offs (as promised). He got QPR up when all others failed, the Blades up and was firing with a low budget Palace but lets just focus on him not rating a striker eh
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: Glyn_Wigley on May 02, 2013, 10:21:14 pm
Yeah, but none of us rate Billy Kee so we're out of the running too. ;)
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: BK29 on May 02, 2013, 10:26:00 pm
He also treat Leeds top goalscorer like shite and practically firced him out and said he was useless and always persisted with Luke Varney ffs!

I don't agree that he'd keep us up... Uncommited, egotistical, Dinosaur who would have taken Leeds down if he'd have stayed.

I'D RATHER HAVE DICKOV!!!

He left because they didn't make the play offs (as promised). He got QPR up when all others failed, the Blades up and was firing with a low budget Palace but lets just focus on him not rating a striker eh

He was going to be sacked about 2 month into the season at Leeds... It was only the takeover that stopped this (part of the deal).

I'd rather rate him on his last job (with a much better squad than ours) than jobs before that. I haven;t just focused on him 'not rating a striker' either...
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: Drover on May 02, 2013, 10:26:41 pm
He's currently on sky sports one with beagrie n lee clark on the Footballers football show.
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: PaulRover08 on May 02, 2013, 10:29:14 pm
He also treat Leeds top goalscorer like shite and practically firced him out and said he was useless and always persisted with Luke Varney ffs!

I don't agree that he'd keep us up... Uncommited, egotistical, Dinosaur who would have taken Leeds down if he'd have stayed.

I'D RATHER HAVE DICKOV!!!

He left because they didn't make the play offs (as promised). He got QPR up when all others failed, the Blades up and was firing with a low budget Palace but lets just focus on him not rating a striker eh

He was going to be sacked about 2 month into the season at Leeds... It was only the takeover that stopped this (part of the deal).

I'd rather rate him on his last job (with a much better squad than ours) than jobs before that. I haven;t just focused on him 'not rating a striker' either...

Have I missed something. We're Leeds a top of the table championship club before he took over? If you watched the Footballers Football show tonight you'd see NW saying he had 5-6 player lined up to come in and see Leeds challenging but couldn't sign them until the takeover was done and that took too long and he lost them. Why only focus on the last job. Is that because it supports your point more than an overall objective view.
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: Glyn_Wigley on May 02, 2013, 10:30:11 pm
I'd rather rate him on his last job (with a much better squad than ours) than jobs before that.

Whilst knowing nothing about the behind the scenes goings on? I'd rather go on his complete record from a number of clubs as being more representative of his abilities.
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: PaulRover08 on May 02, 2013, 10:31:39 pm
I'd rather rate him on his last job (with a much better squad than ours) than jobs before that.

Whilst knowing nothing about the behind the scenes goings on? I'd rather go on his complete record from a number of clubs as being more representative of his abilities.

Yeah but that wouldn't support his view
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: Drover on May 02, 2013, 10:32:26 pm
If a decision is made and announced on our new manager tomorrow,then I think the fact its pretty quick after knowing if we got promoted hints it will be given to Flynn or someone already lined up like Dickov or Warnock,but I doubt its warnock reading between what he has said recently.
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: Bentley Bullet on May 02, 2013, 10:32:45 pm
The way Warnock praised Rovers on the Football league show last Saturday made me think he could be in line for the managers job. He has mellowed over the last couple of years and is one of the few characters left in the game.

However, if he were appointed he would be older than his directer of football in the likely event that it would be Flynn.
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: Glyn_Wigley on May 02, 2013, 10:33:21 pm
Yeah but that wouldn't support his view

Well I say we should judge him only by his last post. :D
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: BK29 on May 02, 2013, 10:34:19 pm
He also treat Leeds top goalscorer like shite and practically firced him out and said he was useless and always persisted with Luke Varney ffs!

I don't agree that he'd keep us up... Uncommited, egotistical, Dinosaur who would have taken Leeds down if he'd have stayed.

I'D RATHER HAVE DICKOV!!!

He left because they didn't make the play offs (as promised). He got QPR up when all others failed, the Blades up and was firing with a low budget Palace but lets just focus on him not rating a striker eh

He was going to be sacked about 2 month into the season at Leeds... It was only the takeover that stopped this (part of the deal).

I'd rather rate him on his last job (with a much better squad than ours) than jobs before that. I haven;t just focused on him 'not rating a striker' either...

Have I missed something. We're Leeds a top of the table championship club before he took over? If you watched the Footballers Football show tonight you'd see NW saying he had 5-6 player lined up to come in and see Leeds challenging but couldn't sign them until the takeover was done and that took too long and he lost them. Why only focus on the last job. Is that because it supports your point more than an overall objective view.

No, i'd rather focus on his last job as it's most recent and it we can judge how he is now, off of that rather than 5 years or whatever, before.

Neil Warnock only kept his job for so long BECAUSE of the takeover.

The vast majority of his signings at Leeds have been terrible... He wanted Leeds to fork out 1.5M on wages and transfer fee's for a 34yo Clint Hill, no wonder they never trusted him with signings/money.
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: wilts rover on May 02, 2013, 10:36:04 pm
He also treat Leeds top goalscorer like shite and practically firced him out and said he was useless and always persisted with Luke Varney ffs!

I don't agree that he'd keep us up... Uncommited, egotistical, Dinosaur who would have taken Leeds down if he'd have stayed.

I'D RATHER HAVE DICKOV!!!

He left because they didn't make the play offs (as promised). He got QPR up when all others failed, the Blades up and was firing with a low budget Palace but lets just focus on him not rating a striker eh

He was going to be sacked about 2 month into the season at Leeds... It was only the takeover that stopped this (part of the deal).

I'd rather rate him on his last job (with a much better squad than ours) than jobs before that. I haven;t just focused on him 'not rating a striker' either...

As opposed to Paul Tisdale who got his current team relegated and finished behind the might of Port Vale, Burton, Cheltenham & Northampton in the League? Hmmmm
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: PaulRover08 on May 02, 2013, 10:38:21 pm
He also treat Leeds top goalscorer like shite and practically firced him out and said he was useless and always persisted with Luke Varney ffs!

I don't agree that he'd keep us up... Uncommited, egotistical, Dinosaur who would have taken Leeds down if he'd have stayed.

I'D RATHER HAVE DICKOV!!!

He left because they didn't make the play offs (as promised). He got QPR up when all others failed, the Blades up and was firing with a low budget Palace but lets just focus on him not rating a striker eh

He was going to be sacked about 2 month into the season at Leeds... It was only the takeover that stopped this (part of the deal).

I'd rather rate him on his last job (with a much better squad than ours) than jobs before that. I haven;t just focused on him 'not rating a striker' either...

Have I missed something. We're Leeds a top of the table championship club before he took over? If you watched the Footballers Football show tonight you'd see NW saying he had 5-6 player lined up to come in and see Leeds challenging but couldn't sign them until the takeover was done and that took too long and he lost them. Why only focus on the last job. Is that because it supports your point more than an overall objective view.

No, i'd rather focus on his last job as it's most recent and it we can judge how he is now, off of that rather than 5 years or whatever, before.

Neil Warnock only kept his job for so long BECAUSE of the takeover.

The vast majority of his signings at Leeds have been terrible... He wanted Leeds to fork out 1.5M on wages and transfer fee's for a 34yo Clint Hill, no wonder they never trusted him with signings/money.

If only football was as black and white as you are suggesting.
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: BK29 on May 02, 2013, 10:39:46 pm
He also treat Leeds top goalscorer like shite and practically firced him out and said he was useless and always persisted with Luke Varney ffs!

I don't agree that he'd keep us up... Uncommited, egotistical, Dinosaur who would have taken Leeds down if he'd have stayed.

I'D RATHER HAVE DICKOV!!!

He left because they didn't make the play offs (as promised). He got QPR up when all others failed, the Blades up and was firing with a low budget Palace but lets just focus on him not rating a striker eh

He was going to be sacked about 2 month into the season at Leeds... It was only the takeover that stopped this (part of the deal).

I'd rather rate him on his last job (with a much better squad than ours) than jobs before that. I haven;t just focused on him 'not rating a striker' either...

As opposed to Paul Tisdale who got his current team relegated and finished behind the might of Port Vale, Burton, Cheltenham & Northampton in the League? Hmmmm

Took them up from the CONF to L1 and kept them there for 2 season's on an absolutely miniscule budget. Playing nice football aswell as putting a big focus on the clubs youth.

He's done that while working well with a DoF too btw, which is a good sign if LFynn does indeed get that role.
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: StocktonRover on May 02, 2013, 10:40:45 pm
He also treat Leeds top goalscorer like shite and practically firced him out and said he was useless and always persisted with Luke Varney ffs!

I don't agree that he'd keep us up... Uncommited, egotistical, Dinosaur who would have taken Leeds down if he'd have stayed.

I'D RATHER HAVE DICKOV!!!

He left because they didn't make the play offs (as promised). He got QPR up when all others failed, the Blades up and was firing with a low budget Palace but lets just focus on him not rating a striker eh

He was going to be sacked about 2 month into the season at Leeds... It was only the takeover that stopped this (part of the deal).

I'd rather rate him on his last job (with a much better squad than ours) than jobs before that. I haven;t just focused on him 'not rating a striker' either...

Have I missed something. We're Leeds a top of the table championship club before he took over? If you watched the Footballers Football show tonight you'd see NW saying he had 5-6 player lined up to come in and see Leeds challenging but couldn't sign them until the takeover was done and that took too long and he lost them. Why only focus on the last job. Is that because it supports your point more than an overall objective view.

No, i'd rather focus on his last job as it's most recent and it we can judge how he is now, off of that rather than 5 years or whatever, before.

Neil Warnock only kept his job for so long BECAUSE of the takeover.

The vast majority of his signings at Leeds have been terrible... He wanted Leeds to fork out 1.5M on wages and transfer fee's for a 34yo Clint Hill, no wonder they never trusted him with signings/money.

You seem to know all about the back room activities at Bell end Road - would't you be better posting on WACCOE?
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: BK29 on May 02, 2013, 10:42:11 pm
He also treat Leeds top goalscorer like shite and practically firced him out and said he was useless and always persisted with Luke Varney ffs!

I don't agree that he'd keep us up... Uncommited, egotistical, Dinosaur who would have taken Leeds down if he'd have stayed.

I'D RATHER HAVE DICKOV!!!

He left because they didn't make the play offs (as promised). He got QPR up when all others failed, the Blades up and was firing with a low budget Palace but lets just focus on him not rating a striker eh

He was going to be sacked about 2 month into the season at Leeds... It was only the takeover that stopped this (part of the deal).

I'd rather rate him on his last job (with a much better squad than ours) than jobs before that. I haven;t just focused on him 'not rating a striker' either...

Have I missed something. We're Leeds a top of the table championship club before he took over? If you watched the Footballers Football show tonight you'd see NW saying he had 5-6 player lined up to come in and see Leeds challenging but couldn't sign them until the takeover was done and that took too long and he lost them. Why only focus on the last job. Is that because it supports your point more than an overall objective view.

No, i'd rather focus on his last job as it's most recent and it we can judge how he is now, off of that rather than 5 years or whatever, before.

Neil Warnock only kept his job for so long BECAUSE of the takeover.

The vast majority of his signings at Leeds have been terrible... He wanted Leeds to fork out 1.5M on wages and transfer fee's for a 34yo Clint Hill, no wonder they never trusted him with signings/money.

You seem to know all about the back room activities at Bell end Road - would't you be better posting on WACCOE?

No i wouldn't be, because i'm a rovers fan not Leeds.
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: MachoMadness on May 02, 2013, 10:43:27 pm
I like Warnock, and I know JR is good friends with him, so it's believable if nothing else and I'd welcome it. However I do think Warnock is somewhat out of our price range.
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: Donnybax on May 02, 2013, 10:49:50 pm
This is from someone who masturbates every night to billy kee I'd rather not take your opinion as gospel thanks
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: wilts rover on May 02, 2013, 10:50:54 pm
He also treat Leeds top goalscorer like shite and practically firced him out and said he was useless and always persisted with Luke Varney ffs!

I don't agree that he'd keep us up... Uncommited, egotistical, Dinosaur who would have taken Leeds down if he'd have stayed.

I'D RATHER HAVE DICKOV!!!

He left because they didn't make the play offs (as promised). He got QPR up when all others failed, the Blades up and was firing with a low budget Palace but lets just focus on him not rating a striker eh

He was going to be sacked about 2 month into the season at Leeds... It was only the takeover that stopped this (part of the deal).

I'd rather rate him on his last job (with a much better squad than ours) than jobs before that. I haven;t just focused on him 'not rating a striker' either...

As opposed to Paul Tisdale who got his current team relegated and finished behind the might of Port Vale, Burton, Cheltenham & Northampton in the League? Hmmmm

Took them up from the CONF to L1 and kept them there for 2 season's on an absolutely miniscule budget. Playing nice football aswell as putting a big focus on the clubs youth.

He's done that while working well with a DoF too btw, which is a good sign if LFynn does indeed get that role.

As did Dave Penney - who was found wanting when the stakes got higher. Paul Tisdale has a nice safe little job with a lovely little club, why do you think he hasn't moved? Waiting for Donny Rovers!
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: MiKA on May 02, 2013, 10:53:08 pm
Why tarnish our great reputation with a prick such as him!  Wouldn't be at all happy if he came here   :suicide:
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: BK29 on May 02, 2013, 10:55:32 pm
He also treat Leeds top goalscorer like shite and practically firced him out and said he was useless and always persisted with Luke Varney ffs!

I don't agree that he'd keep us up... Uncommited, egotistical, Dinosaur who would have taken Leeds down if he'd have stayed.

I'D RATHER HAVE DICKOV!!!

He left because they didn't make the play offs (as promised). He got QPR up when all others failed, the Blades up and was firing with a low budget Palace but lets just focus on him not rating a striker eh

He was going to be sacked about 2 month into the season at Leeds... It was only the takeover that stopped this (part of the deal).

I'd rather rate him on his last job (with a much better squad than ours) than jobs before that. I haven;t just focused on him 'not rating a striker' either...

As opposed to Paul Tisdale who got his current team relegated and finished behind the might of Port Vale, Burton, Cheltenham & Northampton in the League? Hmmmm

Took them up from the CONF to L1 and kept them there for 2 season's on an absolutely miniscule budget. Playing nice football aswell as putting a big focus on the clubs youth.

He's done that while working well with a DoF too btw, which is a good sign if LFynn does indeed get that role.

As did Dave Penney - who was found wanting when the stakes got higher. Paul Tisdale has a nice safe little job with a lovely little club, why do you think he hasn't moved? Waiting for Donny Rovers!

He hasn't moved yet because he hasn't wanted to, that's the only reason why. He's had the opportunities to do so. While at Exeter he's turned down Swansea (x2) aswell as Southampton. Maybe now he'll be ready for a move?

Dave Penney did a fantastic job here, but let's not forget the money he had to spend! Paul Tisdale has worked on a netto budget and had big success relative to the money spent.
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: scaley back rover on May 02, 2013, 10:57:05 pm
worringly bk netto went bust
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: BK29 on May 02, 2013, 10:59:56 pm
worringly bk netto went bust

Yeah i realised that after i posted. Swap Netto for Lidl. Sorted.
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: scaley back rover on May 02, 2013, 11:00:29 pm
lol
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: dickos1 on May 02, 2013, 11:12:16 pm
Tidsdale hasn't turned down Swansea and Southampton.
Much rather have Warnock with a proven record rather than someone who has done ok in the lower leagues, he hasn't pulled up any trees recently.
You can't have tidsdales record from 5 years ago as your arguement but only use warnocks record over the last 6 months
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: ss1953 on May 02, 2013, 11:16:01 pm
It's well known that JR and Warnock are good friends. It wouldn't be daft for JR to pick his brain before making the biggest decision of next season.
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: BK29 on May 02, 2013, 11:20:40 pm
Tidsdale hasn't turned down Swansea and Southampton.
Much rather have Warnock with a proven record rather than someone who has done ok in the lower leagues, he hasn't pulled up any trees recently.
You can't have tidsdales record from 5 years ago as your arguement but only use warnocks record over the last 6 months

BIB - True, fair point.

Tisdale HAS turned down Swansea (twice - after Martinez left and Sousa) and Southampton (They got Adkins). He's got Exeter still competing (although they fell short this season) and it's testament to the job he is doing because their budget is still small... The can't even afford to keep their best players  past this season i dont think.
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: dickos1 on May 02, 2013, 11:24:37 pm
Is there any evidence of this? Or we just supposed to believe you?
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: BK29 on May 02, 2013, 11:27:12 pm
Is there any evidence of this? Or we just supposed to believe you?

You'll just have to believe me (i know you won;t, i'm not fussed about that). It did happen though. Swansea and Southampton fans will confirm that too.
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: dickos1 on May 02, 2013, 11:32:04 pm
Ok. Your right though, I don't
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: BillyStubbsTears on May 02, 2013, 11:38:07 pm
I've got it!

Donnyroversfc got sent down last June. He didn't have internet access for 11 months and now he's back with a severe case of Internet Tourette's to work out of his system.

Explains it all...
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: BK29 on May 02, 2013, 11:40:08 pm
Nice of you to join us Einstein!
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: BillyStubbsTears on May 03, 2013, 12:13:46 am
I think you meant Archimedes, but good try.
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: BK29 on May 03, 2013, 12:18:11 am
I think you meant Archimedes, but good try.

I'll agree with you on that. Einstein had more personality.
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: BillyStubbsTears on May 03, 2013, 12:29:19 am
So you knew Archimedes then? Running down the street bollock naked screaming at the top of his voice when he'd come up with a good idea doesn't count as being a bit of a personality?

You'll forgive me, I'm sure, if I decide not to get to know you personally. For this, among other reasons.
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: RobTheRover on May 03, 2013, 12:40:19 am
It's well known that JR and Warnock are good friends. It wouldn't be daft for JR to pick his brain before making the biggest decision of next season.

I suspect this is the best post in this thread.
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: Sammy Chung was King on May 03, 2013, 12:53:16 am
I like Warnock, and I know JR is good friends with him, so it's believable if nothing else and I'd welcome it. However I do think Warnock is somewhat out of our price range.

And John's Happy to admit that?  :facepalm:
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: les@donr on May 03, 2013, 01:10:39 am
No to Warnock. There are too many older managers just looking for a pay cheque, and ambitious. I would put Warnock in this catagory. He has nothing to prove, he's been there (PL) and done it. I would rather have a younger manager with some success as a manager on their Resume, but wants to prove themselves at a higher level. There are a number around who fit this spec. I'm sure JR would want someone who is post to improve both themselves (with support and guidance from BF) and Rovers.
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: nice one rovers on May 03, 2013, 07:05:34 am
If Neil Warnocck were to be appointed, I would be cancelling my four x season ticket direct debit.
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: southwestexile on May 03, 2013, 07:16:29 am
Jeeeez, i hope our next manager sticks around for a bit. How long did it take for all the kids in the playground to start fighting again?
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: 1879Rovers on May 03, 2013, 07:30:07 am
I wouldn't want Colin anywhere near the Keepmoat
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: The L J Monk on May 03, 2013, 07:47:42 am
Is there any evidence of this? Or we just supposed to believe you?
http://m.thisiscornwall.co.uk/story.html?aid=11496046



Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: DonnyOsmond on May 03, 2013, 07:53:06 am
" being young, ambitious and having not failed elsewhere"

That's what we need to go for.
Title: Re: Neil Warnock
Post by: BillyStubbsTears on May 03, 2013, 08:56:15 am
Look. There's a red line in the sand for me. I am not supporting a club whose manager's dress sense us taken from Gilbert O'Sullivan c1969.

No ifs, no buts.

(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_iOtVAhsUBKE/SwgHRfIPwvI/AAAAAAAADRM/fddb4UJLRFg/s1600/GilbrtBFront.jpg)