Viking Supporters Co-operative

Viking Chat => Viking Chat => Topic started by: Sprotyrover on October 15, 2013, 08:00:25 pm

Title: cheeky Poles
Post by: Sprotyrover on October 15, 2013, 08:00:25 pm
Whistling during our National anthem,that's gratitude for you.us letting em come over here and work 100 hours a week for minimum wage .......The BOUNDERS!  :that:
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: the vicar on October 15, 2013, 08:02:57 pm
and throwing flares on the pitch to boot
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: normal rules on October 15, 2013, 08:06:07 pm
to be fair to them - they are making it like an away game for England.

The flares at Wembley wont help the current emerging trend of flares at domestic games.

Poland by the way were 8-1 at corals.
An absolutely banging bet.

Have you ever heard such whistling at Wembley against England?
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: coventryrover on October 15, 2013, 08:07:47 pm
Rubbish anthem anyway.. why is it Great Britains and Englands anthem?

We should have Jerusalem
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: Sprotyrover on October 15, 2013, 08:13:22 pm
Good call but it is England mentioned in the song
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: normal rules on October 15, 2013, 08:14:46 pm
all the warning signs are there...............................
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: LincsRover on October 15, 2013, 08:16:37 pm
Rubbish anthem anyway.. why is it Great Britains and Englands anthem?

We should have Jerusalem

 :that:

Totally agree - it seems to be like a goal head start for the opposition with their rousing nationalistic anthems compared to "god save a very rich pampered old lady and sod the rest of us" to a dreary old tune! 'Land of hope and glory' for me, even if there's not much hope or glory at the moment!

Great atmosphere at Wembley makes a change as well - usually too many of the prawn sarnie brigade to be arsed to sing - good for the poles! Just hope we can get through it and qualify!

 :rtid:
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: normal rules on October 15, 2013, 08:20:36 pm
Jerusalem is a bit maudling.

vindaloo anyone? :clapping:
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: normal rules on October 15, 2013, 08:23:46 pm
England have massively underestimated the poles.

as have the bookies :)
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: LincsRover on October 15, 2013, 08:24:32 pm
So long as there's popadums and mango chutney I'm in!
 :woohoo:
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: LincsRover on October 15, 2013, 08:26:48 pm
England have massively underestimated the poles.

as have the bookies :)

Or overestimated England?! Going to be a tough night - they look a good team!
 :unsure:
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: DubaiRover on October 15, 2013, 08:31:15 pm
Rubbish anthem anyway.. why is it Great Britains and Englands anthem?

We should have Jerusalem
Why Jerusalem? Its a little town in the middle east?!? We gave it to the Jews to create Israel. Why would you want that as our national Anthem?
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: normal rules on October 15, 2013, 08:32:51 pm
how on earth did welbeck not get that on target?
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: andysly on October 15, 2013, 08:32:57 pm
Anyone remember '73, this is beginning to look very similar. Early days though.
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: LincsRover on October 15, 2013, 08:34:07 pm
how on earth did welbeck not get that on target?

Cos he's wearing an England shirt not a Man U one!  :facepalm:
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: normal rules on October 15, 2013, 08:35:56 pm
its not welbecks night.....yet
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: Wellred on October 15, 2013, 08:37:47 pm
Barn Door Welbeck.
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: andysly on October 15, 2013, 08:38:57 pm
I've a feeling there's a penalty coming the way they're defending.
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: LincsRover on October 15, 2013, 08:40:46 pm
I've a feeling there's a penalty coming the way they're defending.

Yeah but who to??? With 18 thousand screaming poles it could go either way!
 :facepalm:
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: Copps is Magic on October 15, 2013, 08:42:10 pm
We're all over them tbh, we have so many attacking options ... best England performance in a long time. If we could just put them away this would be a whitewash.
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: andysly on October 15, 2013, 08:42:16 pm
Nice bit of tippy tappy. Glad it went over Welbecks head though
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: Wellred on October 15, 2013, 08:42:39 pm
Good job Welbeck missed the header.
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: normal rules on October 15, 2013, 08:42:53 pm
been absent for 40 mins. well done rooney :scarf:
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: andysly on October 15, 2013, 08:46:45 pm
Thought Rooney had linked things up well between midfield and front guys
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: LincsRover on October 15, 2013, 08:49:24 pm
So far so good - think we'll need at least one more though or it will get nervier and nervier and they look like they could hit us on the break and nick one at any time! Interesting 45 mins coming up I feel - long way from over unless we get one early then it could be floodgates open!

 :clapping:
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: GM-MarkB on October 15, 2013, 08:50:08 pm
We've deserved the lead imo. They've had a couple of breaks, we've steadily pushed them back. Can't see Walcott getting back in the team if Townsend continues this form.

As far as the Cole/Baines debate, if Cole is on the field I don't think Rooney would have gooten a cross of that quality from him. Cole may be the better defender (not my opinion btw) but in a game like this Baines doesn't need to do that much defending, it's all about what he can offer going forward.

I'd expect another in the second half just to seal it
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: Chris Black come back on October 15, 2013, 09:09:24 pm
Rubbish anthem anyway.. why is it Great Britains and Englands anthem?

We should have Jerusalem
Why Jerusalem? Its a little town in the middle east?!? We gave it to the Jews to create Israel. Why would you want that as our national Anthem?

Strictly speaking "we" (as in the UN) agreed in 1947 that in establishing a Jewish homeland, Jerusalem would remain under the control of an international mandate and not by what would become the state of Israel. It was actually under the control of the Arab community (specifically Jordan) until 1967.
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: IDM on October 15, 2013, 09:58:56 pm
Great England performance tonight, and last Friday - played like a club team.  Now, please can we play like that in the group stages in Brazil?

Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: DubaiRover on October 15, 2013, 10:05:25 pm
Rubbish anthem anyway.. why is it Great Britains and Englands anthem?

We should have Jerusalem
Why Jerusalem? Its a little town in the middle east?!? We gave it to the Jews to create Israel. Why would you want that as our national Anthem?

Strictly speaking "we" (as in the UN) agreed in 1947 that in establishing a Jewish homeland, Jerusalem would remain under the control of an international mandate and not by what would become the state of Israel. It was actually under the control of the Arab community (specifically Jordan) until 1967.
Strictly speaking? Why is Israel now considered a european country as its in the middle of Arab lands? The poor Jews refinanced us after the 2nd world war and chose their new homeland, Palestine, as its new homeland.It is not the promised land as described in the Torah, it has no mountains and fresh water and is nothing like the compared promised land of the Torah.
Still why would we use Jerusalem as our National Anthem?
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: Bentley Bullet on October 15, 2013, 10:09:05 pm
Our anthem should be 'Land of hope and glory'.
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: RedJ on October 15, 2013, 10:10:18 pm
Welbeck missed a chance even Kitson would have put away. The Kitson.
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: Chris Black come back on October 15, 2013, 10:20:50 pm
Rubbish anthem anyway.. why is it Great Britains and Englands anthem?

We should have Jerusalem
Why Jerusalem? Its a little town in the middle east?!? We gave it to the Jews to create Israel. Why would you want that as our national Anthem?

Strictly speaking "we" (as in the UN) agreed in 1947 that in establishing a Jewish homeland, Jerusalem would remain under the control of an international mandate and not by what would become the state of Israel. It was actually under the control of the Arab community (specifically Jordan) until 1967.
Strictly speaking? Why is Israel now considered a european country as its in the middle of Arab lands? The poor Jews refinanced us after the 2nd world war and chose their new homeland, Palestine, as its new homeland.It is not the promised land as described in the Torah, it has no mountains and fresh water and is nothing like the compared promised land of the Torah.
Still why would we use Jerusalem as our National Anthem?

"We" didn't give Jerusalem to "the Jews" to create Israel. A national homeland for the Jewish people was agreed by the UN General Assembly in 1947. This did not include Jerusalem as a part of the proposed state for the Jewish people. Therefore nobody gave Jerusalem to anyone. In fact, quite the contrary. It was, according to the 1947 UN agreement, to exist under international control and not as a part of either a Jewish or Arab state.
Title: Re: (No subject)
Post by: DonnyBazR0ver on October 15, 2013, 10:23:44 pm
Noisy buggers. I remember when England fans used to make that sort of racket. Have we gone soft?
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: IDM on October 15, 2013, 10:25:45 pm
the song "Jerusalem" has got f**k all to do with the events in Palestine/Israel of the 20th Century.  It is about Christianity and England.

Anyway, the national anthem should be On Ilkely Moor, or summat like that ;)
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: vaya on October 15, 2013, 10:28:50 pm
'Jerusalem' is also a slightly veiled attack on increased industrialisation.

The national anthem should be the Benny Hill theme tune. Everyone could get involved then, and it'd liven up the pre-match routine.
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: BobG on October 15, 2013, 10:45:01 pm
Why do we have to have a national anthem at all? Pointless, jingoistic nationalism. Completely out of place in what we are forever being told is a connected world.

BobG
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: Dagenham Rover on October 15, 2013, 11:54:41 pm
"And did those Feet" is actually a short poem by William Blake  wrote in 1804-1808  The music to this was composed by Sir Hubert Parry in 1916.
The poem is based on the unknown years of Jesus referred to in the book of Revelations when Jesus is thought to have visited England

Its jack all to do with modern day Jerusalem and Jerusalem  in this context is basically an anthem title
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: Viking Don on October 16, 2013, 12:55:13 am
"And did those Feet" is actually a short poem by William Blake  wrote in 1804-1808  The music to this was composed by Sir Hubert Parry in 1916.
The poem is based on the unknown years of Jesus referred to in the book of Revelations when Jesus is thought to have visited England

Its jack all to do with modern day Jerusalem and Jerusalem  in this context is basically an anthem title


Yep didn't He get married to Mary in the inflatable church at Glastonbury?
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: wilts rover on October 16, 2013, 06:01:36 am
I think Jerusalem is a very apt anthem for the England football team. It is written by a dreamer about things which didn't happen - and are not going to happen - and that is a perfect summary of our chances at any major tournament.
Blake, who from his writings appears to have known where the best crops of magic mushrooms were located (and thus would have had a fun time in the inflatable church at Glastonbury) thought England was so great Jesus must have visited. If only managers in the 70's, 80's, 90's and 00's had been brave enough to pick him in central midfield we might have done better, unfortunately the closest we got was Hoddle - oh and quite a few more players who were crucified by fans and press at the time.
Blake then goes on to say that this horrible, unhygienic, stinking and disease ridden source of all the wealth that is making this the great country it is (for that read - north of England) will obviously one day be swept away and replaced with a mystical land of sun, milk and honey, etc - something which is clearly not going to happen but doesn't stop him believing it if he wants to. Which will be the sum of all newspaper reports of England's Brazil campaign from now until we get knocked out next June.
Perfect anthem - for the England football team and the Tory party.
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: SoundbiteBarmyArmy on October 16, 2013, 08:43:39 am
and throwing flares on the pitch to boot

We did that at Brentford. It worked a treat!

 :thumbsup: :scarf:
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: River Don on October 16, 2013, 04:12:26 pm
Our anthem should be 'Land of hope and glory'.

Apparently when it got it's first airing in the Albert Hall, the audience reaction was likened not to a cheer but a scream. And these were straight laced Victorians remember.
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: River Don on October 16, 2013, 04:13:48 pm
So long as there's popadums and mango chutney I'm in!
 :woohoo:

Nowt more English is there? Though I go for lime pickle myself, something of an acquired taste I grant you.
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: coventryrover on October 16, 2013, 04:57:32 pm
I think Jerusalem is a very apt anthem for the England football team. It is written by a dreamer about things which didn't happen - and are not going to happen - and that is a perfect summary of our chances at any major tournament.
Blake, who from his writings appears to have known where the best crops of magic mushrooms were located (and thus would have had a fun time in the inflatable church at Glastonbury) thought England was so great Jesus must have visited. If only managers in the 70's, 80's, 90's and 00's had been brave enough to pick him in central midfield we might have done better, unfortunately the closest we got was Hoddle - oh and quite a few more players who were crucified by fans and press at the time.
Blake then goes on to say that this horrible, unhygienic, stinking and disease ridden source of all the wealth that is making this the great country it is (for that read - north of England) will obviously one day be swept away and replaced with a mystical land of sun, milk and honey, etc - something which is clearly not going to happen but doesn't stop him believing it if he wants to. Which will be the sum of all newspaper reports of England's Brazil campaign from now until we get knocked out next June.
Perfect anthem - for the England football team and the Tory party.

YEah that.

Owts better than the droll GSTQ.  Perhaps they should have the Super Furries "The Man DOnt Give a F@@@"
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: not on facebook on October 16, 2013, 05:25:32 pm
Angelic upstarts did a song in very early 1980s called...ENGLAND...

The best song that i have heard that would fit the England football fan
Offical tune.

Beats 3 Lions and vindaloo by a country mile
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: River Don on October 16, 2013, 05:51:04 pm
The only problem with Three Lions is the thirty tears of hurt line keeps getting more and more out of date.

I like the Angelic Upstarts, never heard that before. The phrase "the red, the white and the blue" refers to The Union Flag not the St George. The red, the White and the... White wouldn't quite work though.
Title: Re: cheeky Poles
Post by: neil grainger on October 17, 2013, 01:23:11 pm
My best mate at Danum Grammar went on to become bass guitarist with the Angelic Upstarts