Viking Supporters Co-operative

Viking Chat => Off Topic => Topic started by: bpoolrover on March 27, 2015, 01:17:32 am

Title: Ed v dave
Post by: bpoolrover on March 27, 2015, 01:17:32 am
Who faired better tonight?
Title: Re: Ed v dave
Post by: coventryrover on March 27, 2015, 07:08:55 am
It was a farce.

WHo has decided Paxman is a good interviewer?  Doesnt let the interviewee get a word in edgeways
Title: Re: Ed v dave
Post by: Filo on March 27, 2015, 08:33:33 am
To be fair, I don't think either came out on top, but shame on Cameron for dodging the head to head, to me he's running scared!
Title: Re: Ed v dave
Post by: big fat yorkshire pudding on March 27, 2015, 08:51:46 am
It was a farce.

WHo has decided Paxman is a good interviewer?  Doesnt let the interviewee get a word in edgeways

I agree with this, I didn't like his style one bit as I wanted to hear substance and didn't get much of that.

Thought the attempt on Ed's personality was both pointless and unwarranted, what he's like as a person matters in some ways that's for sure, but the extent was totally un-needed.  I thought Ed was good at defending himself as a person as we all would be.  He struggled big style with the policy though and that is I believe his weakness at the moment, Labour policy still doesn't add up.

I thought Cameron surprisingly did better with the audience and on policy, wasn't expecting that really.
Title: Re: Ed v dave
Post by: IC1967 on March 27, 2015, 10:37:26 am
Dave battered him senseless. At the end of red Ed's interview just as the cameras were panning away, Paxman was heard to say "are you alright Ed?' Why did he ask this? Because he knew he had well and truly skewered Ed and could tell by Ed's demeanour that he was looking very sorry for himself.

Well done Dave. You did a great job.
Title: Re: Ed v dave
Post by: wilts rover on March 27, 2015, 07:08:15 pm
The prospective Conservative candidate for Kensington & Chelsea gave an easier ride to Cameron than he did Milliband, how suprising.....