Viking Supporters Co-operative
Viking Chat => Off Topic => Topic started by: BobG on June 20, 2015, 12:04:23 am
-
This last 3 or 4 days he's noticeable by his absence again. Do you reckon he's gone off for treatment? Or perhaps he's getting worried that his real identity is going to be publicly spilled before much longer? There's enough folk who know it now to make that a real possibility.
Anyway, fingers crossed the treatment takes an inordinately long time eh?
Cheers
BobG
-
Maybe that diet of his made him waste away into the aether.
-
Bob,
why on earth do you need to trawl for him - if he's gone, great, but don't encourage him back.
As has been previously posted many times, just ignore him and don't post and he loses his reason to continue.
-
I don't want to bump this attempt at a thread but I feel it necessary to point out how misguided the OP is, if he thinks the general consensus is to assume a forum member needs 'treatment', if he as much as dares take on the clique, of which he is about a fifth of a handful of members.
To be honest it's rather pathetic really.
-
As I see it there is no clique BB. There are forum members, however, who have been around a while and post on a regular basis, of which you are one IMO. I'd agree with Stockton though Bob; if he's gone, don't give him a reason to come back ffs! ;)
-
BJW
There IS a clique on this forum. It consists of a handful of members who almost always show support for each other. The only sign of a disagreement with a fellow clique member is when they abstain from commenting! This thread is a prime example of it!
THAT my friend is a clique.
-
It just seems a pointless thread to me.
-
Bob and Mick have their own issues. I don't know why they cant just go off and play nicely together.
Another forum member wanted the rest of the forum to ignore Mick - so he and Bob are obviously not in the same clique are they, must be two of them.
-
Eh?
-
I will say only three words.. Beetlejuice and Candyman .. Neither of which I will say more than once... :whistle:
-
I decided, several months ago now, that that cretin was getting away with far too much. Folk generally, including me of course, were rising to his idiotic posts. That was what encouraged him. I tried encouraging you all to ignore the fellow - remember the poll about sending him to Coventry? That was mine. But the oh so pious people on here chose to not do that. Fine. So I decided I was going to attack him. If we couldn't agree to ignore him, then I decided I was going to see if I could find a way to get to him .I do not take kindly to fools who seek to destroy intelligent and reasoned discussion. There are several well known ways of getting under the skin. You've seen a few of them these last few months.
So, don't patronise me, Wilts, and others, when hardly any of you buggers would stand up to be counted when I offered you an different, and better, way to deal with the fool. And, if I see reason, I will continue post about an idiot who has seriously tried to damage this forum. It will continue to be your privilege to ignore or contribute to any such post, but the decision about whether or not I post continues to be mine alone.
BobG
-
Sorry Bob but that comes across as really petty and childish.
You're an intelligent bloke but by doing this your stooping to a level even lower than the bloke your having a go at and in my opinion doing as much damage to the forum as he was.
Just stick him on ignore and do what it says on the tin
-
I decided, several months ago now, that that cretin was getting away with far too much. Folk generally, including me of course, were rising to his idiotic posts. That was what encouraged him. I tried encouraging you all to ignore the fellow - remember the poll about sending him to Coventry? That was mine. But the oh so pious people on here chose to not do that. Fine. So I decided I was going to attack him. If we couldn't agree to ignore him, then I decided I was going to see if I could find a way to get to him .I do not take kindly to fools who seek to destroy intelligent and reasoned discussion. There are several well known ways of getting under the skin. You've seen a few of them these last few months.
So, don't patronise me, Wilts, and others, when hardly any of you buggers would stand up to be counted when I offered you an different, and better, way to deal with the fool. And, if I see reason, I will continue post about an idiot who has seriously tried to damage this forum. It will continue to be your privilege to ignore or contribute to any such post, but the decision about whether or not I post continues to be mine alone.
BobG
Isn't a chap allowed to have a few days off? Looks like someone's been getting their knickers in a twist during my short break.
Look. You need to make your mind up. Am I the RESIDENT IDIOT or am I the resident cretin? You seem confused as to which I am. You also seem confused about your use of capital letters. Given your previous prognostications I would have thought it should be RESIDENT CRETIN. Make your mind up please. We're all confused.
Yes we all remember your post about sending me to Coventry. That was a huge success. We also remember the 'Should I stay or should I go' thread. You should have a look at it. There was overwhelming support for me to stay. It would be interesting to see what the result would be if you put yourself up for eviction.
Look daft Bob. It's very simple. I'm entertaining and you are boring. It's that simple.
Now seeing as I'm a magnanimous soul, I won't point out all the other grammatical errors you made in your post. However I think we would all be grateful if you could use paragraphs a bit more. It would make digesting your drivel that bit easier.
Of course you won't be reading this post as you have me on 'ignore' (allegedly). So hopefully you will take the advice of other forum members and take a chill pill and give the persecution complex a rest.
You'll feel so much better for it.
Anyway the good news for all you lefties that can't stand me is that I have become a bit bored with this forum. Now that I have turned it into a right wing forum and have done my bit to ensure a Tory majority government I feel my work is done.
I'll still post from time to time but not as regularly as before. I've seen off the hard left and don't feel there is much of a challenge anymore.
If my fans wish me to contribute further then may I suggest you mount a campaign to convince me to change my mind. I'll give it serious consideration. I know a lot of you look forward to my entertaining posts, so if there is enough demand I'll keep on taking the piss out of the usual suspects.
IC1967 (the one and only)
-
Is there VAT on your second-hand opinions?
-
Jesus Wept this is a Forum FFS!
Much or most of the time I disagree with Mick/IC1967 and when I feel really strongly about it I will reply, otherwise ignore him/her.
It is simple really, don't get so wound up about it - there are far more important things in life than forum disagreements.
-
Is there VAT on your second-hand opinions?
Look. You need to be careful. You are trying to change the topic of the thread to something completely different. Please try and keep to the topic at hand or you'll have the mods after you.
Also daft Bob and silly Billy will be very annoyed at you for responding to me.
IC1967 (the one and only)
-
Jesus Wept this is a Forum FFS!
Much or most of the time I disagree with Mick/IC1967 and when I feel really strongly about it I will reply, otherwise ignore him/her.
It is simple really, don't get so wound up about it - there are far more important things in life than forum disagreements.
Well said. You obviously believe in free speech like what I do.
IC1967 (the one and only)
-
Remember - one mans freedom fighter is another mans terrorist
-
Hi Mick,
nice to see you back, we were worried about you...
-
I decided, several months ago now, that that cretin was getting away with far too much. Folk generally, including me of course, were rising to his idiotic posts. That was what encouraged him. I tried encouraging you all to ignore the fellow - remember the poll about sending him to Coventry? That was mine. But the oh so pious people on here chose to not do that. Fine. So I decided I was going to attack him. If we couldn't agree to ignore him, then I decided I was going to see if I could find a way to get to him .I do not take kindly to fools who seek to destroy intelligent and reasoned discussion. There are several well known ways of getting under the skin. You've seen a few of them these last few months.
So, don't patronise me, Wilts, and others, when hardly any of you buggers would stand up to be counted when I offered you an different, and better, way to deal with the fool. And, if I see reason, I will continue post about an idiot who has seriously tried to damage this forum. It will continue to be your privilege to ignore or contribute to any such post, but the decision about whether or not I post continues to be mine alone.
BobG
Apologies for not following your orders.
-
If your are referring to IC1967, I think he makes a lot of sense.
-
If your are referring to IC1967, I think he makes a lot of sense.
And here comes the family!
-
Hi Mick,
nice to see you back, we were worried about you...
Well done Wilts for refusing to be silenced by daft Bob and silly Billy.
IC1967 (the one and only)
-
If your are referring to IC1967, I think he makes a lot of sense.
I have to agree with you. Welcome to the forum.
Be prepared for abuse if you agree with anything I say.
IC1967 (the one and only)
-
I decided, several months ago now, that that cretin was getting away with far too much. Folk generally, including me of course, were rising to his idiotic posts. That was what encouraged him. I tried encouraging you all to ignore the fellow - remember the poll about sending him to Coventry? That was mine. But the oh so pious people on here chose to not do that. Fine. So I decided I was going to attack him. If we couldn't agree to ignore him, then I decided I was going to see if I could find a way to get to him .I do not take kindly to fools who seek to destroy intelligent and reasoned discussion. There are several well known ways of getting under the skin. You've seen a few of them these last few months.
So, don't patronise me, Wilts, and others, when hardly any of you buggers would stand up to be counted when I offered you an different, and better, way to deal with the fool. And, if I see reason, I will continue post about an idiot who has seriously tried to damage this forum. It will continue to be your privilege to ignore or contribute to any such post, but the decision about whether or not I post continues to be mine alone.
BobG
Apologies for not following your orders.
Nice one pib. Our forefathers have died in their millions so we could have free speech.
It's a pity daft Bob and silly Billy can't take a leaf out of their books.
IC1967 (the one and only)
-
Remember - one mans freedom fighter is another mans terrorist
I agree. I walked into a den of leftie iniquity and they don't like it that I've sorted them out good and proper.
IC1967 (the one and only)
-
There does seem to be a lot of socialists on here.
-
Der-der-der-der
Der-der-der-DER
Der-de-de-deh
Der-de-de-deh
Der-der-der-DER
-
There does seem to be a lot of socialists on here.
Thank f**k for that.
-
There does seem to be a lot of alias accounts on here.
-
There does seem to be a lot of alias accounts on here.
Would you care to list them? I only have one account. That's all. I do not have any aliases. The mods can confirm that the accounts you think are my aliases have different IP addresses.
Why are you surprised I have some support for my views? Are you unaware that this is now predominantly a right wing forum? Haven't you realised that a left wing perspective on life is dying a death?
Get in.
IC1967 (the one and only)
-
this is now a right wing forum? you are delusional mick. is that the reason why you impersonate your brother-in-law on here?
-
There does seem to be a lot of alias accounts on here.
Would you care to list them? I only have one account. That's all. I do not have any aliases. The mods can confirm that the accounts you think are my aliases have different IP addresses.
Why are you surprised I have some support for my views? Are you unaware that this is now predominantly a right wing forum? Haven't you realised that a left wing perspective on life is dying a death?
Get in.
IC1967 (the one and only)
Oooh, paranoia. Not a good reflection.
-
There does seem to be a lot of socialists on here.
Thank f*** for that.
Socialism is a failed experiment. Look at what happened in Russia. Common sense is what is needed and not blind allegiance to dogma. Look where it got Milliband.
-
It's so blatantly obvious that it's him... isn't that a banning offence?
-
If you are suggesting that I am the " cretin", your words, not mine, you are sadly mistaken. I am not. I have no affiliation with him or her. Frankly it seems that there is an attempt to stifle free speech on this site if what is being said offends a chosen few. If I agree with him, I will say so, just as I will say so if I agree with you. it seems unlikely though as you seem to be narrow minded and totally closed to the opinions of others. Free speech was fought for over many generations and I will not be silenced by a small minority of bullies.
-
I decided
Nice one pib. Our forefathers have died in their millions so we could have free speech.
IC1967 (the one and only)
Was that not the potato?
Or the rarely spotted white variety?
-
Frankly it seems that there is an attempt to stifle free speech on this site if what is being said offends a chosen few. If I agree with him, I will say so, just as I will say so if I agree with you. it seems unlikely though as you seem to be narrow minded and totally closed to the opinions of others. Free speech was fought for over many generations and I will not be silenced by a small minority of bullies.
Who, exactly, is attempting to stifle free speech? :huh:
-
Frankly it seems that there is an attempt to stifle free speech on this site if what is being said offends a chosen few. If I agree with him, I will say so, just as I will say so if I agree with you. it seems unlikely though as you seem to be narrow minded and totally closed to the opinions of others. Free speech was fought for over many generations and I will not be silenced by a small minority of bullies.
Who, exactly, is attempting to stifle free speech? :huh:
I wonder if he means those who refer to posters as 'retards' and 'cretins' for having the very nerve to disagree with them?
-
BB
It was never anything about him disagreeing. You disagree with pretty much everything I've ever written here but I don't consider you to be a cretin because you don't argue in a cretinous way.
-
Frankly it seems that there is an attempt to stifle free speech on this site if what is being said offends a chosen few. If I agree with him, I will say so, just as I will say so if I agree with you. it seems unlikely though as you seem to be narrow minded and totally closed to the opinions of others. Free speech was fought for over many generations and I will not be silenced by a small minority of bullies.
Who, exactly, is attempting to stifle free speech? :huh:
I wonder if he means those who refer to posters as 'retards' and 'cretins' for having the very nerve to disagree with them?
Or those who refer to people as silly Billy or Daft Bob?
-
I think we can safely say there is more than one cretin on this forum, hey Mick, hey Bob
-
BB
It was never anything about him disagreeing. You disagree with pretty much everything I've ever written here but I don't consider you to be a cretin because you don't argue in a cretinous way.
Wow that's almost a compliment BST, and certainly unexpected!
Mind you I must say that I always thought it was you who disagreed with pretty much everything I've ever written! ;)
-
No BB. I write right. You disagree. Wrong.