Viking Supporters Co-operative

Viking Chat => Viking Chat => Topic started by: Alan Southstand on November 30, 2016, 04:28:09 pm

Title: Williams Back.....
Post by: Alan Southstand on November 30, 2016, 04:28:09 pm
.....in the squad on Saturday
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: GazLaz on November 30, 2016, 04:58:01 pm
Than god for that. Mandy is nowhere near as good.
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: i_ateallthepies on November 30, 2016, 05:07:28 pm
Should we expect him to be Gaz?  One valid comparison since you're making them would be that he has met and exceeded all reasonable expectations for a new player coming in.  As I remember it Williams (a proven L1 goalscorer) needed appreciably longer to make a meaningful contribution when required.
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: besty on November 30, 2016, 05:16:45 pm
Not sure weve missed him that much,that said more competition has gotta be a positive  :bbscarf:
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: podrover73 on November 30, 2016, 06:03:52 pm
Than god for that. Mandy is nowhere near as good.
very harsh, give the kid a break. He is 19 and stood in well In Williams absence. Williams is 30 with lots of experience.  Do not try to compare a young lad starting his career and an experienced professional.
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: swintonrover on November 30, 2016, 06:07:50 pm
Aye, scoring 4 in 3 at 19, he's absolutely shite...
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: GazLaz on November 30, 2016, 06:16:46 pm
Than god for that. Mandy is nowhere near as good.
very harsh, give the kid a break. He is 19 and stood in well In Williams absence. Williams is 30 with lots of experience.  Do not try to compare a young lad starting his career and an experienced professional.

Obviously not but we should really have a replacement that's somewhere between the two. He's got two goals in your 4 game sample really Swindon. I prefer to judge on performances and how players affect the side though.
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: The Red Baron on November 30, 2016, 06:20:50 pm
Two goals? I made it four in three or five in five if you take the month as a whole.

A fully fit Williams is a better option, but for me Mandeville has done a pretty good job as a stand in.
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: Metalmicky on November 30, 2016, 06:30:15 pm
Than god for that. Mandy is nowhere near as good.
very harsh, give the kid a break. He is 19 and stood in well In Williams absence. Williams is 30 with lots of experience.  Do not try to compare a young lad starting his career and an experienced professional.

You are Mr Frost - I claim my £10...

Obviously not but we should really have a replacement that's somewhere between the two. He's got two goals in your 4 game sample really Swindon. I prefer to judge on performances and how players affect the side though.
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: DonnyBazR0ver on November 30, 2016, 06:44:25 pm
Good news! I wouldn't be surprised though if he's on the bench though with Mandeville starting. It wouldn't be good to drop a player who's performed well and delivered the goods.

Great selection problem to have!
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: darren61 on November 30, 2016, 07:37:02 pm
Than god for that. Mandy is nowhere near as good.
Has the Boy let us down? He is learning his trade and has done more than expected than most, but a" thank God" you are a WUM and i claim my five pounds. Easy money.
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: mrfrostsdad on November 30, 2016, 07:52:48 pm
I expect Williams to be on the bench too Barry.
If I was Mandeville and I was dropped for Saturday I'd be hammering the managers door down
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: watto-drfc on November 30, 2016, 08:28:06 pm
Williams on bench for me saturday then play him next tuesday in mickey mouse cup
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: Drover on November 30, 2016, 09:53:26 pm
Than god for that. Mandy is nowhere near as good.
very harsh, give the kid a break. He is 19 and stood in well In Williams absence. Williams is 30 with lots of experience.  Do not try to compare a young lad starting his career and an experienced professional.

Agreed,and when Williams was 19yrs old he scored 9 goals in 48 appearances for Hereford who were in league 2 that season.
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: RoversAlias on November 30, 2016, 10:44:09 pm
Than god for that. Mandy is nowhere near as good.
very harsh, give the kid a break. He is 19 and stood in well In Williams absence. Williams is 30 with lots of experience.  Do not try to compare a young lad starting his career and an experienced professional.

Obviously not but we should really have a replacement that's somewhere between the two. He's got two goals in your 4 game sample really Swindon. I prefer to judge on performances and how players affect the side though.

Assuming your implication is that the penalties he scored don't really count, that doesn't exactly seem fair considering how many of our players have taken to missing them this season.
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: Sammy Chung was King on December 01, 2016, 12:52:34 am
Mandeville has done a cracking job while Williams has been out. You would expect Williams to eventually get his starting spot back. It's for Mandeville to stop him doing that by keep scoring goals and improving-a nice selection' headache' for the manager.
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: the vicar on December 01, 2016, 08:22:05 am
Than god for that. Mandy is nowhere near as good.
very harsh, give the kid a break. He is 19 and stood in well In Williams absence. Williams is 30 with lots of experience.  Do not try to compare a young lad starting his career and an experienced professional.
Some people expect our kids to start off world beaters, when they are only 3rd rate youngsters.  they have to learn the game first 
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: GazLaz on December 01, 2016, 09:21:22 am
Than god for that. Mandy is nowhere near as good.
very harsh, give the kid a break. He is 19 and stood in well In Williams absence. Williams is 30 with lots of experience.  Do not try to compare a young lad starting his career and an experienced professional.
Some people expect our kids to start off world beaters, when they are only 3rd rate youngsters.  they have to learn the game first 

My comments are aimed at our lack of depth up front rather than Mandy.
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: IDM on December 01, 2016, 09:59:28 am
Jesus wept, you would think we haven't carried on at 2 points per game, 2 goals per game (top scorers in the division) and have a chance to go top of the league this weekend, all with Williams out for the last 7 or 8 weeks!!

Mandeville by all accounts turned the game around at Exeter and scored in all 3 of our last winning games.

Whether that proves to be a flash in the pan or not, remains to be seen, but come on Gaz, what more could the lad have done!!

Williams on the bench for me on Sat, and half a game or 60 mins in the chickenfood trophy...,
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: Copps is Magic on December 01, 2016, 10:36:08 am
Mandeville is far better/more confident at taking penalties than Williams. He is also better technically - by a long way in fact. Mandeville is becoming very confident with ball at feet, his twists and turns remind me of Copps at times.

Not got the same work-rate as Williams (although Williams often runs round aimlessly in some games), same finishing or heading ability.

Mandeville will maintain his place in the team and Williams will be on the bench for the next two league games at least. Having three decent strikers really isn't a problem. It's not an either or situation we'll need all three.
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: Copps is Magic on December 01, 2016, 10:48:13 am
He also MIGHT be more consistent than Williams. People have short memories. At the start of the season Williams was having one of those periods where he couldn't hit a barn door with a banjo. It was only the form of Big John holding things together. We can't afford to have a striker who's so inconsistent. It's alright when he's on it but what about when he's not?
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: drfchound on December 01, 2016, 11:47:47 am
I too expect Williams to be on the bench on Saturday because Mandy has done so well.
Williams could get some game time in against Blackpool to regain match fitness.
Long term though i expect AW to be first choice along with Marquis, UNLESS Mandy does so well that it is impossible to leave him out.
Right now i think it is fair to say that AW is better than LM and that is not being disrespectful to Liam, just a fact.
I have been on the fence about Liams' prospects but have to say that in the last few games he has won me over somewhat.

Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: IDM on December 01, 2016, 11:48:47 am
Didn't DF imply in the DFP that he might play all three?
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: drfchound on December 01, 2016, 12:04:41 pm
mmmm, could be a smokescreen so Stevenage aren't sure about how we will set up.................
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: DonnyBazR0ver on December 01, 2016, 12:14:11 pm
Williams has more core strength (although he sometimes goes down too easy) and on his day, is one of the better finishers around. As it stands on a level playing field, Williams would be first choice.

At this rate of development though, Mandeville will be snapping at his heels. An instinctive, intelligent player who is developing that knack of being in the right place. Once his core strength improves he's going to be a very good goal scorer.

Let's be right though, it might not be a question of either or. We have 3 strikers who score goals, we may need different combinations as the season progresses.
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: Mike_F on December 01, 2016, 12:42:05 pm
I was thinking earlier on that he might pick all three but with Mandeville slightly behind Marquis & Williams. Trouble with that is, if LM doesn't score from the deeper role people could get on his back/lose faith.
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: Canadian Rover on December 01, 2016, 01:13:28 pm
When have we ever had a youth team player come through up front better than Mandeville?

Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: Dutch Uncle on December 01, 2016, 01:24:25 pm
When have we ever had a youth team player come through up front better than Mandeville?



Alick Jeffrey and Peter Kitchen?

Big boots to fill

Edit: Add Alan Warboys and maybe Mike Elwiss to that
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: RoversAlias on December 01, 2016, 02:07:22 pm
Brian Deane?
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: Canadian Rover on December 01, 2016, 06:06:35 pm
So our best youth forward prospect in 20/30 years?
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: Padge_DRFC on December 01, 2016, 06:12:42 pm
His all round game against Orient was his best by a mile. The run in the team playing 90 minutes every week is showing. He doesn't look like a dog on  a hot day after 10 minutes of the match as much
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: i_ateallthepies on December 01, 2016, 07:20:39 pm
Whilst ever he continues to perform and produce as he is he keeps the shirt for me.  We already have bitter experience of Williams' scoring inconsistency.  And Mandeville doesn't have that annoying habit of stopping to curse the football gods whenever things don't go for him.
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: IDM on December 01, 2016, 07:27:43 pm
I for one have no problem with Williams visibly expressing frustration - it shows he cares IMHO.

It is what Fergie will want, selection dilemmas for good reasons!
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: Colemans Left Hook on December 01, 2016, 07:38:07 pm
I am pretty sure Williams will come off the subs bench on the hour winning or losing -- fergie  would be on a hiding to nothing if he started and got injured

common sense rules the day

when rovers first started playing stevenage (non league)  for some reason there was "friction" between the times remember sky sports allowing the world to watch it for free on the sky sports news channel -- the free bit only ever happened once -- after that it was pay time
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: The Red Baron on December 01, 2016, 08:45:42 pm
Probably due to us poaching their manager. That worked out well, didn't it?   :s
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: karldew on December 01, 2016, 10:17:16 pm
Last time Williams had competition (Keshi) didn't it bring the best out of him?
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: DonnyBazR0ver on December 02, 2016, 12:09:07 am
Funny you should mention his antics of throwing his arms in the air in frustration. At first it seemed a bit OTT and a plea for sympathy, but having watched him more closely off the ball, he does it when other players go close etc. That's just how he is, and perhaps like you say, he does genuinely care.
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: RedJ on December 02, 2016, 12:18:01 am
He does it in training a lot too apparently, especially when he misses one on ones.
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: Sammy Chung was King on December 02, 2016, 03:30:29 am
Probably due to us poaching their manager. That worked out well, didn't it?   :s

Wignall did a decent job under trying personal times. A fair few of the players who did well under Penney were signed by him. We were very well organised defensively we just didn't score enough goals. His part in our success is very underrated. His team were the start of us being serious challengers for promotion.
Was Wignall not liked by our supporters on the whole?. Yes he didn't quite achieve what we wanted him to but he set a solid base for Penney's reign.
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: Red wizard on December 02, 2016, 06:44:05 am
It would be a kick in the teeth if Williams walks into the side over Mandeville and could knock his confidence.  If Mandeville don't score on a game a willo comes on and scores then he wins the shirt imo.
Title: Re: Williams Back.....
Post by: Filo on December 02, 2016, 08:22:38 am
Probably due to us poaching their manager. That worked out well, didn't it?   :s

Wignall did a decent job under trying personal times. A fair few of the players who did well under Penney were signed by him. We were very well organised defensively we just didn't score enough goals. His part in our success is very underrated. His team were the start of us being serious challengers for promotion.
Was Wignall not liked by our supporters on the whole?. Yes he didn't quite achieve what we wanted him to but he set a solid base for Penney's reign.


We were nothing more than mid table plodders under Wignall