Viking Supporters Co-operative

Viking Chat => Viking Chat => Topic started by: Branton Rover on January 17, 2020, 04:48:07 pm

Title: Paul Dickov
Post by: Branton Rover on January 17, 2020, 04:48:07 pm
Apparently been spouting off in an article about DRFC can anyone attach it as I can’t find it, thanks
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: since-1969 on January 17, 2020, 04:50:45 pm
Apparently been spouting off in an article about DRFC can anyone attach it as I can’t find it, thanks
Are you really bothered 😕
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: ChrisBx on January 17, 2020, 05:03:16 pm
I saw a quote on Twitter which suggested Dickov had accused the DRFC board of being dishonest about the playing budget.
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: dickos1 on January 17, 2020, 05:05:28 pm
The link was put on here yesterday it’s an audio
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: Copps is Magic on January 17, 2020, 05:08:53 pm
Can non of you dummies copy and paste a link? Thats literally all you need to do.
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: dickos1 on January 17, 2020, 05:13:19 pm
Aye
But It would take a while finding the link
No idea where it was posted on here
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: ian1980 on January 17, 2020, 05:17:16 pm
Apparently been spouting off in an article about DRFC can anyone attach it as I can’t find it, thanks

Start at 1hr 37mins and listen for 10 minutes or so

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=KGJSsNOHbp0&feature=emb_title
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: mushRTID on January 17, 2020, 05:28:30 pm
Very interesting.

I didn’t particularly rate Dickov but I always thought from day 1 he seemed (and was) genuine.

I don’t think he would lie about this.

On the flip side I imagine it happens at a lot of clubs, probably not that uncommon.
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: redrover10 on January 17, 2020, 05:48:57 pm
Its shows it happens probs why mcann left only offering players half there wages leaving us short
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: RugbyRover on January 17, 2020, 05:56:45 pm
Very interesting.

I didn’t particularly rate Dickov but I always thought from day 1 he seemed (and was) genuine.

I don’t think he would lie about this.

On the flip side I imagine it happens at a lot of clubs, probably not that uncommon.

I can't think of a sensible reason why he would start telling porkies now and if he was I'm sure DRFC and their solicitors would be having a word with him about it. If it were true then I think DRFC will just stay quiet about it all.

So much for fan engagement eh? Who was the CEO when Dickov was here?

Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: RoversAlias on January 17, 2020, 05:57:32 pm
Whether true or not, the time in question was five years ago and the club had just lost one of its three majority owners, so it doesn't necessarily have anything to do with our present situation.
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: Nudga on January 17, 2020, 06:10:06 pm
Very interesting.

I didn’t particularly rate Dickov but I always thought from day 1 he seemed (and was) genuine.

I don’t think he would lie about this.

On the flip side I imagine it happens at a lot of clubs, probably not that uncommon.

He was given a huge budget in his relegation season in the championship
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: dickos1 on January 17, 2020, 06:11:06 pm
5 million he states it was
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: Padge_DRFC on January 17, 2020, 06:19:24 pm
Telling us what anyone with more than one brain cell knows.

You've got Portsmouth Sunderland Rotherham Ipswich Peterborough for definite on bigger budgets. Then the rest of the league are basically all in joint 6th with a few quid difference here and there minus the ones in financial trouble
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: NickDRFC on January 17, 2020, 06:27:40 pm
Dickov seemed like a lovely bloke, always interviewed well, and to be fair kept us within a pube’s width of staying in the Championship against all odds, but I remember hearing from someone close to the club at the time that he was usually last in and first out. Not exactly management material.
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: IDM on January 17, 2020, 06:29:44 pm
Telling us what anyone with more than one brain cell knows.

You've got Portsmouth Sunderland Rotherham Ipswich Peterborough for definite on bigger budgets. Then the rest of the league are basically all in joint 6th with a few quid difference here and there minus the ones in financial trouble

What does something from 5 years ago prove about now.??
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: Chris Black come back on January 17, 2020, 06:35:39 pm
Oversaw arguably the most disastrous recruitment period in living memory. He was responsible for ATS, N’Guessen, Chaplow and the massive Scottish centre back who we hoped would be another Gordon Greer but was on par with Germaine Greer.
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: Michael Shaw on January 17, 2020, 06:45:08 pm
Telling us what anyone with more than one brain cell knows.

You've got Portsmouth Sunderland Rotherham Ipswich Peterborough for definite on bigger budgets. Then the rest of the league are basically all in joint 6th with a few quid difference here and there minus the ones in financial trouble

What does something from 5 years ago prove about now.??

We won't get the current manager to say what he thinks about the current budget or he will be out of a job. So the best we can do is rely on the truth and honesty of a manager from 5 years ago. A pity Ferguson and McCann won't speak up.
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: Drover on January 17, 2020, 06:45:14 pm
An
Telling us what anyone with more than one brain cell knows.

You've got Portsmouth Sunderland Rotherham Ipswich Peterborough for definite on bigger budgets. Then the rest of the league are basically all in joint 6th with a few quid difference here and there minus the ones in financial trouble

What does something from 5 years ago prove about now.??

and what does it disprove?? Thing is,successive managers have hinted that the budget is less than they want us to know,that's NOT the real problem,I accept that and move on,the problem being highlighted is they want to give us the impression the budget is bigger than many fans think.Why?Why not just tell it straight and face the music,then let the fans suck it up and live with it.Thing is,it must be sometimes annoying for a manager being judged on his performances/rating with the watching football community thinking he doing it with a more competative budget than he has.
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: phil o sophical on January 17, 2020, 06:52:37 pm
Oversaw arguably the most disastrous recruitment period in living memory. He was responsible for ATS, N’Guessen, Chaplow and the massive Scottish centre back who we hoped would be another Gordon Greer but was on par with Germaine Greer.

On the plus side , he did have nice hair  :chair:
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: scawsby steve on January 17, 2020, 06:53:45 pm
Oversaw arguably the most disastrous recruitment period in living memory. He was responsible for ATS, N’Guessen, Chaplow and the massive Scottish centre back who we hoped would be another Gordon Greer but was on par with Germaine Greer.

It was Gary McKenzie Chris, and you're right about all that dross he signed on. However, don't forget some of the brilliant signings he made as well. Sharp, Wellens, Khumalo, Tamas, Meite, Neill, and not forgetting Sam Johnstone on loan.
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: Wiltshire Exile on January 17, 2020, 07:08:07 pm
Its shows it happens probs why mcann left only offering players half there wages leaving us short
Not quite sure what that statement means!   :unsure:
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: IDM on January 17, 2020, 07:11:33 pm
Telling us what anyone with more than one brain cell knows.

You've got Portsmouth Sunderland Rotherham Ipswich Peterborough for definite on bigger budgets. Then the rest of the league are basically all in joint 6th with a few quid difference here and there minus the ones in financial trouble

What does something from 5 years ago prove about now.??

We won't get the current manager to say what he thinks about the current budget or he will be out of a job. So the best we can do is rely on the truth and honesty of a manager from 5 years ago. A pity Ferguson and McCann won't speak up.

5 yeas ago is 5 yeas ago..  I’m only interested in what goes on on the pitch..
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: NickDRFC on January 17, 2020, 07:15:22 pm
Telling us what anyone with more than one brain cell knows.

You've got Portsmouth Sunderland Rotherham Ipswich Peterborough for definite on bigger budgets. Then the rest of the league are basically all in joint 6th with a few quid difference here and there minus the ones in financial trouble

What does something from 5 years ago prove about now.??

We won't get the current manager to say what he thinks about the current budget or he will be out of a job. So the best we can do is rely on the truth and honesty of a manager from 5 years ago. A pity Ferguson and McCann won't speak up.

5 yeas ago is 5 yeas ago..  I’m only interested in what goes on on the pitch..

Why have you been commenting so much about quotes and misquotes then ;)
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: pib on January 17, 2020, 07:16:39 pm
I haven’t listened to it yet so may have got the wrong end of the stick, but my initial reaction is... of course the budget decreased after JR left, because we were relegated from the Championship to L1.

If Dickov is claiming it decreased IMMEDIATELY after JR’s departure (in November 2013) then who funded the signings of Tamas, Meite, Neill , Johnstone et al?
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: IDM on January 17, 2020, 07:24:18 pm
Telling us what anyone with more than one brain cell knows.

You've got Portsmouth Sunderland Rotherham Ipswich Peterborough for definite on bigger budgets. Then the rest of the league are basically all in joint 6th with a few quid difference here and there minus the ones in financial trouble

What does something from 5 years ago prove about now.??

We won't get the current manager to say what he thinks about the current budget or he will be out of a job. So the best we can do is rely on the truth and honesty of a manager from 5 years ago. A pity Ferguson and McCann won't speak up.

5 yeas ago is 5 yeas ago..  I’m only interested in what goes on on the pitch..

If you mean about signings and reports on transfer activity then they are going to have an influence about the games in the very near future..

That and reacting to posts which I believe warrant reaction..

My point was that something from 5 years ago is irrelevant to today, in my opinion.

I guess that’s ok with you.?

Why have you been commenting so much about quotes and misquotes then ;)
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: southwestexile on January 17, 2020, 07:45:59 pm
Sometimes we all need excuses for being shit
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: Retdon1 on January 17, 2020, 07:50:55 pm
He initially said 5 million and then later 5 or 6 million. I would take what he says with a pinch of salt
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: Drover on January 17, 2020, 08:15:14 pm
I haven’t listened to it yet so may have got the wrong end of the stick, but my initial reaction is... of course the budget decreased after JR left, because we were relegated from the Championship to L1.

If Dickov is claiming it decreased IMMEDIATELY after JR’s departure (in November 2013) then who funded the signings of Tamas, Meite, Neill , Johnstone et al?

He said his budget was £5 million in the championship,it was the lowest or maybe 2nd lowest,and was so close to keeping us up,it was gut wrenching to get relegated on goal difference in the last 10 mins of the season,he says the new chairman after JR left should probably have sacked him straight away,because he was so often being quized about who he was picking in that position and why(something along those lines,apologises if I get something wrong) and he eventually thinks that was because they probably did'nt have faith in him(again my words to what I think he was implying).He also said they wanted him to say his budget was more than it was,and they was obsessed about play-off budget,all the time saying play-off budget.(Again apologies for anything I got wrong),it was a longish listen and not got time to re-listen.Before anyone moans at me,Im not moaning myself,just trying to explain what PD said.I mean,it makes sense,if I was chairman/director and wanted to make the club as self sustainable as possible,I would hope for reaching play-offs each year,to bring in as much revenue as possible.Nothing wrong with that,the problem is,some fans misinterpret that as lack of ambition.
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: Padge_DRFC on January 17, 2020, 08:17:11 pm
Telling us what anyone with more than one brain cell knows.

You've got Portsmouth Sunderland Rotherham Ipswich Peterborough for definite on bigger budgets. Then the rest of the league are basically all in joint 6th with a few quid difference here and there minus the ones in financial trouble

What does something from 5 years ago prove about now.??

We won't get the current manager to say what he thinks about the current budget or he will be out of a job. So the best we can do is rely on the truth and honesty of a manager from 5 years ago. A pity Ferguson and McCann won't speak up.

5 yeas ago is 5 yeas ago..  I’m only interested in what goes on on the pitch..

If you mean about signings and reports on transfer activity then they are going to have an influence about the games in the very near future..

That and reacting to posts which I believe warrant reaction..

My point was that something from 5 years ago is irrelevant to today, in my opinion.

I guess that’s ok with you.?

Why have you been commenting so much about quotes and misquotes then ;)

When they say top 6 budget they're probably not far off the truth but because of the reason I put. They can't exactly tell the truth when trying to sell more season tickets.
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: silent majority on January 17, 2020, 08:25:06 pm
And every year the club files it's accounts at Companies House, and every year those accounts prove that the club are telling the truth about budgets, and every year some posters quite happily trot out any old tripe.

I just don't understand why some supporters are determined to keep constantly regurgitating false claims against the current board. What do they think it will achieve?



Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: NickDRFC on January 17, 2020, 08:42:07 pm
And every year the club files it's accounts at Companies House, and every year those accounts prove that the club are telling the truth about budgets, and every year some posters quite happily trot out any old tripe.

I just don't understand why some supporters are determined to keep constantly regurgitating false claims against the current board. What do they think it will achieve?





I think the board bashing on here and other social media is rubbish but that’s just not true is it? No one can glean the wages budget from what’s on companies house. The latest filed accounts don’t show anything about the profit and loss account, much less the wages of the club. All that’s there is the balance sheet - the movement in retained earnings (£2.8m) is most likely the loss but even then that’s not necessarily the case.
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: RoversAlias on January 17, 2020, 09:04:36 pm
Another thing to note with Dickov - he was very much John Ryan's man as far as I know, they were mates/neighbours and JR pushed to get him in as manager during Flynn's tenure. So his loyalty to JR may well have an impact on his perspective.

Did well to last as long as manager as he did after JR's departure really. And I did think he was a good bloke who did a good job in the Championship season at least.
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: silent majority on January 17, 2020, 09:06:55 pm
And every year the club files it's accounts at Companies House, and every year those accounts prove that the club are telling the truth about budgets, and every year some posters quite happily trot out any old tripe.

I just don't understand why some supporters are determined to keep constantly regurgitating false claims against the current board. What do they think it will achieve?





I think the board bashing on here and other social media is rubbish but that’s just not true is it? No one can glean the wages budget from what’s on companies house. The latest filed accounts don’t show anything about the profit and loss account, much less the wages of the club. All that’s there is the balance sheet - the movement in retained earnings (£2.8m) is most likely the loss but even then that’s not necessarily the case.

No, but then again I never said you could.  It's only been in recent years that full accounts haven't been visible. But we get to see the accounts in full, and can verify everything that we've spoken about on this forum is accurate.
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: silent majority on January 17, 2020, 09:08:27 pm
Another thing to note with Dickov - he was very much John Ryan's man as far as I know, they were mates/neighbours and JR pushed to get him in as manager during Flynn's tenure. So his loyalty to JR may well have an impact on his perspective.

Did well to last as long as manager as he did after JR's departure really. And I did think he was a good bloke who did a good job in the Championship season at least.

Very true, not only that but he had a part to play in the takeover of the club.

Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: NickDRFC on January 17, 2020, 09:14:10 pm
And every year the club files it's accounts at Companies House, and every year those accounts prove that the club are telling the truth about budgets, and every year some posters quite happily trot out any old tripe.

I just don't understand why some supporters are determined to keep constantly regurgitating false claims against the current board. What do they think it will achieve?





I think the board bashing on here and other social media is rubbish but that’s just not true is it? No one can glean the wages budget from what’s on companies house. The latest filed accounts don’t show anything about the profit and loss account, much less the wages of the club. All that’s there is the balance sheet - the movement in retained earnings (£2.8m) is most likely the loss but even then that’s not necessarily the case.

No, but then again I never said you could.  It's only been in recent years that full accounts haven't been visible. But we get to see the accounts in full, and can verify everything that we've spoken about on this forum is accurate.

You said “Every year those accounts prove that the club is telling the truth about budgets”. They don’t. At all. The last time we published accounts that had staff costs in them was 2015. We are well within our rights to publish small companies accounts but you can’t tell this forum that the information on wages is there for all to see when it simply isn’t.

You might have seen more detailed accounts but that’s no reason to criticise or patronise the 99.9% who aren’t privy to them.
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: silent majority on January 17, 2020, 09:22:58 pm
And every year the club files it's accounts at Companies House, and every year those accounts prove that the club are telling the truth about budgets, and every year some posters quite happily trot out any old tripe.

I just don't understand why some supporters are determined to keep constantly regurgitating false claims against the current board. What do they think it will achieve?





I think the board bashing on here and other social media is rubbish but that’s just not true is it? No one can glean the wages budget from what’s on companies house. The latest filed accounts don’t show anything about the profit and loss account, much less the wages of the club. All that’s there is the balance sheet - the movement in retained earnings (£2.8m) is most likely the loss but even then that’s not necessarily the case.

No, but then again I never said you could.  It's only been in recent years that full accounts haven't been visible. But we get to see the accounts in full, and can verify everything that we've spoken about on this forum is accurate.

You said “Every year those accounts prove that the club is telling the truth about budgets”. They don’t. At all. The last time we published accounts that had staff costs in them was 2015. We are well within our rights to publish small companies accounts but you can’t tell this forum that the information on wages is there for all to see when it simply isn’t.

You might have seen more detailed accounts but that’s no reason to criticise or patronise the 99.9% who aren’t privy to them.

But again your misinterpreting what I've said.

Yes they do prove the budget to us. And yes we do tell everybody what we've seen and given our explanation of the accounts. Where have I suggested otherwise?



Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: NickDRFC on January 17, 2020, 09:37:46 pm
Am I missing something obvious here? Your post, quoted above, says explicitly that the accounts on companies house support any assertions about the budget, which is just not true given the lack of any detail around expenses. If you meant something else then fair enough, but it wasn’t in any way apprent from what you said initially.
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: ian1980 on January 17, 2020, 11:24:14 pm
So what is shown on companies house (small companies accounts) don’t actually show/prove what is being said or claimed at all.

Virtually every other post on this forum is people asking others to provide proof of their viewpoint yet quite happy you say “they do provide the budget to us” & “everything we’ve spoken about is accurate”

That’s fair enough so please can you provide the  proof?

Publishing the full and detailed accounts for everyone to see would obviously do this? Surely there’s nothing to hide????
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: wesisback on January 18, 2020, 12:16:15 am
There would be nothing to hide and no damage done in providing the fans with this information 4 years later.
It would immediately show whether it was the Club/trust or Paul Dickov are the party with no integrity.
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: pib on January 18, 2020, 08:36:04 am
Back to Dickov, I love how he tries to make out he’s a great manager in that interview (I know he’s hardly going to say different), and how he thinks we were doing OK in League One before he got sacked!

He was a rancid manager and his spell in charge of us in L1 was worse than in the Championship!
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: anton123 on January 18, 2020, 08:39:35 am
I thought he was doing a decent job in the championship until the last 6 games we was getting some good results and is crazy we got relagated that year but in league 1 it was not good
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: i_ateallthepies on January 18, 2020, 08:48:31 am
There would be nothing to hide and no damage done in providing the fans with this information 4 years later.
It would immediately show whether it was the Club/trust or Paul Dickov are the party with no integrity.

The accounts aren't the VSCs to publish.  How long do you suppose the trusting relationship between club and VSC would last if Martin did as you suggest?
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: Cramby10 on January 18, 2020, 08:48:49 am
The bloke was a complete fraud of a manager. Worst in my time. It angered me how he was handed the job on a plate by his mate Mr Ryan. This after the lengthy manager search and the so called ‘18 point plan’ or whatever it was that the manager needed to pass and despite being totally shite at Oldham. It was never going to be anyone else.
 I felt I had totally lost my team and lost my passion for the club through that horrid spell. I even didn’t renew my season ticket for the first and only time in decades in the league 1 season.
Can’t even bring myself to look or listen to anything the bloke has to say, even now.
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: big fat yorkshire pudding on January 18, 2020, 09:46:49 am
There would be nothing to hide and no damage done in providing the fans with this information 4 years later.
It would immediately show whether it was the Club/trust or Paul Dickov are the party with no integrity.

West, they dont have to, for this time period it's there online. Total staff costs of over 7m.  Suggests 6m probably about right. The club made a hefty loss that year so Dickov criticising that budget us a bit rich.
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: Chris Black come back on January 18, 2020, 09:50:35 am
Dickov was a very strange fish. Thought he did well in Championship all things considered and made some ok signings. When we dropped to League One though it was appalling - the signings, the football, the results. The Dickov and Ferguson years in League One and Two were effectively five years wasted. McCann and Moore have both demonstrated how to make best use of the financial and player resources available, including playing good football.
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: Cramby10 on January 18, 2020, 10:00:52 am
He only did ok in Championship because the club was riding the crest of a wave with that finish at Brentford. With a team with a spirit that in my time has been unrivalled. Yet he sucked out most of that in fairly quick time.
 How many managers are handed a job on a plate with a team that just been promoted? He was given the golden ticket yet still managed to f**k it up.
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: selby on January 18, 2020, 10:10:54 am
  Flynn and Jones were undermined before he came, at the very time it was the height of their success, one of the few footballing mistakes made by John Ryan, and the start also of his demise,
  The meeting with the players in that side earlier in the season spoke volumes of how the club fell into that trap.
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: silent majority on January 18, 2020, 10:40:23 am
There would be nothing to hide and no damage done in providing the fans with this information 4 years later.
It would immediately show whether it was the Club/trust or Paul Dickov are the party with no integrity.

The accounts aren't the VSCs to publish.  How long do you suppose the trusting relationship between club and VSC would last if Martin did as you suggest?

Exactly right.
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: DonnyOsmond on January 18, 2020, 10:45:28 am
The only manager that left us in a worse state than when he took over in the last 15 years.
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: PDX_Rover on January 18, 2020, 05:08:56 pm
Telling us what anyone with more than one brain cell knows.

You've got Portsmouth Sunderland Rotherham Ipswich Peterborough for definite on bigger budgets. Then the rest of the league are basically all in joint 6th with a few quid difference here and there minus the ones in financial trouble

What does something from 5 years ago prove about now.??

We won't get the current manager to say what he thinks about the current budget or he will be out of a job. So the best we can do is rely on the truth and honesty of a manager from 5 years ago. A pity Ferguson and McCann won't speak up.

Another d**khead statement.
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: PDX_Rover on January 18, 2020, 05:10:26 pm
Another thing to note with Dickov - he was very much John Ryan's man as far as I know, they were mates/neighbours and JR pushed to get him in as manager during Flynn's tenure. So his loyalty to JR may well have an impact on his perspective.

Did well to last as long as manager as he did after JR's departure really. And I did think he was a good bloke who did a good job in the Championship season at least.

And JR, being effusive JR, might have promised him the moon on a stick - whole the reality was more appropriate.
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: johnny rovers on January 18, 2020, 05:42:07 pm
Whether true or not, the time in question was five years ago and the club had just lost one of its three majority owners, so it doesn't necessarily have anything to do with our present situation.

The only common denominator in a it is Mr Blunt the chairman.

He goes by without much of a thought from the fan base and he is the chairman and in charge of making signings, could he be the issue why we aren't signing players??
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: johnny rovers on January 18, 2020, 05:44:02 pm
Oversaw arguably the most disastrous recruitment period in living memory. He was responsible for ATS, N’Guessen, Chaplow and the massive Scottish centre back who we hoped would be another Gordon Greer but was on par with Germaine Greer.

But as he states in his interview couldn't sign players in the two summer windows due to takeovers that never happened. Have a listen
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: pib on January 18, 2020, 05:47:04 pm
Oversaw arguably the most disastrous recruitment period in living memory. He was responsible for ATS, N’Guessen, Chaplow and the massive Scottish centre back who we hoped would be another Gordon Greer but was on par with Germaine Greer.

But as he states in his interview couldn't sign players in the two summer windows due to takeovers that never happened. Have a listen

There was certainly one takeover when we’d just got into the Championship when JR tried to return with Louis Tomlinson, but what was the other one?

Given his recruitment record in his last season of bringing in N’Guessan, Chaplow and Gary Mackenzie it’s probably for the best that he couldn’t sign any players!
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: DonnyOsmond on January 18, 2020, 05:51:36 pm
Oversaw arguably the most disastrous recruitment period in living memory. He was responsible for ATS, N’Guessen, Chaplow and the massive Scottish centre back who we hoped would be another Gordon Greer but was on par with Germaine Greer.

But as he states in his interview couldn't sign players in the two summer windows due to takeovers that never happened. Have a listen

There was certainly one takeover when we’d just got into the Championship when JR tried to return with Louis Tomlinson, but what was the other one?

Given his recruitment record in his last season of bringing in N’Guessan, Chaplow and Gary Mackenzie it’s probably for the best that he couldn’t sign any players!

Sequentia Capital was at the start of 13-14 when we were in the Championship.
Louis Tomlinson was 14-15 when we'd just gone down to L1.
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: johnny rovers on January 18, 2020, 05:58:35 pm
Oversaw arguably the most disastrous recruitment period in living memory. He was responsible for ATS, N’Guessen, Chaplow and the massive Scottish centre back who we hoped would be another Gordon Greer but was on par with Germaine Greer.

But as he states in his interview couldn't sign players in the two summer windows due to takeovers that never happened. Have a listen

There was certainly one takeover when we’d just got into the Championship when JR tried to return with Louis Tomlinson, but what was the other one?

Given his recruitment record in his last season of bringing in N’Guessan, Chaplow and Gary Mackenzie it’s probably for the best that he couldn’t sign any players!

Sequentia, the year before. Irish/Belize. Do be surprised that they were also involved a year later in the background with JR and Tomlinson
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: Bristol Red Rover on January 18, 2020, 06:41:11 pm
Here's what the wages were in £1000's - overall club not just players.

08/09 Championship £5,748k
09/10 Championship £5,948k
10/11 Championship £6,701k
11/12 Championship £8,326k
12/13 League 1 £6,346k
13/14 Championship £6,618k
14/15 League 1 £3,741k
15/16 and onwards ????

Dickov said "players budget" was £12.5 million in the Championship in 11/12 and before, and £5/6 million in 13/14. Given the above includes all staff, he may be correct for 13/14, clearly not for 11/12 (unless I haven't a clue what I'm looking at, which is more than likely!).

Interesting to note the difference between 12/13 and 12/15.
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: silent majority on January 18, 2020, 07:23:00 pm
Oversaw arguably the most disastrous recruitment period in living memory. He was responsible for ATS, N’Guessen, Chaplow and the massive Scottish centre back who we hoped would be another Gordon Greer but was on par with Germaine Greer.

But as he states in his interview couldn't sign players in the two summer windows due to takeovers that never happened. Have a listen

There was certainly one takeover when we’d just got into the Championship when JR tried to return with Louis Tomlinson, but what was the other one?

Given his recruitment record in his last season of bringing in N’Guessan, Chaplow and Gary Mackenzie it’s probably for the best that he couldn’t sign any players!

Sequentia, the year before. Irish/Belize. Do be surprised that they were also involved a year later in the background with JR and Tomlinson

It was pretty much the same takeover, just dressed up differently using the frontmen of JR and LT.
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: johnny rovers on January 18, 2020, 07:29:54 pm
Oversaw arguably the most disastrous recruitment period in living memory. He was responsible for ATS, N’Guessen, Chaplow and the massive Scottish centre back who we hoped would be another Gordon Greer but was on par with Germaine Greer.

But as he states in his interview couldn't sign players in the two summer windows due to takeovers that never happened. Have a listen

There was certainly one takeover when we’d just got into the Championship when JR tried to return with Louis Tomlinson, but what was the other one?

Given his recruitment record in his last season of bringing in N’Guessan, Chaplow and Gary Mackenzie it’s probably for the best that he couldn’t sign any players!

Sequentia, the year before. Irish/Belize. Do be surprised that they were also involved a year later in the background with JR and Tomlinson

It was pretty much the same takeover, just dressed up differently using the frontmen of JR and LT.

I suspected this at the time...JR's last throw of the dice that never came off
Title: Re: Paul Dickov
Post by: lee.j09 on January 18, 2020, 07:59:08 pm
There would be nothing to hide and no damage done in providing the fans with this information 4 years later.
It would immediately show whether it was the Club/trust or Paul Dickov are the party with no integrity.

The accounts aren't the VSCs to publish.  How long do you suppose the trusting relationship between club and VSC would last if Martin did as you suggest?

Exactly right.

So what precisely is the point in the vsc?

From my view point it seems as though it’s just so you can say I told you so...