Viking Supporters Co-operative
Viking Chat => Viking Chat => Topic started by: Michael Gibson on January 25, 2020, 04:44:37 pm
-
Can I have a little sweetie mr blunt!!!!
Can I have a little sweetie mr blunt!!!!
Can I have a little sweetie a proper little sweetie!!! Can I have a sweetie mr blunt!!!!
Can ya f**k!!!!
-
Bell end
-
Sad man.
-
I wonder how many times you lot have actually had a bird??? Definitely none ...
-
Sad man
-
I wonder how many times you lot have actually had a bird??? Definitely none ...
A bird.?
Never had a pet budgie in my life, but we have chickens in our back garden..
If you are using a term to mean women, then I've had my fair share, but that's my business.
You clearly favour Mrs Palm and her 5 loving daughters. Why don't you toddle off with your box of kleenex and leave the sensible football debate to the grown ups.?
-
We really do have some moronic “supporters”
-
Can I have a little sweetie mr blunt!!!!
Can I have a little sweetie mr blunt!!!!
Can I have a little sweetie a proper little sweetie!!! Can I have a sweetie mr blunt!!!!
Can ya f**k!!!!
What the f**k is wrong with you?
-
Don’t feed the troll
-
What the f**k is wrong with posters called Michael on here
-
St. Michael. Patron saint of tw@ts.
-
Can I have a little sweetie mr blunt!!!!
Can I have a little sweetie mr blunt!!!!
Can I have a little sweetie a proper little sweetie!!! Can I have a sweetie mr blunt!!!!
Can ya f**k!!!!
Ok...here goes!
Has this sits in the realm of Limerick using meter and syllable counts to create tempo, can I suggest a small tweak ?
The syllable count on lines 1&2 are both metric ( 11 syllables) and have tempo,..
however line 3 is unmetered because of the enjambment ...( wrapped line)
and because it runs 2 syllables short, it stutters ....( the word “little” will sort this out )
This is now metered, with the correct syllable tempo...
Can I have a little sweetie mr blunt
Can I have a little sweetie mr blunt
Can I have a little sweetie
a proper little sweetie
Can I have a little sweetie mr blunt
Can ya f**k!!!!
As a first attempt at caustic humour using a poetic yet singy songy reference....you kind of failed in an adorable way
-
St. Michael. Patron saint of tw@ts.
Patron saint of skidmarks.
-
He goes fishing and never fails to catch a few. :facepalm:
-
Can I have a little sweetie mr blunt!!!!
Can I have a little sweetie mr blunt!!!!
Can I have a little sweetie a proper little sweetie!!! Can I have a sweetie mr blunt!!!!
Can ya f**k!!!!
Ok...here goes!
Has this sits in the realm of Limerick using meter and syllable counts to create tempo, can I suggest a small tweak ?
The syllable count on lines 1&2 are both metric ( 11 syllables) and have tempo,..
however line 3 is unmetered because of the enjambment ...( wrapped line)
and because it runs 2 syllables short, it stutters ....( the word “little” will sort this out )
This is now metered, with the correct syllable tempo...
Can I have a little sweetie mr blunt
Can I have a little sweetie mr blunt
Can I have a little sweetie
a proper little sweetie
Can I have a little sweetie mr blunt
Can ya f**k!!!!
As a first attempt at caustic humour using a poetic yet singy songy reference....you kind of failed in an adorable way
There's also the use of the exclamation marks rather than question marks.
The way I'd read the meter of the first two lines if the librettist had used question marks, I'd put the emphasis on "have".
But that makes no sense with exclamation marks, because those imply that this line is now not imploring Mr Blunt for a little sweetie, but rather bragging that the librettist CAN indeed handle his sweeties. In which case, logically there should be emphasis on the words "Can I". In which case, f**k knows what the meter is.
-
Can I have a little sweetie mr blunt!!!!
Can I have a little sweetie mr blunt!!!!
Can I have a little sweetie a proper little sweetie!!! Can I have a sweetie mr blunt!!!!
Can ya f**k!!!!
Ok...here goes!
Has this sits in the realm of Limerick using meter and syllable counts to create tempo, can I suggest a small tweak ?
The syllable count on lines 1&2 are both metric ( 11 syllables) and have tempo,..
however line 3 is unmetered because of the enjambment ...( wrapped line)
and because it runs 2 syllables short, it stutters ....( the word “little” will sort this out )
This is now metered, with the correct syllable tempo...
Can I have a little sweetie mr blunt
Can I have a little sweetie mr blunt
Can I have a little sweetie
a proper little sweetie
Can I have a little sweetie mr blunt
Can ya f**k!!!!
As a first attempt at caustic humour using a poetic yet singy songy reference....you kind of failed in an adorable way
There's also the use of the exclamation marks rather than question marks.
The way I'd read the meter of the first two lines if the librettist had used question marks, I'd put the emphasis on "have".
But that makes no sense with exclamation marks, because those imply that this line is now not imploring Mr Blunt for a little sweetie, but rather bragging that the librettist CAN indeed handle his sweeties. In which case, logically there should be emphasis on the words "Can I". In which case, f**k knows what the meter is.
I think some people spend two much thyme on there computer !?
-
Roger McGough must be shitting his pants.
-
Roger McGough must be shitting his pants.
I preferred the take on Roger McGough's previous Rovers' song.
We'll drink a drink a drink
To Alick the king the king the king
The saviour of the Rovers football team
For he invented attacking football
der, der der der, der der der (Can't remember the last line!)
-
Most efficacious, with every casey.
-
Roger McGough must be shitting his pants.
I preferred the take on Roger McGough's previous Rovers' song.
We'll drink a drink a drink
To Alick the king the king the king
The saviour of the Rovers football team
For he invented attacking football
der, der der der, der der der (Can't remember the last line!)
Didn’t it finish something like?
“And when he scores all Belle Vue roars”.
My memory isn’t what it was but that seems about right.