Viking Supporters Co-operative
Viking Chat => Off Topic => Topic started by: BillyStubbsTears on June 30, 2022, 09:10:42 pm
-
...you'd missed the news that the Cabinet is full of people who would make mince seem thin...
https://mobile.twitter.com/danroan/status/1542503588559085569?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
-
I saw that also - she is comedy gold...
-
It’s her dyslexia for god’s sake. Remember lol.
-
How useless are the backbenchers if she's in the Cabinet.
-
Probably distracted by the news that Carrie was caught giving BJ a BJ, and wishing it was her
-
I know plenty of blokes who wouldn’t know the difference between RU and RL.
-
What an embarrassing gaffe. Just like Dianne Abbot's with the numbers.
They're all the same.
Sorry, couldn't resist.
-
What an embarrassing gaffe. Just like Dianne Abbot's with the numbers.
They're all the same.
Sorry, couldn't resist.
Except Abbott did it once and it's still brought up 5 years later. Dorries does it every week.
-
Still. One thing about her existence. It shows that God has a vicious sense of humour.
15 years back, she said in an interview, "“I am not an MP for any reason other than because God wants me to be."
-
What an embarrassing gaffe. Just like Dianne Abbot's with the numbers.
They're all the same.
Sorry, couldn't resist.
Except Abbott did it once and it's still brought up 5 years later. Dorries does it every week.
No doubt that this will be continually brought up as well.
Guaranteed.
-
I agree hound. If this is all anyone has to criticise her of at the moment what a result.
As said it will surely raise its head over and over throughout her career. I think she’s probably a strong enough character to just laugh it off unless some wokey Rugby fan decides that it’s caused them some kind of mental health issue
-
What an embarrassing gaffe. Just like Dianne Abbot's with the numbers.
They're all the same.
Sorry, couldn't resist.
Except Abbott did it once and it's still brought up 5 years later. Dorries does it every week.
No doubt that this will be continually brought up as well.
Guaranteed.
Nah, there'll be another Nadine gaffe along soon to take it's place.
-
What an embarrassing gaffe. Just like Dianne Abbot's with the numbers.
They're all the same.
Sorry, couldn't resist.
Except Abbott did it once and it's still brought up 5 years later. Dorries does it every week.
No doubt that this will be continually brought up as well.
Guaranteed.
Nah, there'll be another Nadine gaffe along soon to take it's place.
The problem is, keeping up with them.
Abbott's mistake was excruciating and she was badly prepared, but at least it was a mistake in resonding to a critical question designed to trip her up.
Dorries's latest was in a speech that had been prepared by her own staff. Neither she, nor they appeared to understand the difference between Union and League. Not in reponse to a question, but as an open offering of what they thought. And she's the Sports minister!
-
Never mind numbers, How many times have you left the house wearing odd shoes. And they are both for your left foot?
-
Never mind numbers, How many times have you left the house wearing odd shoes. And they are both for your left foot?
Any proof NR? I think we've been here before.
-
What an embarrassing gaffe. Just like Dianne Abbot's with the numbers.
They're all the same.
Sorry, couldn't resist.
Except Abbott did it once and it's still brought up 5 years later. Dorries does it every week.
No doubt that this will be continually brought up as well.
Guaranteed.
Nah, there'll be another Nadine gaffe along soon to take it's place.
The problem is, keeping up with them.
Abbott's mistake was excruciating and she was badly prepared, but at least it was a mistake in resonding to a critical question designed to trip her up.
Dorries's latest was in a speech that had been prepared by her own staff. Neither she, nor they appeared to understand the difference between Union and League. Not in reponse to a question, but as an open offering of what they thought. And she's the Sports minister!
Hardly an Earth shattering thing though is it, not as if she is a Chancellor in waiting.
-
What an embarrassing gaffe. Just like Dianne Abbot's with the numbers.
They're all the same.
Sorry, couldn't resist.
Except Abbott did it once and it's still brought up 5 years later. Dorries does it every week.
Once! Haha, comedy gold!
-
What an embarrassing gaffe. Just like Dianne Abbot's with the numbers.
They're all the same.
Sorry, couldn't resist.
Except Abbott did it once and it's still brought up 5 years later. Dorries does it every week.
Saw a Tweet saying she had said " I thought the best bit of World Cup 1970 was Captain Tom Moore stopping Pele with that brilliant tackle"
-
Explain BB
(This will be fun.
I say "fun" I mean "pitiful".)
-
https://www.thecanary.co/trending/2022/04/29/nadine-dorries-wades-into-yet-another-gaffe/
-
Never mind numbers, How many times have you left the house wearing odd shoes. And they are both for your left foot?
Any proof NR? I think we've been here before.
https://twitter.com/marcowenjones/status/1205152273850089477
This is beyond embarrising, how much do we pay this woman.
-
Explain BB
(This will be fun.
I say "fun" I mean "pitiful".)
Explain what, Billy boy?
-
Your hilarity BB. I'd have thought that would have been obvious.
-
Ah right, thanks for that.
Apologies, I thought you were going to be silly again.
-
Never mind numbers, How many times have you left the house wearing odd shoes. And they are both for your left foot?
Any proof NR? I think we've been here before.
https://twitter.com/marcowenjones/status/1205152273850089477
This is beyond embarrising, how much do we pay this woman.
I think you maybe were a real person once, before you were photoshopped
-
Never mind numbers, How many times have you left the house wearing odd shoes. And they are both for your left foot?
Any proof NR? I think we've been here before.
https://twitter.com/marcowenjones/status/1205152273850089477
This is beyond embarrising, how much do we pay this woman.
Still claiming to be politically neutral DD?
-
Never mind numbers, How many times have you left the house wearing odd shoes. And they are both for your left foot?
Any proof NR? I think we've been here before.
https://twitter.com/marcowenjones/status/1205152273850089477
This is beyond embarrising, how much do we pay this woman.
I think you maybe were a real person once, before you were photoshopped
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/diane-abbott-shoes/
-
Did they ask her about it dd, that's usually the normal thing to do?
and remember the first call was that she was wearing 2 left or right shoes until it was pointed out that would have been mighty uncomfortable, then the story changed ....... and on it goes
-
Never mind numbers, How many times have you left the house wearing odd shoes. And they are both for your left foot?
Any proof NR? I think we've been here before.
https://twitter.com/marcowenjones/status/1205152273850089477
This is beyond embarrising, how much do we pay this woman.
Still claiming to be politically neutral DD?
What's political neutrality got to do with it, the woman's a clown but then i guess she learnt a lot from her confidant Jezza.
-
Never mind numbers, How many times have you left the house wearing odd shoes. And they are both for your left foot?
Any proof NR? I think we've been here before.
https://twitter.com/marcowenjones/status/1205152273850089477
This is beyond embarrising, how much do we pay this woman.
I think you maybe were a real person once, before you were photoshopped
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/diane-abbott-shoes/
It’s all there.
Plenty wouldn’t like to be in her shoes though.
But yeah, she has only made one gaffe.
-
Fascinating how a thread about a (literal) balls up by a current Govt Minister gets hijacked by the "Diane Abbott Hur-hur-hur" obsessives. Time after time.
-
Did they ask her about it dd, that's usually the normal thing to do?
and remember the first call was that she was wearing 2 left or right shoes until it was pointed out that would have been mighty uncomfortable, then the story changed ....... and on it goes
Do yourself a favour fella and have a day off, you'll become a danger to yourself and small pets again.
-
Did they ask her about it dd, that's usually the normal thing to do?
and remember the first call was that she was wearing 2 left or right shoes until it was pointed out that would have been mighty uncomfortable, then the story changed ....... and on it goes
Do yourself a favour fella and have a day off, you'll become a danger to yourself and small pets again.
and on you go .........
-
Fascinating how a thread about a (literal) balls up by a current Govt Minister gets hijacked by the "Diane Abbott Hur-hur-hur" obsessives. Time after time.
Listen, we all know Dorries is a total liability but its always good to reference it with a true champ.
-
Fascinating how a thread about a (literal) balls up by a current Govt Minister gets hijacked by the "Diane Abbott Hur-hur-hur" obsessives. Time after time.
Don’t worry bst, you will get your chance to bring Dorries stories up again in the future, which you will no doubt do with great glee.
-
Fascinating how a thread about a (literal) balls up by a current Govt Minister gets hijacked by the "Diane Abbott Hur-hur-hur" obsessives. Time after time.
BST, would you be happy for an incoming Labour government to hand Ms Abbott a cabinet role?
-
Hound, are you suggesting BST goes on and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, on, and on about anything anti-government he can find, and if he can't find owt new he just digs up an old story and goes on, and on, and on, and on about that?
-
Hound, are you suggesting BST goes on and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, on, and on about anything anti-government he can find, and if he can't find owt new he just digs up an old story and goes on, and on, and on, and on about that?
No BB, stating the bleedin obvious, he is much worse than that.
-
Fascinating how a thread about a (literal) balls up by a current Govt Minister gets hijacked by the "Diane Abbott Hur-hur-hur" obsessives. Time after time.
BST, would you be happy for an incoming Labour government to hand Ms Abbott a cabinet role?
I think she would be a very poor quality minister in that hypothetical world. I think Nadine Dorries is a much worse one in this real world. Reason. Whatever you think if Abbott's politics (and I'm not a massive supporter) she's generally (albeit with one famous exception) in control of the facts around the issues she's discussing. You may not agree with her conclusions (I often don't) but at least she's debating from a fact based foundation.
Dorries, by contrast, is a car crash on the facts. Off the top of my head, she, as Culture, Media and Sport secretary has made incorrect prouncements on the ownership of C5, on the funding of C4, on a survey her own department ran on TV company ownership and now on how the English Rugby League won the Rugby Union World Cup.
Any minister can make a mistake. It's inevitable. But when you make them as frequently as Dorries does, it implies that you either cannot understand or have contempt for basic facts.
What do you reckon?
-
Hound, are you suggesting BST goes on and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, on, and on about anything anti-government he can find, and if he can't find owt new he just digs up an old story and goes on, and on, and on, and on about that?
Like Waldorf and Stadtler, only less life-like and without the wit.
-
The lack of wit is intentional. It's wasted on you. Even though you spend most of your life on this forum on your soapbox it goes over your head.
-
Hound, are you suggesting BST goes on and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, on, and on about anything anti-government he can find, and if he can't find owt new he just digs up an old story and goes on, and on, and on, and on about that?
No BB, stating the bleedin obvious, he is much worse than that.
do people really need to dig up old stories
well i've just found a new variation on an old theme
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1205990/jeremy-corbyn-news-labour-party-diane-abbott-love-affair-general-election-2019-spt
i knew he deliberately got friends to come around to his flat when he knew the " said lady (?)" was literally in it so he could impress them with his "latest notch" About About .... so the "big issue" is did she make another mistake or was it "in the line of duty" to advance up the career ladder ?
-
Fascinating how a thread about a (literal) balls up by a current Govt Minister gets hijacked by the "Diane Abbott Hur-hur-hur" obsessives. Time after time.
BST, would you be happy for an incoming Labour government to hand Ms Abbott a cabinet role?
I think she would be a very poor quality minister in that hypothetical world. I think Nadine Dorries is a much worse one in this real world. Reason. Whatever you think if Abbott's politics (and I'm not a massive supporter) she's generally (albeit with one famous exception) in control of the facts around the issues she's discussing. You may not agree with her conclusions (I often don't) but at least she's debating from a fact based foundation.
Dorries, by contrast, is a car crash on the facts. Off the top of my head, she, as Culture, Media and Sport secretary has made incorrect prouncements on the ownership of C5, on the funding of C4, on a survey her own department ran on TV company ownership and now on how the English Rugby League won the Rugby Union World Cup.
Any minister can make a mistake. It's inevitable. But when you make them as frequently as Dorries does, it implies that you either cannot understand or have contempt for basic facts.
What do you reckon?
Yes i can go along with that, MS Abbott has been shut down by Starmer and his center right pals so you don't get to hear or see too much of her. probably to Labours credit.
-
No wonder this country is in the shit. The level of intelligence of the right wing in this country is clearly on display on this thread. Christ Almighty. No argument,, no fact, no history, no prognosis. Just character asassination and juvenile posts that even children would be ashamed of, Yes BB. That's you. If that's the level of debate in the right wing, this country really is f**ked. But then, it has been ever thus - through decade after decade after decade.
BobG
-
Bob, if posters can't have a bit of a laugh and joke in a thread like this then that says more about you than them, remember your pal started the thread having a laugh at an incompetent Minister.
Lets hope you don't blow a gasket and show your true colours again ranting about people being too thick to be allowed to vote and should be disenfranchised, i noticed none of your pals wanted to stand behind that little purler!
-
Talking shit again BG in support of your leader. A leader who thinks probably the most racist politician in the house has only made one gaffe. A leader who refuses to accept ANY links put up that are contrary to his agenda. A leader who thinks he decides the rules of the forum and anyone who doesn't conform is childish.
That's why I, for one, can't be arsed with him, or anyone who goes along with his bullshit.
-
I think you need to point out the funny bits dd
-
I think you need to point out the funny bits dd
Well i found the OP funny like your pal BST, would you like to ask him too?
-
I think you need to point out the funny bits dd
Well i found the OP funny like your pal BST, would you like to ask him too?
I think you need to speak to your buddy before he goes the full Pincher
-
A laugh? A LAUGH???
Jesus H on a stick....
BobG
-
You’ve all forgotten this Dorries gem, when she threatened to ‘nail a journalist’s balls to the floor, using his front teeth’, for having the nerve to query how her daughter could be her tax payer funded secretary, when she lived so far away.
https://pressgazette.co.uk/tory-mp-tells-sunday-mirror-reporter-ill-nail-your-testicles-floor-twitter-rant-over-doorstep/
-
This has all gone quiet.
Below is an extract from The Guardian so I am surprised that ****** hasn’t highlighted it for us:
“A female Welsh MP has accused a member of the shadow cabinet of lewd sexism by stating she would be successful because men wanted to sleep with her, as the attorney general accused some male MPs of acting “like animals”.
After the latest allegation of misogyny to hit Westminster, Labour promised to launch an investigation if a complaint was made. But the MP told BBC Wales that identifying herself and making a complaint was not in her best interests.
She alleged an unnamed member of Labour’s frontbench described her as a “secret weapon” because, he said, women wanted to be her friend and men wanted to sleep with her.”
-
Never mind numbers, How many times have you left the house wearing odd shoes. And they are both for your left foot?
I thought you were talking about many of our players last season turning out in two left boots?
-
A laugh? A LAUGH???
Jesus H on a stick....
BobG
So you don't think we should be laughing at MPs on both sides of the house who say stupid things?
What should we do; take them seriously?
-
Bobby G is an intellectual snob. Of the very worst kind. One who chooses to have discussion with folk he deems to be less intellectual than him. That way he can call them village idiots and such like. Like, let’s say, folk on a spin off from a 4th division football forum.
I say the worst kind of intellectual snob because he’s not actually nearly as intelligent as he likes people to think he is.
In fact, he’s quite thick.
-
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2022/07/03/diane-abbott-claims-boris-johnson-rumoured-like-assaulting-women/?li_source=LI&li_medium=liftigniter-rhr
Bang on time, has someone let Ms Abbott off the lead again?
-
''Police call to Boris Johnson’s home after reports of domestic incident
tory leadership contender’s partner heard telling him to ‘get off’ her during disturbance''
'''A neighbour told the Guardian they heard a woman screaming followed by “slamming and banging”. At one point, Ms Symonds could be heard telling Johnson to “get off me” and “get out of my flat”''
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/uk/police-call-to-boris-johnson-s-home-after-reports-of-domestic-incident-1.3933681
-
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2022/07/03/diane-abbott-claims-boris-johnson-rumoured-like-assaulting-women/?li_source=LI&li_medium=liftigniter-rhr
Bang on time, has someone let Ms Abbott off the lead again?
Hmm. Let her who throws the first stone be without sin?
Interesting article going back to when her and Corbyn were banging each other. Especially the mention of “aggressive behaviour” .
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjvxdSz-t_4AhUbhlwKHVitClkQFnoECCQQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fotakukart.com%2Fjeremy-corbyn-and-diane-abbott-relationship%2F&usg=AOvVaw1D5-3I7RYJWG5UFIvBiPA-
-
Is this a battle of the comics?
-
''Police call to Boris Johnson’s home after reports of domestic incident
tory leadership contender’s partner heard telling him to ‘get off’ her during disturbance''
'''A neighbour told the Guardian they heard a woman screaming followed by “slamming and banging”. At one point, Ms Symonds could be heard telling Johnson to “get off me” and “get out of my flat”''
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/uk/police-call-to-boris-johnson-s-home-after-reports-of-domestic-incident-1.3933681
So i post a story that's current(on the day) and you felt the need to regurgitate a story from 3 years ago that was hearsay from an unreliable source that resulted in the square root of diddly squat to try to substantiate the point that Ms Abbott was making.!
How weak and feeble was that!!
-
It's your choice I guess a real police call out with witnesses saying what they heard to a sub-prime news outlet interpreting something said on the radio, where would you put your money?
''Boris Johnson: police called to loud altercation at potential PM's home
This article is more than 3 years old
Exclusive: Neighbour records shouting and banging at flat MP shares with Carrie Symonds''
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jun/21/police-called-to-loud-altercation-at-boris-johnsons-home
''Police called to Boris Johnson flat after neighbour reportedly heard screaming
Officers were alerted at 12.24am on Friday after neighbours said there had been a loud altercation, according to reports''
https://news.sky.com/story/police-in-late-night-call-to-boris-johnsons-home-11746622
Could it be this is what Abbott was referring too? she could have meant 'attacking women' as he attacks anyone that is not a member of the bullingdon junior t**t club aye?
-
''Police call to Boris Johnson’s home after reports of domestic incident
tory leadership contender’s partner heard telling him to ‘get off’ her during disturbance''
'''A neighbour told the Guardian they heard a woman screaming followed by “slamming and banging”. At one point, Ms Symonds could be heard telling Johnson to “get off me” and “get out of my flat”''
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/uk/police-call-to-boris-johnson-s-home-after-reports-of-domestic-incident-1.3933681
So i post a story that's current(on the day) and you felt the need to regurgitate a story from 3 years ago that was hearsay from an unreliable source that resulted in the square root of diddly squat to try to substantiate the point that Ms Abbott was making.!
How weak and feeble was that!!
If you wish to go the full 'all mouth no trousers' dd and still insist it's hearsay I'm happy to put my ₤200 up to your ₤100 for the food bank.
Don't let fear hold you back.